Welcome!

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2014 First Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 05/08/14 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2014 first quarter net income for common stock of $361 million or $1.23 a share compared with $192 million or $0.66 a share in 2013. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of its lease in/lease out (LILO) transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $343 million or $1.17 a share in 2014 compared with $316 million or $1.08 a share in 2013.

"First quarter financial results were in line with expectations, and our new rate plans provide stability for customers and certainty for shareholders," said President and CEO John McAvoy. "Our employees performed admirably during a colder-than-normal winter that adversely affected customers' energy supply costs. We continue to implement storm hardening improvements. We also are continuing to help residents and businesses affected by the tragic gas explosion in East Harlem, while working with the National Transportation Safety Board to determine the cause."

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.


                                                             Net Income for
                                                              Common Stock
                                               Earnings       (Millions of
                                               per Share        Dollars)
                                           ---------------- ----------------
                                             2014     2013    2014     2013
                                           -------  ------- -------  -------
Reported earnings per share and net income
 for common stock - GAAP basis (basic)
                                           $  1.23  $  0.66 $   361  $   192
Add: LILO transactions (a)                   (0.02)    0.51      (7)     150
Less: Net mark-to-market effects of the
 CEBs (b)                                     0.04     0.09      11       26
                                           -------  ------- -------  -------
Earnings from ongoing operations - non-
 GAAP                                      $  1.17  $  1.08 $   343  $   316
                                           -------  ------- -------  -------

(a)  In January 2013, a court disallowed tax losses claimed by Con Edison
     relating to Con Edison Development's LILO transactions. For the three
     months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, the impact of the
     LILO transactions on earnings was a $7 million (after taxes of $6
     million) benefit due primarily to lower than previously estimated
     interest on the related tax liability and a $150 million (after taxes
     of $102 million) charge reflecting the recalculation of the accounting
     effect of the LILO transactions and interest on the tax liability.
(b)  After taxes of $9 million and $19 million for the three months ended
     March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


For the year 2014, the company confirms its previous forecast of earnings per share from ongoing operations in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 a share. Earnings per share from ongoing operations exclude a $0.02 a share benefit relating to the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the 2013 period, reflect primarily changes in the rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries, the weather impact on its steam delivery service, decreases in certain operations and maintenance expenses and increases in depreciation and property taxes, reflecting primarily the impact of higher utility plant balances. The results of operations also include the impact of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

Operations and maintenance expenses for CECONY primarily reflect a decrease in pension costs and lower surcharges for assessments and fees that are collected in revenues, offset in part by higher operating costs attributable to emergency response to weather related events.

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the 2014 period compared to the 2013 period, resulting from these and other major factors:


                                                                 Net Income
                                                                 for Common
                                                                   Stock
                                                     Earnings    Variation
                                                    per Share    (Millions
                                                    Variation   of Dollars)
                                                   -----------  -----------
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
 (CECONY) (a)
  Rate plans                                       $      0.15  $        43
  Weather impact on steam revenues                        0.04           13
  Operations and maintenance expense                      0.03           10
  Depreciation and property taxes                        (0.05)         (15)
  Other                                                   0.02            6
                                                   -----------  -----------
Total CECONY                                              0.19           57
Orange and Rockland Utilities (O&R) (a)                  (0.03)          (9)
CEBs (b)                                                  0.41          121
Other, including parent company expenses                     -            -
                                                   -----------  -----------
Total variation                                    $      0.57  $       169
                                                   -----------  -----------

(a)  Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's and O&R's New York
     electric and gas rate plans and the weather-normalization clause
     applicable to their gas businesses, revenues are generally not affected
     by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were
     approved. Under the rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs
     and certain other costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates
     for such costs.
(b)  These variations include an after-tax benefit in the 2014 period of $7
     million or $0.02 a share compared to an after-tax charge in the 2013
     period of $150 million or $0.51 a share relating to the LILO
     transactions. In addition, the variations include a tax benefit in the
     2013 period of $15 million or $0.05 a share resulting from the
     acceptance by the Internal Revenue Service of the company's claim for
     manufacturing tax deductions. The variations also include after-tax net
     mark-to-market gains of $11 million or $0.04 a share in the 2014 period
     and after-tax net mark-to-market gains of $26 million or $0.09 a share
     in the 2013 period.


Refer to the company's First Quarter Form 10-Q, which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at www.conedison.com (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Press Releases").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure also is useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $41 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in infrastructure projects.

Contact:
Robert McGee
212-460-4111

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"At the keynote this morning we spoke about the value proposition of Nutanix, of having a DevOps culture and a mindset, and the business outcomes of achieving agility and scale, which everybody here is trying to accomplish," noted Mark Lavi, DevOps Solution Architect at Nutanix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"We're here to tell the world about our cloud-scale infrastructure that we have at Juniper combined with the world-class security that we put into the cloud," explained Lisa Guess, VP of Systems Engineering at Juniper Networks, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Grape Up will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct. 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Grape Up is a software company specializing in cloud native application development and professional services related to Cloud Foundry PaaS. With five expert teams that operate in various sectors of the market across the U.S. and Europe, Grape Up works with a variety of customers from emergi...
"We're a cybersecurity firm that specializes in engineering security solutions both at the software and hardware level. Security cannot be an after-the-fact afterthought, which is what it's become," stated Richard Blech, Chief Executive Officer at Secure Channels, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Detecting internal user threats in the Big Data eco-system is challenging and cumbersome. Many organizations monitor internal usage of the Big Data eco-system using a set of alerts. This is not a scalable process given the increase in the number of alerts with the accelerating growth in data volume and user base. Organizations are increasingly leveraging machine learning to monitor only those data elements that are sensitive and critical, autonomously establish monitoring policies, and to detect...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Mike Johnston, an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io, discussed how to use Kubernetes to set up a SaaS infrastructure for your business. Mike Johnston is an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io with over 12 years of experience designing, deploying, and maintaining server and workstation infrastructure at all scales. He has experience with brick and mortar data centers as well as cloud providers like Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace. H...
Consumers increasingly expect their electronic "things" to be connected to smart phones, tablets and the Internet. When that thing happens to be a medical device, the risks and benefits of connectivity must be carefully weighed. Once the decision is made that connecting the device is beneficial, medical device manufacturers must design their products to maintain patient safety and prevent compromised personal health information in the face of cybersecurity threats. In his session at @ThingsExpo...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Massive Networks will exhibit at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Massive Networks mission is simple. To help your business operate seamlessly with fast, reliable, and secure internet and network solutions. Improve your customer's experience with outstanding connections to your cloud.
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
Everything run by electricity will eventually be connected to the Internet. Get ahead of the Internet of Things revolution and join Akvelon expert and IoT industry leader, Sergey Grebnov, in his session at @ThingsExpo, for an educational dive into the world of managing your home, workplace and all the devices they contain with the power of machine-based AI and intelligent Bot services for a completely streamlined experience.
Because IoT devices are deployed in mission-critical environments more than ever before, it’s increasingly imperative they be truly smart. IoT sensors simply stockpiling data isn’t useful. IoT must be artificially and naturally intelligent in order to provide more value In his session at @ThingsExpo, John Crupi, Vice President and Engineering System Architect at Greenwave Systems, will discuss how IoT artificial intelligence (AI) can be carried out via edge analytics and machine learning techn...
FinTechs use the cloud to operate at the speed and scale of digital financial activity, but are often hindered by the complexity of managing security and compliance in the cloud. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Sesh Murthy, co-founder and CTO of Cloud Raxak, showed how proactive and automated cloud security enables FinTechs to leverage the cloud to achieve their business goals. Through business-driven cloud security, FinTechs can speed time-to-market, diminish risk and costs, maintain continu...
When shopping for a new data processing platform for IoT solutions, many development teams want to be able to test-drive options before making a choice. Yet when evaluating an IoT solution, it’s simply not feasible to do so at scale with physical devices. Building a sensor simulator is the next best choice; however, generating a realistic simulation at very high TPS with ease of configurability is a formidable challenge. When dealing with multiple application or transport protocols, you would be...
Existing Big Data solutions are mainly focused on the discovery and analysis of data. The solutions are scalable and highly available but tedious when swapping in and swapping out occurs in disarray and thrashing takes place. The resolution for thrashing through machine learning algorithms and support nomenclature is through simple techniques. Organizations that have been collecting large customer data are increasingly seeing the need to use the data for swapping in and out and thrashing occurs ...