Welcome!

News Feed Item

Elgin Mining Reports First Quarter 2014 Results

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/13/14 -- Elgin Mining Inc. ("Elgin Mining" or the "Company") (TSX:ELG) reports its financial and operational results for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Elgin Mining owns and operates the Bjorkdal gold mine ("Bjorkdal Mine") in Sweden, and holds the past-producing Lupin gold mine ("Lupin") and the Ulu gold property in Nunavut, Canada. All figures are in United States dollars(1) ($ or USD) unless otherwise indicated.

A copy of the Company's financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis can be viewed on the Company's website at www.elginmining.com or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

First Quarter 2014 Financial Highlights


--  Gold production of 10,812 ounces which was ahead of plan for the
    quarter; 
    
--  Cash cost of $932 and all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") of $1,161 per gold
    ounce sold; 
    
--  Cash cost of $1,049 and AISC of $1,284 per gold ounce produced;  
    
--  Cash flow from operating activities was $2.0 million, and increased to
    $4.2 million when non-cash working capital movements are excluded; and 
    
--  Cash improved by $0.1 million during the quarter after debt repayments
    of $0.3 million. 

First Quarter 2014 Operational Highlights


--  Underground ("UG") mine productivity continued to exceed early
    expectations with the UG unit mining rate reaching close to 2,000 ore
    tonnes per day. Lower UG head grades in the quarter were due to a three
    week delay in mine sequencing to finalize a ventilation raise, with
    higher planned grades expected for the remainder of the year; 
    
--  Open Pit ("OP") head grades were above plan reflecting the benefits of
    the mine's on-going grade control efforts; 
    
--  Unit mining costs in both the UG and OP have trended significantly
    downwards from elevated levels in 2013 due to the Company's continued
    focus to reduce costs and optimize operational efficiencies. In the OP,
    the mine has reverted to the previous lower-cost drill and blast
    patterns for the full quarter, and in the UG, the transition from
    contractor to owner-operated mining that commenced in Q4-2013 continues
    to deliver a high-level of productivity, helping to drive down unit
    costs; 
    
--  Plant reached record daily throughput towards the end of the quarter
    without any loss in the plant's metallurgical recovery rate, mainly due
    to improvements in the flotation circuit; 
    
--  Permit application to expand the plant's annual throughput limit from
    1.3 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes remains on track with receipt
    of the temporary expansion permit anticipated by the end of 2014; and 
    
--  Completed a detailed structural and geological review of the deposit
    which has led to the identification of several potential high-grade UG
    targets at the Bjorkdal Mine which the Company will drill test in the
    coming quarters. 

(1) Effective January 1, 2014, the Company changed its presentation currency from the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar to improve comparability of its financial results with those of its gold mining peers and to allow easier comparison of the Company's financial numbers to other measures that are quoted in USD, including the price of gold and key performance indicators used within the gold mining industry.

Re-affirmation of Bjorkdal Mine 2014 Guidance

The Bjorkdal Mine's first quarter gold production is traditionally the weakest quarter of the year due to the cold weather impact on the plant's crushing and milling circuits, and on labour and equipment productivity within the mines, in addition to being the shortest quarter in the year. Despite these factors, production is still ahead of target and was in fact the best Q1 since the restart of mining operations in 2006.

The ongoing improvements have definitely taken hold and now that the UG mine sequencing is back on track, second quarter gold production to May 12, 2014 (42 days out of the 91 days in the quarter) currently stands at 6,242 gold ounces from the processing of an approximate equal mix of UG and OP ore feed. The strong start to this quarter is attributable to higher UG grades as planned and continued higher OP head grades which have put the Company on track year-to-date to meet or exceed the higher end of production guidance for 2014.

The Company's full year 2014 guidance for gold production and unit cash cost is as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 Gold Production Guidance       Production Low-end   Production High-end
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold production (ounces)                        44,000                49,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash cost per gold ounce produced                                           
 (USD/ounce)                                      $982                  $886
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AISC per gold ounce produced                                                
 (USD/ounce)                                    $1,227                $1,106
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AISC per gold ounce produced                                                
 excluding non-cash accretion and                                           
 share-based payment expense                                                
 (USD/ounce)                                    $1,207                $1,088
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining capital (USD)                  $7.9 million          $7.9 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEK per USD FX rate assumption                    6.50                  6.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAD per USD FX rate assumption                    1.10                  1.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above AISC guidance includes all capital expenditures (including capitalized exploration) expected to be incurred at the Bjorkdal Mine for 2014, and all general and administration costs incurred at the Company's corporate office in Canada.

Management forecasts that full year gold production will be at the high end of the range while AISC per gold ounce produced will be at the low-end of the range provided.

Patrick Downey, President and CEO, commented, "We have had a good start to 2014 as our operational improvements have continued to provide increased productivity and improved unit costs. The OP and UG operations are performing extremely well, and we can expect to see greater UG productivity and lower unit costs as final ramp-up is achieved later in 2014. These improvements have continued well into Q2 where our grades to the mill have continued to ramp up and we expect to have a very solid Q2 in terms of gold ounces produced, cash cost per ounce, and AISC per ounce. There are now three expected quarters in a row where the mine and overall operation have performed at or above plan. We are also now proceeding with our 15% mill expansion to increase processing capacity from 1.3 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes annually. This additional capacity should increase overall gold production to 55,000 to 60,000 ounces per year with expected low capital expenditures, mainly related to mill upgrades.

Following up on our successful exploration program during 2013, we have recently completed a detailed structural and geological study of the ore body and have now identified some very exciting targets which will be drilled tested in 2014 as part of our exploration budget."

First Quarter 2014 Financial and Operational Summaries


                                              For the three   For the three 
                                               months ended    months ended 
                                             March 31, 2014  March 31, 2013 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL DATA                                                              
Revenue                                       $  14,884,095   $  16,601,659 
Production costs, excluding depreciation and                                
 depletion                                    $  10,535,150   $  13,195,614 
Income from mining operations                 $   1,056,709   $     951,485 
Exploration expense                           $       2,939   $     122,882 
Corporate administration                      $     703,179   $   1,293,904 
Lupin care and maintenance                    $     390,718   $   2,485,195 
Net loss                                      $    (613,961)  $  (3,569,845)
Net loss per share                                                          
- Basic                                       $       (0.00)  $       (0.02)
- Diluted                                     $       (0.00)  $       (0.02)
Cash flow provided by operating activities    $   2,006,167   $  (2,772,394)
Cash and cash equivalents                     $  12,501,725   $  10,861,475 
Working capital                               $   9,975,100   $  16,212,713 
Long-term debt, non-current                   $   3,048,271   $     612,470 
Capital expenditures                          $   1,808,910   $   2,779,943 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING DATA                                                              
Gold ounces produced                                 10,812          10,034 
Gold ounces sold                                     11,136          10,644 
Average realized gold price (USD per ounce)   $       1,384   $       1,618 
Cash cost per gold ounce sold (USD per                                      
 ounce)                                       $         932   $       1,246 
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounce sold                                  
 (USD per ounce)                              $       1,161   $       1,606 
Cash cost per gold ounce produced (USD per                                  
 ounce)                                       $       1,049   $       1,347 
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounce                                       
 produced (USD per ounce)                     $       1,284   $       1,729 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conference Call Details

Elgin Mining will host a conference call on Wednesday, May 14th, 2014 at 2:00 pm (Eastern Time).

Live Dial-In Information

Toronto and International: 416-695-7806 passcode: 7551641

North America (Toll Free): 866-696-5910 passcode: 7551641

Replay Call Information

Toronto and International: 905-694-9451 passcode: 9378295

North America (Toll Free): 800-408-3053 passcode: 9378295

The conference call replay will be available from 7 pm (Eastern Time) on May 14th, 2014, until 11:59 pm (Eastern Time) on May 28th, 2014.

Elgin Mining Inc.

Elgin Mining is a Canadian based company focused on production at the Bjorkdal gold mine in Sweden. In addition, Elgin Mining's portfolio includes the Lupin and Ulu gold projects located in Nunavut, Canada.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Except for statements of historical fact relating to the Company, information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, including any information as to the Company's strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance. Forward-looking statements are characterized by words such as "plan," "expect", "budget", "target", "project", "intend," "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made, and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other known and unknown factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

These factors include risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the material identified as mineral reserves and mineral resources from that predicted, changes in development or mining plans due to changes in logistical, technical or other factors, the impact of general business and economic conditions, global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future conditions, fluctuating metal prices and currency exchange rates, possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates, changes in accounting policies, changes in the Company's corporate resources, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, changes in project development and production time frames, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, higher prices for fuel, steel, power, labour and other consumables contributing to higher costs and general risks of the mining industry, failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, unexpected changes in mine life, unanticipated results of future studies, seasonality and unanticipated weather changes, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, successful completion of proposed acquisitions, permitting time lines, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation and labour disputes as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's Annual Information Form dated March 21, 2014, a copy of which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended.

There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates, assumptions or opinions should change, except as required by applicable law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the exploration and development plans and objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 21st Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound change in personal and enterprise IT since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago. All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devic...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
A look across the tech landscape at the disruptive technologies that are increasing in prominence and speculate as to which will be most impactful for communications – namely, AI and Cloud Computing. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Curtis Peterson, VP of Operations at RingCentral, highlighted the current challenges of these transformative technologies and shared strategies for preparing your organization for these changes. This “view from the top” outlined the latest trends and developments i...
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural networks. We’re in the midst of a wave of excitement around AI such as hasn’t been seen for a few decades. But those previous periods of inflated expectations led to troughs of disappointment. Will this time be different? Most likely. Applications of AI such as predictive analytics are already decreasing costs and improving reliability of industrial machinery. Furthermore, the funding and research going into AI now comes from a wide range of com...
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann and Aruna Ravichandran have been named Co-Chairs of @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo Silicon Valley which will take place Oct. 31-Nov. 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. "DevOps is at the intersection of technology and business-optimizing tools, organizations and processes to bring measurable improvements in productivity and profitability," said Aruna Ravichandran, vice president, DevOps product and solutions marketing...