Welcome!

News Feed Item

Elgin Mining Reports First Quarter 2014 Results

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/13/14 -- Elgin Mining Inc. ("Elgin Mining" or the "Company") (TSX: ELG) reports its financial and operational results for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Elgin Mining owns and operates the Bjorkdal gold mine ("Bjorkdal Mine") in Sweden, and holds the past-producing Lupin gold mine ("Lupin") and the Ulu gold property in Nunavut, Canada. All figures are in United States dollars(1) ($ or USD) unless otherwise indicated.

A copy of the Company's financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis can be viewed on the Company's website at www.elginmining.com or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

First Quarter 2014 Financial Highlights


--  Gold production of 10,812 ounces which was ahead of plan for the
    quarter;

--  Cash cost of $932 and all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") of $1,161 per gold
    ounce sold;

--  Cash cost of $1,049 and AISC of $1,284 per gold ounce produced;

--  Cash flow from operating activities was $2.0 million, and increased to
    $4.2 million when non-cash working capital movements are excluded; and

--  Cash improved by $0.1 million during the quarter after debt repayments
    of $0.3 million.

First Quarter 2014 Operational Highlights


--  Underground ("UG") mine productivity continued to exceed early
    expectations with the UG unit mining rate reaching close to 2,000 ore
    tonnes per day. Lower UG head grades in the quarter were due to a three
    week delay in mine sequencing to finalize a ventilation raise, with
    higher planned grades expected for the remainder of the year;

--  Open Pit ("OP") head grades were above plan reflecting the benefits of
    the mine's on-going grade control efforts;

--  Unit mining costs in both the UG and OP have trended significantly
    downwards from elevated levels in 2013 due to the Company's continued
    focus to reduce costs and optimize operational efficiencies. In the OP,
    the mine has reverted to the previous lower-cost drill and blast
    patterns for the full quarter, and in the UG, the transition from
    contractor to owner-operated mining that commenced in Q4-2013 continues
    to deliver a high-level of productivity, helping to drive down unit
    costs;

--  Plant reached record daily throughput towards the end of the quarter
    without any loss in the plant's metallurgical recovery rate, mainly due
    to improvements in the flotation circuit;

--  Permit application to expand the plant's annual throughput limit from
    1.3 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes remains on track with receipt
    of the temporary expansion permit anticipated by the end of 2014; and

--  Completed a detailed structural and geological review of the deposit
    which has led to the identification of several potential high-grade UG
    targets at the Bjorkdal Mine which the Company will drill test in the
    coming quarters.

(1) Effective January 1, 2014, the Company changed its presentation currency from the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar to improve comparability of its financial results with those of its gold mining peers and to allow easier comparison of the Company's financial numbers to other measures that are quoted in USD, including the price of gold and key performance indicators used within the gold mining industry.

Re-affirmation of Bjorkdal Mine 2014 Guidance

The Bjorkdal Mine's first quarter gold production is traditionally the weakest quarter of the year due to the cold weather impact on the plant's crushing and milling circuits, and on labour and equipment productivity within the mines, in addition to being the shortest quarter in the year. Despite these factors, production is still ahead of target and was in fact the best Q1 since the restart of mining operations in 2006.

The ongoing improvements have definitely taken hold and now that the UG mine sequencing is back on track, second quarter gold production to May 12, 2014 (42 days out of the 91 days in the quarter) currently stands at 6,242 gold ounces from the processing of an approximate equal mix of UG and OP ore feed. The strong start to this quarter is attributable to higher UG grades as planned and continued higher OP head grades which have put the Company on track year-to-date to meet or exceed the higher end of production guidance for 2014.

The Company's full year 2014 guidance for gold production and unit cash cost is as follows:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 Gold Production Guidance       Production Low-end   Production High-end
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gold production (ounces)                        44,000                49,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash cost per gold ounce produced
 (USD/ounce)                                      $982                  $886
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AISC per gold ounce produced
 (USD/ounce)                                    $1,227                $1,106
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AISC per gold ounce produced
 excluding non-cash accretion and
 share-based payment expense
 (USD/ounce)                                    $1,207                $1,088
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustaining capital (USD)                  $7.9 million          $7.9 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEK per USD FX rate assumption                    6.50                  6.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAD per USD FX rate assumption                    1.10                  1.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above AISC guidance includes all capital expenditures (including capitalized exploration) expected to be incurred at the Bjorkdal Mine for 2014, and all general and administration costs incurred at the Company's corporate office in Canada.

Management forecasts that full year gold production will be at the high end of the range while AISC per gold ounce produced will be at the low-end of the range provided.

Patrick Downey, President and CEO, commented, "We have had a good start to 2014 as our operational improvements have continued to provide increased productivity and improved unit costs. The OP and UG operations are performing extremely well, and we can expect to see greater UG productivity and lower unit costs as final ramp-up is achieved later in 2014. These improvements have continued well into Q2 where our grades to the mill have continued to ramp up and we expect to have a very solid Q2 in terms of gold ounces produced, cash cost per ounce, and AISC per ounce. There are now three expected quarters in a row where the mine and overall operation have performed at or above plan. We are also now proceeding with our 15% mill expansion to increase processing capacity from 1.3 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes annually. This additional capacity should increase overall gold production to 55,000 to 60,000 ounces per year with expected low capital expenditures, mainly related to mill upgrades.

Following up on our successful exploration program during 2013, we have recently completed a detailed structural and geological study of the ore body and have now identified some very exciting targets which will be drilled tested in 2014 as part of our exploration budget."

First Quarter 2014 Financial and Operational Summaries


                                              For the three   For the three
                                               months ended    months ended
                                             March 31, 2014  March 31, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL DATA
Revenue                                       $  14,884,095   $  16,601,659
Production costs, excluding depreciation and
 depletion                                    $  10,535,150   $  13,195,614
Income from mining operations                 $   1,056,709   $     951,485
Exploration expense                           $       2,939   $     122,882
Corporate administration                      $     703,179   $   1,293,904
Lupin care and maintenance                    $     390,718   $   2,485,195
Net loss                                      $    (613,961)  $  (3,569,845)
Net loss per share
- Basic                                       $       (0.00)  $       (0.02)
- Diluted                                     $       (0.00)  $       (0.02)
Cash flow provided by operating activities    $   2,006,167   $  (2,772,394)
Cash and cash equivalents                     $  12,501,725   $  10,861,475
Working capital                               $   9,975,100   $  16,212,713
Long-term debt, non-current                   $   3,048,271   $     612,470
Capital expenditures                          $   1,808,910   $   2,779,943
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING DATA
Gold ounces produced                                 10,812          10,034
Gold ounces sold                                     11,136          10,644
Average realized gold price (USD per ounce)   $       1,384   $       1,618
Cash cost per gold ounce sold (USD per
 ounce)                                       $         932   $       1,246
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounce sold
 (USD per ounce)                              $       1,161   $       1,606
Cash cost per gold ounce produced (USD per
 ounce)                                       $       1,049   $       1,347
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounce
 produced (USD per ounce)                     $       1,284   $       1,729
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conference Call Details

Elgin Mining will host a conference call on Wednesday, May 14th, 2014 at 2:00 pm (Eastern Time).

Live Dial-In Information

Toronto and International: 416-695-7806 passcode: 7551641

North America (Toll Free): 866-696-5910 passcode: 7551641

Replay Call Information

Toronto and International: 905-694-9451 passcode: 9378295

North America (Toll Free): 800-408-3053 passcode: 9378295

The conference call replay will be available from 7 pm (Eastern Time) on May 14th, 2014, until 11:59 pm (Eastern Time) on May 28th, 2014.

Elgin Mining Inc.

Elgin Mining is a Canadian based company focused on production at the Bjorkdal gold mine in Sweden. In addition, Elgin Mining's portfolio includes the Lupin and Ulu gold projects located in Nunavut, Canada.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Except for statements of historical fact relating to the Company, information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, including any information as to the Company's strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance. Forward-looking statements are characterized by words such as "plan," "expect", "budget", "target", "project", "intend," "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made, and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other known and unknown factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

These factors include risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the material identified as mineral reserves and mineral resources from that predicted, changes in development or mining plans due to changes in logistical, technical or other factors, the impact of general business and economic conditions, global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future conditions, fluctuating metal prices and currency exchange rates, possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates, changes in accounting policies, changes in the Company's corporate resources, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, changes in project development and production time frames, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, higher prices for fuel, steel, power, labour and other consumables contributing to higher costs and general risks of the mining industry, failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, unexpected changes in mine life, unanticipated results of future studies, seasonality and unanticipated weather changes, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, successful completion of proposed acquisitions, permitting time lines, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation and labour disputes as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's Annual Information Form dated March 21, 2014, a copy of which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended.

There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates, assumptions or opinions should change, except as required by applicable law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the exploration and development plans and objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Catchpoint Systems, Inc., a provider of innovative web and infrastructure monitoring solutions, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's DevOps Summit at 18th Cloud Expo New York, which will take place June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Catchpoint is a leading Digital Performance Analytics company that provides unparalleled insight into customer-critical services to help consistently deliver an amazing customer experience. Designed ...
Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.
While many government agencies have embraced the idea of employing cloud computing as a tool for increasing the efficiency and flexibility of IT, many still struggle with large scale adoption. The challenge is mainly attributed to the federated structure of these agencies as well as the immaturity of brokerage and governance tools and models. Initiatives like FedRAMP are a great first step toward solving many of these challenges but there are a lot of unknowns that are yet to be tackled. In hi...
With the proliferation of both SQL and NoSQL databases, organizations can now target specific fit-for-purpose database tools for their different application needs regarding scalability, ease of use, ACID support, etc. Platform as a Service offerings make this even easier now, enabling developers to roll out their own database infrastructure in minutes with minimal management overhead. However, this same amount of flexibility also comes with the challenges of picking the right tool, on the right ...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...
When you focus on a journey from up-close, you look at your own technical and cultural history and how you changed it for the benefit of the customer. This was our starting point: too many integration issues, 13 SWP days and very long cycles. It was evident that in this fast-paced industry we could no longer afford this reality. We needed something that would take us beyond reducing the development lifecycles, CI and Agile methodologies. We made a fundamental difference, even changed our culture...
The proper isolation of resources is essential for multi-tenant environments. The traditional approach to isolate resources is, however, rather heavyweight. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Igor Drobiazko, co-founder of elastic.io, drew upon his own experience with operating a Docker container-based infrastructure on a large scale and present a lightweight solution for resource isolation using microservices. He also discussed the implementation of microservices in data and application integrat...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...