Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc. Announces 2014 First Quarter Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 05/15/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, announced today its unaudited interim financial and operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014. All dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars.

In the first quarter of 2014, Cub achieved several key accomplishments including its eighth consecutive quarter of production growth and operational success on the Company's 100% working interest Rusko-Komarovske-21 ("RK-21") well which was drilled during the first quarter and subsequently tied-in.

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,857 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the three months
    ended March 31, 2014 for an increase of 22% over 1,528 boe/d in the same
    period in 2013; 
--  Exit rate of 1,952 boe/d at March 31, 2014 for a 6% decrease over exit
    rate of 2,070 boe/d at December 31, 2013; 
--  Current production of approximately 1,900 boe/d; 
--  Achieved average natural gas price of $8.63/Mcf and condensate price of
    $78.19/bbl for the three months ended March 31, 2014; 
--  On March 14, 2014, the RK-21 well was spud and subsequently cased to TD,
    tested 2.6 MMcf/d and tied-in; 
--  Completed the expansion of the Kub-Gas (30% WI) Makeevskoye and
    Olgovskoye production and processing facility in 2013. Gas began flowing
    on March 6, 2014 resulting in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the
    previous 30 MMcf/d. While this work was completed by the end of the
    first quarter of 2014, full production gains are pending re-routing of
    gas production and permitting which is expected in the next couple of
    months; 
--  The M-17 well (30% WI) was drilled to its total depth of 3,445 metres
    and the S7 zone tested gas at a rate of over 0.9 MMcf/d through a seven
    millimetre choke; and 
--  Cub also announced the O-24 well (30% WI) tested and flowed gas at low
    rates in the R30c zone. The Company plans to fracture stimulate this
    zone later this year.

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $30.28/Boe or $5.05/Mcfe for the quarter ended March 31,
    2014; 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014
    increased 55% to $1.7 million (2013 - $1.1 million) which was driven by
    the recent success of RK-22; 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the three months ended
    March 31, 2014 were $23.4 million (2013 - $28.7 million) for a decrease
    of 18% of which the Company's 30% share was $7.0 million (2013 - $8.6
    million). The decrease was due to lower gas prices and the devaluation
    of the Ukrainian Hrynvia; 
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $8.7 million (2013 - $9.7 million) for the three months
    ended March 31, 2014; 
--  During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company received $1.0
    (2013 - $3.0) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas representing the
    distribution of excess cash flow; 
--  Income from the Company's 30% equity investment in KUB-Gas for the three
    months ended March 31, 2014 was $1.1 million (2013 - $2.2 million); 
--  The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $0.9 million
    or $0.00 per share (2013 - net income of $0.3 million or $0.00 per
    share); 
--  Capital expenditures of $1.1 million (2013 $0.3 million) for the three
    months ended March 31, 2014 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a
    non-IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of
    the allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $3.2 million (2013 -
    $1.9 million) for the three month ended March 31, 2014. 
--  The Company utilized $1.0 million of the available $5.0 million
    unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt during the three months ended
    March 31, 2014

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                      Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended
(in thousands of US dollars)              March 31, 2014      March 31, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural gas revenue                1,701                 1,055
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas                                          
 revenue(1)                                      8,734                 9,668
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit (loss)                                 (915)                  276
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per share - basic                                           
 and diluted                                     (0.00)                 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from (used in)                                              
 operations(2)                                    (126)                1,583
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated from                                               
 operations(3)                                   2,391                 2,692
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures(4)                          1,074                   323
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital expenditures(4)                 3,222                 1,871
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)                         30.28                 43.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)                          5.05                  7.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          March 31, 2014   December 31, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital (deficit)                         (306)                  942
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents                        1,908                 1,617
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term debt                                   1,000                     -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:                                                                      
(1)   Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that 
      adds the Company's petroleum and natural revenue earned in the        
      respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas   
      petroleum and natural gas sales that the Company has an economic      
      interest in.                                                          
(2)   Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash    
      flow from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working 
      capital.                                                              
(3)   Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the    
      Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the      
      Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that  
      the Company has an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from       
      operations is calculated as the income from equity investment less the
      KUB-Gas depletion and depreciation.                                   
(4)   Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and     
      equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro- 
      rata capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the         
      Company's capital expenditures in the respective periods to the       
      Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that   
      the Company has an economic interest in.                              

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "During the first quarter we continued our production growth with a particular emphasis on our western 100% owned Ukrainian assets. The RK-22 well was brought on production in late 2013 and improved our production and cashflow. We recently announced the success of the follow up RK-21 well with plans to drill the RK-1 re-entry, RK-23 and RK-24 wells in the next two quarters. Gas prices realised during the first quarter were negatively impacted by the temporary agreement between Russia and Ukraine and the devaluation of the Ukrainian currency. The gas price agreement between Russian and Ukraine was terminated at the end of March 2014 and gas prices have improved materially in April and May of 2014 which we anticipate will improve income and cashflow in our upcoming quarter."

Outlook

For the remainder of 2014, the Company will continue it's previously announced work program on its 100% owned Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine. The Company plans to drill the RK-23 and RK-24 development wells, re-enter the RK-1 well for completion in a deeper zone and plans to drill up to two wells on the Stanivske licence.

Operations expected in the remainder of 2014 for KUB-Gas include the drilling of four wells including the current O-11 well, four fracture stimulations and a workover of the O-6 well and construction of pipeline to tie-in wells as needed. The Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and processing facilities is expected to be optimized in the next couple of months.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the unaudited interim financial statements and associated Management's Discussion and Analysis, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and has been posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE:KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or a Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is, based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in the region and globally; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and the other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Multiple data types are pouring into IoT deployments. Data is coming in small packages as well as enormous files and data streams of many sizes. Widespread use of mobile devices adds to the total. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists looked at the tools and environments that are being put to use in IoT deployments, as well as the team skills a modern enterprise IT shop needs to keep things running, get a handle on all this data, and deliver...
After more than five years of DevOps, definitions are evolving, boundaries are expanding, ‘unicorns’ are no longer rare, enterprises are on board, and pundits are moving on. Can we now look at an evolution of DevOps? Should we? Is the foundation of DevOps ‘done’, or is there still too much left to do? What is mature, and what is still missing? What does the next 5 years of DevOps look like? In this Power Panel at DevOps Summit, moderated by DevOps Summit Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists loo...
Amazon started as an online bookseller 20 years ago. Since then, it has evolved into a technology juggernaut that has disrupted multiple markets and industries and touches many aspects of our lives. It is a relentless technology and business model innovator driving disruption throughout numerous ecosystems. Amazon’s AWS revenues alone are approaching $16B a year making it one of the largest IT companies in the world. With dominant offerings in Cloud, IoT, eCommerce, Big Data, AI, Digital Assista...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...