Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc. Announces 2014 First Quarter Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 05/15/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE: KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, announced today its unaudited interim financial and operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014. All dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars.

In the first quarter of 2014, Cub achieved several key accomplishments including its eighth consecutive quarter of production growth and operational success on the Company's 100% working interest Rusko-Komarovske-21 ("RK-21") well which was drilled during the first quarter and subsequently tied-in.

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,857 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the three months
    ended March 31, 2014 for an increase of 22% over 1,528 boe/d in the same
    period in 2013;
--  Exit rate of 1,952 boe/d at March 31, 2014 for a 6% decrease over exit
    rate of 2,070 boe/d at December 31, 2013;
--  Current production of approximately 1,900 boe/d;
--  Achieved average natural gas price of $8.63/Mcf and condensate price of
    $78.19/bbl for the three months ended March 31, 2014;
--  On March 14, 2014, the RK-21 well was spud and subsequently cased to TD,
    tested 2.6 MMcf/d and tied-in;
--  Completed the expansion of the Kub-Gas (30% WI) Makeevskoye and
    Olgovskoye production and processing facility in 2013. Gas began flowing
    on March 6, 2014 resulting in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the
    previous 30 MMcf/d. While this work was completed by the end of the
    first quarter of 2014, full production gains are pending re-routing of
    gas production and permitting which is expected in the next couple of
    months;
--  The M-17 well (30% WI) was drilled to its total depth of 3,445 metres
    and the S7 zone tested gas at a rate of over 0.9 MMcf/d through a seven
    millimetre choke; and
--  Cub also announced the O-24 well (30% WI) tested and flowed gas at low
    rates in the R30c zone. The Company plans to fracture stimulate this
    zone later this year.

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $30.28/Boe or $5.05/Mcfe for the quarter ended March 31,
    2014;
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014
    increased 55% to $1.7 million (2013 - $1.1 million) which was driven by
    the recent success of RK-22;
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the three months ended
    March 31, 2014 were $23.4 million (2013 - $28.7 million) for a decrease
    of 18% of which the Company's 30% share was $7.0 million (2013 - $8.6
    million). The decrease was due to lower gas prices and the devaluation
    of the Ukrainian Hrynvia;
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $8.7 million (2013 - $9.7 million) for the three months
    ended March 31, 2014;
--  During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company received $1.0
    (2013 - $3.0) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas representing the
    distribution of excess cash flow;
--  Income from the Company's 30% equity investment in KUB-Gas for the three
    months ended March 31, 2014 was $1.1 million (2013 - $2.2 million);
--  The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $0.9 million
    or $0.00 per share (2013 - net income of $0.3 million or $0.00 per
    share);
--  Capital expenditures of $1.1 million (2013 $0.3 million) for the three
    months ended March 31, 2014 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a
    non-IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of
    the allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $3.2 million (2013 -
    $1.9 million) for the three month ended March 31, 2014.
--  The Company utilized $1.0 million of the available $5.0 million
    unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt during the three months ended
    March 31, 2014

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                      Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended
(in thousands of US dollars)              March 31, 2014      March 31, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural gas revenue                1,701                 1,055
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas
 revenue(1)                                      8,734                 9,668
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit (loss)                                 (915)                  276
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per share - basic
 and diluted                                     (0.00)                 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from (used in)
 operations(2)                                    (126)                1,583
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated from
 operations(3)                                   2,391                 2,692
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures(4)                          1,074                   323
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital expenditures(4)                 3,222                 1,871
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)                         30.28                 43.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)                          5.05                  7.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          March 31, 2014   December 31, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital (deficit)                         (306)                  942
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents                        1,908                 1,617
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term debt                                   1,000                     -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
(1)   Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that
      adds the Company's petroleum and natural revenue earned in the
      respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas
      petroleum and natural gas sales that the Company has an economic
      interest in.
(2)   Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash
      flow from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working
      capital.
(3)   Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the
      Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the
      Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that
      the Company has an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from
      operations is calculated as the income from equity investment less the
      KUB-Gas depletion and depreciation.
(4)   Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and
      equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro-
      rata capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the
      Company's capital expenditures in the respective periods to the
      Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that
      the Company has an economic interest in.

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "During the first quarter we continued our production growth with a particular emphasis on our western 100% owned Ukrainian assets. The RK-22 well was brought on production in late 2013 and improved our production and cashflow. We recently announced the success of the follow up RK-21 well with plans to drill the RK-1 re-entry, RK-23 and RK-24 wells in the next two quarters. Gas prices realised during the first quarter were negatively impacted by the temporary agreement between Russia and Ukraine and the devaluation of the Ukrainian currency. The gas price agreement between Russian and Ukraine was terminated at the end of March 2014 and gas prices have improved materially in April and May of 2014 which we anticipate will improve income and cashflow in our upcoming quarter."

Outlook

For the remainder of 2014, the Company will continue it's previously announced work program on its 100% owned Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine. The Company plans to drill the RK-23 and RK-24 development wells, re-enter the RK-1 well for completion in a deeper zone and plans to drill up to two wells on the Stanivske licence.

Operations expected in the remainder of 2014 for KUB-Gas include the drilling of four wells including the current O-11 well, four fracture stimulations and a workover of the O-6 well and construction of pipeline to tie-in wells as needed. The Makeevskoye and Olgovskoye production and processing facilities is expected to be optimized in the next couple of months.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the unaudited interim financial statements and associated Management's Discussion and Analysis, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and has been posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE: KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or a Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is, based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in the region and globally; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and the other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, provided an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data professionals...
"Once customers get a year into their IoT deployments, they start to realize that they may have been shortsighted in the ways they built out their deployment and the key thing I see a lot of people looking at is - how can I take equipment data, pull it back in an IoT solution and show it in a dashboard," stated Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
@DevOpsSummit taking place June 6-8, 2017 at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers is now open.
Fact is, enterprises have significant legacy voice infrastructure that’s costly to replace with pure IP solutions. How can we bring this analog infrastructure into our shiny new cloud applications? There are proven methods to bind both legacy voice applications and traditional PSTN audio into cloud-based applications and services at a carrier scale. Some of the most successful implementations leverage WebRTC, WebSockets, SIP and other open source technologies. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Da...
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
"IoT is going to be a huge industry with a lot of value for end users, for industries, for consumers, for manufacturers. How can we use cloud to effectively manage IoT applications," stated Ian Khan, Innovation & Marketing Manager at Solgeniakhela, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service. In his session at 19th Cloud Exp...