Welcome!

News Feed Item

Foremost Income Fund Reports Q1 2014 Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/15/14 -- Foremost Income Fund ("Foremost" or the "Fund") announces the financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

OVERVIEW

The Fund is an unincorporated open end mutual fund trust conducting its business through Foremost Universal LP ("Universal") and Foremost Industries LP ("Foremost"). The Fund derives its operational income from both Universal and Foremost. Universal's overall business is focused on the oil and gas industry and includes activity from eight manufacturing sites throughout Alberta. Foremost manufactures off-highway large wheeled and tracked vehicles, and equipment for custom drilling, construction, water wells, and mining sectors. Foremost also maintains a focus on custom built vehicles for its clientele and is located in Calgary, Alberta.

Q1 FINANCIAL RESULTS:

The key elements from Q1 2014 are:

--  Revenue decrease of 27% when comparing quarter over quarter. The Fund
    experienced the results of a general slowdown in oilfield equipment
    demand. Ongoing market and political concerns regarding transportation
    of product to foreign markets, and market price discrepancies led to
    depressed outlooks and product demand by key oilfield producers. Further
    information on the decrease in revenue by segment, and product line, can
    be found in the segmented information section of the MD&A.
--  Q1 2014 gross profit dropped to 11% from 16% in Q1 2013. This is a
    result of lower customer demand driving lower quoted margins and margin
    adjustments made to specific long lead jobs, including field projects
    discussed in previous MD&A's. Further information by product can be
    found in the segmented information section of the MD&A.
--  Administrative expenses have decreased 11%, from $5.5 million in Q1 2013
    to $4.9 million in Q1 2014. This is a result of an increased focus on
    lowering discretionary spending.
--  Included in the foreign exchange loss of $133,000, and net against the
    exchange gains, are unrealized losses on forward contracts for $457,000.
--  EBITDA for Q1 2014 dropped to $10,000, from $4.6 million in 2013. This
    is a reflection of lower gross profit, due to industry conditions and
    adjustments made to margins on field work.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000's, except per Trust Unit amount)
2014                         Q1          Q2         Q3         Q4     Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue               $  46,439                                   $  46,439

Gross profit ($)      $   5,029                                   $   5,029
Gross profit (%)             11%                                         11%

Admin. expenses ($)   $   4,886                                   $   4,886
Admin. expenses (%
 of total revenue)           11%                                         11%
Exchange rate (loss)  $    (133)                                  $    (133)
EBITDA                $      10                                   $      10
Income from
 operations           $  (1,141)                                  $  (1,141)
Comprehensive (loss)  $  (1,541)                                  $  (1,541)

Trust units redeemed     21,123                                      21,123
Redemption payouts    $     160                                   $     160
Basic and diluted
 (loss) per trust
 unit                 $   (0.08)                                  $   (0.08)


2013                         Q1         Q2         Q3         Q4      Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue               $  64,001  $  56,602  $  50,232  $  59,094  $ 229,929

Gross profit ($)      $  10,149  $   4,770  $   7,169  $   7,763  $  29,850
Gross profit (%)             16%         8%        14%        13%        13%

Admin. expenses ($)   $   5,517  $   5,920  $   5,519  $   5,171  $  22,127
Admin. expenses (%
 of total revenue)            9%        10%        11%         9%        10%
Exchange rate
 gain/(loss)          $     (48) $     225  $      54  $     (38) $     193
EBITDA                $   4,679  $  (1,375) $   1,595  $   2,630  $   7,530
Income from
 operations           $   3,484  $  (2,334) $     423  $   1,325  $   2,898
Comprehensive
 income/(loss)        $   2,810  $  (1,504) $  (2,890) $   1,031  $    (553)

Trust units redeemed      8,560     13,326     76,451     30,394    128,731
Redemption payouts    $      70  $     107  $     627  $     229  $   1,033
Basic and diluted
 gain/(loss) per
 trust unit           $    0.15  $   (0.08) $   (0.15) $    0.05  $   (0.03)


2012                          Q1         Q2         Q3        Q4      Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue                $  70,822  $  62,499  $  64,746  $ 63,363  $ 261,430

Gross profit ($)       $  15,393  $  13,081  $  14,236  $  9,389  $  52,099
Gross profit (%)              22%        21%        22%       15%        20%

Admin. expenses ($)    $   6,080  $   5,977  $   5,823  $  6,222  $  24,102
Admin. expenses (% of
 total revenue)                9%        10%         9%       10%         9%
Exchange rate
 (loss)/gain           $     (32) $      41  $    (273) $     34  $    (230)
EBITDA                 $   9,345  $   7,063  $   8,686  $  3,132  $  27,996
Income from operations $   8,328  $   6,096  $   7,384  $  2,092  $  23,900
Comprehensive income   $   7,653  $   5,078  $   5,625  $  1,371  $  19,727

Trust units redeemed       8,486      7,709      2,500    10,090     28,785
Redemption payouts     $      62  $      60  $      19  $     84  $     225
Basic and diluted gain
 per trust unit        $    0.41  $    0.27  $    0.30  $   0.07  $    1.05

MANAGEMENT ACTION IN RESPONSE TO PERFORMANCE WEAKNESS

The financial results of the first quarter have been disappointing and continue to reflect a slowdown in demand in a number of our major product lines. Management has embarked on an aggressive plan designed to return the Fund to overall profitability in 2014. Further, we have already engaged in a significant strategic review of the business and established the following areas of focus:

a.  Connection with the Customer

We are reviewing the business to ensure we and our product offerings align with customer needs. This will ensure product lines carry features and costs that our customers value, delivering improved and more predictable margins.

b.  Cost Discipline

We are driving renewed cost disciplines across every department and function. We are reducing the amount of money tied up in working capital and are reviewing all supply arrangements. A broad workforce reduction has already been implemented affecting approximately 12% of overhead positions. These initial steps combined will contribute to an estimated $4 million in annual savings. Additional savings will follow. Cost discipline will not be a one-time project, but rather will form the basis of a new strategic priority to define Foremost as a quality, low-cost producer.

c.  Engaging the Intelligence and Commitment of our People

Senior management is leading a process whereby we create the environment where our people volunteer their full engagement, capabilities, and intelligence that results in Foremost achieving results in excess of the sum of our parts. We are creating a clear vision and direction for the business and are clearly communicating our objectives. We are also looking at ways to realign compensation packages to be more results orientated.

Clearly the Fund is at a point where change is important. Changes will be implemented in a manner that minimizes disruption and leverages our strengths. We have an established, quality brand with long-term and stable relationships with our customers. We also have an outstanding team of intelligent, capable, committed, and loyal employees. We have worked through challenging business environments in the past, and will continue to do so in 2014. Further, we have a general sense of optimism with respect to the team's response to these early changes and general market conditions which show healthy signs of improvement in many of our markets. We look forward with confidence to reporting more favorable results to Unitholders in future periods.

TRUST UNIT REDEMPTIONS AND DISTRIBUTIONS

The Fund redeemed 21,123 Trust Units during the quarter through its normal redemption program resulting in cash payments of $159,367. During Q1 2013 the Fund redeemed 8,560 Trust Units for $72,000. No options were exercised during the first quarter.

The Trustees have determined that, as of the date of May 15, 2014 the Fund will redeem tendered Trust Units at a value of $6.50 per unit.

TEMPORARY REDUCTION OF MONTHLY LIMIT FOR FUND UNIT REDEMPTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 6.4(ii)(B) OF THE DEED OF TRUST

Pursuant to section 6.4(ii)(B) of the Deed of Trust of the Fund dated November 12, 2005 as amended (the "Deed of Trust"), the Trustees of the Fund have discretion, in any calendar month, to reduce the monthly limit for cash redemptions of Trust Units of the Fund due to concerns as to the current working capital or debt of the Fund. The exercise of such discretion may result in all or a portion (on a pro rata basis, depending on notices of redemption received) of the amount payable for Trust Units redeemed being paid by unsecured promissory notes in accordance with section 6.5 of the Deed of Trust.

Effective May 1, 2014 and applying to all notices of redemption received and/or payable in the month of May 2014, the Trustees of the Fund have exercised their discretion pursuant to section 6.4(ii)(B) to reduce the monthly limit for cash redemptions from $1,500,000.00 to $0.00. The Trustees will review the revised monthly limit in respect of the month of June 2014 no later than June 13, 2014.

In accordance with the Deed of Trust, Unitholders that submit or have submitted notices of redemption on or after May 1, 2014 or in respect of whose Trust Units the Fund is obligated pay the redemption price on or before May 31, 2014, will be contacted individually and provided with the opportunity to elect to withdraw all or any part of such notices of redemption. Any Unitholders not electing to withdraw their redemption notices, in whole or in part will be paid the redemption price in respect of their redeemed Trust Units by unsecured promissory notes.

This discussion is intended for summary purposes only and is subject in all respects to the Deed of Trust. The income and other tax consequences of holding, redeeming or disposing of Trust Units and acquiring promissory notes will vary depending on the unitholder's particular circumstances, including the jurisdiction(s) in which the Unitholder resides or carries on business, and whether the Unitholder is an RRSP, RESP, RRIF, PPSP or TFSA. Accordingly, this summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be legal or tax advice to any prospective purchaser or any Unitholder. All Unitholders should consult their own legal and tax advisors prior to redeeming units of the Fund.

On behalf of the Trustees, Foremost Income Fund

Bevan May, Interim President/CEO and Trustee

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT

Certain statements in this news release may constitute "forward-looking" statements which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Fund to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, such statements use words such as "may", "will", "expect", "believe", "plan" and other similar terminology. These statements include statements the Fund's intention to proceed with a Unitholders' meeting and information regarding the Trustees' views of the future prospects and tax treatment of the Fund and tax treatment of the Special Redemption, the Fund's expectations regarding the future availability of cash to meet redemption requests and the Trustee's expectations for redemption prices in December 2011 and January 2012. These statements reflect management's current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this news release. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including: the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, changes in laws and regulations, increased competition, fluctuations in commodity prices and foreign exchange, and interest rates and stock market volatility.

Contacts:
Foremost Income Fund
Jackie Schenn, CA
Investor Relations
(403) 295-5800 or toll free 1-800-661-9190 (Canada/US)
(403) 295-5832 (FAX)
[email protected]
www.foremost.ca

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
Leading companies, from the Global Fortune 500 to the smallest companies, are adopting hybrid cloud as the path to business advantage. Hybrid cloud depends on cloud services and on-premises infrastructure working in unison. Successful implementations require new levels of data mobility, enabled by an automated and seamless flow across on-premises and cloud resources. In his general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Tevis, an IBM Storage Software Technical Strategist and Customer Solution Architec...
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
"As we've gone out into the public cloud we've seen that over time we may have lost a few things - we've lost control, we've given up cost to a certain extent, and then security, flexibility," explained Steve Conner, VP of Sales at Cloudistics,in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Michael Burley, a Senior Business Development Executive in IT Services at NetApp, described how NetApp designed a three-year program of work to migrate 25PB of a major telco's enterprise data to a new STaaS platform, and then secured a long-term contract to manage and operate the platform. This significant program blended the best of NetApp’s solutions and services capabilities to enable this telco’s successful adoption of private cloud storage and launching ...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
"Since we launched LinuxONE we learned a lot from our customers. More than anything what they responded to were some very unique security capabilities that we have," explained Mark Figley, Director of LinuxONE Offerings at IBM, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...