Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Matrix Reports First Quarter Results and Management Update

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 05/30/14 -- Matrix Asset Management Inc. (the "Company" or "Matrix") reported today its financial and operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2014.

President and CEO, David Levi commented, "Managing cash flow with a view towards reducing Matrix's working capital deficit is a priority while we continue to review options for the Company to address its present debt obligations and to provide liquidity options for its shareholders." Mr. Levi added, "With the return to a focus on the management of venture capital funds, Mr. Matthews, the Company's Chief Financial Officer is leaving and the Company is hiring an individual to serve as the firm's financial controller."

Selected First Quarter Highlights - Unaudited


--  At March 31, 2014, asset under management ("AUM") were $227 million,
    compared to $232 million as at December 31, 2013 and $1.1 billion as at
    March 31, 2013.
--  Total revenue for the first quarter was $1.9 million compared to $3.4
    million during the same period last year.
--  Recurring expenses for the first quarter were $2.8 million compared to
    $4.5 million during the same period last year.
--  EBITDA from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2014 was
    $(0.4) million compared to $(0.6) million for the same period last year.
    Recurring EBITDA for the first quarter of 2014 was $(0.4) million
    compared to $(0.5) million during the same period last year.
--  Net loss for the first quarter was $(0.4) million compared to $(4.5)
    million for the same period last year. The Company recognized a net loss
    from continuing operations for the first quarter of 2014 of $(0.8)
    million compared to net loss from continuing operations of $(1.4)
    million for the same period last year.
--  Total current liabilities of $7.2 million as at March 31, 2014 are
    scheduled for repayment over the next 12 months.
--  Working capital deficit increased during the quarter by $1.5 million to
    $4.4 million. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources".

This release should be read in conjunction with Matrix's unaudited financial statements and Management Discussion & Analysis ("MD&A") for the first quarter ended March 31, 2014, which are available on the SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Subsequent Events:


--  On April 13, 2014 Matrix announced the retirement of four long-serving
    directors of the Board. The directors had been involved for many years
    including with the predecessor companies of Matrix. These directors have
    wanted to retire from the board for some time but remained involved over
    the past year to ensure the completion of the financial and corporate
    restructuring of the Company, complete the annual audit and begin the
    review of strategic options. At present, the Board has fixed the number
    of directors at three. The sole director is considering new independent
    appointments and may present nominations at the June 25, 2014 annual and
    special meeting of shareholders.
--  On May 30, 2014 Mr. Matthews the Chief Financial Officer of Matrix
    resigned. Mr. Matthews was selected as the Chief Financial Officer of
    Matrix in connection with the expansion of the Company's operations to
    mutual funds and the January 2010 business combination of Matrix and
    Seamark Asset Management Ltd. (Seamark). In 2013, Matrix sold Seamark
    and the mutual fund management division, returned to a focus on the
    management of venture capital funds, and is in the process of hiring an
    individual to serve as the firm's financial controller.

Corporate Overview

Matrix is a venture capital asset management company with offices in Vancouver, Toronto & Halifax. As at March 31, 2014, the Company managed approximately $227 million in assets operated through GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., which manages funds in the venture capital sector.

Summary of First Quarter Financial Results - Unaudited

The following table sets out selected consolidated financial information about Matrix for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with financial information for Matrix for the same period in 2013.

The summary of financial results identifies expense items which are considered non-recurring. Management believes that it is important to identify non-recurring items in order to fully understand Matrix's operating results. The intent of identifying these non-recurring items is to provide greater transparency as to what the core or run-rate capacity of the business may be. This is particularly important for Matrix given that Matrix, and GWC in particular, has during prior periods: (i) executed various initiatives and incurred various expenses to grow its business by mergers and acquisitions and (ii) implemented significant restructuring measures as a result of completed mergers and acquisitions. In specific circumstances, management considers these matters to be material, and therefore important to present as supplemental information. Further information regarding non-recurring expenses is contained in Table 3 of Matrix's MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014.


                                                For the three  For the three
                                                 months ended   months ended
                                               March 31, 2014 March 31, 2013
                                                        (in $          (in $
                                                   thousands)     thousands)
Revenue
  Management and administration fees                  $ 1,697        $ 2,940
  Additional administration fees                           96            270
  Incentive participation revenues                         86              -
  Interest income                                           1            181
  Other income                                             55             47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1,935          3,438
Expenses
  Selling, general and administrative                   2,373          3,935
  Share-based compensation                                 20             57
  Servicing commissions                                     -              -
  Amortization - property and equipment                    18             57
  Amortization - deferred sales commissions                38            158
  Amortization - asset management contracts                 -             78
  Interest                                                345            190
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        2,794          4,475
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before merger, acquisition and other
 special project costs and income taxes                 (859)        (1,037)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merger, acquisition and other special project
 costs                                                   (13)             87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before income taxes                                (846)        (1,124)
Income tax recovery                                         -            238
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss from continuing operations                         (846)        (1,362)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax               -             82
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss                                              $ (846)      $ (1,280)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basic and diluted loss per share from
 continuing operations (in $)                          (0.02)         (0.03)
Basic and diluted loss per share from
 discontinued operations (in $)                             -           0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

NON-GAAP MEASURES
----------------------------------------------
EBITDA(1)                                               (425)          (585)
Add non-recurring items, net(2)                          (13)             87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recurring EBITDA(3)                                     (438)          (498)
Free Cash Flow (5)                                      (580)          (626)

Loss before taxes                                       (846)        (1,124)
Add non-recurring items, net(2)                          (13)             87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recurring loss before taxes(4)                          (859)        (1,037)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dividends declared and paid(7)                              -              -

                                                                       As at
                                         As at          As at   December 31,
                                March 31, 2014 March 31, 2013           2013
                                         (in $          (in $          (in $
                                    thousands)     thousands)     thousands)

Cash                                     $ 433        $ 1,113        $ 1,251
Total assets                             4,538         23,743          5,303
Total long-term liabilities              5,975          8,453          6,781
Total assets under
 management(6)                         226,500      1,100,000        232,000

Notes:


1.  EBITDA (defined by Matrix as earnings before interest, taxes,
    depreciation and amortization and other non-cash items) is a measure
    used by many investors to compare issuers on the basis of their ability
    to generate cash from operations. Management believes EBITDA is a useful
    supplemental measure of operating performance as it provides an
    indication as to cash available for working capital needs, capital
    expenditures and dividends.
2.  Non-recurring items are described in Matrix's MD&A for the third quarter
    posted on SEDAR.
3.  Management believes "recurring EBITDA" is a useful supplemental measure
    of operating performance because it provides readers with greater
    insight into what the core or run-rate EBITDA generating capacity of the
    business may be by adjusting EBITDA for various non-recurring items.
    Without presentation of this measure, there can be a lack of
    transparency of the effect of non-recurring revenues or expenses on
    EBITDA.
4.  Management believes "recurring income (loss) before taxes" is a useful
    supplemental measure of operating performance because it provides
    readers with greater insight into what the core or run-rate income
    before taxes generating capacity of the business may be by adjusting
    income before taxes for various non-recurring items. Without
    presentation of this measure, there can be a lack of transparency of the
    effect of non-recurring revenues or expenses on income before taxes.
5.  Management believes "Free Cash Flow" (defined by Matrix as EBITDA less
    interest paid, commissions paid and net taxes (payable/refundable as
    filed)) is a useful supplemental measure of available cash generated
    from the business' operations for working capital needs, capital
    expenditures and dividends.
6.  Assets under management or "AUM" means the fair value of the net assets
    of the funds and accounts managed by Matrix and its subsidiaries in
    respect of which fees are earned.
7.  During the first quarter of 2014 no dividends were declared or paid.
    Dividends are described in Matrix's MD&A for the first quarter of 2014
    posted on SEDAR.

The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the International Accounting Standard 34 - Interim Financial Reporting as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and are the responsibility of the Company's management. The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at March 31, 2014, Matrix had total assets of $4.5 million, a decrease of $0.8 million from $5.3 million at December 31, 2013. During the first quarter, current assets decreased by $0.7 million while long term assets decreased $0.1 million. Total liabilities of $13.2 million as at March 31, 2014 increased by $0.1 million compared to $13.1 million as at December 31, 2013. Current liabilities increased by $0.9 million while long term liabilities decreased by $0.8 million.

The Company requires capital for operating purposes, including funding current and long term liabilities and current and future operations. Subsidiaries of the Company registered under securities laws must also maintain minimum levels of working capital in order to meet regulatory requirements under securities laws. If these minimum working capital requirements are not maintained, these registrations may be revoked. As a result of the term credit facility provided on September 30, 2013 and December 30, 2013, the Company believes that it has rectified its previously announced working capital deficiency but securities regulators have not finalized their review of the matter and any confirmation of that rectification is still pending. There can be no assurance that these subsidiaries will restore and maintain compliance with working capital requirements to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities and a failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to operate and its financial position and future operating results.

Matrix's liquidity position and capital resources are dependent on cash flows from operations which in turn are dependent on AUM. Matrix's AUM is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and has declined significantly with the result of the dispositions related to the Seamark Sale and the Marquest Transaction (See "Introduction" in Matrix's MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014). Matrix's working capital position has also deteriorated significantly over the past two years. Failing to meet payment obligations, including in respect of secured indebtedness or failing to maintain compliance with working capital requirements under securities laws, may have a material adverse effect on Matrix's financial condition, operating results and ability to carry on business. See "Risk Factors" in Matrix's MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

As at March 31, 2014, Matrix had a working capital deficiency of $(4.4) million, comprised of $2.8 million current assets and $(7.2) million in current liabilities. Matrix's retained earnings deficit as at March 31, 2014 was $(33.2) million and the net loss from continuing operations for the quarter was $(0.8) million. Significant items contributing to the working capital deficit are: (1) $5.3 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; (2) $0.5 million of employment related obligations, primarily non-recurring lump sum payments due during the next 12 months; and (3) $0.7 million in operating lease related obligations.

The financial statements and MD&A were prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that Matrix will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities as they become due.

Management's cash flow forecasts indicate that the Company is expected to have resources available to continue to operate as a going concern; however the forecasts are based on a number of assumptions with respect to future cash flows and the Company's ability to re-structure $0.8 million of payments due to related parties on March 31, 2015 and obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that Matrix will re-structure debt obligations and obtain additional financing in a manner that will allow Matrix to continue to operate. Uncertainties surrounding these assumptions may cast significant doubt on the ability of Matrix to discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business and continue to operate as a going concern. See Note 1 "Organization and Continuing Operations" in the annual audited consolidated financial statements and see Note 8 "Corporate Debt" in the condensed interim consolidated financial statements for a description of terms and security on corporate debt.

There is material uncertainty surrounding Matrix's ability to generate positive cash flows to generate savings from cost reduction programs (and as to the quantum of such savings), to re-pay, re-finance and/or re-structure debt obligations, to collect fund management fees and incentive participation dividends from managed funds with poor liquidity, to collect tax refunds and as to the outcome of regulatory reviews and filings and prospects for future transactions. See "Forward-Looking Statements". If the Company is unable to re-pay or re-finance its debt obligations, the obligations and associated security may be enforced, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial position and operating results and the Company's ability to continue to operate. The auditor's report in respect of Matrix's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 was unqualified, however did contain and Emphasis of Matter notation with respect to Matrix's working capital deficit as at December 31, 2013, net loss for the year and Matrix's ability to continue to operate as a going concern.

It is not possible to predict whether strategic options pursued by Matrix will result in sufficient improvements to Matrix's financial condition to allow Matrix to continue as a going concern. If the going concern assumption ceases to be appropriate, adjustments will be necessary to the carrying amounts and/or classification of Matrix's assets and liabilities. Further, a comprehensive restructuring plan could materially change the carrying amounts and classifications reported in the consolidated financial statements.

Matrix's first quarter 2014 financial statements and MD&A are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

About Matrix (www.matrixasset.ca)

Matrix is a venture capital asset management company with offices in Vancouver, Toronto & Halifax. As at March 31, 2014, the Company managed approximately $227 million in assets operated through GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., which manages funds in the venture capital sector.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this press release are forward-looking statements based on beliefs, assumptions and expectations of the Company and not on historical fact. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purposes of assisting the reader in understanding the Company's financial position and results of operations and to present information about management's current expectations and plans related to future periods. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements and that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. These statements may include, without limitation, statements regarding Matrix's ability to continue to operate as a going concern and meet minimum working capital and other regulatory requirements, future operations, business, financial condition, AUM, financial results, expense reductions, tax refunds, dividends and dividend policies, proposed financings, re-payment, re-financing and/or re-structuring Matrix's financial obligations, managed venture capital fund divestments, prospects, opportunities, goals, strategies, accounting policies and estimates and outlook of the Company for the current fiscal year and subsequent periods. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature or depend upon or refer to future events or conditions.

Forward-looking statements are based upon beliefs and assumptions of management that were applied in drawing a conclusion or making an estimate, forecast or projection as reflected in the forward-looking statements, including the perception of historical trends and current conditions and beliefs and assumptions with respect to levels of AUM and related assumptions as to levels of portfolio returns and managed fund sales and redemptions, beliefs and assumptions concerning prevailing and future economic and market conditions and the impact of such conditions and other factors on Matrix's AUM, managed portfolio performance and the trading price of Matrix shares, the continuation of portfolio and fund management and advisory engagements, the extent and effectiveness of cost-saving measures and the impact of such measures and other factors on earnings, the outcome of pending and future tax filings, the outcome of litigation, the outcome of disputes on the allocation of expenses between Matrix and the Canadian Fund, the outcome of claims made to the Canadian Fund, the status of pending transactions and proposed transactions and the expected benefits from and impact of transactions on Matrix's future operations, the ability of Matrix to re-pay, re-finance or re-structure financial obligations, maintain compliance with related contractual covenants, minimum working capital and other regulatory requirements and other laws, tax rates, the outcomes of regulatory compliance reviews, the ability of managed venture capital funds to generate liquidity, pay management fees and IPA revenues when due and satisfy secured payment obligations under financing arrangements, performance of managed venture capital investments relative to carrying values and performance fee return thresholds, the collection of trade receivables and the absence of extraordinary or one-time expenses not currently known to management. While management considers these beliefs and assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available, these statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that such beliefs and assumptions will prove to be correct.

Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements due to many factors including, but not limited to, regulatory and other risks associated with venture capital fund management sector generally, market, economic, political and other risks affecting portfolio performance, interest and foreign exchange rates, levels of managed fund sales and redemptions and in turn Matrix's AUM, risks associated with tax filings and litigation, other risks affecting revenues and earnings, regulatory and other risks associated with fund and asset management activities, managed venture capital fund divestments and liquidity levels, risks associated with non-performance of financial obligations, including secured obligations, integration and continuity risks affecting completed acquisitions, changes in consumer demand for the financial products offered by the Company, Matrix's ability to respond to competition and other risks and uncertainties listed under "Risk Factors" in the MD&A for the period ended March 31, 2014 and in Matrix's Annual Information Form dated March 31, 2014, which is available on SEDAR. Many of these risks are beyond the control of Matrix.

The assumptions and risks noted in this press release are not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's business and the forward-looking statements in this press release. Readers should consider these and other risks, uncertainties and potential events carefully and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Other than as specifically required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements are made, or to reflect new information, future unanticipated events or results or other factors.

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

"EBITDA", "recurring EBITDA", "Free Cash Flow", "recurring expenses", and "recurring income (loss) before taxes" are not measures recognized under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). However, management of Matrix believes that most shareholders, creditors, other stakeholders and investment analysts prefer to have these measures included as reported measures of operating performance, a proxy for cash flow, and to facilitate valuation analysis. These non-IFRS measures do not have any standard meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Readers are cautioned that these non-IFRS measures are not alternatives to measures determined in accordance with IFRS and should not, on their own, be construed as indicators of performance, cash flows or profitability or measures of liquidity. These non-IFRS measures should only be read in conjunction with the financial statements of Matrix posted on SEDAR. "AUM", "working capital" and "non-recurring items" are also non-IFRS measures. AUM is the fair value of the net assets of the funds and accounts managed by Matrix and its subsidiaries in respect of which they earn fees. Working capital is determined by deducting current liabilities from current assets. For additional information regarding Matrix's use of non-IFRS measures, including reconciliations of these measures to the nearest IFRS measures, please refer to the "Non-IFRS Financial Measures" and "Non-Recurring Items, EBITDA & Free Cash Flow" sections of its MD&A available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Learn how to solve the problem of keeping files in sync between multiple Docker containers. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Aaron Brongersma, Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Modulus, discussed using rsync, GlusterFS, EBS and Bit Torrent Sync. He broke down the tools that are needed to help create a seamless user experience. In the end, can we have an environment where we can easily move Docker containers, servers, and volumes without impacting our applications? He shared his results so yo...
Palerra, the cloud security automation company, announced enhanced support for Amazon AWS, allowing IT security and DevOps teams to automate activity and configuration monitoring, anomaly detection, and orchestrated remediation, thereby meeting compliance mandates within complex infrastructure deployments. "Monitoring and threat detection for AWS is a non-trivial task. While Amazon's flexible environment facilitates successful DevOps implementations, it adds another layer, which can become a ...
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, discussed h...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Arch...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...