Welcome!

News Feed Item

MBMI Announces Philippine Court Decision; Receipt of Downpayment for the Second Agreement; and Sale of Philippine Equipment

RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 06/17/14 -- MBMI RESOURCES INC. ("MBMI") (TSX VENTURE: MBR) announces that:


    1.    The Third Division of the Supreme Court in the Republic of the
          Philippines has recently issued a decision dated April 21, 2014 in
          G.R. No. 199580 (the "Decision").

The background of the case is as follows: On January 2, 2007, Redmont Consolidated Mines Corporation ("Redmont") filed with the Panel of Arbitrators ("POA") verified petitions against the applications for Mineral Production Sharing Agreements ("MPSAs") and Exploration Permits Applications ("EPs") of Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corporation ("Narra Nickel"), McArthur Mining Inc. ("McArthur Mining") and Tesoro Mining and Development Corporation ("Tesoro Mining"; collectively, the "Operating Companies"). Redmont asserted that the Operating Companies are supposedly not qualified to engage in mining activities because they are 100% owned by MBMI Resources, Inc., a Canadian corporation. During this time, Redmont had already applied for an exploration permit in the same area covered by the Operating Companies' MPSA applications.

On December 14, 2007, the POA rendered its Resolution where it disqualified the Operating Companies for being foreign corporations and declared null and void the MPSA granted to them. The POA gave due course to Redmont's application for exploration permit.

The Operating Companies filed their Motion for Reconsideration, which the POA denied in its February 7, 2008 Order. They then filed an appeal with the Mines Adjudication Board ("MAB") which, in turn, reversed and set aside the December 14, 2007 Order of the POA.

The MAB ruled, among others, that the POA had no jurisdiction because the issue on the nationality of a corporation and its qualification to apply for an MPSA is not among the disputes within the POA's powers, and it is the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") which has the jurisdiction to determine a corporation's nationality.

Redmont's Motion for Reconsideration of the MAB Order was denied. Thus, Redmont filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals, docketed as CA-G.R. SP. No. 109703.

In its Decision dated October 1, 2010, the Court of Appeals upheld the ruling of the POA rejecting the Operating Companies' MPSA applications, and ruled as follows:


    Wherefore, the Petition is PARTIALLY GRANTED. The assailed Orders, dated
    September 10, 2008 and July 1, 2009 of the Mining Adjudication Board are
    reversed and set aside. The findings of the Panel of Arbitrators of the
    Department of Environment and Natural Resources that respondents
    McArthur, Tesoro and Narra are foreign corporations is upheld and,
    therefore, the rejection of their applications for Mineral Production
    Sharing Agreement should be recommended to the Secretary of the DENR.

    With respect to the applications of respondents McArthur, Tesoro and
    Narra for Financial or Technical Assistance Agreement (FTAA) or
    conversion of their MPSA applications to FTAA, the matter for its
    rejection or approval is left for determination by the Secretary of the
    DENR and the President of the Republic of the Philippines.

The Operating Companies moved for the reconsideration of the Court of Appeals' decision, pointing out that the case had already been rendered moot as a result of the execution of the Financial and Technical Assistance Agreement ("FTAA") between them and the Republic of the Philippines on April 12, 2010. (The Operating Companies converted their applications for MPSAs and EPs into an FTAA application, and the latter was granted by the Government. Moreover, under Philippine law, the Government may enter into FTAAs with wholly foreign-owned companies.)

In a Resolution dated February 15, 2011, the Court of Appeals denied the Operating Companies' motion for reconsideration.

Subsequently, the Operating Companies filed their petition for review with the Supreme Court, docketed as G.R. No. 199580, where they argued that:


(1)   the POA had no jurisdiction to determine their nationalities, as such
      jurisdiction was vested in the SEC;

(2)   they are, and have always been, Philippine nationals because 60% of
      their outstanding capital stock was owned by the Holding Companies
      (i.e., Sara Marie Mining, Inc., Patricia Louise Mining and Development
      Corporation, and Madrilejos Mining Corporation), which were themselves
      60% Philippine-owned; and

(3)   the case has become moot with the execution of the FTAA.

Subsequently, the Operating Companies manifested that their Holding Companies had become 100% Philippine-owned, with the sale of the Canadian/foreign equity (previously held by MBMI Resources, Inc.) at that level to DMCI Mining Corporation ("DMCI") in October 2012. Thus, this was a further reason to consider the nationality issue moot.

In a November 27, 2013 Resolution, the Supreme Court ordered the consolidation of SC GR. No. 205513 (the SEC case initiated by Redmont) with this case.

Subsequently, the Operating Companies filed another Manifestation dated April 4, 2014 disclosing that DMCI had also acquired MBMI's interests/equity in the Operating Companies.

In its Decision dated April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court denied the Operating Companies' petition for review on the following grounds:


(1)   the case is not moot and academic;

(2)   the conversion of the Operating Companies' MPSA applications to FTAA
      applications is suspicious, improper and not in accord with the law;

(3)   applying the Grandfather Rule, the Operating Companies are foreign
      corporations disqualified from holding MPSA applications;

(4)   the POA has jurisdiction to determine the nationalities of the
      Operating Companies; and

(5)   the sale/transfer of MBMI's shares to DMCI is immaterial to the
      present case because this is not in issue and is already being tackled
      in the SC GR. No. 202877 (i.e., the FTAA Case).

On April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court resolved to deconsolidate this case and the SEC Case considering that both cases involve different causes of action.

The Operating Companies filed their Motion for Reconsideration on June 5, 2014 seeking the reversal of the Decision. Their grounds for reconsideration are:


(1)   The Decision casts all sorts of aspersions on the Operating Companies
      and accuses them of bad faith/ill motives. However, those aspersions
      and accusations are all legally and factually baseless. They cannot
      overcome the fundamental presumption of good faith in the Operating
      Companies' favor.

      A. The Operating Companies' actions (e.g., the conversion of their
      MPSA applications to an FTAA application) and corporate structures are
      regular, valid, and expressly allowed by law.

      B. The Decision readily but baselessly accuses the Operating Companies
      of bad faith, but is itself unfair to them.

      Moreover, the Decision inexplicably does not even castigate or censure
      Redmont for its blatant, willful, and deliberate forum shopping. The
      Decision erred when it did not dismiss Redmont's cases precisely due
      to its forum shopping.

(2)   The Decision's insistence on the Grandfather Rule is erroneous and
      unjustified.

      A. The Grandfather Rule has no basis or support in the Constitution.
      The Constitution only requires that a corporation engaged in a
      nationalized and/or partially nationalized activity be at least 60%
      Philippine-owned.

      B. The Grandfather Rule has no statutory basis or support. The Foreign
      Investments Act (Republic Act No. 7042, as amended) and the Mining Act
      also only require the corporation engaged in a nationalized and/or
      partially nationalized activity to be at least 60% Philippine-owned.

      C. The 1967 SEC Rule cited in the Assailed Decision expressly states
      that the Grandfather Rule will only apply if the percentage of
      Philippine ownership in the corporation is less than 60% (which was
      not the case here).

      The Decision's insistence on the Grandfather Rule and espousal of
      nebulous, undefined grounds for its application can only lead to
      uncertainty and erosion of investor confidence.

(3)   The Decision erred in stretching the application of Rule 130, Section
      29 of the Rules of Court (the res inter alios acta rule) to joint
      venturers.

(4)   The POA has no jurisdiction over the issue of the Operating Companies'
      nationalities. The Decision erred in ruling otherwise.

2.    MBMI received the Downpayment under the Second Agreement with its
      Philippine Partner

As disclosed in the press release dated March 24, 2014, MBMI has agreed to transfer all of its interest in the DevCos to DMCI. MBMI is pleased to announce that it has received the Downpayment of $750,000.00 from DMCI pursuant to the Agreement signed by MBMI and DMCI for the transfer of the DevCo Shares. (For further information regarding that transaction, please see the Company's press release of March 24, 2014.)


3.    MBMI Philippines sells heavy equipment in Philippines

On May 12, 2014, MBMI's affiliate in the Philippines, MBMI Resources Philippines ("MBMI Philippines"), entered into a Deed of Absolute Sale with Ivy Michelle Trading and Construction for the sale of thirteen (13) units of heavy equipment. The consideration of Nine Million Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (9,200,000.00) for the sale has been received in full by MBMI Philippines.

For further information relating to MBMI or this release, please refer to MBMI's website at www.mbmiresources.com.

Cautionary Statement:

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

The foregoing information may contain forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of MBMI Resources Inc. Forward-looking statements, specifically those concerning future performance, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from MBMI's plans and expectations. These plans, expectations, risks and uncertainties are detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by MBMI with the TSX Venture Exchange and securities regulators. MBMI Resources Inc. does not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
While many government agencies have embraced the idea of employing cloud computing as a tool for increasing the efficiency and flexibility of IT, many still struggle with large scale adoption. The challenge is mainly attributed to the federated structure of these agencies as well as the immaturity of brokerage and governance tools and models. Initiatives like FedRAMP are a great first step toward solving many of these challenges but there are a lot of unknowns that are yet to be tackled. In hi...
With the proliferation of both SQL and NoSQL databases, organizations can now target specific fit-for-purpose database tools for their different application needs regarding scalability, ease of use, ACID support, etc. Platform as a Service offerings make this even easier now, enabling developers to roll out their own database infrastructure in minutes with minimal management overhead. However, this same amount of flexibility also comes with the challenges of picking the right tool, on the right ...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Up until last year, enterprises that were looking into cloud services usually undertook a long-term pilot with one of the large cloud providers, running test and dev workloads in the cloud. With cloud’s transition to mainstream adoption in 2015, and with enterprises migrating more and more workloads into the cloud and in between public and private environments, the single-provider approach must be revisited. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Yoav Mor, multi-cloud solution evangelist at Cloudy...
When you focus on a journey from up-close, you look at your own technical and cultural history and how you changed it for the benefit of the customer. This was our starting point: too many integration issues, 13 SWP days and very long cycles. It was evident that in this fast-paced industry we could no longer afford this reality. We needed something that would take us beyond reducing the development lifecycles, CI and Agile methodologies. We made a fundamental difference, even changed our culture...
The proper isolation of resources is essential for multi-tenant environments. The traditional approach to isolate resources is, however, rather heavyweight. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Igor Drobiazko, co-founder of elastic.io, drew upon his own experience with operating a Docker container-based infrastructure on a large scale and present a lightweight solution for resource isolation using microservices. He also discussed the implementation of microservices in data and application integrat...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...
In his General Session at DevOps Summit, Asaf Yigal, Co-Founder & VP of Product at Logz.io, will explore the value of Kibana 4 for log analysis and will give a real live, hands-on tutorial on how to set up Kibana 4 and get the most out of Apache log files. He will examine three use cases: IT operations, business intelligence, and security and compliance. This is a hands-on session that will require participants to bring their own laptops, and we will provide the rest.
IoT is at the core or many Digital Transformation initiatives with the goal of re-inventing a company's business model. We all agree that collecting relevant IoT data will result in massive amounts of data needing to be stored. However, with the rapid development of IoT devices and ongoing business model transformation, we are not able to predict the volume and growth of IoT data. And with the lack of IoT history, traditional methods of IT and infrastructure planning based on the past do not app...
"LinearHub provides smart video conferencing, which is the Roundee service, and we archive all the video conferences and we also provide the transcript," stated Sunghyuk Kim, CEO of LinearHub, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"We're bringing out a new application monitoring system to the DevOps space. It manages large enterprise applications that are distributed throughout a node in many enterprises and we manage them as one collective," explained Kevin Barnes, President of eCube Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.