|By Bob Gourley||
|June 23, 2014 06:40 AM EDT||
There are two sides to most stories, and Net Neutrality is no exception. While Internet service providers maintain that companies should pay for the current rise of Internet traffic, many Internet advocates, public figures, and American citizens have indicated that they do not want discrimination online that could hinder innovation and drive up costs for digital content. Although comments opposing the FCC’s proposed fast lanes literally crashed the Commission’s website earlier this month and several public figures have spoken out against the fast lanes, it remains difficult to quantify whether most Americans oppose Net Neutrality – or just the most vocal Americans.
Congressional Democrats seem to think the former. In a press release dated May 14th, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont expressed his reservations about fast lanes; “I have heard from hundreds of Vermonters who have expressed concerns about aspects of Mr. Wheeler’s proposed approach to new net neutrality rules and I share their concerns.” Representative Doris Matsui, of California, shared similar convictions in her own press release; “A free and open Internet is essential for consumers, and to encourage innovation and competition in the Internet ecosystem. Our country cannot afford the ‘pay-for-play’ schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets.”
The press pages of both Senator Leahy and Representative Matsui stated on June 17th that both Congressmen intend to introduce legislation that would attempt to ban “paid-prioritization” agreements between ISPs and content providers. “The Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act would help prevent the creation of a two-tiered Internet system, ensuring startups and entrepreneurs have access to a marketplace and ensuring consumers can access all content equally.” The proposed legislation would lend legal clout to Net Neutrality advocates and constitute a considerable win for digital content providers.
In his coverage of the proposed legislation, Brian Fung with The Washington Post reports that the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act would fail to attract support from Congressional Republicans – a roadblock perhaps more substantial than ISP opposition, as Republicans currently control the House of Representatives.
Regardless of the bill’s chances of success, the introduction of the Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act validates a few recent claims made by Open Internet Advocates. First, the bill indicates the willingness of Congressional leaders to wade into the Net Neutrality debate. In turn, that willingness indicates that those leaders feel substantial pressure from their constituents to oppose the FCC’s latest proposal – and presumably little pressure from fast lane supporters. Third, while the issue has recently garnered a great deal of public attention, the introduction of this bill suggests that the issue could be the topic of many upcoming debated – it could be serious issue for the upcoming Presidential election.
Nov. 30, 2015 01:45 PM EST Reads: 426
Nov. 30, 2015 01:45 PM EST Reads: 432
Nov. 30, 2015 01:12 PM EST
Nov. 30, 2015 01:00 PM EST Reads: 536
Nov. 30, 2015 12:45 PM EST Reads: 342
Nov. 30, 2015 12:45 PM EST Reads: 287
Nov. 30, 2015 11:45 AM EST
Nov. 30, 2015 11:00 AM EST Reads: 217
Nov. 30, 2015 10:45 AM EST Reads: 462
Nov. 30, 2015 10:30 AM EST Reads: 353
Nov. 30, 2015 10:00 AM EST Reads: 290
Nov. 30, 2015 09:00 AM EST Reads: 506
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true ...
Nov. 30, 2015 08:00 AM EST Reads: 565
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Nov. 30, 2015 07:00 AM EST Reads: 382
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem"...
Nov. 30, 2015 07:00 AM EST Reads: 468