Welcome!

News Feed Item

Dunav Announces an Increased Mineral Resource for its Tulare Copper-Gold Project

547 million tonnes grading an average of 0.23% copper and 0.22g/t gold for 2.8 billion pounds of copper and 3.8 million ounces of gold

LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC -- (Marketwired) -- 06/23/14 -- Dunav Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE: DNV) (the "Company" or "Dunav") is pleased to announce a mineral resource update for the Kiseljak deposit and a new mineral resource estimate for the Yellow Creek deposit, both part of Dunav's Tulare Copper-Gold Porphyry Project in Southern Serbia.

The combined Kiseljak and Yellow Creek mineral resource estimate, prepared by AMC Consultants Limited (UK) ("AMC"), an independent mining consulting firm, has been estimated at 547 million tonnes grading an average of 0.23% copper ("Cu") and 0.22g/t gold ("Au") in the inferred resource category, for 2.8 billion pounds of copper and 3.8 million ounces of gold, using a 0.15% copper equivalent ("CuEq") cut-off and an open pit mining scenario for Kiseljak and a 0.30% CuEq cut-off and a bulk underground mining scenario for Yellow Creek.

A summary of the Kiseljak and Yellow Creek inferred mineral resource estimate is tabulated below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Kiseljak and Yellow Creek Inferred Mineral Resource
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deposit      Cut-off   Million    Cu        Cu    Au    Au     S  CuEq  AuEq
            (CuEq %)    Tonnes   (%)  (Bn lbs) (g/t) (Moz)   (%)   (%) (g/t)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiseljak        0.15       459  0.22       2.2  0.20   3.0   1.9  0.35  0.55
Yellow Creek    0.30        88  0.30       0.6  0.30   0.8   2.8  0.48  0.77
Total                      547  0.23       2.8  0.22   3.8   2.1  0.37  0.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  The effective date of the mineral resource estimate is March 31, 2014.
2.  The copper price used for copper equivalent and gold equivalent
    calculation approximates the mean of monthly average London Metal
    Exchange copper spot prices for April 2013 to April 2014 and is
    $3.00/lb. The gold price used in the copper equivalent and gold
    equivalent calculation approximates the mean of the monthly average spot
    gold prices for April 2013 to April 2014 and is US$1,300/oz.
3.  Taking into consideration currently available information, possible
    projected throughput rates for the Tulare Copper-Gold Porphyry Project,
    typical mining costs, and a range of processing costs and indicative
    ranges of processing recoveries, Dunav considers that cut-off grades lie
    in the range of 0.15% CuEq (for an open pit mining scenario) to 0.30%
    CuEq (for a bulk underground mining scenario).
4.  The copper and gold equivalent cut-offs used by Dunav are based on the
    Cu and Au grades, using the following formulas:
    --  Using a gold price of US$41.80/gramme and a copper price of
        US$66.00/per cent
    --  Cu_eq = ((Au(i)41.80)+(Cu(i)66.00))/66.00
    --  Au_eq = ((Au(i)41.80)+(Cu(i)66.00))/41.80
5.  The resources summarized above for Kiseljak are constrained within a pit
    shell returning maximum undiscounted value based on the following
    assumptions: NSR Cu price of US$3.15/lb (US$3.80/lb spot price less 17%
    for offsite concentrate costs), NSR Au price of US$1305/oz (US$1450/oz
    less 10% for offsite concentrate costs), 75% Au recovery, 90% Cu
    recovery, US$1.80/tonne mining costs, US$7.00/ tonne processing and
    other costs and 45 degree pit slopes. Only transitional and primary
    copper-gold mineralization is considered in the pit shell determination.
6.  The resources summarized above for Yellow Creek are based on the
    following assumptions: NSR Cu price of US$3.15/lb (US$3.80/lb spot price
    less 17% for offsite concentrate costs), NSR Au price of US$1305/oz
    (US$1450/oz less 10% for offsite concentrate costs), 75% Au recovery,
    90% Cu recovery, US$8.10/tonne mining costs (bulk underground mining),
    US$7.00/ tonne processing and other costs.
7.  Mineral resources, which are not mineral reserves, do not have
    demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may
    be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
    taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues.
8.  The quantity and grade of reported inferred resources in this estimation
    are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to
    define these inferred resources as indicated or measured mineral
    resources.
9.  Totals and average grades are subject to rounding to the appropriate
    precision.

Kiseljak

The Kiseljak updated inferred mineral resource has been estimated at 459 million tonnes grading an average of 0.22% copper and 0.20g/t gold for 2.2 billion pounds of copper and 3.0 million ounces of gold, using a 0.15% CuEq cut-off. The key change between the initial mineral resource estimate for the Kiseljak deposit (news release of November 26, 2012) and the current mineral resource is that the updated resource estimate is constrained within a pit shell.

A summary of the updated Kiseljak inferred mineral resource estimate using a range of CuEq cut-offs is tabulated below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off    Million      Cu        Cu      Au      Au       S    CuEq    AuEq
(CuEq %)    Tonnes     (%)  (Bn lbs)   (g/t)   (Moz)     (%)     (%)   (g/t)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.15           459    0.22       2.2    0.20     3.0     1.9    0.35    0.55
0.20           380    0.24       2.0    0.23     2.8     1.8    0.38    0.60
0.25           302    0.26       1.7    0.25     2.4     1.7    0.42    0.66
0.30           239    0.29       1.5    0.27     2.1     1.7    0.46    0.73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

See notes above

Yellow Creek

The Yellow Creek inferred mineral resource has been estimated at 88 million tonnes grading an average of 0.30% copper and 0.30g/t gold for 0.6 billion pounds of copper and 0.8 million ounces of gold, using a 0.30% CuEq cut-off. At a 0.30% CuEq cut off, Yellow Creek has a sub-vertical pipe-like morphology, which would be potentially suitable for an underground 'bulk' mining approach.

A summary of the Yellow Creek inferred mineral resource estimate using various cut-offs is tabulated below:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cut-off    Million      Cu        Cu      Au      Au       S    CuEq    AuEq
(CuEq %)    Tonnes     (%)  (Bn lbs)   (g/t)   (Moz)     (%)     (%)   (g/t)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25           102    0.28       0.6    0.28     0.9     2.8    0.46    0.72
0.30            88    0.30       0.6    0.30     0.8     2.8    0.48    0.77
0.35            71    0.32       0.5    0.32     0.7     3.0    0.52    0.83
0.40            54    0.35       0.4    0.35     0.6     3.0    0.57    0.90
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

See notes above

1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Tulare Copper-Gold Porphyry Project comprises several porphyry copper-gold targets including Kiseljak, Yellow Creek and Calovica vis South, and also includes the Bakrenjaca carbonate base metal epithermal vein system. All target areas are located within 3 km of the Kiseljak deposit. Dunav controls 100% of this recently identified porphyry cluster, located within the Lece Volcanic Complex.

Data Acquisition


--  The Kiseljak and Yellow Creek resource estimates are based on 131 drill
    holes, as at January 3, 2014. Details of the drilling and sampling
    program, at the time of the database handover, are summarised in the
    table below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item               Kiseljak Yellow Creek Yellow Creek Yellow Creek
                         DD           DD           DT           RC     Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOLES                    80           39            3            9       131
METERS DRILLED     32,844.2     19,474.1        505.8        1,326    54,150
SAMPLES              32,614       19,472          503        1,314    53,903
AVERAGE
RECOVERY                94%          96%          95%            -       95%
ASSAYS (Cu)          32,614       19,472          503        1,314    53,903
ASSAYS (Au)          32,614       19,472          503        1,314    53,903
ASSAYS (S)           32,614       19,472          503        1,314    53,903
BULK DENSITIES        4,664        3,180           65            -     7,909
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

--  Figure 1 displays the drilling carried out to date at Kiseljak and
    Yellow Creek. Figure 2 shows a typical cross section through the
    Kiseljak and Yellow Creek deposits.
--  Diamond drilling has been carried out such that drill holes are always
    started using PQ core and then reduced to HQ triple tube (HQ3) once
    competent rock has been intersected. The diamond drill core size is kept
    as HQ or HQ3 for as long as possible. Drill core is carefully packed for
    transport to the sample processing facility in Tulare. Once the diamond
    core has been processed (including photography, geotechnical and
    geological logging, magnetic susceptibility measurement, etc.) samples
    are then transported to SGS Bor for sample preparation and analysis.
--  The average core recovery is 95%.
--  All drill hole collars were surveyed by differential GPS (DGPS) by staff
    surveyors (registered independent surveyors regularly audit Dunav's
    survey control and procedures).
--  The diamond drill holes were down-hole surveyed, on average, every 30
    meters using electronic survey equipment.
--  Kiseljak has been drilled on a nominal 80 meter by 80 meter grid spacing
    while the average drill spacing at Yellow Creek is approximately 120
    meters by 120 meters.
--  Diamond core sampling has been carried out using Dunav's detailed
    protocols throughout the entire drilling program. A small amount of
    reverse circulation drilling at Yellow Creek has also been utilized, in
    order to drill through barren volcanic cover rocks prior to completing
    the drill holes with diamond drilling.
--  Density measurements are routinely taken every three meters down hole
    from diamond drill core. The bulk density of the drill core segments
    have been measured at the SGS managed laboratory at Bor using the
    industry standard wax-seal immersion method. Some 4,664 density
    measurements have been taken at Kiseljak along with 3,245 measurements
    at Yellow Creek for a total of 7,909 bulk density values. The density
    data has been used for variographic analysis and ordinary kriging
    estimation in order to estimate the tonnage factors in the block model.

Assaying


--  All drilling at Kiseljak and Yellow Creek has been routinely assayed for
    copper (Cu), gold (Au), silver (Ag), molybdenum (Mo) and sulphur (S).
    The primary assay laboratory is the SGS-managed facility in Bor. Referee
    assaying has been carried out at Genalysis in Australia, ALS in
    Vancouver, ALS Gura Rosiei in Romania, and ALS Izmir in Turkey. Some
    32,614 one meter samples were used to define the Kiseljak model while
    21,289 samples comprised the Yellow Creek modelling data set. Routine
    quality control sampling and analysis has been completed, as part of
    Dunav's standard QAQC procedures.

Resource Estimation


--  One-meter composites were used to define lithological boundaries,
    geological boundaries and the mineralized zone outlines. Five-meter
    down-hole composites were used for statistical analysis, variography and
    grade estimation. Some 6,537 composites for Kiseljak and 4,363
    composites at Yellow Creek were produced. Detailed interpretation of the
    geological and grade data has resulted in the modelling of 5 main zones
    of copper-gold mineralization at Kiseljak and 3 zones at Yellow Creek.
--  Comprehensive variography has been carried out for the Cu, Au, S and
    bulk density data grade for use in the ordinary kriging estimations.
    Where possible, separate variogram models have been constructed for each
    defined mineralized zone, subdivided by oxidation state; completely
    oxidized (COX), partially oxidized (POX) and unoxidized (FRS).
--  Block models have been prepared using a 20 m cubic parent block size
    with sub-blocking to 10 m and 5 m.
--  Grade estimation has been completed using ordinary kriging. In some
    domains bulk density has been estimated using ordinary kriging, while in
    others by inverse distance squared weighting. No grade capping was
    applied.

Grade-Tonnage Reporting


--  The Kiseljak mineral resource was estimated using the Canadian Institute
    of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Standards on Mineral Resources
    and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing
    Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council. The
    resource estimate is within the defined mineralized wireframes,
    constrained by a pit shell and is reported at a range of lower cut-off
    grades.
--  Dunav believes that possible cut off grades lie in the range of the base
    case of 0.15% CuEq (for an open pit mining scenario) to 0.30% CuEq (for
    a bulk underground mining scenario), based on possible metal prices,
    mill throughputs (7mtpa to 12mtpa), mining, processing and general
    administration costs, metal recoveries (90% for Cu and 75% for Au), mass
    pull factors, concentrate grades, moisture content, offsite concentrate
    costs, payability deductions, treatment and refining charges.

--  The Kiseljak and Yellow Creek resources have been categorized as
    inferred resources using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and
    Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (November 2010).

Please see the following link to view all Kiseljak and Yellow Creek drill holes located spatially in three dimensions: http://www.corebox.net/properties/tulare-porphyry-project

2. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Diamond drill core has been prepared at the laboratory facility at Bor and assayed at the SGS managed laboratory at Bor. Diamond drill samples have been assayed for gold by 50 gram fire assay with an AAS finish whilst copper, silver and molybdenum have been analysed using an aqua regia digest with an AAS finish. A one metre sampling interval has been used where possible for the Tulare Porphyry Project diamond drilling program; all diamond core is routinely sampled and sent for assay. Half core is routinely submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Reverse circulation drill samples have been prepared at the laboratory facility at Bor and assayed at the laboratory at Bor. A one meter sampling interval has been used for the Tulare Porphyry Project reverse circulation drilling program. Following Dunav standard quality assurance procedures, a full suite of field and laboratory duplicates and replicates along with internationally accredited standards and blanks, have been submitted with each batch of samples.

3. QUALIFIED PERSONS

The Kiseljak and Yellow Creek resource estimates were undertaken under the supervision of independent qualified person Chris Arnold MAusIMM CP(Geo) of AMC. Mr. Arnold has reviewed and approved the contents of this press release insofar as the Kiseljak and Yellow Creek mineral resource estimates are concerned. The other technical information contained in this press release was prepared and approved by Dr Julian F. H. Barnes, FAusIMM, MAIG, a special consultant to the Company. Dr. Barnes is a 'qualified person' within the meaning of that term under National Instrument 43-101.

AMC is completing a National Instrument 43-101 technical report for the mineral resource estimate to be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this press release.

About Dunav Resources Ltd.: Dunav Resources is a mineral exploration company focussed on the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Serbia. Additional information about the Company is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and at www.dunavresources.com.

Dunav had approximately $7.1 million in its treasury at March 31, 2014, which it plans to use for the exploration and development of its mineral projects in Serbia. Dunav's issued and outstanding share capital totals 175,319,442 common shares, of which approximately 45.5% is held by Dundee Precious Metals Inc.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

Cautionary Statement

This press release contains 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward looking information in this news release includes information with respect to the mineral resource estimate and its potential expansion and upgrade to a higher level of confidence, the timing, location, and results of future work programs, and the geological and economic potential of the Tulare Project, including the possibility of developing an underground operation there.

Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource reported in this news release will ever be upgraded to a higher category or to reserves.

Although the Company believes in light of the experience of its officers and directors, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors it considers to be relevant that the expectations reflected in this forward-looking information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and depends on assumptions and other factors, all of which may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated or estimated in such forward-looking information. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligations to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.

Figure 1 is available at the following address: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/953627a_Fig1.pdf.

Figure 2 is available at the following address: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/953627a_Fig2.pdf.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
Join us at Cloud Expo June 6-8 to find out how to securely connect your cloud app to any cloud or on-premises data source – without complex firewall changes. More users are demanding access to on-premises data from their cloud applications. It’s no longer a “nice-to-have” but an important differentiator that drives competitive advantages. It’s the new “must have” in the hybrid era. Users want capabilities that give them a unified view of the data to get closer to customers and grow business. The...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...