Welcome!

News Feed Item

U.S. Median Home Prices Increase 13 Percent in May as Higher-End Sales Account for Bigger Share of Market

Distressed Sales and Short Sales Down to 14.3 Percent of U.S Residential Sales; New Analysis Pinpoints Biggest Distressed Property Discounts Based on Foreclosure Status, Equity, Occupancy Status, Year Built Range and State

IRVINE, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 06/24/14 -- RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the nation's leading source for comprehensive housing data, today released its May 2014 Residential & Foreclosure Sales Report, which shows that U.S. residential properties, including single family homes, condominiums and townhomes, sold at an estimated annual pace of 5,147,550 in May, virtually unchanged from April and an increase of less than 1 percent from May 2013.

The median sales price of U.S. residential properties -- including both distressed and non-distressed sales -- was $180,000, up 6 percent from the previous month and up 13 percent from a year ago. The year-over-year increase in May was the second consecutive month with a double-digit annual increase in U.S. home prices, and the biggest annual increase since U.S. home prices bottomed out in March 2012.

The median price of distressed sales -- properties in the foreclosure process or bank-owned -- was $120,000, 37 percent below the median price of non-distressed properties: $190,000. Distressed sales and short sales combined accounted for 14.3 percent of all U.S. residential sales in May, down from 15.6 percent of sales in April and down from 15.9 percent of all sales in May 2013.

"Distressed sales continue to represent a smaller share of the overall sales pie nationwide, helping to boost median home prices higher given that distressed sales tend to be in lower price ranges," said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. "When broken down by average price range, U.S. sales are clearly shifting away from the lower end. Properties selling below $200,000 represented 50 percent of all sales in May, but that was down from a 55 percent share a year ago. Meanwhile, the share of homes selling above $200,000 increased from a 45 percent a year ago to a 50 percent in May 2014."

Home sales in higher price ranges represent growing share of market
Sales prices in every price range above $200,000 analyzed in the report increased as a share of total sales, both from the previous month and from a year ago, with the increase generally higher in the higher price ranges (see table below).

The share of home sales in the $200,000 to $300,000 price range increased 2 percent from the previous month and were up 6 percent from a year ago, but the share of home sales in all price ranges above $750,000 was up more than 20 percent from a year ago.

Meanwhile the share of home sales decreased from a year ago in all price ranges below $200,000, with bigger decreases corresponding to lower price ranges. The share of homes priced between $100,000 and $200,000 decreased 5 percent from a year ago, while the share of homes between $50,000 and $100,000 decreased 13 percent and the share of homes priced below $50,000 -- often highly distressed homes -- decreased 22 percent.

Home sales in the $100,000 to $200,000 price range accounted for one-third of all home sales in May -- the largest percentage of any price range -- but homes priced between $200,000 and $400,000 were close, accounting for nearly 32 percent of all sales for the month. Sales of homes priced in the $200,000 to $400,000 range were at their highest percentage of U.S. home sales since September 2008 -- a 68-month high.

Markets with highest annual home price appreciation
States with the biggest increases in median prices in May compared to a year ago were New York (up 28 percent), Ohio (up 19 percent), Michigan (up 18 percent), Illinois (up 17 percent), and Georgia (up 16 percent).

Some markets in these states and others are continuing to see home price appreciation accelerate compared to last year:

  • Cleveland: median home prices up 18 percent from year ago compared to 1 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Second consecutive month with double-digit increase in home prices.

  • Dayton, Ohio: median home prices up 18 percent from year ago compared to 1 percent annual home price decrease in May 2013. Fourth consecutive month with double-digit increase in home prices.

  • Akron, Ohio: median home prices up 16 percent from year ago compared to 4 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Third consecutive month with double-digit increase in home prices.

  • Columbus, Ohio: median home prices up 13 percent from year ago compared to 3 percent annual home price decrease in May 2013. Fourth consecutive month with double-digit increase in home prices.

  • Austin, Texas: median prices up 11 percent from year ago compared to 7 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Eight out of last nine months with double-digit increase in home prices.

  • Augusta, Ga.: median home prices up 11 percent from year ago compared to 4 percent annual home price decrease in May 2013.

"Housing demand across Ohio is currently outpacing supply in many metro areas. As demand remains healthy, we are seeing home prices rise in many areas year over year, creating a return of equity and enabling homeowners to now consider placing their homes on the market to take advantage of low interest rates," said Michael Mahon, executive vice president/broker at HER Realtors, covering the Columbus, Cincinnati and Dayton, Ohio markets.

"While demand is high, concern still remains regarding the lack of available inventory particularly within the first time homebuyer segment of the market," Mahon continued. "Home sellers should consider now an optimal time to review their financial and housing goals with a real estate agent, and consider taking advantage of the higher prices they could potentially receive on selling their home in today's market."

Cooling markets for home price appreciation
Although home price appreciation accelerated on a national basis in May, it continued to cool in some markets with torrid increases in 2013:

  • Phoenix: median home prices up 6 percent from year ago compared to 28 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Smallest annual increase in home prices since February 2012.

  • Las Vegas: median home prices up 15 percent from year ago compared to 24 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Smallest annual increase in home prices since August 2012.

  • Los Angeles: median home prices up 11 percent from year ago compared to 27 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Smallest increase since November 2012.

  • Denver: median home prices up 7 percent from year ago compared to 14 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013. Smallest increase since April 2012.

  • Tampa: median home prices up 5 percent from year ago compared to 23 percent annual home price appreciation in May 2013.

"Inventory remains historically low, which is keeping home prices steady," said Wesley Hardin with RE/MAX Alliance, covering the Denver, Colo. market. "We are starting to see more transactions terminated than ever before because sellers want to make sure they are getting the best deal on their property."

Sales volume decreases annually in 23 states, 31 of 50 largest metro areas
The 1 percent increase in U.S. annualized sales in May from a year ago was the smallest increase in any month so far this year, and the 0.19 increase from the previous month marked the eighth consecutive month with flat or declining home sales on a month-over-month basis.

Annualized sales volume in May decreased from a year ago in 23 states and the District of Columbia, along 31 of the nation's 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas.

States with decreasing sales volume from a year ago included California (down 15 percent), Arizona (down 10 percent), Nevada (down 7 percent), Michigan (down 3 percent), and Florida (down 3 percent).

Major metro areas with decreasing sales volume from a year ago included Boston (down 23 percent), Fresno, Calif., (down 22 percent), Orlando (down 18 percent), Los Angeles (down 16 percent), and Phoenix (down 13 percent).

"Sales continue to be down year over year, but inventory levels are beginning to climb giving prospective homeowners more choices to buy within the Southern California market," said Chris Pollinger, senior vice president of sales at First Team Real Estate, covering the Southern California market.

Highest share of distressed sales in Las Vegas, Lakeland and Modesto
Short sales and distressed sales -- in foreclosure or bank-owned -- accounted for 14.3 percent of all sales in May, down from 15.6 percent in April and down from 15.9 percent of all sales in May 2013.

Metro areas with the highest share of combined short sales and distressed sales were Las Vegas (36.6 percent), Lakeland, Fla., (33.3 percent), Modesto, Calif., (31.9 percent), Jacksonville, Fla., (31.7 percent), and Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario in Southern California (29.3 percent).

Short sales nationwide accounted for 4.5 percent of all sales in May, down from 5.4 percent in April and down from 5.8 percent in May 2013. Metros with the five highest percentages of short sales in May were all in Florida: Lakeland (17.7 percent), Orlando (14.9 percent), Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater (13.4 percent), Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville (12.9 percent), and Sarasota (11.6 percent).

Sales of bank-owned (REO) properties nationwide accounted for 8.6 percent of all sales in May, down from 9.1 percent of all sales in April and down from 9.3 percent of all sales in May 2013. Metros with the highest percentage of REO sales in May were Modesto, Calif., (26.7 percent), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (23.3 percent), Las Vegas (23.1 percent), Stockton, Calif., (21.5 percent), and Bakersfield, Calif. (19.7 percent).

Sales at the public foreclosure auction accounted for 1.2 percent of all sales nationwide in May, up from 1.1 percent of all sales in April and up from 0.8 percent of all sales in May 2013. Metros with the highest percentage of foreclosure auction sales in May included Orlando (3.8 percent), Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater (3.8 percent), Miami (3.7 percent), Indianapolis (3.5 percent), and Lakeland, Fla., (3.4 percent).

Biggest distressed discounts on scheduled auctions, vacant with negative equity
As a supplement to the May U.S. Residential & Foreclosure Sales Report, RealtyTrac analyzed residential property sales transactions in the 12 months ending in March 2014 to pinpoint which types of distressed properties are selling at the biggest discounts based on foreclosure status, occupancy status, equity and year built range.

The analysis looked at 24 different distressed property profiles based on these four factors, comparing the sales price to the estimated full market value for each sale. The final discount was calculated by comparing the average discount (below market value) or premium (above market value) for each property profile to the control of properties not in foreclosure that sold during the same time period.

Based on this analysis, distressed properties with the biggest discount were those scheduled for public foreclosure auction that were vacant, had negative equity and were built between 1950 and 1990. Properties in this category sold for an average discount that was 28 percent below the control group of non-distressed sales.

Other distressed property profiles with discounts among the top five nationwide were the following:

  • Properties in default with positive equity (26 percent discount)
  • Properties in default with negative equity, vacant and built in 1950 or before (26 percent discount)
  • Properties scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant (25 percent discount)
  • Properties scheduled for foreclosure auction and vacant (25 percent).

Distressed properties selling at a premium
The analysis found that not all distressed properties sold at a big discount, and in some cases even sold at a premium above non-distressed properties. Bank-owned properties overall sold at a 3 percent premium, while bank-owned properties built in 1950 or before sold at a 7 percent premium.

Some sub-categories of bank-owned homes sold at a discount. Bank-owned properties that were confirmed vacant -- without the former homeowner or tenant still living there -- sold at an 18 percent discount below the non-distressed control, and bank-owned properties that sold after 1990 and between 1950 and 1990 also sold at slight discounts.

Properties with negative equity that were not in foreclosure or bank owned sold at a substantial premium of 19 percent above the control of all properties with no foreclosure status.

Best distressed discounts vary by state
The analysis also found the property profiles with the biggest discounts -- and the discounts available -- varied significantly by state. Below are the distressed property profiles with the biggest available discounts for select states.

  • California: scheduled for foreclosure auction with positive equity (17 percent discount)
  • Florida: scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and built between 1950 and 1990 (29 percent discount)
  • Ohio: in default, negative equity, vacant and built between 1950 and 1990 (34 percent discount)
  • Michigan: in default and vacant (34 percent discount)
  • New York: scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant (38 percent discount)

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Residential & Foreclosure Sales Report provides counts and median prices for sales of residential properties nationwide, by state and metropolitan statistical areas with a population of 500,000 or more. Data is also available at the county level upon request. The report also provides a breakdown of short sales, bank-owned sales and foreclosure auction sales to third parties. The data is derived from recorded sales deeds and loan data, which is used to determine cash sales and short sales. Sales counts for recent months are projected based on seasonality and expected number of sales records for those months that are not yet available from public record sources but will be in the future given historical patterns. Statistics for previous months are revised when each new monthly report is issued as more deed data becomes available for those previous months.

Definitions
Residential property sales: sales of single family homes, condominiums/townhomes, and co-ops, not including multi-family properties.

Annualized sales: an annualized estimate of the number of residential property sales based on the actual number of sales deeds received for the month, accounting for expected sales records for that month that will be received in future months as well as seasonality.

Distressed sales: sale of a residential property that is actively in the foreclosure process or bank-owned when the sale is recorded.

Distressed discount: percentage difference between the median price of distressed sales and a non-distressed sales in a given geographic area.

Bank-Owned sales: sales of residential properties that have been foreclosed on and are owned by the foreclosing lender (bank).

Short sales: sales of residential properties where the sale price is below the combined total of outstanding mortgages secured by the property.

Foreclosure Auction sales: sale of a property at the public foreclosure auction to a third party buyer that is not the foreclosing lender.

Report License
The RealtyTrac U.S. Residential & Foreclosure Sales report is the result of a proprietary evaluation of information compiled by RealtyTrac; the report and any of the information in whole or in part can only be quoted, copied, published, re-published, distributed and/or re-distributed or used in any manner if the user specifically references RealtyTrac as the source for said report and/or any of the information set forth within the report.

Data Licensing and Custom Report Order
Investors, businesses and government institutions can contact RealtyTrac to license bulk foreclosure and neighborhood data or purchase customized reports. For more information contact our Data Licensing Department at 800.462.5193 or [email protected].

About RealtyTrac
RealtyTrac is a leading supplier of U.S. real estate data, with nationwide parcel-level records for more than 125 million U.S. parcels that include property characteristics, tax assessor data, sales and mortgage deed records, Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) and 20 million active and historical default, foreclosure auction and bank-owned properties. RealtyTrac's housing data and foreclosure reports are relied on by many federal government agencies, numerous state housing and banking departments, investment funds as well as millions of real estate professionals and consumers, to help evaluate housing trends and make informed decisions about real estate.

Image Available: http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/frame_mw?attachid=2624297

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Automation is enabling enterprises to design, deploy, and manage more complex, hybrid cloud environments. Yet the people who manage these environments must be trained in and understanding these environments better than ever before. A new era of analytics and cognitive computing is adding intelligence, but also more complexity, to these cloud environments. How smart is your cloud? How smart should it be? In this power panel at 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, paneli...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), provided an overview of various initiatives to certify the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldwide re...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend 21st Cloud Expo October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, CA, and June 12-14, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...