Welcome!

News Feed Item

Inscape Announces Fourth Quarter and Annual Results

HOLLAND LANDING, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 06/26/14 -- Inscape (TSX:INQ) today announced its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2014 annual financial results ended April 30, 2014.

Fiscal year 2014 was a challenging year for the Company. The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 had a net loss of $1.5 million or 10 cents per share. The same quarter of last year had a net loss of $1.4 million or 10 cents per share. On an annual basis, the fiscal year ended with a net loss of $7.1 million or 49 cents per share, compared to a net loss of $1.3 million or 9 cents per share in fiscal year 2013. The current year's loss included $2.8 million decrease in the fair value of outstanding hedge contracts as the U.S. spot exchange rate at the end of the year was higher than the average strike price of the hedges. Fiscal year 2014's operating loss before taxes was $6.1 million, compared with an operating loss of $1.6 million a year ago due to an 11.7% decline in sales.

The sales decline from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2014 was the key driver of the Company's losses and is attributable to several factors: disruption to distribution channels partially caused by the bankruptcy of a major dealer; stagnation in US Government budget approvals; delayed key product launches, as well as significant concentration of resources on the launch of new products for fiscal 2015.

Although resolving these issues will take some time, management is cautiously optimistic about the plans in place to address them. A reinvigorated sales force focusing on key markets across North America, improved brand messaging and training programs, and a back-to-basics approach to communicating our brand to dealers demonstrate management's focus on distribution channels. The US Government has approved budgets for office spaces this year. A focus on sales efforts has begun paying off with an increase in opportunities, and the new product introductions which received five Best of NeoCon Awards (4 Gold and 1 Silver) in the June 2014 trade show. Inscape won the most awards of any manufacturers at NeoCon this year.

"We have a strong financial position and our foundation remains strong," said Jim Stelter, CEO. "Our outlook continues to improve as we actively engage our markets, intensify our marketing efforts, and make more people aware of how we can provide great solutions for them."

Sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 at $15.2 million were 5.4% lower than the $16 million for same quarter of the previous year. The annual sales of $66.2 million fell 11.7% from last year's sales of $74.9 million. The drop in the year-over-year sales was mainly caused by a decline in the volume of the office furniture projects by 13.1%, while the moveable wall segment had a 3.9% decrease from last year.

The fourth quarter's gross profit as a percentage of sales was 21.1%, a decrease of 1.4 percentage points from the 22.5% of the same quarter a year ago. The decrease in gross profit percentage was mainly caused by lower realized selling prices, partially offset by lower overheads and better margin on services. The annual gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased 4.2 percentage points from last year's 26.5% to the current year's 22.3%. The reduced gross margin percentage was attributable to lower realized selling prices and decrease in volume, partially offset by lower overheads and variable production costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") in the fourth quarter were 35.7% of sales, compared to 33.6% in the same quarter of last year. In terms of dollar amounts, SG&A expense during the current quarter was comparable to the same quarter of last year. SG&A for the year was 31.6% of sales versus 28.6% of last year. The dollar spent was $0.5 million lower than last year. The lower SG&A was attributable to $0.2 million variable selling expenses due to reduced sales volume, $0.3 million lower provision for doubtful accounts accrued in last year relating to the bankruptcy of a dealer, $0.4 million overheads. The lower SG&A was partially offset by a $0.3 write off of a product licence fee during the year.

During the fourth quarter, the Company booked a valuation allowance relating to deferred tax assets accrued during the first three quarters of fiscal 2014. Due to the continued losses in the fourth quarter and the effects of lower accounting income in the previous two years, management deemed it appropriate to charge a valuation allowance for these assets. This adjustment is a non-cash charge to the results and the Company has 20 years in which the assets can be realized against future income, at which point the valuation allowance can be reversed.

At the end of the fiscal year 2014, the company was debt-free with cash and cash equivalents totaling $18.9 million.


                           Inscape Corporation                              
                Summary of Consolidated Financial Results                   
         (Unaudited) (in thousands of Canadian dollars except EPS)          
                                                                            
                                                   Three Months             
                                                  Ended April 30,           
                                                     2014      2013   Change
------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
                                                                            
Sales                                           $ 15,171  $ 16,038     -5.4%
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Gross profit                                       3,203     3,614    -11.4%
Selling, general & administrative expenses         5,423     5,390      0.6%
Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign exchange           151       (93)         
(Increase) Decrease in fair value of                                        
 derivatives                                      (1,777)      499          
Investment income                                    (88)     (100)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Loss before taxes                                   (506)   (2,082)         
Income taxes                                         945      (642)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Net loss                                        $ (1,451) $ (1,440)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
                                                                            
Basic earnings per share                        $  (0.10) $  (0.10)         
                                                                            
Weighted average number of shares (in                                       
 thousands)                                                                 
for basic EPS calculation                         14,373    14,373          
for diluted EPS calculation                       14,380    14,383          
                                                                            
                                                   Twelve Months            
                                                 Ended April 30,            
                                                    2014      2013    Change
------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
                                                                            
Sales                                           $ 66,155  $ 74,900    -11.7%
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Gross profit                                      14,742    19,852    -25.7%
Selling, general & administrative expenses        20,890    21,413     -2.4%
Unrealized gain on foreign exchange                 (389)      (95)         
Decrease in fair value of derivatives              2,825       989          
Investment income                                   (374)     (394)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Loss before taxes                                 (8,210)   (2,061)         
Income taxes                                      (1,118)     (805)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
Net loss                                        $ (7,092) $ (1,256)         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
-------------------------------------------------------------------         
                                                                            
Basic and diluted earnings per share            $  (0.49) $  (0.09)         
                                                                            
Weighted average number of shares (in                                       
 thousands)                                                                 
for basic EPS calculation                         14,373    14,375          
for diluted EPS calculation                       14,380    14,452          

Financial Statements

http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/F2014_Qt4.pdf

Fourth Quarter Call Details

Inscape will host a conference call at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, June 27, 2014 to discuss the company's quarterly and annual results. To participate, please call 1-800-381-7839. A replay of the conference call will also be available from June 27, 2014 after 10:30 a.m. until midnight on July 4, 2014. To access the rebroadcast, please dial 1-800-558-5253 (Reservation Number 21718745).

Forward-looking Statements

Certain of the above statements are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially as a result of many factors including, but not limited to, further changes in market conditions and changes or delays in anticipated product demand. In addition, future results may also differ materially as a result of many factors, including: fluctuations in the company's operating results due to product demand arising from competitive and general economic and business conditions in North America; length of sales cycles; significant fluctuations in international exchange rates, particularly the U.S. dollar exchange rate; restrictions in access to the U.S. market; changes in the company's markets, including technology changes and competitive new product introductions; pricing pressures; dependence on key personnel; and other factors set forth in the company's Ontario Securities Commission reports and filings.

ABOUT INSCAPE

Inscape makes smart workspaces. For over a century, we have collaborated with our clients to provide customized solutions based on their individual needs. Our meticulously engineered system, storage and wall products provide unparalleled flexibility to create unique applications at a lower cost of ownership. Easy reconfiguration and seamless integration with other products means our smart applications will work today and tomorrow. And they look fabulous.

For more information, visit www.inscapesolutions.com.

Contacts:
Inscape Corporation
Matthew Posno
Chief Financial Officer
905 836 7676
905 836 5037 (FAX)
www.inscapesolutions.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
“delaPlex Software provides software outsourcing services. We have a hybrid model where we have onshore developers and project managers that we can place anywhere in the U.S. or in Europe,” explained Manish Sachdeva, CEO at delaPlex Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Keeping pace with advancements in software delivery processes and tooling is taxing even for the most proficient organizations. Point tools, platforms, open source and the increasing adoption of private and public cloud services requires strong engineering rigor – all in the face of developer demands to use the tools of choice. As Agile has settled in as a mainstream practice, now DevOps has emerged as the next wave to improve software delivery speed and output. To make DevOps work, organization...
Let’s face it, embracing new storage technologies, capabilities and upgrading to new hardware often adds complexity and increases costs. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Seth Oxenhorn, Vice President of Business Development & Alliances at FalconStor, discussed how a truly heterogeneous software-defined storage approach can add value to legacy platforms and heterogeneous environments. The result reduces complexity, significantly lowers cost, and provides IT organizations with improved efficienc...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Isomorphic Software will exhibit at DevOps Summit at 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Isomorphic Software provides the SmartClient HTML5/AJAX platform, the most advanced technology for building rich, cutting-edge enterprise web applications for desktop and mobile. SmartClient combines the productivity and performance of traditional desktop software with the simp...
"We've discovered that after shows 80% if leads that people get, 80% of the conversations end up on the show floor, meaning people forget about it, people forget who they talk to, people forget that there are actual business opportunities to be had here so we try to help out and keep the conversations going," explained Jeff Mesnik, Founder and President of ContentMX, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
"When you think about the data center today, there's constant evolution, The evolution of the data center and the needs of the consumer of technology change, and they change constantly," stated Matt Kalmenson, VP of Sales, Service and Cloud Providers at Veeam Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 19th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo Silicon Valley Call for Papers is now open.
The IoT is changing the way enterprises conduct business. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how businesses can gain an edge over competitors by empowering consumers to take control through IoT. He cited examples such as a Washington, D.C.-based sports club that leveraged IoT and the cloud to develop a comprehensive booking system. He also highlighted how IoT can revitalize and restore outdated business models, making them profitable ...
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Yoseph Reuveni, Director of Software Engineering at Jet.com, will discuss Jet.com's journey into containerizing Microsoft-based technologies like C# and F# into Docker. He will talk about lessons learned and challenges faced, the Mono framework tryout and how they deployed everything into Azure cloud. Yoseph Reuveni is a technology leader with unique experience developing and running high throughput (over 1M tps) distributed systems with extre...
To leverage Continuous Delivery, enterprises must consider impacts that span functional silos, as well as applications that touch older, slower moving components. Managing the many dependencies can cause slowdowns. See how to achieve continuous delivery in the enterprise.
"delaPlex is a software development company. We do team-based outsourcing development," explained Mark Rivers, COO and Co-founder of delaPlex Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
We all know the latest numbers: Gartner, Inc. forecasts that 6.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2016, up 30 percent from last year, and will reach 20.8 billion by 2020. We're rapidly approaching a data production of 40 zettabytes a day – more than we can every physically store, and exabytes and yottabytes are just around the corner. For many that’s a good sign, as data has been proven to equal money – IF it’s ingested, integrated, and analyzed fast enough. Without real-ti...
"There's a growing demand from users for things to be faster. When you think about all the transactions or interactions users will have with your product and everything that is between those transactions and interactions - what drives us at Catchpoint Systems is the idea to measure that and to analyze it," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York Ci...
I wanted to gather all of my Internet of Things (IOT) blogs into a single blog (that I could later use with my University of San Francisco (USF) Big Data “MBA” course). However as I started to pull these blogs together, I realized that my IOT discussion lacked a vision; it lacked an end point towards which an organization could drive their IOT envisioning, proof of value, app dev, data engineering and data science efforts. And I think that the IOT end point is really quite simple…
As companies gain momentum, the need to maintain high quality products can outstrip their development team’s bandwidth for QA. Building out a large QA team (whether in-house or outsourced) can slow down development and significantly increases costs. This eBook takes QA profiles from 5 companies who successfully scaled up production without building a large QA team and includes: What to consider when choosing CI/CD tools How culture and communication can make or break implementation