Welcome!

News Feed Item

New RealtyTrac Analysis Profiles Single Family Homes That Sell at the Deepest Discounts and Highest Premiums Based on Foreclosure Status, Equity, Occupancy, Year Built

24 Discrete Profiles Analyzed for Sales Price Relative to Estimated Market Value; Profiles Ranked Nationwide and by State Based on 12-Month Analysis of Home Sales

IRVINE, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 07/10/14 -- RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the nation's leading source for comprehensive housing data, today released an analysis profiling what single family homes sell at the deepest discounts and what single family homes sell at the highest premiums based on four variables: foreclosure status, equity, occupancy and year built.

"In a competitive real estate market with still-low inventory and multiple offers the norm, it's more important than ever for buyers and sellers to identify properties that offer the best possibility for a discount and those that are the most likely to sell at a premium," said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. "A data-centric evaluation of potential purchases is important for both buyers and sellers to help counterbalance the emotions that often emerge during a typical real estate transaction. Those emotions can range from frenzy to fatigue -- both of which can result in poor decisions."

The RealtyTrac analysis looked at 24 discrete property profiles based on the four variables and what average discount -- or premium -- each of those profiles sold for in the 12 months ending in March 2014. The discount or premium was calculated based on the average percentage that properties in each profile sold below or above their estimated full market value, and then comparing that percentage to a control group: all single family homes not in foreclosure that sold during the same time period. The 24 different profiles were analyzed for discount or premium for all U.S. properties and also for each state separately, with the profiles with the biggest discounts varying from state to state.

"Nationwide and in most states we found the types of homes selling at the biggest discount were those that were in the earlier stages of foreclosure, were vacant and had negative equity," Blomquist said. "One notable exception to the negative equity marker was homes in default with positive equity, which sold at the second biggest discount nationwide. The top five property profiles with the biggest discounts nationwide all sold at average discounts of 25 percent or more.

"On the other end of the spectrum, it may surprise many to see that nationwide and in several states some profiles of bank-owned homes actually sold at a premium," Blomquist continued. "Overall bank-owned properties nationwide sold at a 2.5 percent premium, and bank-owned properties built before 1950 sold at a 6.7 percent premium. There were in exceptions to this: for example, bank-owned homes in Ohio sold at a 17 percent discount, and in Michigan they sold at a nearly 13 percent discount."

Top five property profiles with biggest discounts
The property profile providing the biggest average discount was that of a home scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity (outstanding amount of loans secured by the property was more than the estimated market value of the property), vacant, and built between 1950 and 1990. Properties matching this profile sold at an average discount of 28.2 percent below market value when compared with the control group of all properties not in foreclosure that sold during the 12 months ending in March 2014.

The property profile with the second biggest average discount was that of a home in default (where the bank had initiated the foreclosure process but not yet scheduled a foreclosure auction) with positive equity. For this profile, the occupancy status included both vacant and occupied properties and all years built. Properties matching this profile sold at an average discount of 26.0 percent below market value, and this profile by far had the most available properties matching it nationwide: 87,882, representing 11 percent of all properties in some stage of foreclosure.

Other property profiles among the top five with the biggest discounts were homes in default with negative equity, vacant and built before 1950 (25.8 percent average discount below market value); homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and no filter for year built (24.7 percent average discount below market value); and homes scheduled for foreclosure auction that were vacant with no filter for equity status or year built (24.6 percent average discount below market value).

Four property profiles selling at a premium
Four of the 24 property profiles analyzed sold at an average premium above market value when compared to the control group. The profile with the biggest premium was that of a home not in foreclosure but with negative equity, with no filters for equity, occupancy or year built. Properties matching this profile sold at a premium of 19.2 percent above market value when compared to the control group of all properties not in foreclosure that sold in the 12 months ending March 2014.

Other property profiles selling at a premium were bank-owned homes built before 1950 with no filter for equity or occupancy status (6.7 percent premium); bank-owned properties with no filter for equity, occupancy or year built (2.5 percent premium); and homes in default with negative equity, vacant and built after 1990 (1.7 percent premium).

States with the biggest available discounts
The top property profiles with the biggest discounts available differed from state to state, as did the biggest percentage discount available for each state. States with the biggest available discounts:

  • Illinois: 56.0 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and built between 1950 and 1990

  • Missouri: 49.6 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and built in 1950 or earlier.

  • Oklahoma: 40.2 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and no filter for year built

  • New York: 38.5 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and no filter for year built

  • Wisconsin: 37.3 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and built in 1950 or earlier.

Markets with the most properties matching top five profiles with biggest discounts
Metropolitan statistical areas with the most single family homes matching the top five profiles with the biggest discounts in their respective states were led by Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, where 5,864 single family homes matched one of the top five profiles -- representing nearly 27 percent of all homes in some stage of foreclosure in the metro area.

"The best homes for re-sale are the houses in good neighborhoods within great school districts," said Chris Pollinger, senior vice president of sales at First Team Real Estate, covering the Southern California market. "It's always a better deal to buy the least expensive house in a better neighborhood and fix it up versus buying the best turnkey home in the area."

About 9 percent of homes in some stage of foreclosure matched one of the top five discount profiles in the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet metro area, but the 4,365 properties represented by that 9 percent was the second highest total nationwide.

The Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington metro area had 3,438 single family homes matching one of the top five discount profiles, the third highest total of any metro area nationwide and representing nearly 17 percent of all homes in some stage of foreclosure.

Other markets in the top 10 for most homes matching the top five discount profiles were Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario in Southern California (3,018), Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach (2,714), Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta (2,544), New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (2,344), Columbus, Ohio (1,838), Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor (1,774), and Denver-Aurora (1,548).

"When consumers are considering what home makes the best deal there are many amenities to consider such as location, curb appeal and age of home," said Michael Mahon, executive vice president/broker at HER Realtors, covering the Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio markets. "To determine the best deal when making a home purchase consumers must be true to themselves and their own personal goals in regards to the timing of a purchase, anticipated length of stay in the home, values of homes in the vicinity, proximity to work and reputation of local schools."

"The properties that seem to be the best deals are those with easy access to transportation -- bus stops, park-n-rides, light rail stations and highways," said Kelly Moye of RE/MAX Alliance, covering the Denver, Colo. market. "More affordable properties in good condition that would make good rentals are also high in demand as the rental market is seeing record rental rates and very low vacancy."


         10 Markets with Most Homes Matching Top 5 Discount Profiles

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Number of
                                                Properties    Percentage of
                                              Matching Top 5      Total
                                                 Discount      Foreclosure
Metropolitan Statistical Area                    Profiles         Market
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA                   5,864          26.72%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI                    4,365           8.67%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD            3,438          16.80%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA                   3,018          15.66%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL                2,714           4.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA                     2,544          15.47%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island,
 NY-NJ-PA                                              2,344           3.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbus, OH                                           1,838          24.52%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH                            1,774          20.29%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver-Aurora, CO                                      1,548          49.02%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Report methodology
For this analysis, RealtyTrac evaluated historical sales data for single family homes from Q2 2013 to Q1 2014. RealtyTrac broke down the sales into 24 property profiles based on four variables: equity, foreclosure type (pre-foreclosure, auction, bank owned), year built, and occupancy status (vacant or occupied). The 24 property profiles were evaluated nationwide and by state. To calculate the discount or premium, RealtyTrac first determined the average percentage of estimated value represented by the actual sales price (sales price divided by each property's estimated market value) and then subtracted that percentage from the same calculation for the control group: single family homes that were not in any stage of foreclosure or bank-owned. For any possible combination tested, where the count number for the state was less than 40, the national discount percentage was used instead. The results were than ranked on a state level and on a national level.


          Discounts and Premiums Available by U.S. Property Profile

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Profile (All Single Family Residential Property)   U.S.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discount/Premium=Avg Pct Below/Above Market Compared to
Control                                                     Discount/Premium
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + 1950 < Effective Year
Built > 1990                                                          -28.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Positive Equity                                             -26.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built <
= 1950                                                                -25.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity +Vacant                                     -24.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Vacant                                                      -24.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built <
= 1950                                                                -23.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built >
= 1990                                                                -23.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Positive Equity                                             -23.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default                                                               -23.3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + 1950 < Effective Year
Built < 1990                                                          -22.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity                                             -20.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction                                                               -20.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Vacant                                                      -20.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Vacant                                                          -18.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity                                             -16.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity +Vacant                                     -16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control+ Positive Equity                                               -7.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Effective Year Built > = 1990                                    -6.3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + 1950 < Effective Year Built < 1990                               -1.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built >
= 1990                                                                  1.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO                                                                     2.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Effective Year Built < = 1950                                     6.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control+Negative Equity                                                19.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control- All SFR transactions without foreclosure event                 0.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales Price Percent of Estimated Market Value on Average                1.10
                                                           -----------------

Report License
The RealtyTrac U.S. Residential & Foreclosure Sales report is the result of a proprietary evaluation of information compiled by RealtyTrac; the report and any of the information in whole or in part can only be quoted, copied, published, re-published, distributed and/or re-distributed or used in any manner if the user specifically references RealtyTrac as the source for said report and/or any of the information set forth within the report.

Data Licensing and Custom Report Order
Investors, businesses and government institutions can contact RealtyTrac to license bulk foreclosure and neighborhood data or purchase customized reports. For more information contact our Data Licensing Department at 800.462.5193 or [email protected].

About RealtyTrac
RealtyTrac is a leading supplier of U.S. real estate data, with nationwide parcel-level records for more than 125 million U.S. parcels that include property characteristics, tax assessor data, sales and mortgage deed records, Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) and 20 million active and historical default, foreclosure auction and bank-owned properties. RealtyTrac's housing data and foreclosure reports are relied on by many federal government agencies, numerous state housing and banking departments, investment funds as well as millions of real estate professionals and consumers, to help evaluate housing trends and make informed decisions about real estate.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, an entertainment executive/TV producer turned serial entrepreneur, will present a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to max...
Imagine having the ability to leverage all of your current technology and to be able to compose it into one resource pool. Now imagine, as your business grows, not having to deploy a complete new appliance to scale your infrastructure. Also imagine a true multi-cloud capability that allows live migration without any modification between cloud environments regardless of whether that cloud is your private cloud or your public AWS, Azure or Google instance. Now think of a world that is not locked i...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Auditwerx will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Auditwerx specializes in SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 attestation services throughout the U.S. and Canada. As a division of Carr, Riggs & Ingram (CRI), one of the top 20 largest CPA firms nationally, you can expect the resources, skills, and experience of a much larger firm combined with the accessibility and attent...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), will provide an overview of various initiatives to certifiy the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldw...
In his General Session at 16th Cloud Expo, David Shacochis, host of The Hybrid IT Files podcast and Vice President at CenturyLink, investigated three key trends of the “gigabit economy" though the story of a Fortune 500 communications company in transformation. Narrating how multi-modal hybrid IT, service automation, and agile delivery all intersect, he will cover the role of storytelling and empathy in achieving strategic alignment between the enterprise and its information technology.
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Scott Davis, CTO of Embotics, will discuss how automation can provide the dynamic management required to cost-effectively deliver microservices and container solutions at scale. He will discuss how flexible automation is the key to effectively bridging and seamlessly coordinating both IT and developer needs for component orchestration across disparate clouds – an increasingly important requirement at today’s multi-cloud enterprise.
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" ...
The essence of cloud computing is that all consumable IT resources are delivered as services. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Yung Chou, Technology Evangelist at Microsoft, demonstrated the concepts and implementations of two important cloud computing deliveries: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS). He discussed from business and technical viewpoints what exactly they are, why we care, how they are different and in what ways, and the strategies for IT to transi...
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound e...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
Keeping pace with advancements in software delivery processes and tooling is taxing even for the most proficient organizations. Point tools, platforms, open source and the increasing adoption of private and public cloud services requires strong engineering rigor - all in the face of developer demands to use the tools of choice. As Agile has settled in as a mainstream practice, now DevOps has emerged as the next wave to improve software delivery speed and output. To make DevOps work, organization...
My team embarked on building a data lake for our sales and marketing data to better understand customer journeys. This required building a hybrid data pipeline to connect our cloud CRM with the new Hadoop Data Lake. One challenge is that IT was not in a position to provide support until we proved value and marketing did not have the experience, so we embarked on the journey ourselves within the product marketing team for our line of business within Progress. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Sum...
Niagara Networks exhibited at the 19th International Cloud Expo, which took place at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, in November 2016. Niagara Networks offers the highest port-density systems, and the most complete Next-Generation Network Visibility systems including Network Packet Brokers, Bypass Switches, and Network TAPs.
Virtualization over the past years has become a key strategy for IT to acquire multi-tenancy, increase utilization, develop elasticity and improve security. And virtual machines (VMs) are quickly becoming a main vehicle for developing and deploying applications. The introduction of containers seems to be bringing another and perhaps overlapped solution for achieving the same above-mentioned benefits. Are a container and a virtual machine fundamentally the same or different? And how? Is one techn...