Welcome!

News Feed Item

New RealtyTrac Analysis Profiles Single Family Homes That Sell at the Deepest Discounts and Highest Premiums Based on Foreclosure Status, Equity, Occupancy, Year Built

24 Discrete Profiles Analyzed for Sales Price Relative to Estimated Market Value; Profiles Ranked Nationwide and by State Based on 12-Month Analysis of Home Sales

IRVINE, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 07/10/14 -- RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the nation's leading source for comprehensive housing data, today released an analysis profiling what single family homes sell at the deepest discounts and what single family homes sell at the highest premiums based on four variables: foreclosure status, equity, occupancy and year built.

"In a competitive real estate market with still-low inventory and multiple offers the norm, it's more important than ever for buyers and sellers to identify properties that offer the best possibility for a discount and those that are the most likely to sell at a premium," said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. "A data-centric evaluation of potential purchases is important for both buyers and sellers to help counterbalance the emotions that often emerge during a typical real estate transaction. Those emotions can range from frenzy to fatigue -- both of which can result in poor decisions."

The RealtyTrac analysis looked at 24 discrete property profiles based on the four variables and what average discount -- or premium -- each of those profiles sold for in the 12 months ending in March 2014. The discount or premium was calculated based on the average percentage that properties in each profile sold below or above their estimated full market value, and then comparing that percentage to a control group: all single family homes not in foreclosure that sold during the same time period. The 24 different profiles were analyzed for discount or premium for all U.S. properties and also for each state separately, with the profiles with the biggest discounts varying from state to state.

"Nationwide and in most states we found the types of homes selling at the biggest discount were those that were in the earlier stages of foreclosure, were vacant and had negative equity," Blomquist said. "One notable exception to the negative equity marker was homes in default with positive equity, which sold at the second biggest discount nationwide. The top five property profiles with the biggest discounts nationwide all sold at average discounts of 25 percent or more.

"On the other end of the spectrum, it may surprise many to see that nationwide and in several states some profiles of bank-owned homes actually sold at a premium," Blomquist continued. "Overall bank-owned properties nationwide sold at a 2.5 percent premium, and bank-owned properties built before 1950 sold at a 6.7 percent premium. There were in exceptions to this: for example, bank-owned homes in Ohio sold at a 17 percent discount, and in Michigan they sold at a nearly 13 percent discount."

Top five property profiles with biggest discounts
The property profile providing the biggest average discount was that of a home scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity (outstanding amount of loans secured by the property was more than the estimated market value of the property), vacant, and built between 1950 and 1990. Properties matching this profile sold at an average discount of 28.2 percent below market value when compared with the control group of all properties not in foreclosure that sold during the 12 months ending in March 2014.

The property profile with the second biggest average discount was that of a home in default (where the bank had initiated the foreclosure process but not yet scheduled a foreclosure auction) with positive equity. For this profile, the occupancy status included both vacant and occupied properties and all years built. Properties matching this profile sold at an average discount of 26.0 percent below market value, and this profile by far had the most available properties matching it nationwide: 87,882, representing 11 percent of all properties in some stage of foreclosure.

Other property profiles among the top five with the biggest discounts were homes in default with negative equity, vacant and built before 1950 (25.8 percent average discount below market value); homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and no filter for year built (24.7 percent average discount below market value); and homes scheduled for foreclosure auction that were vacant with no filter for equity status or year built (24.6 percent average discount below market value).

Four property profiles selling at a premium
Four of the 24 property profiles analyzed sold at an average premium above market value when compared to the control group. The profile with the biggest premium was that of a home not in foreclosure but with negative equity, with no filters for equity, occupancy or year built. Properties matching this profile sold at a premium of 19.2 percent above market value when compared to the control group of all properties not in foreclosure that sold in the 12 months ending March 2014.

Other property profiles selling at a premium were bank-owned homes built before 1950 with no filter for equity or occupancy status (6.7 percent premium); bank-owned properties with no filter for equity, occupancy or year built (2.5 percent premium); and homes in default with negative equity, vacant and built after 1990 (1.7 percent premium).

States with the biggest available discounts
The top property profiles with the biggest discounts available differed from state to state, as did the biggest percentage discount available for each state. States with the biggest available discounts:

  • Illinois: 56.0 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and built between 1950 and 1990

  • Missouri: 49.6 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity, vacant and built in 1950 or earlier.

  • Oklahoma: 40.2 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and no filter for year built

  • New York: 38.5 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and no filter for year built

  • Wisconsin: 37.3 percent discount on homes scheduled for foreclosure auction with negative equity and vacant and built in 1950 or earlier.

Markets with the most properties matching top five profiles with biggest discounts
Metropolitan statistical areas with the most single family homes matching the top five profiles with the biggest discounts in their respective states were led by Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, where 5,864 single family homes matched one of the top five profiles -- representing nearly 27 percent of all homes in some stage of foreclosure in the metro area.

"The best homes for re-sale are the houses in good neighborhoods within great school districts," said Chris Pollinger, senior vice president of sales at First Team Real Estate, covering the Southern California market. "It's always a better deal to buy the least expensive house in a better neighborhood and fix it up versus buying the best turnkey home in the area."

About 9 percent of homes in some stage of foreclosure matched one of the top five discount profiles in the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet metro area, but the 4,365 properties represented by that 9 percent was the second highest total nationwide.

The Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington metro area had 3,438 single family homes matching one of the top five discount profiles, the third highest total of any metro area nationwide and representing nearly 17 percent of all homes in some stage of foreclosure.

Other markets in the top 10 for most homes matching the top five discount profiles were Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario in Southern California (3,018), Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach (2,714), Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta (2,544), New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (2,344), Columbus, Ohio (1,838), Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor (1,774), and Denver-Aurora (1,548).

"When consumers are considering what home makes the best deal there are many amenities to consider such as location, curb appeal and age of home," said Michael Mahon, executive vice president/broker at HER Realtors, covering the Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio markets. "To determine the best deal when making a home purchase consumers must be true to themselves and their own personal goals in regards to the timing of a purchase, anticipated length of stay in the home, values of homes in the vicinity, proximity to work and reputation of local schools."

"The properties that seem to be the best deals are those with easy access to transportation -- bus stops, park-n-rides, light rail stations and highways," said Kelly Moye of RE/MAX Alliance, covering the Denver, Colo. market. "More affordable properties in good condition that would make good rentals are also high in demand as the rental market is seeing record rental rates and very low vacancy."

         10 Markets with Most Homes Matching Top 5 Discount Profiles

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Number of
                                                Properties    Percentage of
                                              Matching Top 5      Total
                                                 Discount      Foreclosure
Metropolitan Statistical Area                    Profiles         Market
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA                   5,864          26.72%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI                    4,365           8.67%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD            3,438          16.80%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA                   3,018          15.66%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL                2,714           4.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA                     2,544          15.47%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island,
 NY-NJ-PA                                              2,344           3.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbus, OH                                           1,838          24.52%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH                            1,774          20.29%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver-Aurora, CO                                      1,548          49.02%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Report methodology
For this analysis, RealtyTrac evaluated historical sales data for single family homes from Q2 2013 to Q1 2014. RealtyTrac broke down the sales into 24 property profiles based on four variables: equity, foreclosure type (pre-foreclosure, auction, bank owned), year built, and occupancy status (vacant or occupied). The 24 property profiles were evaluated nationwide and by state. To calculate the discount or premium, RealtyTrac first determined the average percentage of estimated value represented by the actual sales price (sales price divided by each property's estimated market value) and then subtracted that percentage from the same calculation for the control group: single family homes that were not in any stage of foreclosure or bank-owned. For any possible combination tested, where the count number for the state was less than 40, the national discount percentage was used instead. The results were than ranked on a state level and on a national level.

          Discounts and Premiums Available by U.S. Property Profile

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Profile (All Single Family Residential Property)   U.S.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discount/Premium=Avg Pct Below/Above Market Compared to
Control                                                     Discount/Premium
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + 1950 < Effective Year
Built > 1990                                                          -28.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Positive Equity                                             -26.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built <
= 1950                                                                -25.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity +Vacant                                     -24.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Vacant                                                      -24.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built <
= 1950                                                                -23.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built >
= 1990                                                                -23.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Positive Equity                                             -23.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default                                                               -23.3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + 1950 < Effective Year
Built < 1990                                                          -22.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity                                             -20.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction                                                               -20.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Vacant                                                      -20.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Vacant                                                          -18.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction + Negative Equity                                             -16.8%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity +Vacant                                     -16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control+ Positive Equity                                               -7.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Effective Year Built > = 1990                                    -6.3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + 1950 < Effective Year Built < 1990                               -1.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default + Negative Equity + Vacant + Effective Year Built >
= 1990                                                                  1.9%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO                                                                     2.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REO + Effective Year Built < = 1950                                     6.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control+Negative Equity                                                19.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control- All SFR transactions without foreclosure event                 0.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales Price Percent of Estimated Market Value on Average                1.10
                                                           -----------------

Report License
The RealtyTrac U.S. Residential & Foreclosure Sales report is the result of a proprietary evaluation of information compiled by RealtyTrac; the report and any of the information in whole or in part can only be quoted, copied, published, re-published, distributed and/or re-distributed or used in any manner if the user specifically references RealtyTrac as the source for said report and/or any of the information set forth within the report.

Data Licensing and Custom Report Order
Investors, businesses and government institutions can contact RealtyTrac to license bulk foreclosure and neighborhood data or purchase customized reports. For more information contact our Data Licensing Department at 800.462.5193 or [email protected].

About RealtyTrac
RealtyTrac is a leading supplier of U.S. real estate data, with nationwide parcel-level records for more than 125 million U.S. parcels that include property characteristics, tax assessor data, sales and mortgage deed records, Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) and 20 million active and historical default, foreclosure auction and bank-owned properties. RealtyTrac's housing data and foreclosure reports are relied on by many federal government agencies, numerous state housing and banking departments, investment funds as well as millions of real estate professionals and consumers, to help evaluate housing trends and make informed decisions about real estate.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...