|By Business Wire||
|July 15, 2014 06:10 AM EDT||
Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/bxxhhh/assuring_services) has announced the addition of the "Assuring Services in the Virtual Network" report to their offering.
This report examines how service assurance vendors are adapting to the necessary changes from physical to virtual networking in helping CSPs deliver the best customer experience that machine learning, virtualization, and analytics can buy.
While adjusting to the challenges of IP mobile data and a new focus on the customer experience, CSPs face even larger demands to transform their business and network focus as well. Virtualization has become a real goal. Software Defined Networking (SDN) promises to disrupt traditional network operations by turning the management and orchestration function within the network upside down. Automation, in the form of Self-Organizing Networks (SON) promises to do likewise.
This report focuses on the service assurance supplier perspective, and their response to new operational requirements. Heading into 2013, service assurance suppliers were surveyed and asked about their forward-looking strategies. Given the rapid appearance of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and SDN since then, some suppliers were revisited in early 2014 to get a feel for how the emergence of network virtualization technologies will affect their plans and the needs of their CSP customers. The results of both time-based perspectives are addressed within this report.
Key Topics Covered:
- Executive Summary
- The Service Assurance Market
- Service Assurance Supplier - Survey Analysis
- Helping CSPs Differentiate
- Disruption: The Good Kind
- The Last Word
- Accanto Systems
- AIRCOM International
- Cariden (Cisco)
- Centina Systems
- Monolith Software
- Nakina Systems
- NetCracker Technology
- NetScout Systems NSN
For more information visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/bxxhhh/assuring_services
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Dec. 2, 2016 03:15 PM EST Reads: 1,433
Dec. 2, 2016 02:15 PM EST Reads: 1,497
Dec. 2, 2016 02:02 PM EST Reads: 212
Dec. 2, 2016 02:00 PM EST Reads: 4,807
Dec. 2, 2016 01:30 PM EST Reads: 5,686
Dec. 2, 2016 01:30 PM EST Reads: 1,803
Dec. 2, 2016 01:15 PM EST Reads: 2,070
Dec. 2, 2016 01:00 PM EST Reads: 1,382
Dec. 2, 2016 01:00 PM EST Reads: 2,441
Dec. 2, 2016 12:11 PM EST Reads: 231
Dec. 2, 2016 12:00 PM EST Reads: 1,825
Dec. 2, 2016 12:00 PM EST Reads: 175
Dec. 2, 2016 11:45 AM EST Reads: 1,455
Dec. 2, 2016 11:30 AM EST Reads: 1,847
Dec. 2, 2016 11:30 AM EST Reads: 3,739