News Feed Item

Private Equity Distributions Hit an All-Time High in 2013, and Venture Capital Produced Its Highest Annual Return in 15 Years, According to Cambridge Associates Benchmarks

Both Benchmarks Lagged Public Equity Returns for the Year; Only VC Topped Public Equities in Q4, Though Both PE and VC Earned Solid Returns for the Quarter

BOSTON, MA -- (Marketwired) -- 07/16/14 -- During a 2013 in which low interest rates pushed many investors into equities, the public equity markets saw stellar returns, beating out the performance of investments in US private equity and venture capital for the year. But these alternative assets also fared well, with US private equity and venture capital funds having their best annual returns since 2006 and 1999, respectively. Investors in private equity funds received the largest total annual capital distribution in the history of the Cambridge Associates benchmark, while investors in VC funds received their second largest payout since 2000.

The Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Private Equity Index® rose 20.6% during 2013, while the Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® rose 27.2%, its best annual performance in 15 years. For the fourth quarter, the private equity and venture capital indices returned 6.7% and 11.9%, respectively, with the latter outperforming the public equity markets. See the table below for comparisons of the Cambridge benchmarks against several key public market indices. Returns for periods of one year and longer are annualized.

U.S. Private Equity and Venture Capital Index Returns (%)
Periods ending December 31, 2013

    For the periods ending            1    3     5     10    15    20    25
       December 31, 2013       Qtr. Year Years Years Years Years Years Years
     CA US Private Equity       6.7 20.6  14.9  15.8  14.0  12.1  13.6  13.6
     CA US Venture Capital     11.9 27.2  15.4  12.5   9.7  22.6  30.8  20.7
                                Other Indices
             DJIA              10.2 29.7  15.7  16.7   7.4   6.5  10.2  11.2
       NASDAQ Composite*       10.7 38.3  16.3  21.5   7.6   4.4   8.8  10.0
    Russell 2000 Composite      8.7 38.8  15.7  20.1   9.1   8.4   9.3  10.2
            S&P 500            10.5 32.4  16.2  17.9   7.4   4.7   9.2  10.3

Sources: Cambridge Associates LLC, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., Frank Russell Company, Standard and Poor's, and Thomson Datastream.
* Capital Changes Only

Both benchmarks continued to outperform public companies over longer time horizons -- and in the case of the VC index, significantly.

Private Equity

All of the Key Sectors in the PE Benchmark had Positive Returns for both the Quarter and the Year

Strong returns from investments in financial services companies, one of the PE index's largest sectors, were a major driver in the private equity benchmark's performance in 2013. The sector represented roughly 10% of the index's value by weight but returned 14.4% for the quarter and 33.5% for the year. All eight of the meaningfully sized sectors in the index (those comprising at least 5% of its value) also had positive returns for both the quarter and the year. The three largest -- consumer, energy and healthcare -- represented more than half of the index's total value and returned between 6.7% and 8.8%.

Information technology (IT) just edged out financial services for the best major sector performance of the year, earning 33.6%. Energy had the lowest performance among the eight key sectors for both the quarter and the year, returning 6.7% and 18.3%, respectively.

PE Index's Largest Vintage was also Q4's Best Performer

Vintage year performances in the fourth quarter were strong across most of the index, with every vintage from 1998 through 2013 benefiting from healthy increases in their portfolio company valuations. The five largest vintages, 2004 to 2008, saw a combined $36 billion improvement in asset values for the period. On December 31, these five vintage years represented almost 80% of the PE index's value.

The largest vintage year in the PE index was 2007, and it was also Q4's best performer, earning 7.6% for the period. At year's end it represented 27.6% of the index, which, because the index is capital weighted, made the 2007 vintage the single largest driver of the index's quarterly performance. For the year, funds launched in 2007 returned 23.1%, which was second among the five largest vintages, falling just short of the 2005 vintage year's 23.3% increase. Funds launched in 2004 had the lowest return among the key vintages for the quarter: 3.0%; for the year, the 2006 vintage's 18.2% return was the lowest.

PE Index Hit a New Record for Annual Distributions in 2013

Fund managers in the PE benchmark called and distributed more capital to their limited partners (LPs) in Q4 than they did in the previous quarter. Calls were up 7.3% to $16.4 billion, while distributions made a huge jump of 31% to $41.6 billion, which in dollar terms was the second highest quarterly increase in the 28 years that Cambridge Associates has tracked the index. Q4 was the eighth consecutive quarter in which distributions outstripped contributions.

For the year, fund managers drew down $56.3 billion from their LPs, which was roughly $15 billion and $20 billion less than in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Annual distributions, however, hit an all-time high for the index in 2013. Fund managers returned $134.6 billion to their LPs for the year -- the largest amount since the index's inception.

"The outsized distribution from the PE index's fund managers in 2013 was made possible by both friendly credit markets and bullish public equities. Both of these factors made exits and recapitalizations easier, ultimately to the benefit of PE fund investors," said Keirsten Lawton, Managing Director and Co-Head of US Private Equity Research at Cambridge Associates.

Venture Capital

IT Sector was the Top Performer in VC Benchmark for Q4 and all of 2013

The performance of IT companies was the principal driver of the VC benchmark's quarterly and annual returns, the latter of which was the best in 15 years. The index's largest sector at year's end, accounting for 34.4% of the index's value, IT rose 21.8% for the fourth quarter and 40.8% for the year. The index remained highly concentrated by sector, with only four sectors, including IT, representing at least 5.0% of the index. In addition to IT, the other key sectors were health care, media and communications, and software.

While health care was the second largest sector by weight in the index, it had the lowest return for the quarter and year among the key sectors: 7.9% and 32.3%, respectively.

Annual Returns for All 7 Key Vintage Years in the VC Index were in Double Digits

By far the top performing vintage year among the seven significantly sized vintages in the VC index -- for both the quarter and the year -- was the 2010 vintage. Though representing only 8.2% of the index's value, funds launched in 2010 rose 32.1% for the quarter and 56.1% for the calendar year, giving the vintage a larger than usual impact on the index's performance relative to the vintage's size. The 2007 vintage, the largest in the index, turned in the second strongest performance of the key vintages for both the quarter and the year, rising 19.5% and 39.1% for the periods, respectively.

Funds launched in 2005 had the lowest return among the top seven vintages for the quarter -- just 1.9%; the 2000 vintage year funds had 2013's lowest total, 11.9%.

Capital Calls and Distributions in the VC Index were Up in Q4 but Down for the Year

In the fourth quarter, fund managers called just under $3.5 billion from their LPs and distributed $6.5 billion, making Q4 the eighth consecutive quarter in which distributions outnumbered contributions. Quarterly contributions were up 12.2% from Q3, while distributions were up a much smaller 1.7%. Investors in the 2000 and 2006 vintage years together received 31% of the total distributions for the quarter -- more than $800 million each.

For the year, calls and distributions in the index were both down. Contributions dropped 10.0% from 2012 to $12.8 billion; distributions fell 3.6% to $21.5 billion.

"Even with the drop in capital distributions from 2012, annual distributions in 2013 were still the fourth highest annual total in the history of the index, behind only 2012 and the bubble years of 1999 and 2000," said Peter Mooradian, Managing Director, Private Growth Research at Cambridge Associates.

For more details on the Q4 and 2013 performance of the Cambridge Associates US private equity and venture capital benchmarks, go to http://40926u2govf9kuqen1ndit018su.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/US-PE-VC-Benchmark-Commentary-4Q13.pdf.

About Cambridge Associates and the Indices

Founded in 1973, Cambridge Associates is a provider of independent investment advice and research to institutional investors and private clients worldwide. Today the firm serves nearly 1,000 global investors and delivers a range of services, including investment consulting, outsourced investment solutions, research and tools (Research Navigatorsm and Benchmark Calculator), and performance monitoring, across asset classes. The firm compiles the performance results for more than 5,600 private partnerships and their nearly 70,000 portfolio company investments to publish its proprietary private investments benchmarks, of which the Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® and Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Private Equity Index® are widely considered to be among the standard benchmark statistics for these asset classes. Cambridge Associates has more than 1,100 employees serving its client base globally and maintains offices in Arlington, VA; Boston; Dallas; Menlo Park, CA; London; Singapore; Sydney; and Beijing. Cambridge Associates consists of five global investment consulting affiliates that are all under common ownership and control. For more information about Cambridge Associates, please visit www.cambridgeassociates.com.

Cambridge Associates has been selected to provide data and to develop and maintain customized industry benchmarks for a number of prominent industry associations, including the African Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (AVCA); the Asia Pacific Real Estate Association (APREA); Australian Private Equity & Venture Capital Association Limited (AVCAL); Canada's Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (CVCA); the Hong Kong Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (HKVCA); the Indian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (IVCA); Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA); the Latin American Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (LAVCA); the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA); and the New Zealand Private Equity & Venture Capital Association Inc. (NZVCA). Cambridge Associates also provides data and analysis to the Emerging Markets Private Equity Association (EMPEA).

Both the Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Private Equity Index® and the Cambridge Associates LLC U.S. Venture Capital Index® are reported each week in Barron's Market Laboratory section. In addition, complete historical data can be found on Standard & Poor's Micropal products and on our website, www.cambridgeassociates.com.

Inquiries about these indices should be addressed to: Frank Lentini at Sommerfield Communications, 55 Broad Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10004; 212.255.8386; (fax) 212.255.8459; [email protected].

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
We are always online. We access our data, our finances, work, and various services on the Internet. But we live in a congested world of information in which the roads were built two decades ago. The quest for better, faster Internet routing has been around for a decade, but nobody solved this problem. We’ve seen band aid approaches like CDNs that attack a niche's slice of static content part of the Internet, but that’s it. It does not address the dynamic services-based Internet of today. It doe...
Between the mockups and specs produced by analysts, and resulting applications built by developers, there exists a gulf where projects fail, costs spiral, and applications disappoint. Methodologies like Agile attempt to address this with intensified communication, with partial success but many limitations. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Charles Kendrick, CTO at Isomorphic Software, will present a revolutionary model enabled by new technologies. Learn how business and deve...
In the 21st century, security on the Internet has become one of the most important issues. We hear more and more about cyber-attacks on the websites of large corporations, banks and even small businesses. When online we’re concerned not only for our own safety but also our privacy. We have to know that hackers usually start their preparation by investigating the private information of admins – the habits, interests, visited websites and so on. On the other hand, our own security is in danger bec...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Robert Cohen, an economist and senior fellow at the Economic Strategy Institute, will provide economic scenarios that describe how the rapid adoption of software-defined everything including cloud services, SDDC and open networking will change GDP, industry growth, productivity and jobs. This session will also include a drill down for several industries such as finance, social media, cloud service providers and pharmaceuticals.
DevOps is speeding towards the IT world like a freight train and the hype around it is deafening. There is no reason to be afraid of this change as it is the natural reaction to the agile movement that revolutionized development just a few years ago. By definition, DevOps is the natural alignment of IT performance to business profitability. The relevance of this has yet to be quantified but it has been suggested that the route to the CEO’s chair will come from the IT leaders that successfully ma...
The Internet of Things (IoT), in all its myriad manifestations, has great potential. Much of that potential comes from the evolving data management and analytic (DMA) technologies and processes that allow us to gain insight from all of the IoT data that can be generated and gathered. This potential may never be met as those data sets are tied to specific industry verticals and single markets, with no clear way to use IoT data and sensor analytics to fulfill the hype being given the IoT today.
@ThingsExpo has been named the Top 5 Most Influential M2M Brand by Onalytica in the ‘Machine to Machine: Top 100 Influencers and Brands.' Onalytica analyzed the online debate on M2M by looking at over 85,000 tweets to provide the most influential individuals and brands that drive the discussion. According to Onalytica the "analysis showed a very engaged community with a lot of interactive tweets. The M2M discussion seems to be more fragmented and driven by some of the major brands present in the...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Interface Masters Technologies, a leader in Network Visibility and Uptime Solutions, will exhibit at the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Interface Masters Technologies is a leading vendor in the network monitoring and high speed networking markets. Based in the heart of Silicon Valley, Interface Masters' expertise lies in Gigabit, 10 Gigabit and 40 Gigabit Eth...
As the world moves toward more DevOps and Microservices, application deployment to the cloud ought to become a lot simpler. The Microservices architecture, which is the basis of many new age distributed systems such as OpenStack, NetFlix and so on, is at the heart of Cloud Foundry - a complete developer-oriented Platform as a Service (PaaS) that is IaaS agnostic and supports vCloud, OpenStack and AWS. Serverless computing is revolutionizing computing. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Raghav...
Fact: storage performance problems have only gotten more complicated, as applications not only have become largely virtualized, but also have moved to cloud-based infrastructures. Storage performance in virtualized environments isn’t just about IOPS anymore. Instead, you need to guarantee performance for individual VMs, helping applications maintain performance as the number of VMs continues to go up in real time. In his session at Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, Product and Marketing at Tintri, wil...
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
As software becomes more and more complex, we, as software developers, have been splitting up our code into smaller and smaller components. This is also true for the environment in which we run our code: going from bare metal, to VMs to the modern-day Cloud Native world of containers, schedulers and microservices. While we have figured out how to run containerized applications in the cloud using schedulers, we've yet to come up with a good solution to bridge the gap between getting your conta...
If you had a chance to enter on the ground level of the largest e-commerce market in the world – would you? China is the world’s most populated country with the second largest economy and the world’s fastest growing market. It is estimated that by 2018 the Chinese market will be reaching over $30 billion in gaming revenue alone. Admittedly for a foreign company, doing business in China can be challenging. Often changing laws, administrative regulations and the often inscrutable Chinese Interne...
Enterprise IT has been in the era of Hybrid Cloud for some time now. But it seems most conversations about Hybrid are focused on integrating AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google ECM into existing on-premises systems. Where is all the Private Cloud? What do technology providers need to do to make their offerings more compelling? How should enterprise IT executives and buyers define their focus, needs, and roadmap, and communicate that clearly to the providers?
You have great SaaS business app ideas. You want to turn your idea quickly into a functional and engaging proof of concept. You need to be able to modify it to meet customers' needs, and you need to deliver a complete and secure SaaS application. How could you achieve all the above and yet avoid unforeseen IT requirements that add unnecessary cost and complexity? You also want your app to be responsive in any device at any time. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Mark Allen, General Manager of...