Welcome!

News Feed Item

TC PipeLines, LP Raises Distribution 2014 Second Quarter Partnership Cash Flows of $77 million

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 07/24/14 -- TC PipeLines, LP (NYSE: TCP) today announced the second quarter 2014 cash distribution of $0.84 per common unit. This is a $0.03 per common unit increase over the distribution paid in first quarter 2014 and represents a 3.7 percent increase for unitholders.

TC PipeLines also reported second quarter 2014 Partnership cash flows of $77 million. Net income attributable to controlling interests was $37 million or $0.58 per common unit.

"We experienced another solid quarter of financial performance with all of our pipeline assets delivering strong results," said Steve Becker, President of TC PipeLines GP, Inc. "The increase in our cash distribution reflects our confidence in the long-term value of our portfolio of stable, cash flow generating assets."

TC PipeLines also announced the intent to launch a new at-the-market (ATM) equity issuance program. The program will allow TC PipeLines to issue up to $200 million of limited partner units.

Second Quarter 2014 Highlights (All financial figures are unaudited)


--  Net income attributable to controlling interests of $37 million or $0.58
    per common unit
--  Partnership cash flows of $77 million
--  Paid cash distributions of $52 million
--  Raised second quarter 2014 cash distribution to $0.84 per common unit
--  Distribution is payable on August 14, 2014 to unitholders of record as
    of the close of business on August 5, 2014
--  Marks the 15th consecutive year of increasing distributions for the
    Partnership

The Partnership's financial highlights for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 were:


                                         Three months            Six months
                                                ended                 ended
(unaudited)                                  June 30,              June 30,
(millions of dollars except per
 common unit amounts)
                                      2014       2013       2014       2013

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership cash flows(a)               77         42        137         86
Cash distributions paid                (52)       (43)      (103)       (85)

Cash distributions paid per
 common unit                     $    0.81  $    0.78  $    1.62  $    1.56

Net income attributable to
 controlling interests(b)               37         34         94         78
Net income per common unit(c) -
 basic and diluted               $    0.58  $    0.40  $    1.48  $    0.92

Weighted average common units
 outstanding
                                      62.3       57.4       62.3       55.4
(millions) - basic and diluted

Common units outstanding at end
 of period
                                      62.3       62.3       62.3       62.3
(millions)

(a) Partnership cash flows is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the description of Partnership Cash Flows in the section of this release entitled "Non-GAAP Measures" and the Supplemental Schedule Non-GAAP Measures for further detail.

(b) The additional 45 percent membership interests in each of GTN and Bison were acquired from subsidiaries of TransCanada in July 2013. As a result, the acquisition was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control, similar to a pooling of interests, whereby the assets and liabilities of GTN and Bison were recorded at TransCanada's carrying value and the Partnership's historical financial information was recast to consolidate GTN and Bison for all periods presented.

(c) Net income per common unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 is equivalent to that presented prior to the recast. Refer to the description of net income per common unit in the Financial Summary Schedule for further detail.

Recent Developments

Cash Distributions - On July 23, 2014, the board of directors of our General Partner declared the Partnership's second quarter 2014 cash distribution in the amount of $0.84 per common unit, payable on August 14, 2014 to unitholders of record as of August 5, 2014.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, net income attributable to controlling interests increased by $3 million to $37 million compared to the second quarter of 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher equity earnings from Northern Border and Great Lakes.

Partnership cash flows increased to $77 million in the second quarter of 2014 compared to $42 million in the same period of 2013. This increase was due to increased cash distributions from GTN and Bison of $25 million as a result of the 2013 Acquisition and due to an increased cash distribution from Great Lakes. The increased cash distribution from Great Lakes was primarily due to additional sales of daily capacity during the first quarter.

The Partnership paid distributions of $52 million in the second quarter of 2014, an increase of $9 million compared to the same period in 2013. This increase was due to a $0.03 increase in the distribution per common unit in July 2013 and issuance of additional common units in May 2013.

Non-GAAP Measures

The Partnership uses the non-GAAP financial measures "Partnership cash flows" and "Partnership cash flows before General Partner distributions" as they provide measures of cash generated during the period to evaluate our cash distribution capability. Management also uses these measures as a basis for recommendations to our General Partner's board of directors regarding the distribution to be declared each quarter. Partnership cash flow information is presented to enhance investors' understanding of the way management analyzes the Partnership's financial performance.

Partnership cash flows include net income attributable to controlling interests, less net income attributed to GTN's and Bison's former parent, plus operating cash flows from North Baja and Tuscarora, and cash distributions received from GTN, Northern Border, Bison and Great Lakes less equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates and Other Pipes' net income as previously reported, plus net income attributable to non-controlling interests from consolidated subsidiaries after the 2013 Acquisition, and net of distributions declared to the General Partner.

Partnership cash flows and Partnership cash flows before General Partner distributions are provided as a supplement to GAAP financial results and are not meant to be considered in isolation or as substitutes for financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Conference Call

Analysts, members of the media, investors and other interested parties are invited to participate in a teleconference by calling 866.226.1793 on Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 10 a.m. central time (CDT)/11 a.m. eastern time (EDT). Steve Becker, President of the General Partner, will discuss the second quarter 2014 financial results and provide an update on the Partnership's business developments, followed by a question and answer session for the investment community and media. Please dial in 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. No pass code is required. A live webcast of the conference call will also be available through the Partnership's website at www.TCPipeLinesLP.com. Slides for the presentation will be posted on the Partnership's website under "Events and Presentations" prior to the webcast.

A replay of the teleconference will also be available beginning two hours after the conclusion of the call and until 11 p.m. (CDT)/midnight (EDT) on July 31, 2014, by calling 800.408.3053, then entering pass code 9157068.

TC PipeLines, LP is a Delaware master limited partnership with interests in six federally regulated U.S. interstate natural gas pipelines which serve markets in Western and Midwestern United States. The Partnership is managed by its general partner, TC PipeLines GP, Inc., a subsidiary of TransCanada Corporation (NYSE: TRP). For more information about TC PipeLines, LP, visit the Partnership's website at www.TCPipeLinesLP.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain non-historical statements in this release relating to future plans, projections, events or conditions, including our belief in the long-term strength of the North American natural gas industry which we expect will generate ongoing value for our unitholders, are intended to be "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations and, therefore, subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this release, including, without limitation, competitive conditions in the natural gas industry, increases in operating and compliance costs, the outcome of rate proceedings, our ability to identify and complete expansion and growth opportunities, operating hazards beyond our control, availability of capital and market demand that the Partnership expects or believes will or may occur in the future. These and other factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated are discussed in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), as updated and supplemented by subsequent filings with the SEC. All forward-looking statements are made only as of the date made and except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, subsequent events or other changes.


TC PipeLines, LP
Financial Summary

Consolidated Statement of Income


                                   Three months ended      Six months ended
(unaudited)                                  June 30,              June 30,
(millions of dollars, except per
 common unit amounts)                 2014    2013(a)       2014    2013(a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transmission revenues                   82         82        169        168
Equity earnings from
 unconsolidated affiliates              18         15         51         33
Operation and maintenance
 expenses                              (12)       (13)       (24)       (26)
Property taxes                          (6)        (6)       (12)       (12)
General and administrative              (1)        (4)        (3)        (6)
Depreciation                           (22)       (22)       (43)       (43)
Financial charges and other            (14)       (10)       (26)       (19)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                              45         42        112         95
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income attributable to non-
 controlling interests                   8          8         18         17
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income attributable to
 controlling interests                  37         34         94         78
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income attributable to
 controlling interests
 allocation(b)
Common units                            36         23         92         51
General Partner                          1          -          2          1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        37         23         94         52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income per common unit -
 basic and diluted (c)           $    0.58  $    0.40  $    1.48  $    0.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common units
 outstanding (millions)
- basic and diluted                   62.3       57.4       62.3       55.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Common units outstanding, end of
 period (millions)                    62.3       62.3       62.3       62.3

(a) Financial information was recast to consolidate GTN and Bison.

(b) Net income attributable to controlling interest allocation excludes net income attributed to GTN's and Bison's former parent which amounted to $11 million and $26 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

(c) Net income per common unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to controlling interests, after deduction of the General Partner's allocation and net income attributed to GTN's and Bison's former parent, by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. The General Partner's allocation is computed based upon the General Partner's effective two percent general partner interest plus an amount equal to incentive distributions. On May 22, 2013, the Partnership issued 8.855 million common units in a public offering.


TC PipeLines, LP
Financial Summary

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet


(unaudited)                                            30-Jun-14   31-Dec-13
(millions of dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Current assets                                                82          69
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates                    1,184       1,195
Plant, property and equipment                              2,004       2,042
Other assets                                                 136         137
                                                    ------------------------
                                                           3,406       3,443
                                                    ------------------------


LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities                                          128          55
Other liabilities                                             26          24
Long-term debt, including current portion                  1,484       1,575
Partners' equity                                           1,768       1,789
                                                    ------------------------
                                                           3,406       3,443
                                                    ------------------------

TC PipeLines, LP Supplemental Schedule

Non-GAAP Measures

Reconciliation of Net Income attributable to controlling interests to Partnership Cash Flows


                                             Three months
                                                    ended  Six months ended
(unaudited)                                      June 30,          June 30,
(millions of dollars except per common
 unit amounts)
                                            2014     2013     2014     2013

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income attributable to controlling
 interests(a)                                 37       34       94       78

Less net income attributed to GTN's and
                                               -      (11)       -      (26)
Bison's former parent (a)
                                        ------------------------------------
Net income as previously reported             37       23       94       52

Add:
Cash distributions from GTN (b)               25        8       45       14
Cash distributions from Northern Border
 (b)                                          26       22       47       44
Cash distributions from Bison (b)             11        3       23        7
Cash distributions from Great Lakes (b)       14        6       19       12
Cash flows provided by North Baja's and
                                              11       13       24       27
Tuscarora's operating activities
                                        ------------------------------------
                                              87       52      158      104
Less:
Equity earnings as previously reported:
  GTN                                          -       (4)       -       (9)
  Northern Border                            (16)     (15)     (39)     (31)
  Bison                                        -       (3)       -       (6)
  Great Lakes                                 (2)       -      (12)      (2)
                                        ------------------------------------
                                             (18)     (22)     (51)     (48)
Less:
Other Pipes' net income as previously
 reported (c)

  GTN                                        (15)       -      (37)       -
  Bison                                      (11)       -      (23)       -
  North Baja                                  (6)      (6)     (12)     (12)
  Tuscarora                                   (4)      (4)      (8)      (8)
                                        ------------------------------------
                                             (36)     (10)     (80)     (20)
Add:
Net income attributable to non-
 controlling
                                               8        -       18        -
interests after the 2013 Acquisition
                                        ------------------------------------

Partnership cash flows before General
                                              78       43      139       88
Partner distributions
General Partner distributions (d)             (1)      (1)      (2)      (2)
                                        ------------------------------------

Partnership cash flows                        77       42      137       86
                                        ------------------------------------

Cash distributions declared                  (54)     (52)    (106)     (94)
Cash distributions declared per common
 unit (e)                                $  0.84  $  0.81  $  1.65  $  1.59

Cash distributions paid                      (52)     (43)    (103)     (85)
Cash distributions paid per common unit
 (e)                                     $  0.81  $  0.78  $  1.62  $  1.56
                                        ------------------------------------

(a) Financial information was recast to consolidate GTN and Bison for all periods presented. Prior to the 2013 Acquisition, our net income was $23 million and $52 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, reflecting our actual ownership in each of GTN and Bison at that time. As a result of the recast, net income attributable to controlling interests is $34 million and $78 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, as if we owned 70 percent in each of GTN and Bison. Net income attributed to GTN and Bison's former parent of $11 million and $26 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, reflecting the acquired ownership interests not then owned by the Partnership, reconciles the net income as previously reported and net income attributable to controlling interests.

(b) In accordance with the cash distribution policies of the respective entities, cash distributions from GTN, Northern Border, Bison and Great Lakes, are based on their respective prior quarter financial results. Distributions from GTN and Bison are based on 70 percent ownership starting from July 1, 2013. Distributions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were not recast.

(c) "Other Pipes" includes the results of North Baja and Tuscarora and, after July 1, 2013, GTN and Bison as well.

(d) General Partner distributions represent the cash distributions paid to the General Partner with respect to its effective two percent general partner interest plus an amount equal to incentive distributions. Incentive distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were nil.

(e) Cash distributions declared per common unit and cash distributions paid per common unit are computed by dividing cash distributions, after the deduction of the General Partner's allocation, by the number of common units outstanding. The General Partner's allocation is computed based upon the General Partner's effective two percent general partner interest plus an amount equal to incentive distributions.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
"We are a monitoring company. We work with Salesforce, BBC, and quite a few other big logos. We basically provide monitoring for them, structure for their cloud services and we fit into the DevOps world" explained David Gildeh, Co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
In the world of DevOps there are ‘known good practices’ – aka ‘patterns’ – and ‘known bad practices’ – aka ‘anti-patterns.' Many of these patterns and anti-patterns have been developed from real world experience, especially by the early adopters of DevOps theory; but many are more feasible in theory than in practice, especially for more recent entrants to the DevOps scene. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists discussed...
After more than five years of DevOps, definitions are evolving, boundaries are expanding, ‘unicorns’ are no longer rare, enterprises are on board, and pundits are moving on. Can we now look at an evolution of DevOps? Should we? Is the foundation of DevOps ‘done’, or is there still too much left to do? What is mature, and what is still missing? What does the next 5 years of DevOps look like? In this Power Panel at DevOps Summit, moderated by DevOps Summit Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists loo...