Welcome!

News Feed Item

First Quantum Minerals Reports Second Quarter 2014 Results

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 07/30/14 -- (In United States dollars, except where noted otherwise)

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. ("First Quantum" or the "Company"), (TSX: FM)(LSE: FQM) today announced comparative net earnings(1) of $133.6 million or $0.23 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2014 inclusive of $19.5 million or $0.04 per share of unfavorable, recurring acquisition-related adjustments.

SECOND QUARTER 2014 HIGHLIGHTS(2)

--  Higher production in main metals:
    --  Copper up 4% to 107,808 tonnes
    --  Nickel up 12% to 12,223 tonnes
--  Significantly increased copper sales:
    --  Revenues up 11% to $685.1 million despite lower market price
    --  Overall sales volume up 20% to 114,449 tonnes
    --  Kansanshi sales volume up 26% over Q2 2013 and Q1 2014
--  14% higher nickel revenues to $147.7 million despite 11% lower sales
    volume
--  Low cash cost of production maintained:
    --  Copper up 8% to $1.45 per pound
    --  Nickel down 24% to $4.16 per pound
--  Growth projects supported by strong cash flow from operations and
    enhanced financing:
    --  $388.6 million of cash flow generated by operations(3)
    --  $769.4 million cash balance including restricted cash at June 30,
        2014
    --  Further enhanced financial flexibility with issuance of $850.0
        million of senior notes
--  $618.6 million invested in the expansion of the production base
    --  Sentinel advanced to 94% overall completion
    --  Phase 1 copper smelter advanced to 78% overall completion; initial
        commissioning started in July
    --  Enterprise nickel advanced
    --  Proposed acquisition of Lumina Copper Corporation expected to close
        on or before August 30, 2014

(1) Earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company have been adjusted to remove the effect of unusual items to arrive at comparative earnings. Comparative earnings and comparative earnings per share are not measures recognized under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. The Company has disclosed these measures to assist with the understanding of results and to provide further financial information about the results to investors.

(2) Results are compared to the second quarter 2013, unless noted otherwise.

(3) Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital and tax paid.

CEO'S COMMENTS

"Continued solid operations and the benefits of our cost control drive underlie the results for the quarter. The operational flexibility that has been built into Kansanshi was particularly evident as good headway was made on reducing concentrate inventory by utilizing as much of its recently-expanded oxide circuit as economically feasible. Both our nickel operations had good quarters with Kevitsa turning in one of its best performances since startup," noted Philip Pascall, First Quantum's CEO and Chairman.

"The second half of 2014 is an important one for First Quantum. Both the Phase 1 copper smelter and Trident project are tracking well for staged commissioning during this period towards commercial operations in 2015. These are significant components in the Company's growth and when in operation, they are expected to employ an additional 2,400 people, add up to 300,000 tonnes of new copper production capacity and enhance the overall unit operating cost.

"Our balance sheet remains strong. With the addition of extra financing flexibility during the quarter, funding for our growth projects is well provided for and we were able to take the opportunity to supplement our growth pipeline with our proposed acquisition of Lumina Copper Corporation. This underscores our belief in the fundamentals of copper and is another step in our long-stated objective of geographical diversification through the acquisition of world class, early-stage copper assets. The Taca Taca project is at the stage where we can apply our resources and development expertise to realize its full potential and further add to our copper production profile," Mr. Pascall concluded.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

                            ------------------------------------------------
                             Three months ended June       Six months
                                       30                 ended June 30
                            ------------------------------------------------
(U.S. dollars millions,
 except where noted
 otherwise)                         2014        2013        2014     2013(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales revenues                     945.1       869.3     1,835.6     1,770.5
Gross profit                       292.6       201.1       574.2       511.3
EBITDA(2)                          381.5       284.2       745.1       594.6
Net earnings attributable to
 shareholders of the
 Company(3)                        133.6        71.9       260.4       184.3
Earnings per share                 $0.23       $0.12       $0.44       $0.35
Diluted earnings per share         $0.23       $0.12       $0.44       $0.34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparative earnings(3)            133.6       103.6       260.4       257.4
Comparative earnings per
 share(3)                          $0.23       $0.18       $0.44       $0.48
Cash flow from operations,
 before changes in working
 capital and tax paid              388.6       281.6       758.7       606.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 include the results of the Las Cruces mine (100%), the Cayeli mine (100%), and the Pyhasalmi mine (100%) (together "the acquired operations") from March 22, 2013, the date of acquisition.

(2) Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") are not recognized under IFRS. Refer to the "Regulatory Disclosures" section in the Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, for further information.

(3) Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company have been adjusted to remove the effect of unusual items to arrive at comparative earnings. Comparative earnings and comparative earnings per share are not measures recognized under IFRS and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. The Company has disclosed these measures to assist with the understanding of results and to provide further financial information about the results to investors.

OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

                            ------------------------------------------------
                             Three months ended June       Six months
                                       30                 ended June 30
                            ------------------------------------------------
(U.S. dollars where
 applicable)                        2014        2013        2014     2013(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper production (tonnes)       107,808     103,694     220,926     183,002
Copper sales (tonnes)            114,449      95,491     217,235     184,600
Cash cost of copper
 production (C1)(2) (per lb)       $1.45       $1.34       $1.41       $1.43
Realized copper price (per
 lb)                               $2.97       $3.10       $3.03       $3.29
Nickel production (contained
 tonnes)                          12,223      10,875      24,061      21,947
Nickel sales (contained
 tonnes)                          10,651      11,927      24,748      22,975
Cash cost of nickel
 production (C1)(2) (per lb)       $4.16       $5.45       $4.30       $5.38
Realized nickel price (per
 payable lb)                       $8.45       $6.82       $7.38       $7.29
Gold production (ounces)          60,723      63,567     120,887     119,511
Gold sales (ounces)               60,135      59,381     113,261     118,172
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 include those of the Las Cruces mine (100%), the Cayeli mine (100%) and the Pyhasalmi mine (100%) from March 22, 2013, the date of acquisition.

(2) Cash costs (C1) is not recognized under IFRS. Refer to the "Regulatory Disclosures" section in the MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, for further information.

UPDATED FULL YEAR 2014 GUIDANCE

--  Total production
    --  copper between 418,000 and 444,000 tonnes
    --  nickel between 45,000 and 48,000 tonnes
    --  gold between 221,000 and 242,000 ounces
    --  zinc between 55,000 and 60,000 tonnes
    --  palladium between 22,000 and 24,000 ounces
    --  platinum between 26,000 and 29,000 ounces
--  Cash cost of production
    --  copper between $1.32 and $1.48 per pound
    --  nickel between $4.40 and $4.90 per pound
--  Capital expenditures of between $2.2 billion and $2.4 billion, excluding
    capitalization of any pre-commercial production costs and capitalized
    interest

CONFERENCE CALL & WEBCAST

The Company will host a conference call and webcast to discuss the results on Thursday, July 31, 2014.

Conference call and webcast details are as follows:

Date:     July 31, 2014
Time:     9:00 am (EDT); 2:00 pm (BST); 6:00 am (PDT)
Webcast:  http://www.first-quantum.com/
Dial in:  North America: 800 709 0218 (toll free)
          International and North America: 1 647 722 6851
          United Kingdom: 0800 496 0830 (toll free) or 44 207 855 8971

Replay:   Canada and international: 1 416 626 4100
          OR
          Toll free North America: 800 558 5253
Passcode: 21724489

The conference call replay will be available from 11:00 am (EDT) July 31, 2014 until 11:59 pm (EDT) on August 7, 2014.

COMPLETE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The complete unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, and MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are available at www.first-quantum.com and should be read in conjunction with this news release.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

This news release and the Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and are presented in United States dollars, except where noted. Changes in accounting policies have been applied consistently to comparative periods unless otherwise noted.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors of First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

G. Clive Newall, President

12g3-2b-82-4461

Listed in Standard and Poor's

Cautionary statement on forward-looking information

Certain statements and information herein, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. These forward-looking statements are principally included in the Development activities section and are also disclosed in other sections of the document. The forward looking statements include estimates, forecasts and statements as to the Company's expectations of production and sales volumes, expected timing of completion of project development at Kansanshi, Sentinel, Enterprise and Cobre Panama, the impact of ore grades on future production, the potential of production disruptions, capital expenditure and mine production costs, the outcome of mine permitting, the outcome of legal proceedings which involve the Company, information with respect to the future price of copper, gold, cobalt, nickel, zinc, pyrite, PGE, and sulphuric acid, estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources, First Quantum's exploration and development program, estimated future expenses, exploration and development capital requirements, the Company's hedging policy, and goals and strategies. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements or information can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate" or "believes" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

With respect to forward-looking statements and information contained herein, the Company has made numerous assumptions including among other things, assumptions about the price of copper, gold, nickel, zinc, pyrite, PGE, cobalt and sulphuric acid, anticipated costs and expenditures and the ability to achieve the Company's goals. Although management believes that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that a forward-looking statement or information herein will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements and information by their nature are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. These factors include, but are not limited to, future production volumes and costs, costs for inputs such as oil, power and sulphur, political stability in Zambia, Peru, Mauritania, Finland, Spain, Turkey, Panama and Australia, adverse weather conditions in Zambia, Finland, Spain, Turkey and Mauritania, labour disruptions, mechanical failures, water supply, procurement and delivery of parts and supplies to the operations, the production of off-spec material.

See the Company's Annual Information Form for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information. Although the Company has attempted to identify factors that would cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements or information, there may be other factors that cause actual results, performances, achievements or events not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. Also, many of these factors are beyond First Quantum's control. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. The Company undertake no obligation to reissue or update forward-looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date hereof except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements and information made herein are qualified by this cautionary statement.

Contacts:
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. - North American contact:
Sharon Loung
Director, Investor Relations
(647) 346-3934 / Toll Free: 1 (888) 688-6577
(604) 688-3818 (FAX)
[email protected]

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. - United Kingdom contact:
Clive Newall
President
+44 140 327 3484
+44 140 327 3494 (FAX)
[email protected]
www.first-quantum.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Sometimes I write a blog just to formulate and organize a point of view, and I think it’s time that I pull together the bounty of excellent information about Machine Learning. This is a topic with which business leaders must become comfortable, especially tomorrow’s business leaders (tip for my next semester University of San Francisco business students!). Machine learning is a key capability that will help organizations drive optimization and monetization opportunities, and there have been some...
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, provided a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to oper...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.