Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. Declares First Distribution Increase and Reports Earnings for Second Quarter 2014

HOUSTON, TX -- (Marketwired) -- 07/31/14 -- Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP) ("Midcoast Partners" or the "Partnership") announced today that the board of directors of its general partner has declared a cash distribution of $0.325 per unit on all of its outstanding common and subordinated units, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, representing a 4 percent increase over the prior quarter. The distribution is payable on August 14, 2014, to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 7, 2014.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Executed a debt-funded first drop-down acquisition from Enbridge Energy Partners (NYSE: EEP) for $350 million, effective July 1, 2014.

  • Announced first quarterly distribution increase of 1.25 cents per unit, representing a 4 percent increase over the minimum quarterly distribution.

  • Reports adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow for the second quarter of $16.7 million and $14.9 million, respectively.

  • Construction of Beckville natural gas processing plant in the Cotton Valley play on target for first quarter 2015 in-service.

"We are excited to have completed our first drop-down transaction since our IPO. This immediately accretive drop-down is a tangible first step as we execute our strategy of increasing the scale of Midcoast Partners and positioning the Partnership to successfully execute our plan to deliver top-tier distribution growth. We are also pleased to announce our initial quarterly distribution increase. The distribution increase represents a 4 percent increase over our minimum quarterly distribution," said C. Gregory Harper, principal executive officer for the Partnership.

"The outlook for Midcoast Partners continues to improve with our system's natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) volumes reaching an inflection point in the second quarter and continuing to ramp-up. As we look forward, our organic growth program is proceeding on schedule and we are aggressively pursuing opportunities to secure additional accretive growth, in addition to positioning the Partnership for prospective drop-down opportunities from our sponsors. With our foundation improving, management intends to recommend quarterly distribution increases to the board of directors of our general partner going forward, as we look to deliver mid-teens compounded annual distribution growth to our unitholders through 2017," noted Harper.

COMPARATIVE EARNINGS STATEMENT

The financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 for Midcoast Energy Partners are presented on a consolidated basis. Among other factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our results of operations may not be comparable to our predecessor's historical results of operations since our Predecessor's results of operations historically reflected 100 percent of the revenues and expenses relating to Midcoast Operating, L.P. and its subsidiaries. We owned a 39 percent controlling interest in Midcoast Operating for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, and for those periods we consolidated the results of operations of Midcoast Operating and then recorded a 61 percent non-controlling interest deduction for EEP's retained interest in Midcoast Operating.


                                      Three months ended   Six months ended
                                           June 30,            June 30,
                                      ------------------  ------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)               2014    2013 (2)    2014    2013 (2)
                                      --------  --------  --------  --------
Operating revenue                     $1,396.8  $1,299.1  $3,043.7  $2,669.4
Operating expenses:
  Cost of natural gas                  1,259.8   1,113.0   2,748.5   2,309.1
  Operating and maintenance               84.2      91.0     165.9     174.4
  General and administrative              21.6      23.6      48.8      48.1
  Depreciation and amortization           36.8      35.3      73.8      70.5
                                      --------  --------  --------  --------
Operating income (loss)                   (5.6)     36.2       6.7      67.3
Interest expense                           2.8         -       6.1         -
Other income                               2.4       0.1       1.1       0.2
                                      --------  --------  --------  --------
Income (loss) before income tax
 expense                                  (6.0)     36.3       1.7      67.5
Income tax expense                         0.8       7.8       1.8       8.3
                                      --------  --------  --------  --------
Net income (loss)                     $   (6.8) $   28.5  $   (0.1) $   59.2
Less: Net income (loss) attributable
 to noncontrolling interest               (2.2)        -       4.1         -
                                      --------  --------  --------  --------
Net income (loss) attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interest in Midcoast
 Energy Partners, L.P.                $   (4.6) $   28.5  $   (4.2)     59.2
                                      ========  ========  ========  ========

Net income (loss) attributable to
 limited partners (1)                 $   (4.5) $   10.8  $   (4.1) $   22.7
                                      ========  ========  ========  ========
Weighted average limited partner
 units (millions) (1)                     45.2      26.7      45.2      26.7
                                      ========  ========  ========  ========
Net income (loss) per limited partner
 unit (dollars) (1)                   $  (0.09) $   0.41  $  (0.09) $   0.85
                                      ========  ========  ========  ========

(1) Represents calculation retrospectively reflecting the affiliate
    capitalization of MEP consisting of 4.1 million MEP Class A common
    units, 22.6 million MEP subordinated units and 0.9 million MEP general
    partner interest units upon the transfer of a controlling ownership,
    including limited partner and general partner interests, in Midcoast
    Operating. The noncontrolling interest reflects the 61% retained by EEP
    for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013.
(2) For periods prior to November 13, 2013, the financial and operating
    information presented pertain to Midcoast Operating, L.P., our
    predecessor for accounting purposes.


COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

Following are explanations for significant changes in the Midcoast Operating's financial results, comparing the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 with the same periods of 2013. The comparison refers to adjusted operating income, which excludes the effect of non-cash and nonrecurring items (see Non-GAAP Reconciliations section below).


Midcoast Operating
                                     Three months ended   Six months ended
      Adjusted Operating Income           June 30,            June 30,
                                     ------------------  ------------------
(unaudited, dollars in millions)       2014      2013      2014      2013
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Gathering, Processing and
 Transportation                      $   10.7  $   12.7  $    6.7  $   46.3
Logistics and Marketing                  (3.0)      0.1       9.9      (1.1)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Adjusted operating income                 7.7      12.8      16.6      45.2
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
MEP Corporate                            (2.2)        -      (2.2)        -
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Adjusted operating income            $    5.5  $   12.8  $   14.4  $   45.2
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------

Gathering, Processing and Transportation - Second quarter adjusted operating results for the Gathering, Processing and Transportation segment were $2.0 million lower than the same period of 2013. The decrease in adjusted operating income was predominantly attributable to lower natural gas throughput and NGL production volumes on our major systems and due to reduced gas drilling activity in our Anadarko and East Texas regions coupled with delayed natural gas well completions in East Texas. Additionally, volumes were impacted by the loss of a major customer on our Anadarko system in the second half of 2013. The decrease in operating income was partially offset by lower operating and general and administrative costs. While volumes in the second quarter of 2014 were lower than the comparable period of 2013, Management believes system volumes have stabilized as volumes increased month over month in the second quarter of 2014. Management expects this trend to continue through the balance of 2014.


Midcoast Operating
    Gathering, Processing and      Three months ended     Six months ended
     Transportation Throughput          June 30,              June 30,
                                  --------------------  --------------------
(MMBtu per day)                      2014       2013       2014       2013
                                  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
East Texas                        1,029,000  1,211,000  1,000,000  1,231,000
Anadarko                            826,000    972,000    825,000    968,000
North Texas                         300,000    344,000    286,000    338,000
                                  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Total                             2,155,000  2,527,000  2,111,000  2,537,000
                                  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Logistics and Marketing - Second quarter adjusted operating income for the Logistics and Marketing segment was $3.1 million lower than the same period of 2013. The decrease in adjusted operating income was predominantly attributable to lower natural gas and NGL volumes from our asset systems.

Corporate - On June 19, 2014, the Partnership announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire from its affiliate EEP an incremental 12.6 percent limited partner interest in Midcoast Operating, L.P. ("Midcoast Operating") for $350 million in cash. This acquisition closed on July 1, 2014 and increased the Partnership's interest in Midcoast Operating to 51.6 percent. This transaction is the first acquisition of additional interests in Midcoast Operating since the Partnership's initial public offering on November 13, 2013. Public partnership expenses are recognized in the corporate segment.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUARTERLY RESULTS AND 2014 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Midcoast Partners will review its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 in a live Internet presentation, commencing at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 31, 2014. Interested parties may watch the live webcast at the link provided below. A replay will be available shortly afterward. Presentation slides and condensed unaudited financial statements will also be available on the Partnership's website at the link below.

MEP Events and Presentations:

http://www.midcoastpartners.com/Investor-Relations/Events-and-Presentations/

Webcast link: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/2nsimr7z

The audio portion of the live presentation will be accessible by telephone at (866) 700-0133 (Passcode: 61751590) and can be replayed until August 14, 2014 by calling (888) 286-8010 (Passcode: 67610308). An audio replay will also be available for download in MP3 format from either of the website addresses above.

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

Adjusted net income and adjusted operating income for the principal business segments are provided to illustrate trends in income excluding derivative fair value losses and gains and other nonrecurring items that affect earnings. The derivative non-cash losses and gains result from marking to market certain financial derivatives used by the Partnership for hedging purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance as prescribed under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.


Midcoast Energy Partners             Three months ended   Six months ended
          Adjusted Earnings               June 30,            June 30,
                                     ------------------  ------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions
 except per unit amounts)              2014     2013(1)    2014     2013(1)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Net income (loss) attributable to
 general and limited partner
 ownership interests in Midcoast
 Energy Partners, L.P.               $   (4.6) $   28.5  $   (4.2) $   59.2
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses
  -Gathering, Processing and
   Transportation                         4.0      (7.5)      3.9      (8.9)
  -Logistics and Marketing                0.2     (14.8)     (1.5)    (11.9)
Make-up rights adjustment                 0.4         -       1.2         -
Option premium amortization              (0.3)     (1.1)     (0.6)     (1.3)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Adjusted net income (loss)           $   (0.3) $    5.1  $   (1.2) $   37.1
                                     ========  ========  ========  ========

Adjusted net income (loss)
 attributable to limited partners
 (2)                                 $   (0.3) $    1.9  $   (1.2) $   14.2
                                     ========  ========  ========  ========
Weighted average units (millions)
 (2)                                     45.2      26.7      45.2      26.7
                                     ========  ========  ========  ========
Adjusted net income (loss) per
 limited partner unit (dollars) (2)  $      -  $   0.07  $  (0.02) $   0.54
                                     ========  ========  ========  ========

(1) Results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013
    represents financial results of Midcoast Operating, L.P. ("Midcoast
    Operating"), our predecessor for accounting purposes.
(2) Represents calculation retrospectively reflecting the affiliate
    capitalization of MEP consisting of 4.1 million MEP Class A common
    units, 22.6 million MEP subordinated units and 0.9 million MEP general
    partner interest units, upon the transfer of a controlling ownership,
    including limited partner and general partner interests in Midcoast
    Operating. The noncontrolling interest reflects the 61% retained by EEP
    for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013.



Midcoast Operating
      Gathering, Processing and      Three months ended   Six months ended
           Transportation                 June 30,            June 30,
                                     ------------------  ------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)       2014      2013      2014      2013
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Operating income (loss)              $    0.1  $   21.3  $   (4.8) $   56.5
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                          10.3      (7.5)     10.0      (8.9)
Make-up rights adjustment                 1.1         -       3.2         -
Option premium amortization              (0.8)     (1.1)     (1.7)     (1.3)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Adjusted operating income            $   10.7  $   12.7  $    6.7  $   46.3
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------

Midcoast Operating                   Three months ended   Six months ended
       Logistics and Marketing            June 30,            June 30,
                                     ------------------  ------------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)       2014      2013      2014      2013
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Operating income (loss)              $   (3.5) $   14.9  $   13.7  $   10.8
Noncash derivative fair value
 (gains) losses                           0.5     (14.8)     (3.8)    (11.9)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------
Adjusted operating income (loss)     $   (3.0) $    0.1  $    9.9  $   (1.1)
                                     --------  --------  --------  --------


Midcoast Energy Partners

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is used as a supplemental financial measurement to assess liquidity and the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs and make cash distributions to unitholders. The following reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted EBITDA is provided because EBITDA is not a financial measure recognized under generally accepted accounting principles.


Midcoast Energy Partners              Three months ended   Six months ended
           Adjusted EBITDA                 June 30,            June 30,
                                      ------------------  -----------------
(unaudited; dollars in millions)             2014                2014
                                      ------------------  -----------------
Net cash provided (used) by operating
 activities                           $            (37.5) $           176.3
Changes in operating assets and
 liabilities, net of cash acquired                  77.4              (93.4)
Income tax expense                                   0.8                1.8
Interest expense                                     2.8                6.1
Option premium amortization                         (0.7)              (1.7)
Other                                                1.0                  -
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to EEP
 retained interest                                 (27.1)             (55.5)
                                      ------------------  -----------------
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to MEP                 16.7               33.6
                                      ------------------  -----------------


Maintenance capital expenditures                    (5.0)              (9.9)
Income taxes paid                                   (0.8)              (0.9)
Cash paid for interest MOLP                         (0.2)              (0.5)
Cash paid for interest MEP                          (2.1)              (3.8)
Intercorporate abatement                             2.5                4.9
Texas Express distribution in excess
 of income                                           3.8                3.8
                                      ------------------  -----------------
Distributable cash flow               $             14.9  $            27.2
                                      ------------------  -----------------


About Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P.
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP), is a limited partnership formed by Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P ("Enbridge Partners") to serve as Enbridge Partners' primary vehicle for owning and growing its natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) midstream business in the United States. Our assets consist of a 51.6 percent controlling interest in Midcoast Operating, L.P., a Texas limited partnership that owns a network of natural gas and NGL gathering and transportation systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities and NGL fractionation facilities primarily located in Texas and Oklahoma. Midcoast Operating also owns and operates natural gas, condensate and NGL logistics and marketing assets that primarily support its gathering, processing and transportation business. Through our ownership of Midcoast Operating's general partner, we control, manage and operate these systems.

Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: EEP), owns 100 percent of Midcoast Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Midcoast Partners and holds an approximate 54 percent interest in Midcoast Partners. Enbridge Partners owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and, through Midcoast Partners, natural gas transportation systems in the United States. Its principal crude oil system is the largest pipeline transporter of growing oil production from western Canada and the North Dakota Bakken formation. Enbridge Partners is recognized by Forbes as one of the 100 Most Trustworthy Companies in America.

Forward Looking Statements

This news release includes forward-looking statements, which are statements that frequently use words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "position," "projection," "should," "strategy," "target," "will" and similar words. Although we believe that such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance. Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond the ability of Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. ("MEP") to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for, and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and natural gas liquids, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) MEP's ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline and gathering systems, as well as other processing and treating plants; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at MEP's facilities or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which MEP transports products or to whom MEP sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance; (6) changes in or challenges to MEP's rates; and (7) changes in laws or regulations to which MEP is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance.

Forward-looking statements regarding "drop-down" growth opportunities are further qualified by the fact that Enbridge Partners is under no obligation to offer to sell us additional interests in Midcoast Operating, and we are under no obligation to buy any such additional interests. As a result, we do not know when or if any such additional interests will be purchased.

The Partnership's forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties pertaining to operating performance, regulatory parameters, project approval and support, weather, economic conditions, interest rates and commodity prices, including but not limited to those discussed more extensively in our filings with the U.S. securities regulators. The impact of any one risk, uncertainty or factor on any particular forward looking statement is not determinable with certainty as these are independent and our future course of action depends on management's assessment of all information available at the relevant time. Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publically update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition to the risks listed above, other risks include those detailed from time to time in MEP's Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, reports, including, without limitation, in MEP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year and, and any subsequently filed annual, quarterly or current reports, which filings are available to the public at the SEC's website (www.sec.gov).

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner, Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., discussed the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and conducte...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, discussed h...
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
The Internet of Everything (IoE) brings together people, process, data and things to make networked connections more relevant and valuable than ever before – transforming information into knowledge and knowledge into wisdom. IoE creates new capabilities, richer experiences, and unprecedented opportunities to improve business and government operations, decision making and mission support capabilities.
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
Puppet Labs has announced the next major update to its flagship product: Puppet Enterprise 2015.2. This release includes new features providing DevOps teams with clarity, simplicity and additional management capabilities, including an all-new user interface, an interactive graph for visualizing infrastructure code, a new unified agent and broader infrastructure support.
Chuck Piluso presented a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. Prior to Secure Infrastructure and Services, Mr. Piluso founded North American Telecommunication Corporation, a facilities-based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier licensed by the Public Service Commission in 10 states, serving as the company's chairman and president from 1997 to 2000. Between 1990 and 1997, Mr. Piluso served as chairman & founder of International Te...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
One of the hottest areas in cloud right now is DRaaS and related offerings. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Dale Levesque, Disaster Recovery Product Manager with Windstream's Cloud and Data Center Marketing team, will discuss the benefits of the cloud model, which far outweigh the traditional approach, and how enterprises need to ensure that their needs are properly being met.
Learn how to solve the problem of keeping files in sync between multiple Docker containers. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Aaron Brongersma, Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Modulus, discussed using rsync, GlusterFS, EBS and Bit Torrent Sync. He broke down the tools that are needed to help create a seamless user experience. In the end, can we have an environment where we can easily move Docker containers, servers, and volumes without impacting our applications? He shared his results so yo...
Palerra, the cloud security automation company, announced enhanced support for Amazon AWS, allowing IT security and DevOps teams to automate activity and configuration monitoring, anomaly detection, and orchestrated remediation, thereby meeting compliance mandates within complex infrastructure deployments. "Monitoring and threat detection for AWS is a non-trivial task. While Amazon's flexible environment facilitates successful DevOps implementations, it adds another layer, which can become a ...
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.