News Feed Item

SPY Inc. Reports Financial Results for the First Half and Second Quarter 2014

SPY(R) Inc. Total Company First Half Net Sales Reported as $17.4 Million

CARLSBAD, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/06/14 -- SPY Inc. (OTCBB: XSPY) today announced financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

First half sales were $17.4 million in 2014, a decrease of 9% or $1.6 million less than in the first half of 2013. Sales included lower closeout sales of $0.8 million in 2014, compared to $1.4 million in 2013. The decrease in our net sales was primarily driven by an overall decline in the consumer market coupled with several key retailers currently holding lower levels of inventory and fewer closeout sales of our sunglass products. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 54% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 52% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Second quarter sales were $8.2 million in 2014, a decrease of 18% or $1.8 million less than in the second quarter of 2013. The decrease in our net sales was primarily driven by an overall decline in the consumer market coupled with several key retailers currently holding lower levels of inventory and fewer closeout sales of our sunglass products. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 56% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 53% for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

"Although we encountered a challenging consumer environment in the first couple of months of the second quarter we were pleased with the top line improvements in June and especially with the increase in our gross margin rate to the highest level in the last four years," said Michael Marckx, president and CEO. "The margin expansion is a direct result of our strong product development team as well as a concerted effort across the organization to reduce operating costs. Achieving an operating profit along with our expanding portfolio of products, including our successful Happy Lens™ Collection, positions us well for the balance of 2014 as we focus on fulfilling strong pre-orders for snow goggles, driving overall sales, improving our product margins and managing our operating costs."

Income from operations decreased by $0.2 million to $0.2 million in the first half of 2014, compared to income from operations of $0.4 million in the first half of 2013. The $0.2 million decrease was partially due to the decrease in sales offset with a 167 basis point improvement in gross profit as a percent of sales. Additionally, total operating expenses in the first half of 2014 were lower by $0.4 million, compared to the first half of 2013. Cash flow generated by operating activities was $1.5 million in the first half of 2014.

Income from operations decreased by $0.2 million to $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2014, compared to income from operations of approximately $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2013. The $0.2 million decrease was partially due to the decrease in sales offset with a 271 basis point improvement in gross profit as a percent of sales. Additionally, total operating expenses in the second quarter of 2014 were lower by $0.5 million, compared to the second quarter of 2013.

The Company incurred a net loss of $1.5 million and $1.3 million during the first half of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company incurred a net loss of $0.7 million and $0.6 million during the second quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

SPY Inc. invites you to join the investor conference call on Wednesday, August 6, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. PDT. The dial-in number for the call in North America is 1-866-700-6067 and 1-617-213-8834 for international callers. The participant pass code is 95387010. The call will also be webcast live on the internet and can be accessed by logging on at investor.spyoptic.com.

The results of our operations for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are more fully discussed in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2014.

SPY Inc.:

We have a happy disrespect for the usual way of looking (at life) and the need to SEE HAPPY. It is this mindset that drives us to design, market, and distribute premium products for people who "live" to be outdoors, pushing the boundaries in action sports, motorsports, snow sports, cycling and multi-sports. We actively support the lifestyle subcultures that surround these pursuits, and as a result our products serve the broader fashion, music and entertainment markets of the youth culture. Our reason for being is to create the unusual and this is what helps us deliver distinctive products to people who are active, fun and a bit irreverent, like us. Our principal products -- sunglasses, goggles and prescription frames -- are marketed with fun and creativity under the SPY® brand. More information about SPY may be obtained from: www.spyoptic.com, www.facebook.com/spyoptic, Twitter @spyoptic and Instagram @spyoptic.

Safe Harbor Statement:

This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or future financial performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "feel," "estimate," "predict," "hope," the negative of such terms, expressions of optimism or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to lack of continuity and effectiveness of our management team, our ability to generate sufficient incremental sales of our core SPY® brand and new products to recoup our significant investments in sales and marketing, our ability to lower our expenses or otherwise reduce our breakeven point on an operating basis, our ability to maintain or increase the availability of our existing credit facilities and otherwise finance our strategic objectives, and the other risks identified from time to time in our filings made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results. Moreover, except as required by law, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such forward-looking statements and undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.


(Thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)

                                                   June 30,    December 31,
                                                     2014          2013
                                                 ------------  ------------
Current assets
  Cash                                           $        808  $        686
  Accounts receivable, net                              5,316         6,543
  Inventories, net                                      6,557         5,872
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets               883           680
  Income taxes receivable                                   -             3
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total current assets                               13,564        13,784
Property and equipment, net                               391           438
Intangible assets, net of accumulated
 amortization of $800 and $782 at June 30, 2014
 and December 31, 2013, respectively                       54            72
Other long-term assets                                     44            63
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total assets                                 $     14,053  $     14,357
                                                 ============  ============

      Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current liabilities
  Lines of credit                                $      2,703  $      4,024
  Current portion of capital leases                        71            77
  Current portion of notes payable                         16            16
  Accounts payable                                      3,467         1,302
  Accrued expenses and other liabilities                2,866         3,069
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total current liabilities                           9,123         8,488
Capital leases, less current portion                       57            92
Notes payable, less current portion                         8            16
Notes payable to stockholders                          21,597        21,452
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total liabilities                                  30,785        30,048
Stockholders' deficit
  Preferred stock: par value $0.0001; 5,000,000
   authorized; none issued                                  -             -
  Common stock: par value $0.0001; 100,000,000
   shares authorized; 13,350,876 and 13,184,876
   shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
   2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively                 1             1
  Additional paid-in capital                           45,780        45,331
  Accumulated other comprehensive income                  514           520
  Accumulated deficit                                 (63,027)      (61,543)
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total stockholders' deficit                       (16,732)      (15,691)
                                                 ------------  ------------

    Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit  $     14,053  $     14,357
                                                 ============  ============


(Thousands, except per share amounts)

                                  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                        June 30,             June 30,
                                 --------------------  --------------------
                                    2014       2013       2014       2013
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                      (Unaudited)           (Unaudited)
Net sales                        $   8,183  $   9,995  $  17,376  $  19,002
Cost of sales                        3,641      4,718      8,053      9,125
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

  Gross profit                       4,542      5,277      9,323      9,877
Operating expenses:
  Sales and marketing                2,726      2,950      5,646      5,804
  General and administrative         1,387      1,789      2,871      3,236
  Shipping and warehousing             132         89        272        258
  Research and development             196        122        349        223
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

    Total operating expenses         4,441      4,950      9,138      9,521
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

  Income (Loss) from operations        101        327        185        356
Other income (expense):
  Interest expense                    (751)      (752)    (1,509)    (1,484)
  Foreign currency transaction
   gain (loss)                          69       (144)         2       (162)
  Other (expense)                     (161)        (5)      (159)        (5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

    Total other expense               (843)      (901)    (1,666)    (1,651)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

  Loss before provision for
   income taxes                       (742)      (574)    (1,481)    (1,295)
Income tax provision                    --         --          3         --
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Net loss                         $    (742) $    (574) $  (1,484) $  (1,295)
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

Net loss per share of Common
    Basic                        $    (.06) $    (.04) $    (.11) $    (.10)
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

    Diluted                      $    (.06) $    (.04) $    (.11) $    (.10)
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

Shares used in computing net
 loss per share of Common Stock
    Basic                           13,343     13,135     13,285     13,125
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

    Diluted                         13,343     13,135     13,285     13,125
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

Other comprehensive income
  Foreign currency translation
   adjustment                    $     (93) $     (84) $    (187) $      93
  Unrealized gain (loss) on
   foreign currency exposure of
   net investment in foreign
   operations                           88         96        180        (98)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

    Total other comprehensive
     income (loss)                      (5)        12         (7)        (5)
                                 ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Comprehensive loss               $    (747) $    (562) $  (1,491) $  (1,300)
                                 =========  =========  =========  =========

Maddy Isbell
PR Manager
Fax: 760-804-8442

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Dr. Robert Cohen, an economist and senior fellow at the Economic Strategy Institute, presented the findings of a series of six detailed case studies of how large corporations are implementing IoT. The session explored how IoT has improved their economic performance, had major impacts on business models and resulted in impressive ROIs. The companies covered span manufacturing and services firms. He also explored servicification, how manufacturing firms shift from se...
"I will be talking about ChatOps and ChatOps as a way to solve some problems in the DevOps space," explained Himanshu Chhetri, CTO of Addteq, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
DevOpsSummit New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. Digital Transformation (DX) is a major focus with the introduction of DXWorldEXPO within the program. Successful transformation requires a laser focus on being data-driven and on using all the tools available that enable transformation if they plan to survive over the long term. A total of 88% of Fortune 500 companies from a generation ago are now out of bus...
For better or worse, DevOps has gone mainstream. All doubt was removed when IBM and HP threw up their respective DevOps microsites. Where are we on the hype cycle? It's hard to say for sure but there's a feeling we're heading for the "Peak of Inflated Expectations." What does this mean for the enterprise? Should they avoid DevOps? Definitely not. Should they be cautious though? Absolutely. The truth is that DevOps and the enterprise are at best strange bedfellows. The movement has its roots in t...
Learn how to solve the problem of keeping files in sync between multiple Docker containers. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Aaron Brongersma, Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Modulus, discussed using rsync, GlusterFS, EBS and Bit Torrent Sync. He broke down the tools that are needed to help create a seamless user experience. In the end, can we have an environment where we can easily move Docker containers, servers, and volumes without impacting our applications? He shared his results so yo...
For organizations that have amassed large sums of software complexity, taking a microservices approach is the first step toward DevOps and continuous improvement / development. Integrating system-level analysis with microservices makes it easier to change and add functionality to applications at any time without the increase of risk. Before you start big transformation projects or a cloud migration, make sure these changes won’t take down your entire organization.
The Jevons Paradox suggests that when technological advances increase efficiency of a resource, it results in an overall increase in consumption. Writing on the increased use of coal as a result of technological improvements, 19th-century economist William Stanley Jevons found that these improvements led to the development of new ways to utilize coal. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Mark Thiele, Chief Strategy Officer for Apcera, compared the Jevons Paradox to modern-day enterprise IT, examin...
Kubernetes is a new and revolutionary open-sourced system for managing containers across multiple hosts in a cluster. Ansible is a simple IT automation tool for just about any requirement for reproducible environments. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, Patrick Galbraith, a principal engineer at HPE, discussed how to build a fully functional Kubernetes cluster on a number of virtual machines or bare-metal hosts. Also included will be a brief demonstration of running a Galera MyS...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
Digital transformation has increased the pace of business creating a productivity divide between the technology haves and have nots. Managing financial information on spreadsheets and piecing together insight from numerous disconnected systems is no longer an option. Rapid market changes and aggressive competition are motivating business leaders to reevaluate legacy technology investments in search of modern technologies to achieve greater agility, reduced costs and organizational efficiencies. ...
Amazon started as an online bookseller 20 years ago. Since then, it has evolved into a technology juggernaut that has disrupted multiple markets and industries and touches many aspects of our lives. It is a relentless technology and business model innovator driving disruption throughout numerous ecosystems. Amazon’s AWS revenues alone are approaching $16B a year making it one of the largest IT companies in the world. With dominant offerings in Cloud, IoT, eCommerce, Big Data, AI, Digital Assista...
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
When you focus on a journey from up-close, you look at your own technical and cultural history and how you changed it for the benefit of the customer. This was our starting point: too many integration issues, 13 SWP days and very long cycles. It was evident that in this fast-paced industry we could no longer afford this reality. We needed something that would take us beyond reducing the development lifecycles, CI and Agile methodologies. We made a fundamental difference, even changed our culture...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Mike Johnston, an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io, discussed how to use Kubernetes to set up a SaaS infrastructure for your business. Mike Johnston is an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io with over 12 years of experience designing, deploying, and maintaining server and workstation infrastructure at all scales. He has experience with brick and mortar data centers as well as cloud providers like Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace. H...