Welcome!

News Feed Item

Fortress Paper Announces Second Quarter 2014 Results

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/06/14 -- Fortress Paper Ltd. ("Fortress Paper" or the "Company") (TSX:FTP) reported a 2014 second quarter EBITDA loss of $6.0 million. The Dissolving Pulp Segment generated EBITDA loss of $4.2 million and the Security Paper Products Segment generated EBITDA loss of $0.4 million. Corporate costs contributed $1.4 million to EBITDA loss.

The Company is encouraged by the Fortress Specialty Cellulose mill results in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. Although the dissolving pulp market conditions continue to be challenging, production efficiencies and cash costs improved during the quarter and relative to comparative periods. The Dissolving Pulp Segment continues to be affected by poor market conditions and the anti-dumping duty imposed by China's Ministry of Commerce in April 2014.

The Fortress Specialty Cellulose mill produced 31,039 air dried metric tonnes ("ADMT") of dissolving pulp and 13,693 ADMT of northern bleached hardwood kraft ("NBHK") pulp during the second quarter of 2014. The Company sold 27,723 ADMT of dissolving pulp and 15,620 ADMT of NBHK pulp in the second quarter of 2014.

The Landqart mill continues to implement new initiatives to improve efficiencies and profitability. EBITDA for the Security Paper Products Segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $3.6 million lower when compared to the first quarter of 2014, and $0.9 million lower compared to the second quarter of 2013. A large production run was shipped in early July and therefore not included in second quarter results. Less than favourable conditions, including the strength of the Swiss franc against the Euro and strong competition for orders putting pressure on pricing, continue to adversely impact the results of the Security Paper Products Segment. The Landqart mill achieved 1,921 tonnes of security paper sales in the second quarter of 2014, compared to 2,583 tonnes of security paper sales in the first quarter of 2014.

Selected Financial Information

The selected financial information presented herein is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's consolidated financial statements as at and for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2014 and the related notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis, which are available on SEDAR.


(thousands of dollars, except shipments,                                    
 unaudited)                                       Q2 2014  Q1 2014  Q2 2013 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Sales from continuing operations                   67,262   53,856   59,883 
EBITDA from continuing operations(1)               (5,994) (13,626)  (8,356)
Net loss from continuing operations               (20,108) (23,421) (20,851)
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations (2)  (18,438) (25,858) (20,632)
Paper shipments (tonnes) (3)                        1,921    2,583    1,953 
Pulp shipments (ADMT)                              43,343   20,259   38,006 
                                                                            
(1) See Net Loss to EBITDA Reconciliation for Continuing Operations.        
(2) See Net Loss to Adjusted Net Loss Reconciliation for Continuing         
    Operations.                                                             
(3) From continuing operations.                                             

Reference is made in this news release to EBITDA (defined as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-operating income and expenses and stock-based compensation), which the Company considers to be an indicative measure of operating performance and a metric to evaluate profitability. Reference is also made to adjusted net loss (calculated as net loss less specific items affecting comparability with prior periods) and adjusted net loss per share (calculated as adjusted net loss divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding in the period). EBITDA, adjusted net loss and adjusted net loss per share are not generally accepted earnings measures and should not be considered as an alternative to net loss or cash flows as determined in accordance with IFRS. As there is no standardized method of calculating these measures, the Company's EBITDA, adjusted net loss and adjusted net loss per share may not be directly comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies. Reconciliations of EBITDA and adjusted net loss to net loss reported in accordance with IFRS are included below.


Net Loss to Adjusted Net Loss Reconciliation for Continuing Operations:     
                                                                            
(thousands of dollars, except per share amounts,                            
 unaudited)                                       Q2 2014  Q1 2014  Q2 2013 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Net loss from continuing operations               (20,108) (23,421) (20,851)
Foreign exchange loss (gain)                        1,670   (1,562)    (534)
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and                                  
 equipment                                              -     (875)     753 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted net loss                                 (18,438) (25,858) (20,632)
                                                                            
Basic and diluted net loss per share                (1.38)   (1.61)   (1.43)
Adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted      (1.26)   (1.77)   (1.42)
                                                                            
Net Loss to EBITDA Reconciliation for Continuing Operations:                
                                                                            
(thousands of dollars, unaudited)                 Q2 2014  Q1 2014  Q2 2013 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Net loss                                          (20,108) (23,421) (20,851)
Income tax (recovery) expense                         (32)     (14)   3,392 
Foreign exchange loss (gain)                        1,670   (1,562)    (534)
Net finance expense                                 5,623    5,683    3,944 
Amortization                                        7,219    6,325    4,281 
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and              -     (875)     753 
 equipment                                                                  
Stock based compensation                             (366)     238      659 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA                                             (5,994) (13,626)  (8,356)

The Company

Fortress Paper operates internationally in two distinct business segments: dissolving pulp and security paper products. The Company operates its dissolving pulp business through the Fortress Specialty Cellulose mill located in Thurso, Quebec, Canada, which has expanded into the renewable energy generation sector with the construction of a cogeneration facility and the production of NBHK pulp. The Company operates its security paper products business at the Landqart mill located in Switzerland, where it produces banknote, passport, visa and other brand protection and security papers, and at its high security production and research facility located in Canada, where it manufactures optically variable thin film material. The segmentation of the Company's manufacturing operations is based on a number of factors, including production, production processes, and economic characteristics.

Conference Call

A conference call to discuss the financial results for the second quarter 2014 will be held on August 7, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. (PDT). To participate in the conference call, please dial one of the following numbers:


North America: 1-855-353-9183                                               
Vancouver: 604-681-8564                                                     
Calgary and international: 403-532-5601                                     
Edmonton: 780-429-5820                                                      
Toronto: 416-623-0333                                                       
Ottawa: 613-212-0171                                                        
Montreal: 514-687-4017                                                      
Participant pass code: 15086#                                               

Conference Reference Number: 1161395#

A replay of the conference call will be available for 30 days. To access the replay, listeners may dial 1-855-201-2300 from North America or 403-255-0697 International. The conference reference number is 1161395# and the participant pass code to access the replay is 15086 #.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
@ThingsExpo has been named the ‘Top WebRTC Influencer' by iTrend. iTrend processes millions of conversations, tweets, interactions, news articles, press releases, blog posts - and extract meaning form them and analyzes mobile and desktop software platforms used to communicate, various metadata (such as geo location), and automation tools. In overall placement, @ThingsExpo ranked as the number one ‘WebRTC Influencer' followed by @DevOpsSummit at 55th.
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, John Jelinek IV, a web developer at Linux Academy, will discuss why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive ad...
Providing the needed data for application development and testing is a huge headache for most organizations. The problems are often the same across companies - speed, quality, cost, and control. Provisioning data can take days or weeks, every time a refresh is required. Using dummy data leads to quality problems. Creating physical copies of large data sets and sending them to distributed teams of developers eats up expensive storage and bandwidth resources. And, all of these copies proliferating...
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a client-oriented software development company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software company that develops and delivers turn-key mobile apps, websites, web services, and complex softw...
The speed of software changes in growing and large scale rapid-paced DevOps environments presents a challenge for continuous testing. Many organizations struggle to get this right. Practices that work for small scale continuous testing may not be sufficient as the requirements grow. In his session at DevOps Summit, Marc Hornbeek, Sr. Solutions Architect of DevOps continuous test solutions at Spirent Communications, explained the best practices of continuous testing at high scale, which is rele...
DevOps tends to focus on the relationship between Dev and Ops, putting an emphasis on the ops and application infrastructure. But that’s changing with microservices architectures. In her session at DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, Evangelist for F5 Networks, will focus on how microservices are changing the underlying architectures needed to scale, secure and deliver applications based on highly distributed (micro) services and why that means an expansion into “the network” for DevOps.
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
Using new techniques of information modeling, indexing, and processing, new cloud-based systems can support cloud-based workloads previously not possible for high-throughput insurance, banking, and case-based applications. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, John Newton, CTO, Founder and Chairman of Alfresco, described how to scale cloud-based content management repositories to store, manage, and retrieve billions of documents and related information with fast and linear scalability. He addres...
Hardware virtualization and cloud computing allowed us to increase resource utilization and increase our flexibility to respond to business demand. Docker Containers are the next quantum leap - Are they?! Databases always represented an additional set of challenges unique to running workloads requiring a maximum of I/O, network, CPU resources combined with data locality.
Due of the rise of Hadoop, many enterprises are now deploying their first small clusters of 10 to 20 servers. At this small scale, the complexity of operating the cluster looks and feels like general data center servers. It is not until the clusters scale, as they inevitably do, when the pain caused by the exponential complexity becomes apparent. We've seen this problem occur time and time again. In his session at Big Data Expo, Greg Bruno, Vice President of Engineering and co-founder of StackIQ...
The cloud market growth today is largely in public clouds. While there is a lot of spend in IT departments in virtualization, these aren’t yet translating into a true “cloud” experience within the enterprise. What is stopping the growth of the “private cloud” market? In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Nara Rajagopalan, CEO of Accelerite, explored the challenges in deploying, managing, and getting adoption for a private cloud within an enterprise. What are the key differences between wh...
Security, data privacy, reliability, and regulatory compliance are critical factors when evaluating whether to move business applications from in-house, client-hosted environments to a cloud platform. Quality assurance plays a vital role in ensuring that the appropriate level of risk assessment, verification, and validation takes place to ensure business continuity during the migration to a new cloud platform.
"Tintri was started in 2008 with the express purpose of building a storage appliance that is ideal for virtualized environments. We support a lot of different hypervisor platforms from VMware to OpenStack to Hyper-V," explained Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...