Welcome!

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2014 Second Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 08/07/14 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2014 second quarter net income for common stock of $212 million or $0.73 a share compared with $172 million or $0.59 a share in 2013. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the lease in/lease out (LILO) transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $189 million or $0.65 a share in 2014 compared with $160 million or $0.55 a share in 2013.

For the first six months of 2014, net income for common stock was $574 million or $1.96 a share compared with $364 million or $1.24 a share in the first six months of 2013. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs, were $532 million or $1.82 a share in 2014 compared with $476 million or $1.62 a share in 2013.

"We continued to meet financial expectations in the second quarter, while our field operations benefited from a mild spring as we prepared our delivery systems for summer," said John McAvoy, Con Edison's chairman, president and CEO. "Our cost management strategies are helping to maximize productivity and efficiency. We're also proud of the success of our sustainability strategy, which has yielded environmental dividends and national recognition, including a 43 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2005 and Newsweek naming us the top U.S. utility in their 2014 Green Rankings."

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.



                     Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                               Net Income for                 Net Income for
                  Earnings      Common Stock      Earnings     Common Stock
                     per        (Millions of         per       (Millions of
                    Share         Dollars)          Share        Dollars)
               -------------------------------------------------------------
                2014    2013    2014    2013    2014    2013   2014    2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported
 earnings per
 share and net
 income for
 common stock-
 GAAP basis
 (basic)       $ 0.73  $ 0.59  $  212  $  172  $ 1.96  $ 1.24 $  574  $  364
Less: Gain on
 sale of solar
 energy
 projects (a)    0.09       -      26       -    0.09       -     26       -
Add: LILO
 transactions
 (b)                -   (0.10)      -     (29)  (0.02)   0.41     (7)    121
Less: Net
 mark-to-
 market
 effects of
 the CEBs (c)   (0.01)  (0.06)     (3)    (17)   0.03    0.03      9       9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from
 ongoing
 operations -
 non-GAAP      $ 0.65  $ 0.55  $  189  $  160  $ 1.82  $ 1.62 $  532  $  476
============================================================================

(a) After taxes of $19 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
    2014.
(b) In January 2013, a court disallowed tax losses claimed by Con Edison
    relating to the 1997 and 1999 LILO transactions. For the six months
    ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the impact of the LILO transactions on
    earnings were a $7 million (after taxes of $6 million) benefit and a
    $121 million (after taxes of $80 million) charge, respectively,
    reflecting the recalculation of the accounting effect of the LILO
    transactions and interest on the tax liability. For the three months
    ended June 30, 2013, the impact of the LILO transactions on earnings was
    $29 million (after taxes of $22 million) benefit, reflecting the
    termination of the 1999 LILO transaction.
(c) After taxes of $(2) million and $(13) million for the three months ended
    June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $6 million and $6 million for the six months
    ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


The company expects its earnings from ongoing operations for the year 2014 to be in the range of $3.70 to $3.85 a share. The company's previous forecast of 2014 earnings was in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 a share. Earnings per share from ongoing operations exclude a $0.09 a share gain on sale of solar energy projects, a $0.02 a share benefit relating to the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the 2013 periods, reflect primarily changes in rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries and the weather impact on its steam delivery service. The rate plans provide for revenues to cover expected increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses, and depreciation and property taxes, reflecting primarily the impact of higher utility plant balances. The results of operations also include the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the impact of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

Operations and maintenance expenses for CECONY were higher in the 2014 periods primarily due to operating costs attributable to emergency response and the support and protection of company underground facilities to accommodate municipal projects and, in the six month period were offset in part by lower pension costs.

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared with the 2013 periods, resulting from these and other major factors:



                            Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                          Variation 2014 vs. 2013   Variation 2014 vs. 2013
                                       Net Income                Net Income
                                       for Common                for Common
                                         Stock                     Stock
                           Earnings    Variation     Earnings    Variation
                          per Share    (Millions    per Share    (Millions
                          Variation   of Dollars)   Variation   of Dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CECONY (a)
  Rate plans             $      0.16  $        45  $      0.32  $        93
  Weather impact on
   steam revenues                  -            -         0.04           13
  Operations and
   maintenance expense         (0.05)         (14)       (0.02)          (4)
  Depreciation and
   property taxes              (0.05)         (13)       (0.09)         (28)
  Other                            -            1         0.01            2
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Total CECONY                    0.06           19         0.26           76
Orange and Rockland
 Utilities (O&R) (a)            0.01            2        (0.02)          (7)
CEBs (b)                        0.06           16         0.46          137
Other, including parent
 company expenses               0.01            3         0.02            4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total variation          $      0.14  $        40  $      0.72  $       210
============================================================================

(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's and O&R's New York
    electric and gas rate plans and the weather-normalization clause
    applicable to their gas businesses, revenues are generally not affected
    by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were
    approved. Under the rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs
    and certain other costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for
    such costs.
(b) These variations include the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the
    impact of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects shown
    in the table on page 1. In addition, the variations include a tax
    benefit in the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $15 million or $0.05 a
    share resulting from the acceptance by the Internal Revenue Service of
    the company's claim for manufacturing tax deductions.


Refer to the company's Second Quarter Form 10-Q, which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at www.conedison.com (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Press Releases").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure also is useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $40 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in energy infrastructure projects.

Contact:
Robert McGee
212-460-4111

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"Splunk basically takes machine data and we make it usable, valuable and accessible for everyone. The way that plays in DevOps is - we need to make data-driven decisions to delivering applications," explained Andi Mann, Chief Technology Advocate at Splunk and @DevOpsSummit Conference Chair, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Security, data privacy, reliability, and regulatory compliance are critical factors when evaluating whether to move business applications from in-house, client-hosted environments to a cloud platform. Quality assurance plays a vital role in ensuring that the appropriate level of risk assessment, verification, and validation takes place to ensure business continuity during the migration to a new cloud platform.
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Robert Doyle, lead architect at eCube Systems, will examine the issues and need for an agile infrastructure and show the advantages of capturing developer knowledge in an exportable file for migration into production. He will introduce the use of NXTmonitor, a next-generation DevOps tool that captures application environments, dependencies and start/stop procedures in a portable configuration file with an easy-to-use GUI. In addition to captur...
Who are you? How do you introduce yourself? Do you use a name, or do you greet a friend by the last four digits of his social security number? Assuming you don’t, why are we content to associate our identity with 10 random digits assigned by our phone company? Identity is an issue that affects everyone, but as individuals we don’t spend a lot of time thinking about it. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ben Klang, Founder & President of Mojo Lingo, discussed the impact of technology on identity. Sho...
Fact is, enterprises have significant legacy voice infrastructure that’s costly to replace with pure IP solutions. How can we bring this analog infrastructure into our shiny new cloud applications? There are proven methods to bind both legacy voice applications and traditional PSTN audio into cloud-based applications and services at a carrier scale. Some of the most successful implementations leverage WebRTC, WebSockets, SIP and other open source technologies. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Da...
A critical component of any IoT project is what to do with all the data being generated. This data needs to be captured, processed, structured, and stored in a way to facilitate different kinds of queries. Traditional data warehouse and analytical systems are mature technologies that can be used to handle certain kinds of queries, but they are not always well suited to many problems, particularly when there is a need for real-time insights.
In his session at DevOps Summit, Tapabrata Pal, Director of Enterprise Architecture at Capital One, will tell a story about how Capital One has embraced Agile and DevOps Security practices across the Enterprise – driven by Enterprise Architecture; bringing in Development, Operations and Information Security organizations together. Capital Ones DevOpsSec practice is based upon three "pillars" – Shift-Left, Automate Everything, Dashboard Everything. Within about three years, from 100% waterfall, C...
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
"We provide DevOps solutions. We also partner with some key players in the DevOps space and we use the technology that we partner with to engineer custom solutions for different organizations," stated Himanshu Chhetri, CTO of Addteq, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
DevOps tends to focus on the relationship between Dev and Ops, putting an emphasis on the ops and application infrastructure. But that’s changing with microservices architectures. In her session at DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, Evangelist for F5 Networks, will focus on how microservices are changing the underlying architectures needed to scale, secure and deliver applications based on highly distributed (micro) services and why that means an expansion into “the network” for DevOps.
WebRTC is bringing significant change to the communications landscape that will bridge the worlds of web and telephony, making the Internet the new standard for communications. Cloud9 took the road less traveled and used WebRTC to create a downloadable enterprise-grade communications platform that is changing the communication dynamic in the financial sector. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Leo Papadopoulos, CTO of Cloud9, discussed the importance of WebRTC and how it enables companies to focus o...
Providing secure, mobile access to sensitive data sets is a critical element in realizing the full potential of cloud computing. However, large data caches remain inaccessible to edge devices for reasons of security, size, format or limited viewing capabilities. Medical imaging, computer aided design and seismic interpretation are just a few examples of industries facing this challenge. Rather than fighting for incremental gains by pulling these datasets to edge devices, we need to embrace the i...
Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...