Welcome!

News Feed Item

Con Edison Reports 2014 Second Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 08/07/14 -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) today reported 2014 second quarter net income for common stock of $212 million or $0.73 a share compared with $172 million or $0.59 a share in 2013. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the lease in/lease out (LILO) transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the competitive energy businesses (CEBs), were $189 million or $0.65 a share in 2014 compared with $160 million or $0.55 a share in 2013.

For the first six months of 2014, net income for common stock was $574 million or $1.96 a share compared with $364 million or $1.24 a share in the first six months of 2013. Earnings from ongoing operations, which exclude the effects of the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs, were $532 million or $1.82 a share in 2014 compared with $476 million or $1.62 a share in 2013.

"We continued to meet financial expectations in the second quarter, while our field operations benefited from a mild spring as we prepared our delivery systems for summer," said John McAvoy, Con Edison's chairman, president and CEO. "Our cost management strategies are helping to maximize productivity and efficiency. We're also proud of the success of our sustainability strategy, which has yielded environmental dividends and national recognition, including a 43 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2005 and Newsweek naming us the top U.S. utility in their 2014 Green Rankings."

The following table is a reconciliation of Con Edison's reported earnings per share to earnings per share from ongoing operations and reported net income to earnings from ongoing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.


                     Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                               Net Income for                 Net Income for
                  Earnings      Common Stock      Earnings     Common Stock
                     per        (Millions of         per       (Millions of
                    Share         Dollars)          Share        Dollars)
               -------------------------------------------------------------
                2014    2013    2014    2013    2014    2013   2014    2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported
 earnings per
 share and net
 income for
 common stock-
 GAAP basis
 (basic)       $ 0.73  $ 0.59  $  212  $  172  $ 1.96  $ 1.24 $  574  $  364
Less: Gain on
 sale of solar
 energy
 projects (a)    0.09       -      26       -    0.09       -     26       -
Add: LILO
 transactions
 (b)                -   (0.10)      -     (29)  (0.02)   0.41     (7)    121
Less: Net
 mark-to-
 market
 effects of
 the CEBs (c)   (0.01)  (0.06)     (3)    (17)   0.03    0.03      9       9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from
 ongoing
 operations -
 non-GAAP      $ 0.65  $ 0.55  $  189  $  160  $ 1.82  $ 1.62 $  532  $  476
============================================================================

(a) After taxes of $19 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
    2014.
(b) In January 2013, a court disallowed tax losses claimed by Con Edison
    relating to the 1997 and 1999 LILO transactions. For the six months
    ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the impact of the LILO transactions on
    earnings were a $7 million (after taxes of $6 million) benefit and a
    $121 million (after taxes of $80 million) charge, respectively,
    reflecting the recalculation of the accounting effect of the LILO
    transactions and interest on the tax liability. For the three months
    ended June 30, 2013, the impact of the LILO transactions on earnings was
    $29 million (after taxes of $22 million) benefit, reflecting the
    termination of the 1999 LILO transaction.
(c) After taxes of $(2) million and $(13) million for the three months ended
    June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $6 million and $6 million for the six months
    ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


The company expects its earnings from ongoing operations for the year 2014 to be in the range of $3.70 to $3.85 a share. The company's previous forecast of 2014 earnings was in the range of $3.65 to $3.85 a share. Earnings per share from ongoing operations exclude a $0.09 a share gain on sale of solar energy projects, a $0.02 a share benefit relating to the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the 2013 periods, reflect primarily changes in rate plans of Con Edison's utility subsidiaries and the weather impact on its steam delivery service. The rate plans provide for revenues to cover expected increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses, and depreciation and property taxes, reflecting primarily the impact of higher utility plant balances. The results of operations also include the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the impact of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects of the CEBs.

Operations and maintenance expenses for CECONY were higher in the 2014 periods primarily due to operating costs attributable to emergency response and the support and protection of company underground facilities to accommodate municipal projects and, in the six month period were offset in part by lower pension costs.

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared with the 2013 periods, resulting from these and other major factors:


                            Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                          Variation 2014 vs. 2013   Variation 2014 vs. 2013
                                       Net Income                Net Income
                                       for Common                for Common
                                         Stock                     Stock
                           Earnings    Variation     Earnings    Variation
                          per Share    (Millions    per Share    (Millions
                          Variation   of Dollars)   Variation   of Dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CECONY (a)
  Rate plans             $      0.16  $        45  $      0.32  $        93
  Weather impact on
   steam revenues                  -            -         0.04           13
  Operations and
   maintenance expense         (0.05)         (14)       (0.02)          (4)
  Depreciation and
   property taxes              (0.05)         (13)       (0.09)         (28)
  Other                            -            1         0.01            2
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Total CECONY                    0.06           19         0.26           76
Orange and Rockland
 Utilities (O&R) (a)            0.01            2        (0.02)          (7)
CEBs (b)                        0.06           16         0.46          137
Other, including parent
 company expenses               0.01            3         0.02            4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total variation          $      0.14  $        40  $      0.72  $       210
============================================================================

(a) Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY's and O&R's New York
    electric and gas rate plans and the weather-normalization clause
    applicable to their gas businesses, revenues are generally not affected
    by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were
    approved. Under the rate plans, pension and other postretirement costs
    and certain other costs are reconciled to amounts reflected in rates for
    such costs.
(b) These variations include the gain on sale of solar energy projects, the
    impact of the LILO transactions and the net mark-to-market effects shown
    in the table on page 1. In addition, the variations include a tax
    benefit in the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $15 million or $0.05 a
    share resulting from the acceptance by the Internal Revenue Service of
    the company's claim for manufacturing tax deductions.


Refer to the company's Second Quarter Form 10-Q, which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Additional information related to utility sales and revenues is available at www.conedison.com (select "Shareholder Services" and then select "Press Releases").

This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect expectations and not facts. Actual results may differ materially from those expectations because of factors such as those identified in reports the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This press release also contains a financial measure, earnings from ongoing operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income, which is an indicator of operating performance determined in accordance with GAAP. Management uses this non-GAAP measure to facilitate the analysis of the company's ongoing performance as compared to its internal budgets and previously reported financial results. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure also is useful and meaningful to investors.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $40 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through the following subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., a regulated utility providing electric, gas, and steam service in New York City and Westchester County, New York; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., a regulated utility serving customers in a 1,350 square mile area in southeastern New York state and adjacent sections of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania; Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., a retail energy supply and services company; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc., a company that participates in energy infrastructure projects.

Contact:
Robert McGee
212-460-4111

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group chat and various other tools/platforms. Currently, HipChat is an extremely powerful collaboration platform due to the various ChatOps integrations that are available. However, DevOps automation can involve orchestration and complex workflows. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Himanshu Chhetri, CTO at Addteq, will cover practical examples and use cases such as self-provisioning infra...
"Storpool does only block-level storage so we do one thing extremely well. The growth in data is what drives the move to software-defined technologies in general and software-defined storage," explained Boyan Ivanov, CEO and co-founder at StorPool, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 16th Cloud Expo, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations? In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Oleg Chunikhin, CTO at Kublr, answered these questions and demonstrated techniques for implementing advanced scheduling. For example, using spot instances and co...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
The use of containers by developers -- and now increasingly IT operators -- has grown from infatuation to deep and abiding love. But as with any long-term affair, the honeymoon soon leads to needing to live well together ... and maybe even getting some relationship help along the way. And so it goes with container orchestration and automation solutions, which are rapidly emerging as the means to maintain the bliss between rapid container adoption and broad container use among multiple cloud host...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the cloud has become a defining competitive edge. Companies that fail to successfully adapt risk failure. The media, of course, continues to extol the virtues of the cloud, including how easy it is to get there. Migrating...
Blockchain is a shared, secure record of exchange that establishes trust, accountability and transparency across business networks. Supported by the Linux Foundation's open source, open-standards based Hyperledger Project, Blockchain has the potential to improve regulatory compliance, reduce cost as well as advance trade. Are you curious about how Blockchain is built for business? In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, discussed the b...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of following equation: monolithic to microservices to serverless architecture (FaaS). To keep up with the cut-throat competition, the organisations need to update their technology stack to make software development their differentiating factor. Thus microservices architecture emerged as a potential method to provide development teams with greater flexibility and other advantages, such as the abili...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
Blockchain. A day doesn’t seem to go by without seeing articles and discussions about the technology. According to PwC executive Seamus Cushley, approximately $1.4B has been invested in blockchain just last year. In Gartner’s recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, blockchain is approaching the peak. It is considered by Gartner as one of the ‘Key platform-enabling technologies to track.’ While there is a lot of ‘hype vs reality’ discussions going on, there is no arguing that blockchain is b...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory? In her Day 2 Keynote at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Aruna Ravichandran, VP, DevOps Solutions Marketing, CA Technologies, was jo...