Welcome!

News Feed Item

Finjan Holdings Provides Shareholder Update

Includes Recent Corporate Activities and Events

NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Finjan Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FNJN), a technology company committed to enabling innovation through the licensing of its intellectual property, today is providing an update on the Company's continued progress in executing its strategy.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Finjan Inc., we own a portfolio of patents related to security software that proactively detects malicious code and thereby protects end users from identity and data theft, spyware, malware, phishing, trojans and other online threats. We continue to maximize the economic benefits of our technology through further licensing of our technology and patents, and to broaden our technology and patent holdings through acquisitions and strategic partnerships.

CORPORATE AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

Since June 2013, when our cybersecurity business became public, Finjan Holdings has continued to execute its business strategy to capitalize on today's emerging cybersecurity and related markets. The following are recent corporate and operational milestones achieved in the second quarter of 2014, as well as subsequent events:

  • Finjan Holdings' common stock began trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market on Monday, May 12, 2014.
  • On June 27, 2014, Finjan Holdings was added to the Russell Microcap Index.
  • On June 30, 2014, Finjan, Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Symantec Corp. alleging infringement of Finjan U.S. Patent Nos. 7,756,996, 7,757,289, 7,930,299, 8,015,182, and 8,141,154 relating to endpoint, web, and network security technologies (see details below).
  • On July 14, 2014, Finjan's Board of Directors appointed Daniel Chinn as Executive Chairman of the Board. In light of Mr. Chinn's appointment as Executive Chairman, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which was previously comprised of Daniel Chinn and Michael Eisenberg, was reconstituted and now consists of Michael Eisenberg and Alex Rogers. Both Messrs. Eisenberg and Rogers are considered independent under applicable NASDAQ rules.
  • Further on July 14, 2014, Finjan Holdings' President, Phil Hartstein, was re-appointed as President and named Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Shimon Steinmetz, was re-appointed as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and named Treasurer.

FINANCIAL UPDATE

  • As of June 30, 2014, the Company held $20.6 million in cash and cash equivalents.
  • The Company ended the second quarter 2014 reporting no long-term debt.
  • Revenues for the second quarter increased to $636,000 compared to $198,000 in the prior year quarter, while cost of revenues increased to $332,000 compared to $148,000 in the prior year quarter.
  • Total operating expenses for the second quarter were $3.6 million, an increase of $1.3 million or 56.1% compared to the prior year period. These increased costs were primarily due to increase in legal and consultancy fees for patent enforcement activities, compensation expenses due to additional employees in 2014 compared to the prior year period, costs related to public company expenses and various costs related to opening new offices in Silicon Valley, evaluation of strategic alternatives, franchise taxes, and directors and officers insurance.
  • On November 21, 2013, we made a $5 million commitment to invest in an Israel-based limited partnership venture capital fund seeking to invest in early-stage cyber technology companies. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the fund made a capital call of $0.5 million. As of June 30, 2014, we had a $4 million outstanding capital commitment to the venture capital fund.

LICENSING AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

As a pioneer in cybersecurity technologies, Finjan developed and patented technology generally deployed across the endpoint, web, and networking markets that is capable of detecting previously unknown and emerging threats on a real-time, behavior-based, basis. As the network, web and endpoint security industries have transitioned from signature-based methods of intercepting only known threats to computers, which were standard in the online security industry during the 1990s, to behavior-based detection of malicious code, we believe that our technology is widely used by third parties. We are committed to preserving and enhancing the value of our proprietary inventions, as well as protecting our existing licensing partners' investments in our portfolio, by offering fair value licenses to currently unlicensed companies.

Following is a brief summary of Finjan's patent rights enforcement activities. For additional information, please review the "Legal Proceedings" portion in the "Part II—Other Information" section of our most recent Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2014, accessible from Finjan's website at www.finjan.com

A.     United States District Court Actions

1.      Finjan, Inc. v. FireEye, Inc., 4:13-cv-03133-SBA, (N.D. Cal):
We filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against FireEye on July 8, 2013, asserting that FireEye is infringing certain claims of six of Finjan's U.S. patents.

  • We amended our Complaint on August 16, 2013 to add a seventh U.S. patent to the list of asserted patents.
  • We are seeking, among other things, a preliminary and permanent injunction against FireEye from infringing, and/or inducing the infringement of our asserted patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues of the accused products, damages no less than a reasonable royalty and, consistent with proof, enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • FireEye answered our Amended Complaint on September 3, 2013, by denying our allegations of infringement and counterclaiming that the asserted patents are invalid.
  • Both parties have demanded a jury trial.
  • On June 6, 2014, the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong entered an Order Granting Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of certain Finjan patents.
  • Accordingly, this action is off calendar until the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) completes its administrative reexamination proceedings.

2.      Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat, Inc., Case 5:13-cv-03999-BLF, (N.D. Cal.):
We filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Blue Coat on August 28, 2013, asserting that Blue Coat is infringing certain claims of six of Finjan's U.S. patents.


  • Blue Coat answered our Complaint on November 26, 2013, by denying our allegations of infringement and counterclaiming that the asserted patents are invalid.
  • We seek, among other things, entry of judgment that Blue Coat has infringed, is infringing, has induced infringement of the above-listed patents, and contributorily infringes the above-listed patents, a preliminary and permanent injunction from infringing, or inducing the infringement of our asserted patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues, damages no less than a reasonably royalty and consistent with proof, enhanced damages, and enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • Both parties have demanded a jury trial.
  • The Court has scheduled a claim construction or "Markman" Hearing in this matter on August 22, 2014.
  • Trial for this action is scheduled for July 20, 2015.

3.      Finjan, Inc. v. Websense, Inc., Case 5:13-cv-04398-BLF, (N.D. Cal., consolidated):
We filed two patent infringement matters in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Websense on September 23, 2013 (5:13-cv-04398-BLF (N.D. Cal.)), and March 24, 2014 (5:14-cv-01353-BLF (N.D. Cal.)), which were consolidated into one matter on June 23, 2014 (5:13-cv-04398-BLF, (N.D. Cal.)), asserting that Websense is infringing certain claims of five of Finjan's U.S. patents.

  • We seek, among other things, entry of judgment that Websense has infringed, is infringing, and has induced infringement of the above-listed patents, a preliminary and permanent injunction from infringing, or inducing the infringement of the above-listed patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues, damages no less than a reasonably royalty and consistent with proof, enhanced damages, and enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • Websense answered our Complaints, filed on November 26, 2013 and April 21, 2014, respectively, by denying our allegations of infringement and asserting various "Defenses," including non-infringement and invalidity of the asserted patents.
  • We have demanded a jury trial.
  • The Court has scheduled a claim construction or "Markman" Hearing for this matter on November 21, 2014.
  • Trial for this action is scheduled for October 5, 2015.

4.      Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc., Case 5:13-cv-05808-BLF, (N.D. Cal.):
We filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Proofpoint and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Armorize Technologies, (collectively "Proofpoint") on December 16, 2013, asserting that Proofpoint and Armorize Technologies are infringing one or more claims of eight of Finjan's U.S. patents.

  • We seek entry of judgment that Proofpoint and Armorize Technologies have infringed and are infringing our asserted patents, a judgment that Proofpoint and Armorize Technologies have induced infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844, 7,058,822, 7,613,918, 7,647,633, 7,975,305, 8,079,086, and 8,225,408, a preliminary and permanent injunction from infringing, or inducing the infringement of the same patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues, damages no less than a reasonably royalty and consistent with proof, enhanced damages, and enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • On April 27, 2014, this matter was reassigned to the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman.
  • On June 30, 2014, Proofpoint filed a Motion to Stay pending reexamination of two of eight of our asserted patents by the USPTO.
  • The parties' briefs have been submitted and a Hearing on the Motion to Stay is set for August 21, 2014.
  • The Court has scheduled a claim construction or "Markman" Hearing for this matter on May 8, 2015.
  • Trial for this action is scheduled for January 11, 2016.

5.      Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos Inc., Case 3:14-cv-01197-WHO (N.D. Cal.):
We filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Sophos on March 14, 2014, asserting that Sophos is infringing certain claims of six of Finjan's U.S. patents.

  • We amended our Complaint on April 8, 2014, to add a seventh U.S. patent to the list of asserted patents.
  • We seek, among other things, entry of judgment that Sophos has infringed and is infringing our asserted patents, a judgment that Sophos has induced infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,804,780, 7,613,918, 7,613,926, 7,757,289, 6,154,844, and 8,667,494, a judgment that Sophos Inc. has contributorily infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,566,580, a preliminary and permanent injunction from infringing, inducing, or contributorily infringing the same patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues, damages no less than a reasonably royalty and consistent with proof, enhanced damages, and enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • This matter was reassigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick on April 10, 2014.
  • Sophos filed its Answer to our First Amended Complaint on May 9, 2014.
  • Both parties demanded a jury trial.
  • Sophos filed a Motion to Transfer Venue to Delaware on May 9, 2014.
  • After considering the parties' briefs and oral arguments on the Motion to Transfer Venue to Delaware at a hearing on June 18, 2014, the Delaware Court entered its Order Denying Sophos Motion to Transfer Venue on June 20, 2014.
  • Judge Orrick has scheduled a claim construction or "Markman" Hearing for this matter on February 13, 2015.
  • The Court has not yet calendared a trial date.

6.      Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Case 3:14-cv-02998-RS (N.D. Cal.):
We filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Symantec on June 30, 2014, asserting that Symantec is infringing certain claims of five of Finjan's U.S. patents.

  • We seek, among other things, entry of judgment that Symantec has infringed and is infringing our asserted patents, a judgment that Symantec has induced infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,756,996, 7,757,289, and 7,930,299, a judgment that Symantec has contributorily infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,015,182, a preliminary and permanent injunction from infringing, inducing, or contributorily infringing the same patents, an accounting of all infringing sales and revenues, damages no less than a reasonably royalty and consistent with proof, enhanced damages, and enhanced damages for willful infringement, costs, interest, and reasonable attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. §285.
  • On July 7, 2014, this action was reassigned to the Honorable Richard Seeborg.
  • Symantec has not yet filed its Answer to our Complaint.
  • We demanded a jury trial.

B.                 Appellate Court Actions:

7.      Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Websense, Inc., Sophos Inc., No. 2013-1682, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:
On December 10, 2013, we appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit") the final judgment entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 10-CV-593-GMS, in favor of Symantec, Websense, and Sophos, where there was a finding of no liability for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,092,194 and 6,480,962. The issue presented by us on appeal was whether the Delaware District Court erred in allowing to stand the jury's verdict that the patents-in-suit are invalid, whether the District Court erred in not granting our request for a new trial.

  • Symantec, Websense, and Sophos filed their brief on February 24, 2014.
  • We filed our Reply Brief thereto on April 9, 2014.
  • Subject to revision of the calendar by the Federal Circuit, oral argument has been scheduled for September 9, 2014.

C.     Proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)

1.      Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings
As defined by the USPTO, an "Ex Parte Reexamination is a "proceeding in which any person may request reexamination of a U.S. patent based on one or more prior patents or printed publications. A requester who is not the patent owner has limited participation rights in the proceedings."

a.      U.S. Patent No. 8,079,086

  • FireEye filed a first third party request for ex parte reexamination of Finjan's U.S. Patent No. 8,079,086 on October 7, 2013.
  • USPTO denied FireEye's request on November 19, 2013, and the reexamination proceedings terminated on January 14, 2014.
  • FireEye filed second third party request for ex parte reexamination of the patent was filed on February 7, 2014.
  • The USPTO denied FireEye's second request on March 27, 2014, and the reexamination proceedings terminated on April 29, 2014.

b.      U.S. Patent No. 7,647,633

  • FireEye filed a third party request for ex parte reexamination of claims 1-7 and 28-33 of Finjan's U.S. Patent No. 7,647,633 on October 7, 2013.
  • The request for reexamination was granted and a non-final Office Action was mailed November 19, 2013. The non-final Office Action included rejections of claims 1-7 and 28-33 under various prior art.
  • An in-person Examiner interview was conducted at the USPTO on February 4, 2014, and a timely response to non-final Office Action was filed on February 19, 2014. Additionally, a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed priority claim was also submitted.
  • The case is currently awaiting USPTO action.

c.       U.S. Patent No. 7,058,822

  • FireEye filed a third party request for ex parte reexamination of claims 1-8 and 16-27 of Finjan's U.S. Patent No. 7,058,822 on October 7, 2013.
  • The request for reexamination was granted and a non-final Office Action was mailed December 6, 2013. The non-final Office Action included rejections of claims 1-8 and 16-27 under various prior art.
  • An in-person Examiner interview was conducted at the USPTO on February 4, 2014, and a timely response to non-final Office Action was filed on March 6, 2014. Additionally, a petition to accept an unintentionally delayed priority claim was also submitted.
  • The case is currently awaiting USPTO action.

2.      Inter Partes Reexamination Proceedings before the USPTO:
As defined by the USPTO, an "Inter Partes Reexamination" is a "proceeding in which any person who is not the patent owner and is not otherwise stopped may request examination of a U.S. Patent issued from an original application filed on or after November 29, 1999, based on one or more prior patents or printed publications. Both patent owner and third party requester have participation rights throughout the proceeding, including appeal rights."

a.      U.S. Patent No. 6,480,962

  • Symantec filed a third party request for Inter Partes Reexamination of all claims 1-55 of U.S. Patent No. 6,480,962 on November 29, 2011.
  • The request for reexamination was granted and a non-final Office Action was mailed January 25, 2012. The non-final Office Action included rejections of claims 1-55 under numerous prior art references and combinations of such references.
  • We timely filed a response to non-final Office Action, as did Symantec and the USPTO mailed an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) on October 2, 2013.
  • We timely responded to the ACP on December 2, 2013, which included proposed claim amendments for consideration.
  • Symantec subsequently responded on January 2, 2014.
  • On June 27, 2014, the USPTO stated that the proposed claim amendments would not be entered and issued a Right of Appeal Notice.
  • On July 1, 2014, we filed a notice of appeal of the rejection of Claims 1-55.

Please note there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in settling or litigating these claims referenced above.

ABOUT FINJAN HOLDINGS
Through our subsidiary, Finjan, Inc., we own a portfolio of patents, related to software that proactively detects malicious code and thereby protects end users from identity and data theft, spyware, malware, phishing, trojans and other online threats. Finjan's mission is to invest in innovation and encourage the development of core intellectual property. Founded in 1997, Finjan developed and patented technology that is capable of detecting previously unknown and emerging threats on a real-time, behavior-based, basis, in contrast to signature-based methods of intercepting only known threats to computers, which were standard in the online security industry during the 1990's. For more information about Finjan, please visit www.finjan.com.

Follow Finjan Holdings on LinkedIn or on Twitter @FinjanHoldings.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include statements regarding our expectations, intentions, beliefs, and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts or by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "project," "potential," "should," "will," "will be," "would," the negative of these terms and similar expressions, but this is not an exclusive way of identifying such statements. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results, performance and achievements may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this press release as a result of various risks, uncertainties and other factors. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, without limitation, our ability to execute our business plan, the outcome of pending or future enforcement actions, our ability to expand our technology portfolio, the enforceability of our patents, the continued use of our technology in the market, the development of a liquid trading market for our securities and other factors described under Item 1A, "Risk Factors," as set forth in the Company's Annual Report on form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014, and any subsequent quarterly or current reports.

The Company will continue to file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the dates specified in such filings or releases. Except as expressly required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after any such date, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements included in this release or that may be made elsewhere from time to time by us, or on our behalf. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

SOURCE Finjan Holdings, Inc.

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Digital transformation has increased the pace of business creating a productivity divide between the technology haves and have nots. Managing financial information on spreadsheets and piecing together insight from numerous disconnected systems is no longer an option. Rapid market changes and aggressive competition are motivating business leaders to reevaluate legacy technology investments in search of modern technologies to achieve greater agility, reduced costs and organizational efficiencies. ...
In this presentation, you will learn first hand what works and what doesn't while architecting and deploying OpenStack. Some of the topics will include:- best practices for creating repeatable deployments of OpenStack- multi-site considerations- how to customize OpenStack to integrate with your existing systems and security best practices.
As organizations shift towards IT-as-a-service models, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and now cloud environments grows with it. Commvault can ensure protection, access and E-Discovery of your data – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud, or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enterprise. In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Randy De Meno, Chief Technologist - Windows Products and Microsoft Part...
"With Digital Experience Monitoring what used to be a simple visit to a web page has exploded into app on phones, data from social media feeds, competitive benchmarking - these are all components that are only available because of some type of digital asset," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
Personalization has long been the holy grail of marketing. Simply stated, communicate the most relevant offer to the right person and you will increase sales. To achieve this, you must understand the individual. Consequently, digital marketers developed many ways to gather and leverage customer information to deliver targeted experiences. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lou Casal, Founder and Principal Consultant at Practicala, discussed how the Internet of Things (IoT) has accelerated our abilit...
For far too long technology teams have lived in siloes. Not only physical siloes, but cultural siloes pushed by competing objectives. This includes informational siloes where business users require one set of data and tech teams require different data. DevOps intends to bridge these gaps to make tech driven operations more aligned and efficient.
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service.
HyperConvergence came to market with the objective of being simple, flexible and to help drive down operating expenses. It reduced the footprint by bundling the compute/storage/network into one box. This brought a new set of challenges as the HyperConverged vendors are very focused on their own proprietary building blocks. If you want to scale in a certain way, let's say you identified a need for more storage and want to add a device that is not sold by the HyperConverged vendor, forget about it...
Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
The best way to leverage your CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO presence as a sponsor and exhibitor is to plan your news announcements around our events. The press covering CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO will have access to these releases and will amplify your news announcements. More than two dozen Cloud companies either set deals at our shows or have announced their mergers and acquisitions at CloudEXPO. Product announcements during our show provide your company with the most reach through our targeted audienc...
JETRO showcased Japan Digital Transformation Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo® at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. The Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) is a non-profit organization that provides business support services to companies expanding to Japan. With the support of JETRO's dedicated staff, clients can incorporate their business; receive visa, immigration, and HR support; find dedicated office space; identify local government subsidies; get...
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo, taking place November 12-13 in New York City, NY, is co-located with 22nd international CloudEXPO | first international DXWorldEXPO and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world.