Click here to close now.




















Welcome!

News Feed Item

Bengal Energy Announces First Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/12/14 -- Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX:BNG) ("Bengal" or the "Company") announces its financial and operating results for the first fiscal 2015 quarter ended June 30, 2014.

FISCAL Q1 2015 HIGHLIGHTS:

During the first quarter of the Company's fiscal 2015 year, Bengal continued its development strategy, resulting in the successful drilling of four light oil wells in the Company's Cuisinier asset in the Cooper Basin, Australia. With the positive results coming from the first phase of its calendar 2014 drilling program, the Company has demonstrated its understanding of the play and has positioned itself well moving into Phase Two scheduled for calendar Q4 2014.

Following are highlights of specific operational, financial and corporate developments for the three months ended June 30, 2014:

Q1 Operational Highlights:


--  Cuisinier Phase 1 Drilling Campaign - As of July 25, 2014 Bengal and its
    joint venture parties ("JV") had finished completions on the recently
    drilled Cuisinier wells 13, 14, 15 and 16. Initial production rates,
    based on swab results, suggest combined production from the four wells
    to be in the range of 950-1,000 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") gross,
    or 275-300 bopd net to the Company. These wells are scheduled to come
    on-line beginning with the Cuisinier 13 well in mid-August and finishing
    with the Cuisinier 16 well by mid-October 2014. Bengal expects to
    confirm production rates from the Phase One wells following tie-in as
    outlined under Production Volumes below. Successful Phase One drilling
    results have encouraged the operator to expand the 2014 Phase Two
    drilling program as described below.  
    
--  Cuisinier Phase 2 Drilling Campaign - Phase Two of the Cuisinier
    drilling campaign is expected to commence during calendar Q4, 2014;
    during which, the JV will drill four to five development/appraisal wells
    at Cuisinier and one exploration well ("Wicho East") in ATP 752P - Barta
    Block. The JV has benefited from results obtained in the successful
    Phase One campaign and has used that information to high-grade locations
    for Phase Two. The Phase Two wells will target further production
    additions and aim to add reserves by expanding the boundaries of the
    pool. 
    
--  Production Volumes - Production in the first quarter averaged 361
    barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd"), a decrease of 28% from 504
    boepd in the previous quarter and a 1% increase over the 356 boepd
    produced in Q1 2014. The decrease is a function of an increase in water
    cut at the Cuisinier 6 well, combined with natural production declines.
    The operator has plans to conduct production logging on the well to
    determine the exact source of the water and prepare a remediation
    strategy for the well. These declines will be offset commencing in Q2 as
    production from Phase One wells is brought on stream. In addition, the
    operator has proposed a hydraulic stimulation review for certain
    candidate wells as none of the Cuisinier wells to date have been
    stimulated prior to being placed on production. Timing and expectations
    for this program will be forthcoming 
    
--  Koki-1 Exploration Well Located four kms to the north of Cuisinier, the
    Koki-1 well drilled in June 2014, failed to define a commercial
    hydrocarbon accumulation. The Koki-1 Well was a step-out beyond Bengal's
    currently evaluated Cuisinier Field reserves area and will not have an
    impact on the Company's 2014 booked reserves. A second Cuisinier
    exploration location is scheduled to be drilled during Bengal's Phase
    Two drilling campaign later this year. The second well will target the
    Hutton formation on an independent structural closure within the
    Cuisinier North 3D area. 

Financial Highlights:


--  Revenues - Bengal's revenue of approximately $3.9 million in the first
    quarter was 26% lower than the $5.3 million generated in the preceding
    quarter due to lower production, but was 5% higher than the $3.7 million
    generated during first fiscal quarter of 2014. 
    
--  Funds Flow from Operations(1) - Bengal generated funds flow from
    operations of $0.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 a 59%
    decrease from the $2.2 million generated in the preceding quarter, due
    to lower production and netbacks and the impact of foreign exchange as
    the Australian dollar appreciated against the US dollar; this also
    reflects a 47% decrease over the $1.7 million recorded in the first
    quarter of fiscal 2014, resulting from the preceding factors as well as
    increased financing charges. Fluctuations in foreign exchange account
    for 29% and 21% of the decrease in funds flow from operations compared
    to the preceding quarter and Q1 2013 respectively.  
    
--  Net Income - Bengal reported a net loss of $729,000 for the quarter
    compared to a net loss of $1.8 million in the preceding quarter, and net
    income of $0.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. 

"First quarter of fiscal 2015 was a mixed period operationally for Bengal," said Chayan Chakrabarty, Bengal's President and CEO. "While we experienced some challenges with an existing Cuisinier well, we are confident that an appropriate solution will be implemented soon, and production will recover. On the other hand, we are very pleased with our accomplishments to date in our ongoing drilling campaign and expect to tie-in an additional 275 - 300 net barrels of high-netback production by mid-October. Bengal continues to make significant progress in its transition to a development company with exciting exploration upside, and I look forward to updating our shareholders about our ongoing developments."

For a discussion of the activities on each of the Company's permits, refer to Bengal's management's discussion and analysis for the first fiscal quarter 2015 ended June 30, 2015 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

(1) Funds flow from operations is an additional generally accepted account principle ("GAAP measure"). The comparable International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") measure is cash from operations. A reconciliation of the two measures can be found in the table on page 6 of Bengal's Annual MD&A.

FINANCIAL & OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$000s except per share, volumes and                                         
 netback amounts                                         Three Months Ended 
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          ----------------------------------
                                                                            
                                             June 30,     June 30,          
                                                 2014         2013 % Change 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue                                                                     
  Oil                                       $   3,786   $    3,626        4 
  Natural gas                                      89           65       37 
  Natural gas liquids                              14           31      (55)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                       $   3,889   $    3,722        5 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                                         281          204       38 
  % of revenue                                    7.2          5.5       31 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating & transportation                      1,206          930       30 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating netback(1)                            2,402   $    2,588       (7)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash from (used in) operations:                 2,219        1,249       78 
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)                0.03         0.02       50 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds from (used in) operations:(2)               926        1,732      (47)
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)                0.01         0.03      (67)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (loss): income                               (729)         836     (187)
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)               (0.01)        0.01     (200)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures                            3,655   $    5,435      (33)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volumes                                                                     
  Oil (bpd)                                       327          313        5 
  Natural gas (mcfd)                              194          240      (19)
  Natural gas liquids (boepd)                       2            3      (33)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total (boepd @ 6:1)                             361          356        1 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Netback(1) ($/boe)                                                          
  Revenue                                   $  118.43   $   114.83        3 
  Royalties                                      8.56         6.32       35 
  Operating & transportation                    36.72        28.69       28 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total                                     $   73.15   $    79.82       (8)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Operating netback is a non-IFRS measure. Netback per boe is calculated by
dividing the revenue and costs in total for the Company by the total        
production of the Company measured in boe.                                  
2. Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure. The comparable IFRS measure 
is cash from operations. A reconciliation of the two measures can be found  
in the table on page 5.                                                     

Bengal has filed its consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the first fiscal 2015 quarter ended June 30, 2014 with Canadian securities regulators. The documents are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or by visiting Bengal's website at www.bengalenergy.ca.

About Bengal

Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX:BNG) is an international oil and gas exploration and production company with producing and prospective light oil-weighted assets in Australia and India. Bengal offers exposure to lower risk, current production and cash flow, combined with longer-term high, potential impact exploration projects. The Company's strategy is to achieve per share growth in cash flow, production and reserves while establishing an attractive portfolio of future drilling and exploration opportunities. Additional information is available on our website at www.bengalenergy.ca.

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements or information ("forward-looking statements") as defined by applicable securities laws that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Bengal's control. These statements relate to future events or our future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward looking statements. The use of any of the words "plan", "expect", "prospective", "project", "intend", "believe", "should", "anticipate", "estimate", or other similar words or statements that certain events "may" or "will" occur are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such forward looking statements are based on management's estimates, opinions, and assumptions at the time the statements were made, including assumptions relating to: the impact of economic conditions in North America, Australia, India and globally; industry conditions; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; increased competition; the availability of qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; stock market volatility and fluctuations in market valuations of companies with respect to announced transactions and the final valuations thereof; results of exploration and testing activities; and the ability to obtain required approvals and extensions from regulatory authorities. We believe the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable but, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that Bengal will derive from them. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements contained herein include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the commencement of production of the four Phase One development wells, anticipated initial production rates based on swab results, the completion of a Phase Two drilling program by the Company at Cuisinier in 2014 including the timing to drill, tie-in and put on production the up to 5 wells to be drilled and the timing to announce results of such drilling, the timing to drill one exploration well on the Wompi permit, the timing for the Company to interpret seismic and evaluate prospective drilling locations in the Tookoonooka area, the timing for the drilling of up to three exploration wells onshore India, the funding by the Company of its share of the costs of the first phase of drilling at Cuisinier out of ongoing cash flow. The forward looking statements contained herein are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause Bengal's actual financial results, performance or achievement in future periods to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, risks associated with: the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals or extensions; failure to satisfy the conditions under farm-in and joint venture agreements; failure to secure required equipment and personnel; changes in general global economic conditions including, without limitations, the economic conditions in North America, Australia, India; increased competition; the availability of qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental and tax laws and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; the results of exploration and development drilling and related activities; the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; and stock market volatility. Readers are encouraged to review the material risks discussed in Bengal's Annual Information Form under the heading "Risk Factors" and in Bengal's annual MD&A under the heading "Risk Factors". The Company cautions that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release speak only as of the date hereof and Bengal does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be require pursuant to applicable securities laws.

Barrels of Oil Equivalent

When converting natural gas to equivalent barrels of oil, Bengal uses the widely recognized standard of 6 thousand cubic feet (mcf) to one barrel of oil (boe). However, a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.


Certain Defined Terms                                                       
boe - barrels of oil equivalent                                             
boe/d - barrels of oil equivalent per day                                   
bbl - barrel                                                                
bbl/d - barrels per day                                                     
mcf - thousand cubic feet                                                   
mcf/d - thousand cubic feet per day                                         

Non-IFRS Measurements

Within this release references are made to terms commonly used in the oil and gas industry. Funds from operations, funds from operations per share and netbacks do not have any standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and previous generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are referred to as non-IFRS measures. Funds from operations per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding consistent with the calculation of net income (loss) per share. Netbacks equal total revenue less royalties and operating and transportation expenses calculated on a boe basis. Management utilizes these measures to analyze operating performance. The Company's calculation of the non-IFRS measures included herein may differ from the calculation of similar measures by other issuers. Therefore, the Company's non-IFRS measures may not be comparable to other similar measures used by other issuers. Funds from operations is not intended to represent operating profit for the period nor should it be viewed as an alternative to operating profit, net income, cash flow from operations or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with IFRS. Non-IFRS measures should only be used in conjunction with the Company's annual audited and interim financial statements. A reconciliation of these measures can be found in the table on page 5 of Bengal's Q1 fiscal 2014 MD&A.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Container technology is sending shock waves through the world of cloud computing. Heralded as the 'next big thing,' containers provide software owners a consistent way to package their software and dependencies while infrastructure operators benefit from a standard way to deploy and run them. Containers present new challenges for tracking usage due to their dynamic nature. They can also be deployed to bare metal, virtual machines and various cloud platforms. How do software owners track the usag...
In their session at 17th Cloud Expo, Hal Schwartz, CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), and Chuck Paolillo, CTO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), provide a study of cloud adoption trends and the power and flexibility of IBM Power and Pureflex cloud solutions. In his role as CEO of Secure Infrastructure & Services (SIAS), Hal Schwartz provides leadership and direction for the company.
There are many considerations when moving applications from on-premise to cloud. It is critical to understand the benefits and also challenges of this migration. A successful migration will result in lower Total Cost of Ownership, yet offer the same or higher level of robustness. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Michael Meiner, an Engineering Director at Oracle, Corporation, analyzed a range of cloud offerings (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) and discussed the benefits/challenges of migrating to each offe...
SYS-CON Events announced today that the "Second Containers & Microservices Expo" will take place November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Containers and microservices have become topics of intense interest throughout the cloud developer and enterprise IT communities.
As organizations shift towards IT-as-a-service models, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and now cloud environments grows with it. CommVault can ensure protection and E-Discovery of your data – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud, or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enterprise. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Randy De Meno, Chief Technologist - Windows Products and Microsoft Partnerships at Com...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin,...
Scrum Alliance has announced the release of its 2015 State of Scrum Report. Almost 5,000 individuals and companies worldwide participated in this year's survey. Most organizations in the market today are still leading and managing under an Industrial Age model. Not only is the speed of change growing exponentially, Agile and Scrum frameworks are showing companies how to draw on the full talents and capabilities of those doing the work in order to continue innovating for success.
SYS-CON Events announced today that MobiDev, a software development company, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. MobiDev is a software development company with representative offices in Atlanta (US), Sheffield (UK) and Würzburg (Germany); and development centers in Ukraine. Since 2009 it has grown from a small group of passionate engineers and business managers to a full-scale mobi...
Between the compelling mockups and specs produced by your analysts and designers, and the resulting application built by your developers, there is a gulf where projects fail, costs spiral out of control, and applications fall short of requirements. In his session at @DevOpsSummit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, presented a new approach where business and development users collaborate – each using tools appropriate to their goals and expertise – to build mocku...
SYS-CON Events announced today that VividCortex, the monitoring solution for the modern data system, will exhibit at the 17th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. The database is the heart of most applications, but it’s also the part that’s hardest to scale, monitor, and optimize even as it’s growing 50% year over year. VividCortex is the first unified suite of database monitoring tools specifically desi...
Graylog, Inc., has added the capability to collect, centralize and analyze application container logs from within Docker. The Graylog logging driver for Docker addresses the challenges of extracting intelligence from within Docker containers, where most workloads are dynamic and log data is not persisted or stored. Using Graylog, DevOps and IT Ops teams can pinpoint the root cause of problems to deliver new applications faster and minimize downtime.
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being software-defined – from our phones and cars through our washing machines to the datacenter. However, there are larger challenges when implementing software defined on a larger scale - when building software defined infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Boyan Ivanov, CEO of StorPool, provided some practical insights on what, how and why when implementing "software-defined" in the datacent...
Learn how you can use the CoSN SEND II Decision Tree for Education Technology to make sure that your K–12 technology initiatives create a more engaging learning experience that empowers students, teachers, and administrators alike.
Mobile, social, Big Data, and cloud have fundamentally changed the way we live. “Anytime, anywhere” access to data and information is no longer a luxury; it’s a requirement, in both our personal and professional lives. For IT organizations, this means pressure has never been greater to deliver meaningful services to the business and customers.
In a recent research, analyst firm IDC found that the average cost of a critical application failure is $500,000 to $1 million per hour and the average total cost of unplanned application downtime is $1.25 billion to $2.5 billion per year for Fortune 1000 companies. In addition to the findings on the cost of the downtime, the research also highlighted best practices for development, testing, application support, infrastructure, and operations teams.