Welcome!

News Feed Item

Bengal Energy Announces First Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/12/14 -- Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX: BNG) ("Bengal" or the "Company") announces its financial and operating results for the first fiscal 2015 quarter ended June 30, 2014.

FISCAL Q1 2015 HIGHLIGHTS:

During the first quarter of the Company's fiscal 2015 year, Bengal continued its development strategy, resulting in the successful drilling of four light oil wells in the Company's Cuisinier asset in the Cooper Basin, Australia. With the positive results coming from the first phase of its calendar 2014 drilling program, the Company has demonstrated its understanding of the play and has positioned itself well moving into Phase Two scheduled for calendar Q4 2014.

Following are highlights of specific operational, financial and corporate developments for the three months ended June 30, 2014:

Q1 Operational Highlights:


--  Cuisinier Phase 1 Drilling Campaign - As of July 25, 2014 Bengal and its
    joint venture parties ("JV") had finished completions on the recently
    drilled Cuisinier wells 13, 14, 15 and 16. Initial production rates,
    based on swab results, suggest combined production from the four wells
    to be in the range of 950-1,000 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") gross,
    or 275-300 bopd net to the Company. These wells are scheduled to come
    on-line beginning with the Cuisinier 13 well in mid-August and finishing
    with the Cuisinier 16 well by mid-October 2014. Bengal expects to
    confirm production rates from the Phase One wells following tie-in as
    outlined under Production Volumes below. Successful Phase One drilling
    results have encouraged the operator to expand the 2014 Phase Two
    drilling program as described below.

--  Cuisinier Phase 2 Drilling Campaign - Phase Two of the Cuisinier
    drilling campaign is expected to commence during calendar Q4, 2014;
    during which, the JV will drill four to five development/appraisal wells
    at Cuisinier and one exploration well ("Wicho East") in ATP 752P - Barta
    Block. The JV has benefited from results obtained in the successful
    Phase One campaign and has used that information to high-grade locations
    for Phase Two. The Phase Two wells will target further production
    additions and aim to add reserves by expanding the boundaries of the
    pool.

--  Production Volumes - Production in the first quarter averaged 361
    barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd"), a decrease of 28% from 504
    boepd in the previous quarter and a 1% increase over the 356 boepd
    produced in Q1 2014. The decrease is a function of an increase in water
    cut at the Cuisinier 6 well, combined with natural production declines.
    The operator has plans to conduct production logging on the well to
    determine the exact source of the water and prepare a remediation
    strategy for the well. These declines will be offset commencing in Q2 as
    production from Phase One wells is brought on stream. In addition, the
    operator has proposed a hydraulic stimulation review for certain
    candidate wells as none of the Cuisinier wells to date have been
    stimulated prior to being placed on production. Timing and expectations
    for this program will be forthcoming

--  Koki-1 Exploration Well Located four kms to the north of Cuisinier, the
    Koki-1 well drilled in June 2014, failed to define a commercial
    hydrocarbon accumulation. The Koki-1 Well was a step-out beyond Bengal's
    currently evaluated Cuisinier Field reserves area and will not have an
    impact on the Company's 2014 booked reserves. A second Cuisinier
    exploration location is scheduled to be drilled during Bengal's Phase
    Two drilling campaign later this year. The second well will target the
    Hutton formation on an independent structural closure within the
    Cuisinier North 3D area.

Financial Highlights:


--  Revenues - Bengal's revenue of approximately $3.9 million in the first
    quarter was 26% lower than the $5.3 million generated in the preceding
    quarter due to lower production, but was 5% higher than the $3.7 million
    generated during first fiscal quarter of 2014.

--  Funds Flow from Operations(1) - Bengal generated funds flow from
    operations of $0.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 a 59%
    decrease from the $2.2 million generated in the preceding quarter, due
    to lower production and netbacks and the impact of foreign exchange as
    the Australian dollar appreciated against the US dollar; this also
    reflects a 47% decrease over the $1.7 million recorded in the first
    quarter of fiscal 2014, resulting from the preceding factors as well as
    increased financing charges. Fluctuations in foreign exchange account
    for 29% and 21% of the decrease in funds flow from operations compared
    to the preceding quarter and Q1 2013 respectively.

--  Net Income - Bengal reported a net loss of $729,000 for the quarter
    compared to a net loss of $1.8 million in the preceding quarter, and net
    income of $0.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

"First quarter of fiscal 2015 was a mixed period operationally for Bengal," said Chayan Chakrabarty, Bengal's President and CEO. "While we experienced some challenges with an existing Cuisinier well, we are confident that an appropriate solution will be implemented soon, and production will recover. On the other hand, we are very pleased with our accomplishments to date in our ongoing drilling campaign and expect to tie-in an additional 275 - 300 net barrels of high-netback production by mid-October. Bengal continues to make significant progress in its transition to a development company with exciting exploration upside, and I look forward to updating our shareholders about our ongoing developments."

For a discussion of the activities on each of the Company's permits, refer to Bengal's management's discussion and analysis for the first fiscal quarter 2015 ended June 30, 2015 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

(1) Funds flow from operations is an additional generally accepted account principle ("GAAP measure"). The comparable International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") measure is cash from operations. A reconciliation of the two measures can be found in the table on page 6 of Bengal's Annual MD&A.

FINANCIAL & OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$000s except per share, volumes and
 netback amounts                                         Three Months Ended
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          ----------------------------------

                                             June 30,     June 30,
                                                 2014         2013 % Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue
  Oil                                       $   3,786   $    3,626        4
  Natural gas                                      89           65       37
  Natural gas liquids                              14           31      (55)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                       $   3,889   $    3,722        5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Royalties                                         281          204       38
  % of revenue                                    7.2          5.5       31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating & transportation                      1,206          930       30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating netback(1)                            2,402   $    2,588       (7)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash from (used in) operations:                 2,219        1,249       78
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)                0.03         0.02       50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds from (used in) operations:(2)               926        1,732      (47)
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)                0.01         0.03      (67)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (loss): income                               (729)         836     (187)
  Per share ($) (basic & diluted)               (0.01)        0.01     (200)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures                            3,655   $    5,435      (33)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volumes
  Oil (bpd)                                       327          313        5
  Natural gas (mcfd)                              194          240      (19)
  Natural gas liquids (boepd)                       2            3      (33)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total (boepd @ 6:1)                             361          356        1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Netback(1) ($/boe)
  Revenue                                   $  118.43   $   114.83        3
  Royalties                                      8.56         6.32       35
  Operating & transportation                    36.72        28.69       28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total                                     $   73.15   $    79.82       (8)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Operating netback is a non-IFRS measure. Netback per boe is calculated by
dividing the revenue and costs in total for the Company by the total
production of the Company measured in boe.
2. Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure. The comparable IFRS measure
is cash from operations. A reconciliation of the two measures can be found
in the table on page 5.

Bengal has filed its consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the first fiscal 2015 quarter ended June 30, 2014 with Canadian securities regulators. The documents are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or by visiting Bengal's website at www.bengalenergy.ca.

About Bengal

Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX: BNG) is an international oil and gas exploration and production company with producing and prospective light oil-weighted assets in Australia and India. Bengal offers exposure to lower risk, current production and cash flow, combined with longer-term high, potential impact exploration projects. The Company's strategy is to achieve per share growth in cash flow, production and reserves while establishing an attractive portfolio of future drilling and exploration opportunities. Additional information is available on our website at www.bengalenergy.ca.

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements or information ("forward-looking statements") as defined by applicable securities laws that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Bengal's control. These statements relate to future events or our future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward looking statements. The use of any of the words "plan", "expect", "prospective", "project", "intend", "believe", "should", "anticipate", "estimate", or other similar words or statements that certain events "may" or "will" occur are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such forward looking statements are based on management's estimates, opinions, and assumptions at the time the statements were made, including assumptions relating to: the impact of economic conditions in North America, Australia, India and globally; industry conditions; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; increased competition; the availability of qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; stock market volatility and fluctuations in market valuations of companies with respect to announced transactions and the final valuations thereof; results of exploration and testing activities; and the ability to obtain required approvals and extensions from regulatory authorities. We believe the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable but, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that Bengal will derive from them. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements contained herein include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the commencement of production of the four Phase One development wells, anticipated initial production rates based on swab results, the completion of a Phase Two drilling program by the Company at Cuisinier in 2014 including the timing to drill, tie-in and put on production the up to 5 wells to be drilled and the timing to announce results of such drilling, the timing to drill one exploration well on the Wompi permit, the timing for the Company to interpret seismic and evaluate prospective drilling locations in the Tookoonooka area, the timing for the drilling of up to three exploration wells onshore India, the funding by the Company of its share of the costs of the first phase of drilling at Cuisinier out of ongoing cash flow. The forward looking statements contained herein are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause Bengal's actual financial results, performance or achievement in future periods to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, risks associated with: the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals or extensions; failure to satisfy the conditions under farm-in and joint venture agreements; failure to secure required equipment and personnel; changes in general global economic conditions including, without limitations, the economic conditions in North America, Australia, India; increased competition; the availability of qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new environmental and tax laws and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; the results of exploration and development drilling and related activities; the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; and stock market volatility. Readers are encouraged to review the material risks discussed in Bengal's Annual Information Form under the heading "Risk Factors" and in Bengal's annual MD&A under the heading "Risk Factors". The Company cautions that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release speak only as of the date hereof and Bengal does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be require pursuant to applicable securities laws.

Barrels of Oil Equivalent

When converting natural gas to equivalent barrels of oil, Bengal uses the widely recognized standard of 6 thousand cubic feet (mcf) to one barrel of oil (boe). However, a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.


Certain Defined Terms
boe - barrels of oil equivalent
boe/d - barrels of oil equivalent per day
bbl - barrel
bbl/d - barrels per day
mcf - thousand cubic feet
mcf/d - thousand cubic feet per day

Non-IFRS Measurements

Within this release references are made to terms commonly used in the oil and gas industry. Funds from operations, funds from operations per share and netbacks do not have any standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and previous generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are referred to as non-IFRS measures. Funds from operations per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding consistent with the calculation of net income (loss) per share. Netbacks equal total revenue less royalties and operating and transportation expenses calculated on a boe basis. Management utilizes these measures to analyze operating performance. The Company's calculation of the non-IFRS measures included herein may differ from the calculation of similar measures by other issuers. Therefore, the Company's non-IFRS measures may not be comparable to other similar measures used by other issuers. Funds from operations is not intended to represent operating profit for the period nor should it be viewed as an alternative to operating profit, net income, cash flow from operations or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with IFRS. Non-IFRS measures should only be used in conjunction with the Company's annual audited and interim financial statements. A reconciliation of these measures can be found in the table on page 5 of Bengal's Q1 fiscal 2014 MD&A.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
"We focus on composable infrastructure. Composable infrastructure has been named by companies like Gartner as the evolution of the IT infrastructure where everything is now driven by software," explained Bruno Andrade, CEO and Founder of HTBase, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
Cloud applications are seeing a deluge of requests to support the exploding advanced analytics market. “Open analytics” is the emerging strategy to deliver that data through an open data access layer, in the cloud, to be directly consumed by external analytics tools and popular programming languages. An increasing number of data engineers and data scientists use a variety of platforms and advanced analytics languages such as SAS, R, Python and Java, as well as frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might...
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Datanami has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo, which will take place on Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Datanami is a communication channel dedicated to providing insight, analysis and up-to-the-minute information about emerging trends and solutions in Big Data. The publication sheds light on all cutting-edge technologies including networking, storage and applications, and thei...