Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc. Announces 2014 Second Quarter Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 08/13/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, announced today its unaudited interim financial and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. All dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars. This update includes results from KUB-Gas LLC ("KUB-Gas"), which Cub has a 30% ownership interest, and Tysagaz JSC ("Tysagaz"), Cub's 100% owned subsidiary.

In the second quarter of 2014, Cub achieved record accomplishments, including a second quarter exit rate of 2,154 boe/d and current rate of 2,350 boe/d, resulting from the commencement of production of the Company's RK-21 well (100% WI) and commencement of production of the M-17 well (30% WI).

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,868 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the three months
    ended June 30, 2014 for an increase of 25% over 1,490 boe/d in the same
    period in 2013. 
--  Exit rate of 2,154 boe/d at June 30, 2014 for a 10% increase over exit
    rate of 1,952 boe/d at March 31, 2014. 
--  Current production of approximately 2,350 boe/d. 
--  KUB-Gas (30%WI) achieved a significant milestone in daily production -
    over 1 million cubic metres per day ("MMcm/d") or approximately 5,885
    boe/d (1,766 boe/d Cub WI) late in the second quarter. 
--  Achieved average natural gas price of $10.23/Mcf and condensate price of
    $79.86/bbl for the three months ended June 30, 2014. 
--  On March 14, 2014, the RK-21 well was spud and subsequently tested gas
    at a maximum rate flow rate of 2.6 million cubic feet per day ("MMcf/d")
    through a 12-millimetre choke. The well was tied-in and placed on
    production on June 2, 2014. 
--  In May 2014, Cub re-entered the RK-1 well (100% WI) for a test of the
    deeper Mesozoic sands. The well reached TD of 3,995 metres and Cub
    completed the evaluation of the Mesozoic sands and the results show the
    presence of pipeline quality gas from samples taken during testing. It
    is believed that these sands have the potential to flow at commercial
    rates after hydraulic fracture stimulation; however, this type of
    operation is not feasible in the current wellbore. The Company is
    evaluating a new well to 4,000 metres which will allow stimulation by
    hydraulic fracturing. The well is currently shut-in and being prepared
    for a completion attempt in the D-4 reservoir at 1,400 metres.  
--  Gas began flowing from the new Kub-Gas (30% WI) Makeevskoye and
    Olgovskoye production and processing facility on March 6, 2014 resulting
    in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the previous 30 MMcf/d. Full
    production gains from the new facility were achieved late in the second
    quarter of 2014. 
--  The M-17 well (30% WI) was drilled during the first quarter. Logs
    indicated 9 metres of net pay in the primary target, the S6 sand, and
    2.5 metres of pay in the S5 and 5.5 metres in the deeper S7. They also
    indicated resource potential 22 metres in the R30c. On test, the S7
    achieved a rate of 900 Mcf/d, exceeding the Company's expectations that
    it would require stimulation to produce at a commercial rate. A bridge
    plug was set above the S7, and after testing, and the S6 commenced
    production on June 26, 2014 at an initial rate of 6.0 MMcf/d (1.8 MMcf/d
    Cub WI). That rate has been increased several times, allowing the well
    to stabilize at each stage, and it has averaged 8.6 MMcf/d (2.6 MMcf/d
    Cub WI) since start-up. The S5 and R30c remain behind pipe to be tested
    and developed at a later date. 
--  On June 27, 2014, field operations in eastern Ukraine were suspended
    temporarily to ensure the continued safety of employees and assets
    during the ongoing regional conflict in the region. As a result, the NM-
    4 well (30% WI) that commenced drilling to test a seismically-identified
    stratigraphic play was suspended at 102 metres. 

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $41.46/Boe or $6.91/Mcfe for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales for the six months ended June 30, 2014
    increased 79% to $3.4 million (2013 - $1.9 million) which was driven by
    the recent success of RK-21 and RK-22. 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the six months ended June
    30, 2014 were $52.8 million (2013 - $57.6 million) for a decrease of 8%
    of which the Company's 30% share was $15.8 million (2013 - $17.3
    million). The decrease was due to lower average gas prices and the
    devaluation of the Ukrainian currency during 2014. 
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $19.2 million (2013 - $19.2 million) for the six months
    ended June 30, 2014. 
--  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company received $4.0
    million (2013 - $5.4 million) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas
    representing the distribution of excess cash flow. 
--  Income from the Company's 30% equity investment in KUB-Gas for the six
    months ended June 30, 2014 was $4.5 million (2013 - $4.5 million). 
--  The net profit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.3 million
    or $0.00 per share (2013 - $0.6 million or $0.00 per share). 
--  Capital expenditures of $4.1 million (2013 $1.2 million) for the six
    months ended June 30, 2014 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a non-
    IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of the
    allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $7.9 million (2013 -
    $3.9 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2014. 
--  The Company utilized $2.0 million of the available $5.0 million
    unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt during the six months ended June
    30, 2014. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Three     Three       Six       Six
                                        Months    Months    Months    Months
                                         Ended     Ended     Ended     Ended
                                      June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,
(in thousands of US Dollars)              2014      2013      2014      2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural gas revenue        1,693       823     3,394     1,878
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas                                          
 revenue(1)                             10,505     9,501    19,239    19,169
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit                               2,192       326     1,277       602
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per share - basic and                                              
 diluted                                  0.01      0.00      0.00      0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from operations(2)       2,502       724     2,376     2,307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated from                                               
 operations(3)                           4,503     1,828     6,894     4,520
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures(4)                  3,034       906     4,108     1,229
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital expenditures(4)         4,662     2,037     7,884     3,908
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)                 41.46     37.21     35.89     40.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)                  6.91      6.20      5.98      6.76
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                     June 30,   December                    
                                          2014  31, 2013                    
                                                                            
                                                                            
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Working capital                             39       942                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Cash and cash equivalents                2,118     1,617                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Long-term debt                           2,000         -                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Notes:                                                                      
                                                                            
(1) Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that   
adds the Company's petroleum and natural revenue earned in the respective   
periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas petroleum and      
natural gas sales that the Company has an economic interest in.             
(2) Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash flow 
from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working capital.   
(3) Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the      
Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the Company's  
30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that the Company has  
an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from operations is calculated as 
the income from equity investment less the KUB-Gas depletion and            
depreciation.                                                               
(4) Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and       
equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro-rata   
capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the Company's capital  
expenditures in the respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of 
the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that the Company has an economic interest  
in.                                                                         

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "During the second quarter of 2014, gas prices increased to $10.23/Mcf as compared to $8.63/Mcf in the first quarter as the temporary agreement between Russia and Ukraine ceased. The gas price increase, along with successful drilling and tie-ins of the RK-21 and M-17 wells lead to a stronger quarter financially as the Company reported a net profit of $2.2 million during the second quarter and collected $3.1 million in dividends from KUB-Gas. We continue to closely monitor the political and economic developments in Ukraine to make any necessary adjustments to our business plans."

Outlook

For the remainder of 2014, the Company will continue on its 100% owned and operated Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine. The RK-1 well is currently shut-in and being prepared for a completion attempt in the D-4 reservoir at 1,400 metres. The Company then plans to drill the RK-23 development well in the third quarter of 2014 and is re-evaluating the balance of its capital program in light of the recent temporary increase in royalty rates through the end of the year.

Operations at KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine are temporarily suspended to ensure the continued safety of employees and assets during the ongoing regional conflict in the region. The Company continues to monitor the security situation and the potential of re-commencing field operations as soon as possible. The Company has four imminent drilling locations, including two exploration wells (NM-4 and M-22), and two development wells (M-15 and M-18). Success on any of these will open up additional development and exploration locations.

Once field operations resume, the Company has planned fracture stimulations on four wells in eastern Ukraine, including NM-3, O-11, O-15 and possibly the S7 zone in M-17. The NM-3 well is a potential oil discovery made in July 2013. The Visean formation is tight and unable to flow unstimulated. If the fracture is successful, it will be the first commercial oil well on Company licences, and will set up several additional development locations.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the unaudited interim financial statements and associated Management's Discussion and Analysis, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and has been posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE:KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or a Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is, based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in Ukraine, the Black Sea Region and globally; political unrest and security concerns in Ukraine; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and the other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Contacts:
Cub Energy Inc.
Mikhail Afendikov
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(713) 677-0439
mikhail.afendikov@cubenergyinc.com

Cub Energy Inc.
Patrick McGrath
Chief Financial Officer
(713) 577-1948
patrick.mcgrath@cubenergyinc.com
www.cubenergyinc.com

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
There are 66 million network cameras capturing terabytes of data. How did factories in Japan improve physical security at the facilities and improve employee productivity? Edge Computing reduces possible kilobytes of data collected per second to only a few kilobytes of data transmitted to the public cloud every day. Data is aggregated and analyzed close to sensors so only intelligent results need to be transmitted to the cloud. Non-essential data is recycled to optimize storage.
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web communications world. The 6th WebRTC Summit continues our tradition of delivering the latest and greatest presentations within the world of WebRTC. Topics include voice calling, video chat, P2P file sharing, and use cases that have already leveraged the power and convenience of WebRTC.
Information technology (IT) advances are transforming the way we innovate in business, thereby disrupting the old guard and their predictable status-quo. It’s creating global market turbulence. Industries are converging, and new opportunities and threats are emerging, like never before. So, how are savvy chief information officers (CIOs) leading this transition? Back in 2015, the IBM Institute for Business Value conducted a market study that included the findings from over 1,800 CIO interviews ...
Stratoscale, the software company developing the next generation data center operating system, exhibited at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which took place at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, in June 2016.Stratoscale is revolutionizing the data center with a zero-to-cloud-in-minutes solution. With Stratoscale’s hardware-agnostic, Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) solution to store everything, run anything and scale everywhere, IT is empowered to take control of their data ce...
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Robert Doyle, lead architect at eCube Systems, will examine the issues and need for an agile infrastructure and show the advantages of capturing developer knowledge in an exportable file for migration into production. He will introduce the use of NXTmonitor, a next-generation DevOps tool that captures application environments, dependencies and start/stop procedures in a portable configuration file with an easy-to-use GUI. In addition to captur...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
SYS-CON Events announced today that SD Times | BZ Media has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 6–8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. BZ Media LLC is a high-tech media company that produces technical conferences and expositions, and publishes a magazine, newsletters and websites in the software development, SharePoint, mobile development and commercial UAV markets.
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain.
In the first article of this three-part series on hybrid cloud security, we discussed the Shared Responsibility Model and examined how the most common attack strategies persist, are amplified, or are mitigated as assets move from data centers to the cloud. Today, we’ll look at some of the unique security challenges that are introduced by public cloud environments. While cloud computing delivers many operational, cost-saving and security benefits, it takes place in a public, shared and on-demand ...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
The Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), which enables organizations to seamlessly run in a hybrid cloud model (public + private cloud), is here to stay. IDC estimates that the software-defined networking market will be valued at $3.7 billion by 2016. Security is a key component and benefit of the SDDC, and offers an opportunity to build security 'from the ground up' and weave it into the environment from day one. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Reuven Harrison, CTO and Co-Founder of Tufin, ...
With the proliferation of both SQL and NoSQL databases, organizations can now target specific fit-for-purpose database tools for their different application needs regarding scalability, ease of use, ACID support, etc. Platform as a Service offerings make this even easier now, enabling developers to roll out their own database infrastructure in minutes with minimal management overhead. However, this same amount of flexibility also comes with the challenges of picking the right tool, on the right ...
“We're a global managed hosting provider. Our core customer set is a U.S.-based customer that is looking to go global,” explained Adam Rogers, Managing Director at ANEXIA, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In today's uber-connected, consumer-centric, cloud-enabled, insights-driven, multi-device, global world, the focus of solutions has shifted from the product that is sold to the person who is buying the product or service. Enterprises have rebranded their business around the consumers of their products. The buyer is the person and the focus is not on the offering. The person is connected through multiple devices, wearables, at home, on the road, and in multiple locations, sometimes simultaneously...