Welcome!

News Feed Item

Cub Energy Inc. Announces 2014 Second Quarter Financial and Operational Results

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (Marketwired) -- 08/13/14 -- Cub Energy Inc. ("Cub" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:KUB), a Black Sea region-focused upstream oil and gas company, announced today its unaudited interim financial and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. All dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars. This update includes results from KUB-Gas LLC ("KUB-Gas"), which Cub has a 30% ownership interest, and Tysagaz JSC ("Tysagaz"), Cub's 100% owned subsidiary.

In the second quarter of 2014, Cub achieved record accomplishments, including a second quarter exit rate of 2,154 boe/d and current rate of 2,350 boe/d, resulting from the commencement of production of the Company's RK-21 well (100% WI) and commencement of production of the M-17 well (30% WI).

Operational Highlights


--  Production averaged 1,868 boe/d (95% natural gas) for the three months
    ended June 30, 2014 for an increase of 25% over 1,490 boe/d in the same
    period in 2013. 
--  Exit rate of 2,154 boe/d at June 30, 2014 for a 10% increase over exit
    rate of 1,952 boe/d at March 31, 2014. 
--  Current production of approximately 2,350 boe/d. 
--  KUB-Gas (30%WI) achieved a significant milestone in daily production -
    over 1 million cubic metres per day ("MMcm/d") or approximately 5,885
    boe/d (1,766 boe/d Cub WI) late in the second quarter. 
--  Achieved average natural gas price of $10.23/Mcf and condensate price of
    $79.86/bbl for the three months ended June 30, 2014. 
--  On March 14, 2014, the RK-21 well was spud and subsequently tested gas
    at a maximum rate flow rate of 2.6 million cubic feet per day ("MMcf/d")
    through a 12-millimetre choke. The well was tied-in and placed on
    production on June 2, 2014. 
--  In May 2014, Cub re-entered the RK-1 well (100% WI) for a test of the
    deeper Mesozoic sands. The well reached TD of 3,995 metres and Cub
    completed the evaluation of the Mesozoic sands and the results show the
    presence of pipeline quality gas from samples taken during testing. It
    is believed that these sands have the potential to flow at commercial
    rates after hydraulic fracture stimulation; however, this type of
    operation is not feasible in the current wellbore. The Company is
    evaluating a new well to 4,000 metres which will allow stimulation by
    hydraulic fracturing. The well is currently shut-in and being prepared
    for a completion attempt in the D-4 reservoir at 1,400 metres.  
--  Gas began flowing from the new Kub-Gas (30% WI) Makeevskoye and
    Olgovskoye production and processing facility on March 6, 2014 resulting
    in increased capacity to 68 MMcf/d from the previous 30 MMcf/d. Full
    production gains from the new facility were achieved late in the second
    quarter of 2014. 
--  The M-17 well (30% WI) was drilled during the first quarter. Logs
    indicated 9 metres of net pay in the primary target, the S6 sand, and
    2.5 metres of pay in the S5 and 5.5 metres in the deeper S7. They also
    indicated resource potential 22 metres in the R30c. On test, the S7
    achieved a rate of 900 Mcf/d, exceeding the Company's expectations that
    it would require stimulation to produce at a commercial rate. A bridge
    plug was set above the S7, and after testing, and the S6 commenced
    production on June 26, 2014 at an initial rate of 6.0 MMcf/d (1.8 MMcf/d
    Cub WI). That rate has been increased several times, allowing the well
    to stabilize at each stage, and it has averaged 8.6 MMcf/d (2.6 MMcf/d
    Cub WI) since start-up. The S5 and R30c remain behind pipe to be tested
    and developed at a later date. 
--  On June 27, 2014, field operations in eastern Ukraine were suspended
    temporarily to ensure the continued safety of employees and assets
    during the ongoing regional conflict in the region. As a result, the NM-
    4 well (30% WI) that commenced drilling to test a seismically-identified
    stratigraphic play was suspended at 102 metres. 

Financial Highlights


--  Netback of $41.46/Boe or $6.91/Mcfe for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales for the six months ended June 30, 2014
    increased 79% to $3.4 million (2013 - $1.9 million) which was driven by
    the recent success of RK-21 and RK-22. 
--  Revenue from hydrocarbon sales by KUB-Gas for the six months ended June
    30, 2014 were $52.8 million (2013 - $57.6 million) for a decrease of 8%
    of which the Company's 30% share was $15.8 million (2013 - $17.3
    million). The decrease was due to lower average gas prices and the
    devaluation of the Ukrainian currency during 2014. 
--  The total pro-rata revenue from hydrocarbon sales, a non-IFRS measure
    combining the Company's revenue and 30% of the allocated KUB-Gas
    revenue, totaled $19.2 million (2013 - $19.2 million) for the six months
    ended June 30, 2014. 
--  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company received $4.0
    million (2013 - $5.4 million) in the form of dividends from KUB-Gas
    representing the distribution of excess cash flow. 
--  Income from the Company's 30% equity investment in KUB-Gas for the six
    months ended June 30, 2014 was $4.5 million (2013 - $4.5 million). 
--  The net profit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.3 million
    or $0.00 per share (2013 - $0.6 million or $0.00 per share). 
--  Capital expenditures of $4.1 million (2013 $1.2 million) for the six
    months ended June 30, 2014 and the pro-rata capital expenditures, a non-
    IFRS measure combining the Company's capital expenditures and 30% of the
    allocated KUB-Gas capital expenditures, totaled $7.9 million (2013 -
    $3.9 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2014. 
--  The Company utilized $2.0 million of the available $5.0 million
    unsecured line of credit with Pelicourt during the six months ended June
    30, 2014. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Three     Three       Six       Six
                                        Months    Months    Months    Months
                                         Ended     Ended     Ended     Ended
                                      June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,
(in thousands of US Dollars)              2014      2013      2014      2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum and natural gas revenue        1,693       823     3,394     1,878
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas                                          
 revenue(1)                             10,505     9,501    19,239    19,169
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net profit                               2,192       326     1,277       602
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per share - basic and                                              
 diluted                                  0.01      0.00      0.00      0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funds generated from operations(2)       2,502       724     2,376     2,307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata funds generated from                                               
 operations(3)                           4,503     1,828     6,894     4,520
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures(4)                  3,034       906     4,108     1,229
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata capital expenditures(4)         4,662     2,037     7,884     3,908
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($/boe)                 41.46     37.21     35.89     40.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-rata netback ($Mcfe)                  6.91      6.20      5.98      6.76
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                     June 30,   December                    
                                          2014  31, 2013                    
                                                                            
                                                                            
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Working capital                             39       942                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Cash and cash equivalents                2,118     1,617                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Long-term debt                           2,000         -                    
--------------------------------------------------------                    
Notes:                                                                      
                                                                            
(1) Pro-rata petroleum and natural gas revenue is a non-IFRS measure that   
adds the Company's petroleum and natural revenue earned in the respective   
periods to the Company's 30% equity share of the KUB-Gas petroleum and      
natural gas sales that the Company has an economic interest in.             
(2) Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure and is defined as cash flow 
from operating activities, excluding changes in non-cash working capital.   
(3) Pro-rata funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure that adds the      
Company's funds from operations in the respective periods to the Company's  
30% equity share of the KUB-Gas funds from operations that the Company has  
an economic interest in. The KUB-Gas funds from operations is calculated as 
the income from equity investment less the KUB-Gas depletion and            
depreciation.                                                               
(4) Capital expenditures includes the purchase of property, plant and       
equipment and the purchase of exploration and evaluation assets. Pro-rata   
capital expenditures is a non-IFRS measure that adds the Company's capital  
expenditures in the respective periods to the Company's 30% equity share of 
the KUB-Gas capital expenditures that the Company has an economic interest  
in.                                                                         

Mikhail Afendikov, Chief Executive Officer of Cub Energy, commented, "During the second quarter of 2014, gas prices increased to $10.23/Mcf as compared to $8.63/Mcf in the first quarter as the temporary agreement between Russia and Ukraine ceased. The gas price increase, along with successful drilling and tie-ins of the RK-21 and M-17 wells lead to a stronger quarter financially as the Company reported a net profit of $2.2 million during the second quarter and collected $3.1 million in dividends from KUB-Gas. We continue to closely monitor the political and economic developments in Ukraine to make any necessary adjustments to our business plans."

Outlook

For the remainder of 2014, the Company will continue on its 100% owned and operated Tysagaz assets in western Ukraine. The RK-1 well is currently shut-in and being prepared for a completion attempt in the D-4 reservoir at 1,400 metres. The Company then plans to drill the RK-23 development well in the third quarter of 2014 and is re-evaluating the balance of its capital program in light of the recent temporary increase in royalty rates through the end of the year.

Operations at KUB-Gas in eastern Ukraine are temporarily suspended to ensure the continued safety of employees and assets during the ongoing regional conflict in the region. The Company continues to monitor the security situation and the potential of re-commencing field operations as soon as possible. The Company has four imminent drilling locations, including two exploration wells (NM-4 and M-22), and two development wells (M-15 and M-18). Success on any of these will open up additional development and exploration locations.

Once field operations resume, the Company has planned fracture stimulations on four wells in eastern Ukraine, including NM-3, O-11, O-15 and possibly the S7 zone in M-17. The NM-3 well is a potential oil discovery made in July 2013. The Visean formation is tight and unable to flow unstimulated. If the fracture is successful, it will be the first commercial oil well on Company licences, and will set up several additional development locations.

Supporting Documents

Cub's complete quarterly reporting package, including the unaudited interim financial statements and associated Management's Discussion and Analysis, have been filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and has been posted on the Company's website at www.cubenergyinc.com.

About Cub Energy Inc.

Cub Energy Inc. (TSX VENTURE:KUB) is an upstream oil and gas company, with a proven track record of exploration and production cost efficiency in the Black Sea region. The Company's strategy is to implement western technology and capital, combined with local expertise and ownership, to increase value in its undeveloped land base, creating and further building a portfolio of producing oil and gas assets within a high pricing environment.

Oil and Gas Equivalents

A barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") or units of natural gas equivalents ("Mcfe") is calculated using the conversion factor of 6 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl (barrel) or a Mcfe conversion of 1bbl: 6 Mcf is, based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead and is not based on either energy content or current prices. While the boe ratio is useful for comparative measures, it does not accurately reflect individual product values and might be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. As well, given that the value ratio, based on the current price of crude oil to natural gas, is significantly different from the 6:1 energy equivalency ratio, using a 6:1 conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value.

Reader Advisory

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Cub believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable; however there can be no assurance those expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in Ukraine, the Black Sea Region and globally; political unrest and security concerns in Ukraine; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the prices of natural gas; governmental regulation of the natural gas industry, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or delayed; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; competition for and/or inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; volatility in market prices for natural gas; liabilities inherent in natural gas operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel and supplies; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling, processing and transportation problems; changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the natural gas industry; failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions; and the other factors. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the forward-looking information contained in this news release. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Enterprise IT has been in the era of Hybrid Cloud for some time now. But it seems most conversations about Hybrid are focused on integrating AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google ECM into existing on-premises systems. Where is all the Private Cloud? What do technology providers need to do to make their offerings more compelling? How should enterprise IT executives and buyers define their focus, needs, and roadmap, and communicate that clearly to the providers?
The many IoT deployments around the world are busy integrating smart devices and sensors into their enterprise IT infrastructures. Yet all of this technology – and there are an amazing number of choices – is of no use without the software to gather, communicate, and analyze the new data flows. Without software, there is no IT. In this power panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation; Alan Williamson, Principal...
Video experiences should be unique and exciting! But that doesn’t mean you need to patch all the pieces yourself. Users demand rich and engaging experiences and new ways to connect with you. But creating robust video applications at scale can be complicated, time-consuming and expensive. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Zohar Babin, Vice President of Platform, Ecosystem and Community at Kaltura, discussed how VPaaS enables you to move fast, creating scalable video experiences that reach your aud...
Get deep visibility into the performance of your databases and expert advice for performance optimization and tuning. You can't get application performance without database performance. Give everyone on the team a comprehensive view of how every aspect of the system affects performance across SQL database operations, host server and OS, virtualization resources and storage I/O. Quickly find bottlenecks and troubleshoot complex problems.
President Obama recently announced the launch of a new national awareness campaign to "encourage more Americans to move beyond passwords – adding an extra layer of security like a fingerprint or codes sent to your cellphone." The shift from single passwords to multi-factor authentication couldn’t be timelier or more strategic. This session will focus on why passwords alone are no longer effective, and why the time to act is now. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Chris Webber, security strateg...
Amazon has gradually rolled out parts of its IoT offerings in the last year, but these are just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to optimizing their back-end AWS offerings, Amazon is laying the ground work to be a major force in IoT – especially in the connected home and office. Amazon is extending its reach by building on its dominant Cloud IoT platform, its Dash Button strategy, recently announced Replenishment Services, the Echo/Alexa voice recognition control platform, the 6-7 strategic...
"We are an all-flash array storage provider but our focus has been on VM-aware storage specifically for virtualized applications," stated Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"We are a leader in the market space called network visibility solutions - it enables monitoring tools and Big Data analysis to access the data and be able to see the performance," explained Shay Morag, VP of Sales and Marketing at Niagara Networks, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smart...
Complete Internet of Things (IoT) embedded device security is not just about the device but involves the entire product’s identity, data and control integrity, and services traversing the cloud. A device can no longer be looked at as an island; it is a part of a system. In fact, given the cross-domain interactions enabled by IoT it could be a part of many systems. Also, depending on where the device is deployed, for example, in the office building versus a factory floor or oil field, security ha...
An IoT product’s log files speak volumes about what’s happening with your products in the field, pinpointing current and potential issues, and enabling you to predict failures and save millions of dollars in inventory. But until recently, no one knew how to listen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Dan Gettens, Chief Research Officer at OnProcess, discussed recent research by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and OnProcess Technology, where MIT created a new, breakthrough analytics model for s...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
SYS-CON Events has announced today that Roger Strukhoff has been named conference chair of Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo 2017 New York. The 20th Cloud Expo and 7th @ThingsExpo will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. "The Internet of Things brings trillions of dollars of opportunity to developers and enterprise IT, no matter how you measure it," stated Roger Strukhoff. "More importantly, it leverages the power of devices and the Internet to enable us all to im...
"We are the public cloud providers. We are currently providing 50% of the resources they need for doing e-commerce business in China and we are hosting about 60% of mobile gaming in China," explained Yi Zheng, CPO and VP of Engineering at CDS Global Cloud, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.