Welcome!

News Feed Item

Waldron Energy Corporation Announces the Successful Drill and Completion of Its Ferrybank Falher Well and Announces Second Quarter 2014 Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/14/14 -- Waldron Energy Corporation (TSX: WDN) ("Waldron" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce initial results from the successful drill and completion of its first Ferrybank Falher well. The Corporation is also pleased to announce its financial and operational results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. These reports are available for review at www.sedar.com and on the Corporation's website at www.waldronenergy.ca.

Ferrybank Falher Drilling Update

The Corporation is pleased to provide an operational update regarding its 100% working interest in the Waldron Ferrybank 16-14-043-28W4 horizontal Upper Mannville (Falher) well (the "16-14 well"). Throughout July and the first half of August 2014, the 16-14 well was successfully drilled and completed. During the 60 hour post frac clean up, the well's final flow rate was 4.1 mmscf/d with 45% of frac fluids recovered. The well is expected to be placed on continuous production by mid-October 2014. The Corporation is currently in the process of licensing a second well.

This is the Corporation's first horizontal Falher zone liquids-rich natural gas well drilled at Ferrybank. The well is an extension of the Ferrybank Upper Mannville I channel sand by three miles. Waldron is currently in the process of making applications to increase the drill spacing to three wells per section on its Ferrybank land base prospective for Falher gas production, consistent with other companies in the area, and owns five sections of P&NG mineral rights directly on trend. Three competitor horizontal Falher wells recently drilled on trend acreage averaged publicly reported production of approximately 3.2 mmscf/d raw gas plus liquids as a 90 day initial production rate.

The Corporation currently has no reserves assigned to this play and is budgeting the 16-14 well to average approximately 400 boe/d over the first ninety days of production. On a reserves basis, these wells are budgeted to add approximately 250 Mboe per well in reserve additions.

Q2 2014 Highlights


--  Reduction in net debt of $6.4 million from $30.6 million at March 31,
    2014 to $24.2 million at June 30, 2014;
--  Sale of a 3% Corporate Gross Overriding Royalty (GORR) for $7 million,
    supporting a Corporate valuation of 2P PV10%, or a net asset value of
    approximately $1.00 per share;
--  Realized natural gas pricing of $4.94 per mcf, NGL pricing of $51.50 per
    bbl and light oil pricing of $104.11 per bbl resulted in an average
    realized price of $40.64 per boe; and
--  Second quarter 2014 funds from operations of $0.3 million was negatively
    impacted by an unscheduled third party plant turnaround (impact of
    approximately 130 boe per day on quarterly production), a one-time Crown
    royalty adjustment of $0.4 million, unexpected third party plant charges
    of $0.2 million and, compared to the first quarter 2014, a $6.65 per boe
    reduction in realized commodity pricing, net of realized losses on
    commodity price contracts.

Q2 2014 Financial
 Highlights
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             Three months ended            Six months ended
                                        June 30                     June 30
                             2014          2013          2014          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial (000's
 except for per
 share amounts)       (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)
Operating netback(1) $      1,362  $      2,592  $      4,755  $      5,461
  Per share basic &
   diluted(1)(3)             0.02          0.06          0.08          0.14
Petroleum and
 natural gas sales          5,326         5,865        12,578        11,815
Funds from
 operations(2)                287         1,415         2,522         3,436
  Per share basic &
   diluted(2)(3)             0.01          0.04          0.04          0.09
Net loss                     (215)       (1,938)       (1,556)       (3,198)
  Per share basic &
   diluted(3)               (0.00)        (0.05)        (0.03)        (0.08)
Capital
 expenditures, net
 of dispositions              745           355         5,465         1,077
Proceeds on sale of
 gross overriding
 royalty                   (7,000)            -        (7,000)            -
Net debt(4)                24,163        33,680        24,163        33,680
Property and
 equipment                 71,309        80,457        71,309        80,457
Exploration and
 evaluation assets          9,311        10,091         9,311        10,091
Shareholders' equity       45,880        45,441        45,880        45,441
Number of shares
 outstanding at
 quarter end               57,267        40,035        57,267        40,035
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Notes:
(1) Operating netback is a non-GAAP measure and the Corporation calculates
    this measure as revenue, net of any unrealized gains or losses on
    commodity price contracts, less royalties and operating and
    transportation expenses.
(2) Funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure and the Corporation
    calculates this measure as cash provided from operations before changes
    in non-cash working capital, decommissioning expenses and transaction
    and other costs.
(3) At June 30, 2014, there were 3,409,500 (2013 - 2,191,333) options and
    7,182,560 (2013 - 7,182,560) warrants outstanding that were not included
    in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding as the effect
    would be anti-dilutive.
(4) Net debt is a non-GAAP measure and the Corporation calculates this
    measure as current assets less current liabilities, excluding commodity
    price contracts.


Q2 2014 Operational
 Highlights
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Three months ended            Six months ended
                                        June 30                     June 30
                             2014          2013          2014          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Production    (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)   (unaudited)
  Natural Gas
   (mcf/d)                  6,215         8,751         6,876         9,087
  NGL (bbls/d)                271           399           279           395
  Light crude oil
   (bbls/d)                   133           152           138           154
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BOE/day                   1,440         2,010         1,563         2,064
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realized Pricing
  Natural Gas
   ($/Mcf)           $       4.94  $       3.86  $       5.55  $       3.67
  NGL ($/bbl))              51.50         45.64         63.13         48.79
  Light crude oil
   ($/bbl)                 104.11         81.84         99.69         82.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average realized
 price               $      40.64  $      32.06  $      44.46  $      31.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Netback per boe
  Sales price        $      40.64  $      32.06  $      44.46  $      31.63
  Realized loss on
   commodity price
   contracts                (3.33)            -         (3.58)            -
  Royalties                 (8.53)        (5.40)        (6.51)        (3.73)
  Operating expenses       (16.16)       (11.78)       (15.38)       (11.50)
  Transportation
   expenses                 (2.22)        (1.66)        (2.17)        (1.77)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating netback    $      10.40  $      13.22  $      16.82  $      14.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A third-party plant turnaround in the Corporation's Strachan area, which typically produces approximately 325 - 375 boe/d, was scheduled to last two weeks but was shut down for approximately six weeks. This resulted in a reduction in overall second quarter 2014 production of approximately 130 boe per day. The plant was brought back on-line in July and the Corporation estimates July 2014 production to be approximately 1,650 - 1,700 boe per day.

Other non-recurring items that negatively impacted funds from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 include an increase in royalty expenses of $0.4 million related to 2013 Crown charges for Gas Cost Allowance as well as $0.2 million in unexpected third party facility charges.

Notwithstanding the reduction in funds from operations for the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation remains optimistic and believes in its deep basin asset base. It is encouraged by the opportunities that an improved balance sheet and successful third quarter 2014 drilling program will present in an effort to exploit its petroleum and natural gas assets and build value for Waldron shareholders.

Sale of Gross Overriding Royalty

On June 18, 2014, Waldron closed the sale of a 3% gross overriding royalty on its existing land base for proceeds of $7 million. The royalty transaction also includes an incremental 7% gross overriding royalty on two Ferrybank Falher wells yet to be drilled and includes a provision that $750,000 is to be returned to the royalty owner for each of the two Ferrybank Falher wells if not drilled. Subsequent to June 30, 2014 the first of the two qualifying wells (the 16-14 well) was drilled.

The Corporation also has an option to purchase the GORR back for 15 months from the closing date at a price of 30% above the original proceeds on the royalty sale less any royalties paid under the GORR agreement and less two thirds of any amounts returned as a result of any failure to drill the Ferrybank wells.

The GORR transaction crystallized accretive value for the Corporation's shareholders as the transaction valued the Corporation at approximately PV10% on a Proved plus Probable basis, or approximately $1.00 per share:


Net Asset Value based on GORR Transaction reserves
 valuation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proved plus Probable NI 51-101 discounted at 10% at
 December 31, 2013 (2P Value)                               $    86,035,000
Approximate reduction to reserve value at December 31, 2013
 as a result of Transaction (2P Value)                           (6,500,000)
Net Debt at June 30, 2014                                       (24,163,000)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value                                             $    55,372,000
Basic Common Shares Outstanding at June 30, 2014                 57,267,170
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Asset Value - Basic (per share)(1)                      $          0.97
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
  (1) Excludes the value of undeveloped lands and certain seismic data and
      does not incorporate changes in dilutives.

Credit Facility Update

During the first quarter 2014, the Corporation completed a $6 million secured subordinated debenture financing that carries an interest rate of 9.5% per annum. The debenture, which is to be repaid in full upon maturity, has a maturity date of February 28, 2015 and may be extended for up to six months subject to a borrowing base review and full compliance with all financial covenants. In conjunction with the closing of the subordinated debenture financing and then subsequently in conjunction with the sale of the Gross Overriding Royalty, and in accordance with the terms of the subordinated debenture, the Corporation's senior lender has revised its borrowing base to $21.0 million, resulting in combined credit facilities of the Corporation of $27.0 million. Net debt at June 30, 2014 was $24.2 million.

Private Placements

On January 15, 2014, Waldron closed a private placement for 2,222,223 common shares of Waldron at $0.45 per share for gross proceeds of $1.0 million.

On July 30, 2014, Waldron closed a private placement for 5,459,545 common shares of Waldron issued on a flow-through basis at $0.33 per share for gross proceeds of $1.8 million.

2014 Hedging Update

Early in the first quarter of 2014, the Corporation entered into the following commodity price contracts:


                               Type of    Quantity
      Period      Commodity   Contract   Contracted   Contract price ($CDN)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Jan 1, 2014 -
  Dec 31, 2014    Crude Oil     Swap      175 bbl/d  Edmonton Par $90.15/bbl

  Jan 1, 2014 -
  Dec 31, 2014   Natural gas    Swap     2,600 mcf/d     AECO $4.15/mcf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversion factor: 1 Mcf = 1.116 GJ

Investor Information

Waldron is a Calgary, Alberta based corporation engaged in the exploration, development and production of petroleum and natural gas. The Corporation's common shares are currently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "WDN." Additional information regarding Waldron is available under the Corporation's profile at www.sedar.com or at the Corporation's website, www.waldronenergy.ca.

Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements relating to the Corporation's plans and other aspects of the Corporation's anticipated future operations, strategies, financial and operating results and business opportunities. These forward-looking statements may include opinions, assumptions, estimates, management's assessment of value, reserves, future plans and operations.

Forward-looking statements typically use words such as "will," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "project," "should," "plan," and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes, and include statements that actions, events or conditions "may," "would," "could," or "will" be taken or occur in the future. Specifically, this press release contains forward-looking statements relating to the results and timing of operations, including budgeted production; whether or not recent industry results are favorable; whether or not additional reserves are recognized; whether or not the Corporation achieves guidance; the character and nature of the Corporation's asset base; whether or not the asset base is prospective; and number of horizontal drilling locations and opportunities and number of follow-up opportunities. The forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions including expectations regarding the success of current or future drill wells; the outlook for petroleum and natural gas prices; estimated amounts and timing of capital expenditures; estimates of future production; assumptions concerning the timing of regulatory approvals; the state of the economy and the exploration and production business; results of operations; business prospects and opportunities; future exchange and interest rates; assumptions with regards to hedging activities; the Corporation's ability to obtain equipment in a timely manner to carry out development activities; and the ability of the Corporation to access capital and credit. While the Corporation considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that contribute to the possibility that the predicted outcome will not occur, including, without limitation: risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, marketing and transportation; loss of markets; volatility of commodities prices; currency fluctuations; imprecision of reserves estimates; environmental risks; competition from other producers; inability to retain drilling rigs and other services; general economic conditions; delays resulting from or inability to obtain required regulatory approvals; and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive.

Although Waldron believes that the expectations represented by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will be realized. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and you should not rely unduly on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release. Except as required by applicable law, Waldron does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Note Regarding Non-GAAP Measures

Funds from operations, operating netback and net debt are not recognized measures under IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). Management believes that in addition to cash flow from operations and net earnings, funds from operations and operating netback are useful supplemental measures as they demonstrate the Corporation's ability to generate the cash necessary to fund future growth through capital investment or repay debt if incurred in future periods. The Company uses net debt (bank debt plus negative working capital or less positive working capital, both excluding bank debt) as an alternative measure of outstanding debt and is used as a measure to assess the Company's financial position. Investors are cautioned, however, that these measures should not be construed as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or net earnings determined in accordance with IFRS as an indication of the Corporation's performance or financial position. The Corporation's method of calculating these measures may differ from other entities and, accordingly, they may not be comparable to measures used by other entities. For these purposes, the Corporation defines funds from operations as cash flow from operations before changes in non-cash operating working capital, transaction and other costs and decommissioning expenditures and defines operating netback as revenue, net of any realized gains or losses on commodity price contracts, less royalties, operating and transportation expenses. Net debt is defined as current assets less current liabilities, excluding commodity price contracts.

Note Regarding BOEs

The term barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A conversion ratio for gas of 6 mcf:1 boe is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency conversion ratio of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis is misleading as an indication of value.

Contacts:
Waldron Energy Corporation
Ernie Sapieha
President & CEO
[email protected]

Waldron Energy Corporation
Jeff Kearl
VP Finance & CFO
[email protected]

Waldron Energy Corporation
Murray Stodalka
Chief Operating Officer
[email protected]

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
New competitors, disruptive technologies, and growing expectations are pushing every business to both adopt and deliver new digital services. This ‘Digital Transformation’ demands rapid delivery and continuous iteration of new competitive services via multiple channels, which in turn demands new service delivery techniques – including DevOps. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit 20th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Co-Chair Andi Mann, panelists examined how DevOps helps to meet the de...
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
The taxi industry never saw Uber coming. Startups are a threat to incumbents like never before, and a major enabler for startups is that they are instantly “cloud ready.” If innovation moves at the pace of IT, then your company is in trouble. Why? Because your data center will not keep up with frenetic pace AWS, Microsoft and Google are rolling out new capabilities. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Don Browning, VP of Cloud Architecture at Turner, posited that disruption is inevitable for comp...
"When we talk about cloud without compromise what we're talking about is that when people think about 'I need the flexibility of the cloud' - it's the ability to create applications and run them in a cloud environment that's far more flexible,” explained Matthew Finnie, CTO of Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
No hype cycles or predictions of zillions of things here. IoT is big. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, Associate Partner at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data analytics considerations, edge-to-cloud tec...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, discussed some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and related how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material was delivered interac...
Wooed by the promise of faster innovation, lower TCO, and greater agility, businesses of every shape and size have embraced the cloud at every layer of the IT stack – from apps to file sharing to infrastructure. The typical organization currently uses more than a dozen sanctioned cloud apps and will shift more than half of all workloads to the cloud by 2018. Such cloud investments have delivered measurable benefits. But they’ve also resulted in some unintended side-effects: complexity and risk. ...
In 2014, Amazon announced a new form of compute called Lambda. We didn't know it at the time, but this represented a fundamental shift in what we expect from cloud computing. Now, all of the major cloud computing vendors want to take part in this disruptive technology. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Doug Vanderweide, an instructor at Linux Academy, discussed why major players like AWS, Microsoft Azure, IBM Bluemix, and Google Cloud Platform are all trying to sidestep VMs and containers wit...
The Internet giants are fully embracing AI. All the services they offer to their customers are aimed at drawing a map of the world with the data they get. The AIs from these companies are used to build disruptive approaches that cannot be used by established enterprises, which are threatened by these disruptions. However, most leaders underestimate the effect this will have on their businesses. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rene Buest, Director Market Research & Technology Evangelism at Ara...
"We are a monitoring company. We work with Salesforce, BBC, and quite a few other big logos. We basically provide monitoring for them, structure for their cloud services and we fit into the DevOps world" explained David Gildeh, Co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
When growing capacity and power in the data center, the architectural trade-offs between server scale-up vs. scale-out continue to be debated. Both approaches are valid: scale-out adds multiple, smaller servers running in a distributed computing model, while scale-up adds fewer, more powerful servers that are capable of running larger workloads. It’s worth noting that there are additional, unique advantages that scale-up architectures offer. One big advantage is large memory and compute capacity...
SYS-CON Events announced today that IBM has been named “Diamond Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 21st Cloud Expo, which will take place on October 31 through November 2nd 2017 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, California.