Welcome!

News Feed Item

Sentry Technology Reports First Quarter Results

RONKONKOMA, NY -- (Marketwired) -- 08/20/14 -- Sentry Technology Corporation (OTC Pink: SKVY) (PINKSHEETS: SKVY) today reported financial results for the Company's first quarter ended March 31, 2014.

Revenues for the first quarter of 2014 were $1,207,000 compared to revenues of $1,355,000 reported in the first quarter of the prior year. The operating loss was $179,000, or $(0.00) per share, in the first quarter of 2014 as compared to an operating loss of $214,000 or $(0.00) per share, in the first quarter of 2013. EBITDA for the first quarter was a negative ($162,000) in 2014 compared to a negative EBITDA of ($192,000) in the first quarter of 2013.

Sentry Technology Corporation designs, manufactures, sells and installs Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) solutions, Electro-Magnetic (EM) and RFID based Library security and self-service systems. Our CCTV product line features VideoRailway™ and SmartTrack™, proprietary, traveling camera technology. Our OperationalVideo™, OVportal™ software application assists retailers with on-line management of safety and security, merchandising audits and employee procedure compliance. Products are used by libraries to secure inventory and improve operating efficiency, by retailers to deter theft and enhance productivity, and by industrial/institutional customers to protect assets and people. More information can be found at www.sentrytechnology.com.

This press release may include information that could constitute forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such forward-looking statements may involve risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those matters disclosed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Adjusted EBITDA

Sentry Technology Corporation uses Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial performance measurement. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated by adding back to net income (loss) interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense and net (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interest. Adjusted EBITDA is provided to investors to supplement the results of operations reported in accordance with GAAP. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides an additional tool for investors to use in comparing Sentry Technology Corporation's financial results with other companies that also use Adjusted EBITDA in their communications to investors. By excluding non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization, as well as non-operating charges for interest and income taxes and net (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, investors can evaluate the Company's operations and can compare its results on a more consistent basis to the results of other companies. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is one of the primary measures management uses to monitor and evaluate financial and operating results.

Sentry Technology Corporation considers Adjusted EBITDA to be an indicator of the Company's operational strength and performance of its business and a useful measure of the Company's operating trends. However, there are significant limitations to the use of Adjusted EBITDA since it excludes interest income and expense, income taxes, and net (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, all of which impact the Company's profitability, as well as depreciation and amortization related to the use of long term assets which benefit multiple periods. Sentry Technology Corporation believes that these limitations are compensated by providing Adjusted EBITDA only with GAAP net income (loss) and clearly identifying the difference between the two measures. Consequently, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss) presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as defined by the Company may not be comparable with similarly named measures provided by other entities. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income or loss is included in the schedule below.


SENTRY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Par Value Amounts)
(Unaudited)


                                                   March 31,   December 31,
                                                     2014          2013
                                                 ------------  ------------

                      ASSETS
Current Assets:
  Cash                                           $         51  $         72
  Short-term investments                                  246           253
  Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
   doubtful accounts of $74 in 2014 and $79 in
   2013                                                   374           477
  Inventory, net                                        1,408         1,433
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets               160           174
                                                 ------------  ------------
Total current assets                                    2,239         2,409
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net                               261           283
OTHER ASSETS                                              141           145
                                                 ------------  ------------
TOTAL ASSETS                                     $      2,641  $      2,837
                                                 ============  ============

      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
  Amount due to related parties                  $      4,240  $      4,266
  Bank indebtedness and revolving line of credit        1,224         1,236
  Accounts payable                                      1,130         1,084
  Accrued liabilities                                     612           597
  Deferred income                                         236           221
  Promissory notes payable                                 38            38
                                                 ------------  ------------
Total current liabilities                               7,480         7,442

Deferred tax liabilities                                   41            42
                                                 ------------  ------------
Total long-term liabilities                                41            42
Total liabilities                                       7,521         7,484

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
  Sentry Technology Corporation stockholders'
   deficit:
    Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized
     10,000 (2013 - 10,000) shares; none issued
     and outstanding
    Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized
     300,000 (2013 - 300,000) shares; issued and
     outstanding 196,405 (2013 - 196,405) shares          196           196
    Additional paid-in capital                         51,759        51,755
    Accumulated deficit                               (58,367)      (58,069)
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss                   97            (8)
                                                 ------------  ------------
Total stockholders' deficit                            (6,315)       (6,126)
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary                   1,435         1,479
                                                 ------------  ------------
Total deficit                                          (4,880)       (4,647)
                                                 ------------  ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT      $      2,641  $      2,837
                                                 ============  ============



SENTRY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)


                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                 --------------------------
                                                          March 31,
                                                 --------------------------
                                                     2014          2013
                                                 ------------  ------------


REVENUES:
  Sales                                          $      1,075  $      1,185
  Service, installation and maintenance revenues          132           170
                                                 ------------  ------------
                                                        1,207         1,355
COST OF SALES AND EXPENSES:
  Cost of sales                                           655           749
  Customer service expenses                               151           183
  Selling, general and administrative expenses            565           580
  Research and development                                 73            85
  Foreign exchange gain                                   (58)          (28)
                                                 ------------  ------------
                                                        1,386         1,569
                                                 ------------  ------------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                                     (179)         (214)
INTEREST EXPENSE, net                                      96            94
                                                 ------------  ------------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND NONCONTROLLING
 INTEREST                                                (275)         (308)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE                                         12             6
                                                 ------------  ------------
LOSS BEFORE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST                      (287)         (314)
LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE
 NONCONTROLLING INTEREST                                   11             5
                                                 ------------  ------------
NET LOSS                                                 (298)         (319)
                                                 ============  ============

NET LOSS PER SHARE - Basic and diluted           $      (0.00) $      (0.00)
                                                 ============  ============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
 OUTSTANDING
    Basic and diluted                                 196,405       196,405
                                                 ============  ============


RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA TO NET LOSS
(In thousands)
                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                 --------------------------
                                                          March 31,
                                                 --------------------------
                                                     2014          2013
                                                 ------------  ------------

Net loss                                         $       (298) $       (319)
Reconciling items:
Interest expense, net                                      96            94
Income tax expense                                         12             6
Depreciation and amortization                              17            22
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling
 interest                                                  11             5
                                                 ------------  ------------

Adjusted EBITDA                                  $       (162) $       (192)
                                                 ============  ============

* Additional financial statements are available on the Company's website at http://www.sentrytechnology.com/.

CONTACT:
Peter L. Murdoch
President & CEO
(631) 739-2000

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"We build IoT infrastructure products - when you have to integrate different devices, different systems and cloud you have to build an application to do that but we eliminate the need to build an application. Our products can integrate any device, any system, any cloud regardless of protocol," explained Peter Jung, Chief Product Officer at Pulzze Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
When it comes to cloud computing, the ability to turn massive amounts of compute cores on and off on demand sounds attractive to IT staff, who need to manage peaks and valleys in user activity. With cloud bursting, the majority of the data can stay on premises while tapping into compute from public cloud providers, reducing risk and minimizing need to move large files. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Scott Jeschonek, Director of Product Management at Avere Systems, discussed the IT and busin...
Between 2005 and 2020, data volumes will grow by a factor of 300 – enough data to stack CDs from the earth to the moon 162 times. This has come to be known as the ‘big data’ phenomenon. Unfortunately, traditional approaches to handling, storing and analyzing data aren’t adequate at this scale: they’re too costly, slow and physically cumbersome to keep up. Fortunately, in response a new breed of technology has emerged that is cheaper, faster and more scalable. Yet, in meeting these new needs they...
The cloud promises new levels of agility and cost-savings for Big Data, data warehousing and analytics. But it’s challenging to understand all the options – from IaaS and PaaS to newer services like HaaS (Hadoop as a Service) and BDaaS (Big Data as a Service). In her session at @BigDataExpo at @ThingsExpo, Hannah Smalltree, a director at Cazena, provided an educational overview of emerging “as-a-service” options for Big Data in the cloud. This is critical background for IT and data professionals...
"Once customers get a year into their IoT deployments, they start to realize that they may have been shortsighted in the ways they built out their deployment and the key thing I see a lot of people looking at is - how can I take equipment data, pull it back in an IoT solution and show it in a dashboard," stated Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Fact is, enterprises have significant legacy voice infrastructure that’s costly to replace with pure IP solutions. How can we bring this analog infrastructure into our shiny new cloud applications? There are proven methods to bind both legacy voice applications and traditional PSTN audio into cloud-based applications and services at a carrier scale. Some of the most successful implementations leverage WebRTC, WebSockets, SIP and other open source technologies. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Da...
@DevOpsSummit taking place June 6-8, 2017 at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo New York Call for Papers is now open.
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
"IoT is going to be a huge industry with a lot of value for end users, for industries, for consumers, for manufacturers. How can we use cloud to effectively manage IoT applications," stated Ian Khan, Innovation & Marketing Manager at Solgeniakhela, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...