Welcome!

News Feed Item

Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Security and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities



 

 

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report:

Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Security and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2307727/Machine-to-Machine-M2M-Security-and-Privacy-Challenges-and-Opportunities.html

Overview:

Machine-to-Machine (M2M) applications will be developed in various sectors of the industry at a rapid pace over the next five years, reaching an inflexion point by 2020 as the Internet of Things (IoT) begins a high growth phase. With increasingly more devices connected to the Internet in which critical business processes depend, the threats to applications increase in terms of incidence, severity, and impact.

It is important to recognize that applications are susceptible to physical attacks on devices as well as network-level attacks, which in many cases have different issues and solutions. The M2M industry is quickly recognizing the need to deal with security and privacy issues pertaining to M2M, but understanding the specific issues and solutions are not broadly understood.

This Mind Commerce research addresses security and privacy based on our many years of M2M coverage as well as recent interviews and survey. The report is divided into four parts as follows:

Part One: Evaluates M2M security issues and challenges
Part Two: Assesses M2M as well as related technologies (Cloud and Big Data)
Part Three: Discusses survey findings, insights and conclusions pertinent to M2M
Part Four: Addresses security within Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) integral to M2M and IoT
All purchases of Mind Commerce reports includes time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.


Target Audience:

Standards organizations
Mobile network operators
Security solution providers
M2M/IoT platform providers
Wireless device manufacturers
Privacy infrastructure providers
Wireless infrastructure providers
M2M and IoT application developers
Enterprise employing M2M/IoT solutions
Security and privacy advocacy organizations
Table of Contents:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Part One: Machine-to-Machine Security 12

1.0 EXPLOITED VULNERABILITIES AND ATTACKS 12
2.0 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR M2M 14
2.1 Authentication 14
2.2 Confidentiality 14
2.3 Access control 14
2.4 Integrity 15
2.5 Privacy 15
2.6 Availability 15
2.7 Non-repudiation 15
3.0 FACTORS LEADING TO COMPLEXITY IN M2M APPLICATIONS 16
3.1 Proliferation of Nodes in Network 16
3.2 Limited Computational Power 16
3.3 Lack of Awareness 16
3.4 Lack of Pre-set Rules 17
3.5 Difficult to Tackle Denial of Power Attacks 17
3.6 Need to Reduce Risk Exposure 17
3.7 DDoS Attack from Compromised Nodes 17
3.8 Users Responsible for Enabling Security Protection 18
3.9 Security is Not highest Priority 18
4.0 MEASURES TO ENSURE SECURITY FOR M2M APPLICATIONS 19
4.1 Security Considerations during Design Phase 19
4.2 Define User-level Security 19
4.3 Limited Access to Internet 20
4.4 Use of Open-source Software to Configure Specific Security Settings 20
4.5 Vendors to Disclose Vulnerabilities 20
4.6 Analyze Attack Surface to Understand Probable Attack Points 21
4.7 Ensure Secure Design 21
4.8 Code Signing to Confirm Integrity 21
4.9 All Value Chain Layers Must be Secured 22
4.10 Stakeholders to Work in Sync for Security Measures 22
4.11 Do not Allow Permanent Access 24
4.12 Implement Typical Security Measures 24
5.0 TWO POINTS OF ATTACK ON M2M COMMUNICATIONS 25
5.1 Physical Attacks on Unattended Devices 25
5.1.1 Recommendations to Increase Security of Physical Devices 26
5.2 Network-side Attacks 26
5.2.1 Recommendations to Increase Security on Network Side 27
6.0 DIFFERENCE IN M2M COMMUNICATION OVER GSM AND CDMA 28
7.0 CRITICAL DEVICE CONTROLS BY M2M APPLICATIONS 29
8.0 SECURITY AN INTEGRAL PART OF APPLICATION DESIGN 30
9.0 SOPHISTICATED SECURITY MECHANISMS FOR M2M SECURITY 31
9.1 Early Detection of Compromised Nodes 31
9.2 Bandwidth Efficient Cooperative Authentication 31
10.0 EVOLVING ELEMENTS OF SECURITY 32
11.0 SECURITY IS ONE OF MANY GO-TO-MARKET FACTORS 33
12.0 SECURING THE COMMUNICATIONS AND NOT JUST DEVICES 34
13.0 USE OF IPV6: ADDED SECURITY PROBLEMS 35
14.0 ADEQUATE USE OF CERTIFICATE FOR SECURITY 36
15.0 SPECIAL SKILL-SET REQUIRED FOR DEPLOYING SECURITY TOOLS 37
16.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND COLLABORATIONS FOR STANDARDS 38
16.1 AllSeen Alliance 38
16.2 IETF 39
16.3 Mobile App Security Working Group 39
16.4 Machine-to-Machine Standardization Task Force (MSTF) 39
16.5 Standards by Verticals 40

Part Two: Machine-to-Machine Privacy 41

17.0 PRIVACY CONCERNS 41
17.1 Data Ownership Unclear 42
17.2 Control Factor Unclear 42
17.3 Government Initiatives 43
17.4 Across Boundaries and Verticals 43
17.5 Aspects of Privacy and Security to be Re-addressed 44
18.0 PRIVACY AND SECURITY CONCERNS FOR BIG DATA 45
18.1 Automated Access through Authorizations 45
18.2 Non-standard Approach to Granting Access 46
18.3 Business Continuity Risk 47
18.4 Best Practices 47
19.0 PRIVACY ISSUES IN CLOUD COMPUTING 49
20.0 PRIVACY AN INTEGRAL PART OF APPLICATION DESIGN 50

Part Three: Industry Views on Security 51

21.0 INDUSTRY SURVEY ON SECURITY 51
21.1 Introduction 51
21.2 Survey Participants 51
21.3 Geographic Reach 52
21.4 Role of M2M in Applications 53
21.5 Highest Concerns of M2M Solution Deployment 53
21.6 Highest Security Concern while Deploying M2M Solutions 54
21.7 Security Solution 55
21.8 Concluding Remarks on Industry Survey 55

Part Four: Wireless Sensor Networks 57

22.0 INTRODUCTION TO WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS 57
23.0 SECURITY THREATS ON OSI LAYERS FOR WSN 58
23.1 Physical Layer of OSI Model 58
23.1.1 Attacks in Physical Layer 58
23.1.2 Countermeasures for Attack in Physical layer 59
23.2 MAC Layer of OSI Model 62
23.2.1 Attacks in MAC Layer 62
23.2.2 Countermeasures for Attack in MAC Layer 63
23.3 Network Layer of OSI Model 66
23.3.1 Attacks in Network Layer 67
23.3.2 Countermeasures for Attack in Network Layer 69
23.4 Application Layer of OSI Model 71
23.4.1 Attacks in Application Layer 72
23.4.2 Countermeasures for Attack in Application layer 73
23.5 Concluding Remarks on Security Threats on OSI layer 74
24.0 SECURITY GOALS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS 76
24.1 Primary Security Goals 76
24.1.1 Data Integrity 76
24.1.2 Data Authentication 77
24.1.3 Data Confidentiality 77
24.1.4 Data Availability 77
24.2 Secondary Security Goals 77
24.2.1 Self-Organization 77
24.2.2 Time Synchronization 77
24.2.3 Data Freshness 78
24.2.4 Secure Localization 78
25.0 CHALLENGES FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS 79
25.1 Wireless Medium inherently Less Secure 79
25.2 Security Tools to Adopt to Ad-Hoc Nature 79
25.3 Hostile Environment of Sensor Nodes 80
25.4 Resource Inadequacy of Sensor Devices 80
25.5 Massive Scale of IoT / M2M 80
25.6 Unreliable Communication 80
25.6.1 Unreliable Transfer 80
25.6.2 Conflicts 80
25.6.3 Latency 81
25.7 Unattended Sensor Nodes 81
25.7.1 Exposure to Physical Attacks 81
25.7.2 Managed Remotely 81
25.7.3 No Central Management Point 81
26.0 TYPES OF ATTACKS IN SENSOR NETWORKS 82
26.1 Passive Attack 82
26.1.1 Attacks against Privacy 82
26.2 Active Attack 83
26.2.1 Denial of Service (DoS) Attack 84
26.2.2 Routing Attacks 84
26.2.3 Physical Attacks on Devices 85
26.2.4 Node Subversion 86
26.2.5 Node Malfunction 86
26.2.6 Node Outage 86
26.2.7 Interception of the Messages of Sensor Nodes 86
26.2.8 Modification of Message 86
26.2.9 False Node 86
26.2.10 Node Replication Attacks 87
27.0 SECURITY MECHANISMS TO COMBAT ACTIVE AND PASSIVE ATTACKS 88
27.1 Low-Level Mechanism 88
27.1.1 Secrecy and Authentication 88
27.1.2 Privacy 89
27.1.3 Secure Routing 89
27.1.4 Robustness to Communication Denial of Service 89
27.1.5 Resilience to Node Capture 89
27.1.6 Key Establishment and Trust Setup 90
27.2 High-Level Mechanism 90
27.2.1 Intrusion Detection 90
27.2.2 Secure Data Aggregation 90
27.2.3 Secure Group Management 90
28.0 SENSOR NETWORK STANDARDIZATION 92
29.0 CONCLUDINS 93

 


LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Security Requirements for M2M 14
Figure 2: Factors leading to complexity in M2M Applications 16
Figure 3: Measures to Ensure Security for M2M Applications 19
Figure 4: Organizations and Collaborations for Standards for Safety 38
Figure 5: Privacy Concerns 42
Figure 6: Privacy and Security Concerns for Big Data 45
Figure 7: Industry Security Survey Participants 52
Figure 8: Geographic Reach of Companies 53
Figure 9: Topmost Concerns for Deploying M2M Solutions 54
Figure 10: Topmost M2M Security/Privacy Considerations by Enterprise 55
Figure 11: Attacks on OSI Layers 58
Figure 12: Counter Measures for Attacks in OSI Layers 74
Figure 13: Security Goals of Wireless Sensor Network 76
Figure 14: Challenges for Wireless Sensor Networks 79
Figure 15: Types of Attacks in Sensor Networks 82
Figure 16: Techniques employed to deploy Active attacks 84
Figure 17: Security Mechanisms to Combat Active and Passive Attacks 88

 


Read the full report:
Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Security and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2307727/Machine-to-Machine-M2M-Security-and-Privacy-Challenges-and-Opportunities.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

 

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
"Infoblox does DNS, DHCP and IP address management for not only enterprise networks but cloud networks as well. Customers are looking for a single platform that can extend not only in their private enterprise environment but private cloud, public cloud, tracking all the IP space and everything that is going on in that environment," explained Steve Salo, Principal Systems Engineer at Infoblox, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventio...
"We're focused on how to get some of the attributes that you would expect from an Amazon, Azure, Google, and doing that on-prem. We believe today that you can actually get those types of things done with certain architectures available in the market today," explained Steve Conner, VP of Sales at Cloudistics, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"Codigm is based on the cloud and we are here to explore marketing opportunities in America. Our mission is to make an ecosystem of the SW environment that anyone can understand, learn, teach, and develop the SW on the cloud," explained Sung Tae Ryu, CEO of Codigm, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Data scientists must access high-performance computing resources across a wide-area network. To achieve cloud-based HPC visualization, researchers must transfer datasets and visualization results efficiently. HPC clusters now compute GPU-accelerated visualization in the cloud cluster. To efficiently display results remotely, a high-performance, low-latency protocol transfers the display from the cluster to a remote desktop. Further, tools to easily mount remote datasets and efficiently transfer...
"CA has been doing a lot of things in the area of DevOps. Now we have a complete set of tool sets in order to enable customers to go all the way from planning to development to testing down to release into the operations," explained Aruna Ravichandran, Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy at CA Technologies, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
High-velocity engineering teams are applying not only continuous delivery processes, but also lessons in experimentation from established leaders like Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook. These companies have made experimentation a foundation for their release processes, allowing them to try out major feature releases and redesigns within smaller groups before making them broadly available. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Lucas, Senior Staff Engineer at Optimizely, discussed how by using ne...
Gemini is Yahoo’s native and search advertising platform. To ensure the quality of a complex distributed system that spans multiple products and components and across various desktop websites and mobile app and web experiences – both Yahoo owned and operated and third-party syndication (supply), with complex interaction with more than a billion users and numerous advertisers globally (demand) – it becomes imperative to automate a set of end-to-end tests 24x7 to detect bugs and regression. In th...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Carl J. Levine, Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1, will objectively discuss how DNS is used to solve Digital Transformation challenges in large SaaS applications, CDNs, AdTech platforms, and other demanding use cases. Carl J. Levine is the Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1. A veteran of the Internet Infrastructure space, he has over a decade of experience with startups, networking protocols and Internet infrastructure, combined with the unique ability to it...
"There's plenty of bandwidth out there but it's never in the right place. So what Cedexis does is uses data to work out the best pathways to get data from the origin to the person who wants to get it," explained Simon Jones, Evangelist and Head of Marketing at Cedexis, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are moving to the cloud faster than most of us in security expected. CIOs are going from 0 to 100 in cloud adoption and leaving security teams in the dust. Once cloud is part of an enterprise stack, it’s unclear who has responsibility for the protection of applications, services, and data. When cloud breaches occur, whether active compromise or a publicly accessible database, the blame must fall on both service providers and users. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben Johnson, C...