Welcome!

News Feed Item

Pain Partnering 2009-2014



 

 

 

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report:


Pain Partnering 2009-2014

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/1112847/Pain-Partnering-2009-2014.html


The Pain Partnering 2009-2014 provides understanding and access to the pain partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an analysis of pain disease partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors pain technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered – contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This data driven report contains over 400 links to online copies of actual pain deals and contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners, where available. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of pain partnering trends.

Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report, whilst chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in pain partnering since 2009, including a summary of deals by industry sector, stage of development, deal type, and technology type. Numerous tables provide outline financial trends.

Chapter 3 provides an overview of the leading pain deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by bigpharma, most active bigpharma. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapter 4 provides a comprehensive directory of pain partnering deals signed and announced since 2009. The chapter is organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc), and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record, and where available the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the
research, development and commercialization of pain technologies and products.

Report scope

Pain Partnering 2009-2014 is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding and access to pain trends and structure of deals entered into by leading companies worldwide.

This data driven report includes:

Trends in pain dealmaking in the biopharma industry since 2009
Access to summary headline, upfront, milestone and royalty data
The leading pain deals by value since 2009


In Pain Partnering 2009-2014, the available deals are listed by:

Headline value
Upfront payment value
Royalty rate value
Company A-Z
Industry sector
Stage of development at signing
Deal component type
Technology type
Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 – Introduction

Chapter 2 – Trends in pain partnering

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Pain partnering over the years
2.3. Bigpharma pain dealmaking activity
2.4. Pain partnering by deal type
2.5. Pain partnering industry sector
2.6. Pain partnering by stage of development
2.7. Pain partnering by technology type
2.8. Disclosed financial deal terms for pain partnering
2.8.1 Pain headline values
2.8.2 Pain upfront payments
2.8.3 Pain milestone payments
2.8.4 Pain royalty rates
Chapter 3 – Leading pain deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top pain deals by value
3.3. Top pain deals involving bigpharma
Chapter 4 – Dealmaking directory

4.1. Introduction
4.2. Company A-Z
4.3. By deal type
Asset purchase
Bigpharma outlicensing
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Contract service
Co-promotion
CRADA
Cross-licensing
Development
Distribution
Equity purchase
Evaluation
Grant
Joint venture
Licensing
Manufacturing
Marketing
Option
Promotion
Research
Settlement
Spin out
Sub-license
Supply
Termination
4.4. By industry sector
Academic
Bigpharma
Biotech
Drug delivery
Medical device
Diagnostic
Generic pharma
Government
Non-profit
Pharmaceutical
Research tools
Services
Specialty pharma
4.5. By stage of development
Discovery
Pre-clinical
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Registration
Marketed
4.6. By technology type
Analysis
Animal models
Assays
Bioinformatics
Biological compounds
Biomarkers
Biomaterials
Cell culture
Cell therapy
Clinical testing
Diagnostic - companion
Devices
Diagnostics
Discovery tools
DNA probes
Drug delivery
Enabling technology
Epigenetics
Equipment
Facilities
Gene therapy
Genomics
Imaging
Industrial chemicals
In vitro models
Monoclonal antibodies
Nanotechnology
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
Personalised medicine
Processes
Proteomics
Radio/Chemo-therapy
Recombinant DNA
Research services
Research supplies
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Stem cells
Vaccines
Chapter 5 – Partnering resource center

5.1. Online partnering
5.2. Partnering events
5.3. Further reading on dealmaking
Appendices

Appendix 1 – Deal type definitions
About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form – Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Pain partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Bigpharma – top 50 –pain deals 2009 to 2011
Figure 3: Bigpharma pain deal frequency – 2009 to 2011
Figure 4: Pain partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 5: Pain partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 6: Pain partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 7: Pain partnering by technology type since 2009
Figure 8: Pain deals with a headline value
Figure 9: Pain deals with upfront payment values
Figure 10: Pain deals with milestone payments
Figure 11: Pain deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 12: Top pain deals by value since 2009
Figure 13: Top pain deals signed by bigpharma value since 2009
Figure 14: Online partnering resources
Figure 15: Forthcoming partnering events
Figure 16: Deal type definitions


Read the full report:
Pain Partnering 2009-2014

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/1112847/Pain-Partnering-2009-2014.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...