Welcome!

News Feed Item

Co-development Terms & Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report:

Co-development Terms & Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2276221/Co-development-Terms--Agreements-in-Pharma-Biotech-and-Diagnostics.html

The Co-development Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics report provides comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the co-development deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading life science companies.

The report provides a detailed understand and analysis of how and why companies enter co-development deals.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered and rights transferred – contract documents provide this insight where press releases and databases do not.

This report contains links to online copies of actual co-development contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by biopharma companies and their partners.

Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of co-development dealmaking and business activities.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of co-development dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report, whilst chapter 2 provides an analysis of the trends in co-development as well as a discussion on the merits of the type of deal.

Chapter 3 provides an overview of the structure of co-development deals. The chapter includes numerous case studies to enable understanding of both pure co-development deals and multicomponent deals where co-development forms a part.

Chapter 4 provides a review of the leading co-development deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by bigpharma, most active bigpharma, signed by bigbiotech, most active bigbiotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract via the Current Agreements deals and alliances database.

Chapter 5 provides a comprehensive review of co-development financials for deals announced since 2009, including headline value, upfront, milestone payments and royalty rates by stage of development, providing both benchmark data and access to individual deal financials.

Chapters 6 and 7 provide a comprehensive listing of the top 50 bigpharma and bigbiotech companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of co-development deals available in the public domain. Where available, each deal title links via Current Agreements deals and alliances database to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 8 provides a comprehensive and detailed review of co-development deals signed and announced since 2009 where a contract document is available. The chapter is organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, technologyand therapeutic area. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous table and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in co-development dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about co-development as an opportunity to participate in the commercialization of either candidate compounds in development or products already on the market.

Report scope

Co-development Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding of the co-development trends and structure of deals entered into by leading life science companies worldwide.

Co-development Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics includes:

Trends in co-development dealmaking in the biopharma industry since 2009
Analysis of co-development deal structure
Case studies of real-life co-development deals
Comprehensive listing of co-development deals since 2009
Access to co-development contract documents
Key financial benchmarks for headline, upfront, milestone and royalty rates
The leading co-development deals by value since 2009
Most active co-development dealmakers since 2009
The leading co-development partnering resources

In Co-development Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics available deals and contracts are listed by:

Company A-Z
Headline value
Therapeutic area
Technology type

Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual deal record and where available, contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The Co-development Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics report provides comprehensive access to available contract documents for co-development deals. Analyzing actual contract agreements allows assessment of the following:
What are the precise rights granted or optioned?
What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company?
What exclusivity is granted?
What is the payment structure for the deal?
How do milestone align with clinical stage development phases?
How aresalesand payments audited?
What is the deal term?
How are the key terms of the agreement defined?
How are IPRs handled and owned?
Who is responsible for commercialization?
Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture?
How is confidentiality and publication managed?
How are disputes to be resolved?
Under what conditions can the deal be terminated?
What happens when there is a change of ownership?
What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed?
Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon?
Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type?
Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law?

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 – Introduction

Chapter 2 – Trends in co-development dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Definition of co-development deals
2.3. Success factors for co-development deals
2.4. When co-development can be useful
2.5. Attributes of co-development deals
2.6. Aligning partners to make the co-development work
2.7. Trends in co-development deals since 2009
2.8. Option to co-develop
2.9. The future of co-development deals

Chapter 3 – Overview of co-development deal structure

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Pure versus multi-component co-development deals
3.3. Pure co-development agreement structure
3.3.1. Example co-development agreements
3.3.1.a. Case study 1: Ambrx – Zhejiang Medicine – June 2013
3.3.1.b. Case study 2: UniQure - Chiesi – July 2013

Chapter 4 – Leading co-development deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. Top co-development deals by value
4.3. Most active co-development dealmakers
4.4. Bigpharma co-development deal activity

Chapter 5 – Bigpharma co-development deals

5.1. Introduction
5.2. How to use co-development deals
5.3. Company co-development agreement listings

Chapter 6 – Bigbiotech co-development deals

6.1. Introduction
6.2. How to use co-development deals
6.3. Company co-development agreement listings

Chapter 7 – Co-development contract directory 2009-2014

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Company A-Z
7.3. By therapy area
Anaesthetics
Cardiovascular
Central Nervous System
Dermatology
Gastrointestinal
Genetic disorders
Gynecology
Hematology
Hospital care
Immunology
Infectives
Metabolic
Musculoskeletal
Oncology
Ophthalmics
Orphan disease
Psychiatry
Public health
Respiratory
7.4. By stage of development at signing
Discovery
Preclinical
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Regulatory
Marketed
Formulation
7.5. By technology area
Antibodies
Assays
Biological compounds
Biomarkers
Biomaterials
Biosimilars/Bio-betters
Clinical testing
Devices
Diagnostics
Discovery tools
DNA probes
Drug delivery
Enabling technology
Equipment
Gene therapy
Genomics
Industrial chemicals
Nanotechnology
Natural product
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
Processes
Proteomics
Recombinant DNA
Research services
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Software tools
Vaccines

Appendix

Appendix 1 – Co-development references
Appendix 2 – Resources
Appendix 3 – Deal type definitions

About Wildwood Ventures

Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Order Form – Upgrades to subscription access products
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form – Reports

Separate appendix file supplied for:

Appendix 1 – Co-development dealmaking - by financial disclosure
Appendix 2 – Co-development dealmaking - by companies A-Z
Appendix 3 – Co-development dealmaking - by stage of development
Appendix 4 – Co-development dealmaking - by therapeutic target
Appendix 5 – Co-development dealmaking - by technology type

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Definition of co-development
Figure 2: Situations where co-development can prove useful
Figure 3: Key components of a co-development deal
Figure 4: Issues in implementing co-development agreements
Figure 5: Trends in co-development deal announcements, 2009-2014
Figure 6: Co-development deals signed at each phase of development, 2009-2013
Figure 7: Co-development agreements – what should a contract include?
Figure 8: Components of the co-development deal structure
Figure 9: Top co-development deals by value since 2009
Figure 10: Most active co-development dealmakers 2009-2014
Figure 11: Bigpharma – top 50 – Co-development deals 2007 to 2013
Figure 12: Bigpharma co-development deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 13: Online partnering resources
Figure 14: Deal type definitions

Read the full report:
Co-development Terms & Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2276221/Co-development-Terms--Agreements-in-Pharma-Biotech-and-Diagnostics.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...