Welcome!

News Feed Item

Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report: Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2276222/Diagnostic-Imaging-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the diagnostic imaging partnering agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides a detailed understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter diagnostic imaging partnering deals. This report provides details of the latest diagnostics agreements announced in the healthcare sectors, covering:

Imaging
CT
Endoscope
Molecular and nuclear
PET
SPECT
MRI
Ultrasound
X ray
Angiography
Fluoroscopy
Mammography

This report provides an overview of diagnostic imaging dealmaking, the common clauses, rights and options in the partnering agreement, and also a comprehensive review of deals signed in since 2009.

This report provides a comprehensive and detailed review of all diagnostic imaging deals announced since 2009. The comprehensive agreements chapter is organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type, and therapy focus. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual deal at Current Agreements (www.currentagreements.com) deals and alliances database, providing easy access to each deal on demand. Where available, the full deal contract document is also provided and indicated by a document symbol.

Contract documents provide unsurpassed access to the detail of a deal normally announced in brief summary through a press release. Detailed analysis of a contract allow better understanding of the terms agreed between the parties, and importantly the basis under which monies and licensing rights are exchanged.

For example, analyzing actual company agreements allows assessment of the following:

What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company?

What exclusivity is granted?

What are the precise rights granted or optioned?

What is the payment structure for the deal?

How aresalesand payments audited?

What is the deal term?

How are the key terms of the agreement defined?

How are IPRs handled and owned?

Who is responsible for commercialization?

Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture?

How is confidentiality and publication managed?

How are disputes to be resolved?

Under what conditions can the deal be terminated?

What happens when there is a change of ownership?

What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed?

Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon?

Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type?

Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law?

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of drug dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report, whilst chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in diagnostic imaging dealmaking since 2009, including details of average headline, upfront, milestone and royalty terms.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading diagnostic imaging deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma, big biotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapter 4 provides a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of diagnostic imaging deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Where available, each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 5 provides a comprehensive and detailed review of diagnostic imaging partnering deals signed and announced since 2009, where a contract document is available in the public domain. The chapter is organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and specific therapy focus. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides a comprehensive and detailed review of diagnostic imaging partnering deals by specific imaging technology types announced since 2009. The chapter is categorized by deals including imaging, CT, Endoscope, Molecular and nuclear (PET, SPECT), MRI, Ultrasound, X-Ray (angiography, fluoroscopy, mammography). Where available, each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in diagnostic imaging partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided organized by diagnostic imaging partnering by company A-Z , stage of development, deal type and therapy area. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of diagnostic imaging technologies and products.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of antibody technologies and products.
Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding and access to diagnostic imaging trends and structure of deals entered into by leading companies worldwide.

Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements includes:

Trends in diagnostic imaging dealmaking in the biopharma industry since 2009
Analysis of diagnostic imaging deal structure
Access to headline, upfront, milestone and royalty data
Case studies of real-life diagnostic imaging deals
Access to over 700 diagnostic imaging deal documents
The leading vaccine deals by value since 2009
Most active diagnostic imaging dealmakers since 2009
The leading diagnostic imaging partnering resources

In Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements, the available contracts are listed by:

Company A-Z
Headline value
Stage of development at signing
Deal component type
Therapy target
Specific technology type

Each deal title links via weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides comprehensive access to available deals and contract documents for over 700 diagnostic imaging deals. Analyzing actual contract agreements allows assessment of the following:

What are the precise vaccine rights granted or optioned?
What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company?
What exclusivity is granted?
What is the payment structure for the deal?
How are sales and payments audited?
What is the deal term?
How are the key terms of the agreement defined?
How are IPRs handled and owned?
Who is responsible for commercialization?
Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture?
How is confidentiality and publication managed?
How are disputes to be resolved?
Under what conditions can the deal be terminated?
What happens when there is a change of ownership?
What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed?
Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon?
Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type?
Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law?
Executive Summary

Chapter 1 – Introduction

Chapter 2 – Trends in diagnostic imaging dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Diagnostic imaging partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma diagnostic imaging dealmaking activity
2.4. Most active in diagnostic imaging partnering
2.5. Diagnostic imaging partnering by industry sector
2.6. Diagnostic imaging partnering by deal type
2.7. Diagnostic imaging partnering by disease type
2.8. Diagnostic imaging partnering by specific technology type
2.9. Average deal terms for diagnostic imaging partnering
2.9.1 Diagnostic imaging headline values
2.9.2 Diagnostic imaging upfront payments
2.9.3 Diagnostic imaging milestone payments
2.9.4 Diagnostic imaging royalty rates
2.10. The anatomy of diagnostic imaging partnering
2.10. The anatomy of a diagnostic imaging deal
2.10.a. Case study : Vaso Diagnostics- GE Healthcare: July 2010

Chapter 3 – Leading diagnostic imaging deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top diagnostic imaging deals by value

Chapter 4 – Big pharma diagnostic imaging deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. How to use big pharma diagnostic imaging partnering deals
4.3. Big pharma diagnostic imaging partnering company profiles
Abbott
Actavis (acquired by Watson)
AstraZeneca
Bayer
Eisai
Eli Lilly
GlaxoSmithKline
Lundbeck
Merck & Co
Merck KGaA
Novartis
Roche
Sanofi
Servier

Chapter 5 – Diagnostic imaging partnering contracts directory

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Company A-Z

Actavis (acquired by Watson)
Acusphere
Audeo Oncology
Beijing Double-Crane Pharmaceutical
Bio-Imaging Technologies
BioClinica
Biofield
Biotage
Caliper Life Sciences
Cantel Medical (UK)
Cryolife
Dr Faupel
Esaote
GE Healthcare
General Electric (GE)
Guided Therapeutics
IsoRay
Konica Minolta
Lantheus Medical Imaging
MDS Nordion
Misonix
Norgine
Novel Laboratories
Pharmalucence
Salix Pharmaceuticals
Siemens
SonoSite
Starch Medical
SurgiVision
Techniscan
USHIFU
Vaso Diagnostics
Vasomedical

5.3. By deal type

Asset purchase
Co-development
Contract service
Development
Distribution
Licensing
Manufacturing
Marketing
Option
Promotion
Settlement
Sub-license
Supply
Technology transfer
Termination

5.4. By stage of development

Preclinical
Phase III
Regulatory
Marketed
5.5. By therapy area
Cardiovascular
Dermatology
Gastrointestinal
Hematology
Hospital care
Oncology

Chapter 6 – Diagnostic imaging dealmaking by specific imaging type

6.1. Introduction
6.2. Deals by diagnostic imaging type

Appendices

Introduction
Appendix 1 – Directory of diagnostic imaging deals by company A-Z 2009 to 2014
Appendix 2 – Directory of diagnostic imaging deals by stage of development 2009 to 2014
Appendix 3 – Directory of diagnostic imaging deals by deal type 2009 to 2014
Appendix 4 – Directory of diagnostic imaging deals by therapy area 2009 to 2014
Appendix 5 – Diagnostic Imaging partnering resource center
Online diagnostic imaging partnering
Diagnostic Imaging partnering events
Further reading on diagnostic imaging dealmaking
About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form – Technology Reports
Order Form – Upgrades to subscription access products

Table of figures

Figure 1: Diagnostic imaging partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma – top 50 – Diagnostic imaging deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma diagnostic imaging deal frequency – 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Active diagnostic imaging dealmaking activity– 2009 to 2014
Figure 5: Diagnostic imaging partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 6: Diagnostic imaging partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 7: Diagnostic imaging partnering by disease type since 2009
Figure 8: Diagnostic imaging partnering by disease type since 2009
Figure 9: Diagnostic imaging deals with a headline value
Figure 10: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 11: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 12: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 13: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 14: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 15: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 16: Diagnostic imaging deal headline value distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 17: Summary median headline value by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 18: Diagnostic imaging deals with upfront payment values
Figure 19: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 20: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 21: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 22: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 23: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 24: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 25: Diagnostic imaging deal upfront payment distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 26: Summary median upfront payments by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 27: Diagnostic imaging deals with milestone payments
Figure 28: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 29: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 30: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 31: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 32: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 33: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 34: Diagnostic imaging deal milestone distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 35: Diagnostic imaging deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 36: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 37: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 38: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 39: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 40: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 41: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 42: Diagnostic imaging deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 43: Summary median royalty rate by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 44: Components of the typical diagnostic imaging deal structure
Figure 45: Top diagnostic imaging deals by value since 2009
Figure 46: Online partnering resources
Figure 47: Forthcoming partnering events

Read the full report:
Diagnostic Imaging Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2276222/Diagnostic-Imaging-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: query@reportbuyer.com
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
IoT offers a value of almost $4 trillion to the manufacturing industry through platforms that can improve margins, optimize operations & drive high performance work teams. By using IoT technologies as a foundation, manufacturing customers are integrating worker safety with manufacturing systems, driving deep collaboration and utilizing analytics to exponentially increased per-unit margins. However, as Benoit Lheureux, the VP for Research at Gartner points out, “IoT project implementers often un...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Technologic Systems Inc., an embedded systems solutions company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's @ThingsExpo, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Technologic Systems is an embedded systems company with headquarters in Fountain Hills, Arizona. They have been in business for 32 years, helping more than 8,000 OEM customers and building over a hundred COTS products that have never been discontinued. Technologic Systems’ pr...
SYS-CON Events announced today that IoT Now has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 6–8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. IoT Now explores the evolving opportunities and challenges facing CSPs, and it passes on some lessons learned from those who have taken the first steps in next-gen IoT services.
SYS-CON Events announced today that WineSOFT will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Based in Seoul and Irvine, WineSOFT is an innovative software house focusing on internet infrastructure solutions. The venture started as a bootstrap start-up in 2010 by focusing on making the internet faster and more powerful. WineSOFT’s knowledge is based on the expertise of TCP/IP, VPN, SSL, peer-to-peer, mob...
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...
SYS-CON Events announced today that delaPlex will exhibit at SYS-CON's @CloudExpo, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. delaPlex pioneered Software Development as a Service (SDaaS), which provides scalable resources to build, test, and deploy software. It’s a fast and more reliable way to develop a new product or expand your in-house team.
The Internet of Things can drive efficiency for airlines and airports. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Sudip Majumder, senior director of development at Oracle, discussed the technical details of the connected airline baggage and related social media solutions. These IoT applications will enhance travelers' journey experience and drive efficiency for the airlines and the airports.
The security needs of IoT environments require a strong, proven approach to maintain security, trust and privacy in their ecosystem. Assurance and protection of device identity, secure data encryption and authentication are the key security challenges organizations are trying to address when integrating IoT devices. This holds true for IoT applications in a wide range of industries, for example, healthcare, consumer devices, and manufacturing. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lancen LaChance, vic...
With billions of sensors deployed worldwide, the amount of machine-generated data will soon exceed what our networks can handle. But consumers and businesses will expect seamless experiences and real-time responsiveness. What does this mean for IoT devices and the infrastructure that supports them? More of the data will need to be handled at - or closer to - the devices themselves.
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Dataloop.IO, an innovator in cloud IT-monitoring whose products help organizations save time and money, has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Dataloop.IO is an emerging software company on the cutting edge of major IT-infrastructure trends including cloud computing and microservices. The company, founded in the UK but now based in San Fran...
Building a cross-cloud operational model can be a daunting task. Per-cloud silos are not the answer, but neither is a fully generic abstraction plane that strips out capabilities unique to a particular provider. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Chris Wolf, VP & Chief Technology Officer, Global Field & Industry at VMware, will discuss how successful organizations approach cloud operations and management, with insights into where operations should be centralized and when it’s best to decentraliz...
In the first article of this three-part series on hybrid cloud security, we discussed the Shared Responsibility Model and examined how the most common attack strategies persist, are amplified, or are mitigated as assets move from data centers to the cloud. Today, we’ll look at some of the unique security challenges that are introduced by public cloud environments. While cloud computing delivers many operational, cost-saving and security benefits, it takes place in a public, shared and on-demand ...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sudarshan Krishnamurthi, a Senior Manager, Business Strategy, at Cisco Systems, will discuss how IT and operational technology (OT) work together, as opposed to being in separate siloes as once was traditional. Attendees will learn how to fully leverage the power of IoT in their organization by bringing the two sides together and bridging the communication gap. He will also look at what good leadership must entail in order to accomplish this, and how IT managers ca...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Mike Johnston, an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io, will discuss how to use Kubernetes to setup a SaaS infrastructure for your business. Mike Johnston is an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io with over 12 years of experience designing, deploying, and maintaining server and workstation infrastructure at all scales. He has experience with brick and mortar data centers as well as cloud providers like Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace....