Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report: Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

Trends in orphan diseases partnering deals
Disclosed headlines, upfronts, milestones and royalties by stage of development
Orphan diseases partnering contract documents
Top orphan diseases deals by value

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter orphan diseases partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors orphan diseases technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This report contains over 90 links to online copies of actual orphan diseases deals and where available, contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of orphan diseases dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in orphan diseases dealmaking since 2009 covering trends by year, deal type, stage of development, technology type and therapeutic indication. In addition the chapter includes an analysis of financial deal terms by stage at signing covering headline value, upfront payment, milestone payments and royalty rates. Analysis includes median values and distribution of values for each stage of development.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading orphan diseases deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma and big biotech, most active bigpharma/bigbiotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapters 4 and 5 provide a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma and big biotech companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of orphan diseases deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides comprehensive access to all orphan diseases deals since 2009 where a deal contract is available, providing the user with direct access to contracts as filed with the SEC regulatory authorities. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 7 provides a comprehensive directory of all orphan diseases partnering deals by specific therapeutic indication announced since 2009. The chapter is organized by specific orphan diseases therapeutic indication. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided with each report of all orphan diseases partnering deals signed and announced since 2009. The appendices are organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in orphan diseases partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of orphan diseases technologies and products.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in orphan diseases dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Orphan diseases partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.4. Big biotech orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.5. Most active in orphan diseases partnering
2.6. Orphan diseases partnering by deal type
2.7. Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector
2.8. Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development
2.9. Orphan diseases partnering by technology type
2.10. Average deal terms for orphan diseases
2.10.1 Orphan diseases headline values
2.10.2 Orphan diseases upfront payments
2.10.3 Orphan diseases milestone payments
2.10.4 Orphan diseases royalty rates

Chapter 3 - Leading orphan diseases deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top orphan diseases deals by value

Chapter 4 - Big pharma orphan diseases deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. How to use big pharma partnering deals
4.3. Big pharma orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Dainippon Sumitomo
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
Grifols
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Mitsubishi Tanabe
Novartis
Pfizer
Sanofi
Shire
Shire Human Genetic Therapies
Takeda
Teva

Chapter 5 - Big biotech orphan diseases deals

5.1. Introduction
5.2. How to use big biotech partnering deals
5.3. Big biotech orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Acorda Therapeutics
Actelion
BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
Grifols
Ipsen
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
ViroPharma

Chapter 6 - Orphan diseases partnering contracts directory

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Company A-Z

Aradigm
Arbios Systems
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners
Cell Therapeutics
Chiesi Farmaceutici
Chroma Therapeutics
Edison Pharmaceuticals
EpiCept
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
GlycoMimetics
Grifols
Halozyme Therapeutics
HepaLife
Hyperion Therapeutics
Ikaria
Intellect Neurosciences
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Meda
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
Orphan Therapeutics
Penwest Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer
S*Bio
Saint Louis University
Ucyclyd Pharma
Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals
UniQure
Viropharma

6.3. By deal type

Asset purchase
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Development
Equity purchase
Licensing
Marketing
Option
Settlement
Supply

6.4. By stage of development

Discovery
Formulation
Marketed
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Preclinical
Regulatory

6.5. By technology type

Assays
Biological compounds
Biomaterials
Cell culture
Enabling technology
Gene therapy
Implant
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Stem cells

Chapter 7 - Orphan diseases dealmaking by therapeutic target

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Deals by therapeutic target
Orphan diseases

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by company A-Z 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 2 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by deal type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 3 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by stage of development 2009-Jan 2014
Appendix 4 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by technology type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 5 - Partnering resource center

Online partnering
Partnering events
Further reading on dealmaking
Deal type definitions

About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form - Therapy Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Orphan diseases partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Big biotech - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to Jan 2014
Figure 5: Big biotech orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 6: Active orphan diseases dealmaking activity- 2009 to 2014
Figure 7: Orphan diseases partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 8: Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 9: Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 10: Orphan diseases partnering by technology type since 2009
Figure 11: Orphan diseases deals with a headline value
Figure 12: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 13: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 14: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 15: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 16: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 17: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 18: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 19: Summary median headline value by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 20 Orphan diseases deals with upfront payment values
Figure 21: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 22: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 23: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 24: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 25: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 26: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 27: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 28: Summary median upfront payments by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 29: Orphan diseases deals with milestone payments
Figure 30: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 31: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 32: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 33: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 34: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 35: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 36: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 37: Orphan diseases deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 38: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 39: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 40: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 41: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 42: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 43: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 44: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 45: Summary median royalty rate by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 46: Top orphan diseases deals by value since 2009
Figure 47: Online partnering resources
Figure 48: Forthcoming partnering events

Read the full report:
Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
Ovum, a leading technology analyst firm, has published an in-depth report, Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting a DevOps Release Management Solution, 2016–17. The report focuses on the automation aspects of DevOps, Release Management and compares solutions from the leading vendors.
Large scale deployments present unique planning challenges, system commissioning hurdles between IT and OT and demand careful system hand-off orchestration. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Smith, Senior Director and a founding member of Incenergy, will discuss some of the key tactics to ensure delivery success based on his experience of the last two years deploying Industrial IoT systems across four continents.
"This week we're really focusing on scalability, asset preservation and how do you back up to the cloud and in the cloud with object storage, which is really a new way of attacking dealing with your file, your blocked data, where you put it and how you access it," stated Jeff Greenwald, Senior Director of Market Development at HGST, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
When it comes to cloud computing, the ability to turn massive amounts of compute cores on and off on demand sounds attractive to IT staff, who need to manage peaks and valleys in user activity. With cloud bursting, the majority of the data can stay on premises while tapping into compute from public cloud providers, reducing risk and minimizing need to move large files. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Scott Jeschonek, Director of Product Management at Avere Systems, discussed the IT and busin...
Keeping pace with advancements in software delivery processes and tooling is taxing even for the most proficient organizations. Point tools, platforms, open source and the increasing adoption of private and public cloud services requires strong engineering rigor – all in the face of developer demands to use the tools of choice. As Agile has settled in as a mainstream practice, now DevOps has emerged as the next wave to improve software delivery speed and output. To make DevOps work, organization...
There will be new vendors providing applications, middleware, and connected devices to support the thriving IoT ecosystem. This essentially means that electronic device manufacturers will also be in the software business. Many will be new to building embedded software or robust software. This creates an increased importance on software quality, particularly within the Industrial Internet of Things where business-critical applications are becoming dependent on products controlled by software. Qua...
"We formed Formation several years ago to really address the need for bring complete modernization and software-defined storage to the more classic private cloud marketplace," stated Mark Lewis, Chairman and CEO of Formation Data Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
SYS-CON Events has announced today that Roger Strukhoff has been named conference chair of Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo 2016 Silicon Valley. The 19th Cloud Expo and 6th @ThingsExpo will take place on November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. "The Internet of Things brings trillions of dollars of opportunity to developers and enterprise IT, no matter how you measure it," stated Roger Strukhoff. "More importantly, it leverages the power of devices and the Interne...
"There's a growing demand from users for things to be faster. When you think about all the transactions or interactions users will have with your product and everything that is between those transactions and interactions - what drives us at Catchpoint Systems is the idea to measure that and to analyze it," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York Ci...
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
Redis is not only the fastest database, but it is the most popular among the new wave of databases running in containers. Redis speeds up just about every data interaction between your users or operational systems. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Dave Nielsen, Developer Advocate, Redis Labs, will share the functions and data structures used to solve everyday use cases that are driving Redis' popularity.
Most organizations prioritize data security only after their data has already been compromised. Proactive prevention is important, but how can you accomplish that on a small budget? Learn how the cloud, combined with a defense and in-depth approach, creates efficiencies by transferring and assigning risk. Security requires a multi-defense approach, and an in-house team may only be able to cherry pick from the essential components. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Vlad Friedman, CEO/Founder o...
"We host and fully manage cloud data services, whether we store, the data, move the data, or run analytics on the data," stated Kamal Shannak, Senior Development Manager, Cloud Data Services, IBM, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
With the proliferation of both SQL and NoSQL databases, organizations can now target specific fit-for-purpose database tools for their different application needs regarding scalability, ease of use, ACID support, etc. Platform as a Service offerings make this even easier now, enabling developers to roll out their own database infrastructure in minutes with minimal management overhead. However, this same amount of flexibility also comes with the challenges of picking the right tool, on the right ...
As organizations shift towards IT-as-a-service models, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and now cloud environments grows with it. Commvault can ensure protection, access and E-Discovery of your data – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud, or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enterprise. In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Randy De Meno, Chief Technologist - Windows Products and Microsoft Part...