Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report: Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

Trends in orphan diseases partnering deals
Disclosed headlines, upfronts, milestones and royalties by stage of development
Orphan diseases partnering contract documents
Top orphan diseases deals by value

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter orphan diseases partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors orphan diseases technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This report contains over 90 links to online copies of actual orphan diseases deals and where available, contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of orphan diseases dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in orphan diseases dealmaking since 2009 covering trends by year, deal type, stage of development, technology type and therapeutic indication. In addition the chapter includes an analysis of financial deal terms by stage at signing covering headline value, upfront payment, milestone payments and royalty rates. Analysis includes median values and distribution of values for each stage of development.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading orphan diseases deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma and big biotech, most active bigpharma/bigbiotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapters 4 and 5 provide a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma and big biotech companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of orphan diseases deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides comprehensive access to all orphan diseases deals since 2009 where a deal contract is available, providing the user with direct access to contracts as filed with the SEC regulatory authorities. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 7 provides a comprehensive directory of all orphan diseases partnering deals by specific therapeutic indication announced since 2009. The chapter is organized by specific orphan diseases therapeutic indication. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided with each report of all orphan diseases partnering deals signed and announced since 2009. The appendices are organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in orphan diseases partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of orphan diseases technologies and products.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in orphan diseases dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Orphan diseases partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.4. Big biotech orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.5. Most active in orphan diseases partnering
2.6. Orphan diseases partnering by deal type
2.7. Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector
2.8. Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development
2.9. Orphan diseases partnering by technology type
2.10. Average deal terms for orphan diseases
2.10.1 Orphan diseases headline values
2.10.2 Orphan diseases upfront payments
2.10.3 Orphan diseases milestone payments
2.10.4 Orphan diseases royalty rates

Chapter 3 - Leading orphan diseases deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top orphan diseases deals by value

Chapter 4 - Big pharma orphan diseases deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. How to use big pharma partnering deals
4.3. Big pharma orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Dainippon Sumitomo
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
Grifols
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Mitsubishi Tanabe
Novartis
Pfizer
Sanofi
Shire
Shire Human Genetic Therapies
Takeda
Teva

Chapter 5 - Big biotech orphan diseases deals

5.1. Introduction
5.2. How to use big biotech partnering deals
5.3. Big biotech orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Acorda Therapeutics
Actelion
BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
Grifols
Ipsen
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
ViroPharma

Chapter 6 - Orphan diseases partnering contracts directory

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Company A-Z

Aradigm
Arbios Systems
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners
Cell Therapeutics
Chiesi Farmaceutici
Chroma Therapeutics
Edison Pharmaceuticals
EpiCept
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
GlycoMimetics
Grifols
Halozyme Therapeutics
HepaLife
Hyperion Therapeutics
Ikaria
Intellect Neurosciences
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Meda
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
Orphan Therapeutics
Penwest Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer
S*Bio
Saint Louis University
Ucyclyd Pharma
Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals
UniQure
Viropharma

6.3. By deal type

Asset purchase
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Development
Equity purchase
Licensing
Marketing
Option
Settlement
Supply

6.4. By stage of development

Discovery
Formulation
Marketed
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Preclinical
Regulatory

6.5. By technology type

Assays
Biological compounds
Biomaterials
Cell culture
Enabling technology
Gene therapy
Implant
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Stem cells

Chapter 7 - Orphan diseases dealmaking by therapeutic target

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Deals by therapeutic target
Orphan diseases

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by company A-Z 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 2 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by deal type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 3 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by stage of development 2009-Jan 2014
Appendix 4 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by technology type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 5 - Partnering resource center

Online partnering
Partnering events
Further reading on dealmaking
Deal type definitions

About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form - Therapy Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Orphan diseases partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Big biotech - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to Jan 2014
Figure 5: Big biotech orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 6: Active orphan diseases dealmaking activity- 2009 to 2014
Figure 7: Orphan diseases partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 8: Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 9: Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 10: Orphan diseases partnering by technology type since 2009
Figure 11: Orphan diseases deals with a headline value
Figure 12: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 13: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 14: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 15: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 16: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 17: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 18: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 19: Summary median headline value by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 20 Orphan diseases deals with upfront payment values
Figure 21: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 22: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 23: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 24: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 25: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 26: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 27: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 28: Summary median upfront payments by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 29: Orphan diseases deals with milestone payments
Figure 30: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 31: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 32: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 33: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 34: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 35: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 36: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 37: Orphan diseases deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 38: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 39: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 40: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 41: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 42: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 43: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 44: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 45: Summary median royalty rate by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 46: Top orphan diseases deals by value since 2009
Figure 47: Online partnering resources
Figure 48: Forthcoming partnering events

Read the full report:
Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...