Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report: Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

Trends in orphan diseases partnering deals
Disclosed headlines, upfronts, milestones and royalties by stage of development
Orphan diseases partnering contract documents
Top orphan diseases deals by value

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter orphan diseases partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors orphan diseases technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This report contains over 90 links to online copies of actual orphan diseases deals and where available, contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of orphan diseases dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in orphan diseases dealmaking since 2009 covering trends by year, deal type, stage of development, technology type and therapeutic indication. In addition the chapter includes an analysis of financial deal terms by stage at signing covering headline value, upfront payment, milestone payments and royalty rates. Analysis includes median values and distribution of values for each stage of development.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading orphan diseases deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma and big biotech, most active bigpharma/bigbiotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapters 4 and 5 provide a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma and big biotech companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of orphan diseases deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides comprehensive access to all orphan diseases deals since 2009 where a deal contract is available, providing the user with direct access to contracts as filed with the SEC regulatory authorities. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 7 provides a comprehensive directory of all orphan diseases partnering deals by specific therapeutic indication announced since 2009. The chapter is organized by specific orphan diseases therapeutic indication. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided with each report of all orphan diseases partnering deals signed and announced since 2009. The appendices are organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in orphan diseases partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of orphan diseases technologies and products.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in orphan diseases dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Orphan diseases partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.4. Big biotech orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.5. Most active in orphan diseases partnering
2.6. Orphan diseases partnering by deal type
2.7. Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector
2.8. Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development
2.9. Orphan diseases partnering by technology type
2.10. Average deal terms for orphan diseases
2.10.1 Orphan diseases headline values
2.10.2 Orphan diseases upfront payments
2.10.3 Orphan diseases milestone payments
2.10.4 Orphan diseases royalty rates

Chapter 3 - Leading orphan diseases deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top orphan diseases deals by value

Chapter 4 - Big pharma orphan diseases deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. How to use big pharma partnering deals
4.3. Big pharma orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Dainippon Sumitomo
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
Grifols
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Mitsubishi Tanabe
Novartis
Pfizer
Sanofi
Shire
Shire Human Genetic Therapies
Takeda
Teva

Chapter 5 - Big biotech orphan diseases deals

5.1. Introduction
5.2. How to use big biotech partnering deals
5.3. Big biotech orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Acorda Therapeutics
Actelion
BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
Grifols
Ipsen
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
ViroPharma

Chapter 6 - Orphan diseases partnering contracts directory

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Company A-Z

Aradigm
Arbios Systems
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners
Cell Therapeutics
Chiesi Farmaceutici
Chroma Therapeutics
Edison Pharmaceuticals
EpiCept
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
GlycoMimetics
Grifols
Halozyme Therapeutics
HepaLife
Hyperion Therapeutics
Ikaria
Intellect Neurosciences
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Meda
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
Orphan Therapeutics
Penwest Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer
S*Bio
Saint Louis University
Ucyclyd Pharma
Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals
UniQure
Viropharma

6.3. By deal type

Asset purchase
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Development
Equity purchase
Licensing
Marketing
Option
Settlement
Supply

6.4. By stage of development

Discovery
Formulation
Marketed
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Preclinical
Regulatory

6.5. By technology type

Assays
Biological compounds
Biomaterials
Cell culture
Enabling technology
Gene therapy
Implant
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Stem cells

Chapter 7 - Orphan diseases dealmaking by therapeutic target

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Deals by therapeutic target
Orphan diseases

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by company A-Z 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 2 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by deal type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 3 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by stage of development 2009-Jan 2014
Appendix 4 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by technology type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 5 - Partnering resource center

Online partnering
Partnering events
Further reading on dealmaking
Deal type definitions

About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form - Therapy Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Orphan diseases partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Big biotech - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to Jan 2014
Figure 5: Big biotech orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 6: Active orphan diseases dealmaking activity- 2009 to 2014
Figure 7: Orphan diseases partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 8: Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 9: Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 10: Orphan diseases partnering by technology type since 2009
Figure 11: Orphan diseases deals with a headline value
Figure 12: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 13: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 14: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 15: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 16: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 17: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 18: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 19: Summary median headline value by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 20 Orphan diseases deals with upfront payment values
Figure 21: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 22: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 23: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 24: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 25: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 26: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 27: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 28: Summary median upfront payments by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 29: Orphan diseases deals with milestone payments
Figure 30: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 31: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 32: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 33: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 34: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 35: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 36: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 37: Orphan diseases deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 38: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 39: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 40: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 41: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 42: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 43: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 44: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 45: Summary median royalty rate by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 46: Top orphan diseases deals by value since 2009
Figure 47: Online partnering resources
Figure 48: Forthcoming partnering events

Read the full report:
Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
As organizations shift towards IT-as-a-service models, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and now cloud environments grows with it. Commvault can ensure protection, access and E-Discovery of your data – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud, or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enterprise. In his general session at 18th Cloud Expo, Randy De Meno, Chief Technologist - Windows Products and Microsoft Part...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that ICC-USA, a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances, will exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO. DXWordEXPO New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. ICC is a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances to meet a wide range of ...
Andi Mann, Chief Technology Advocate at Splunk, is an accomplished digital business executive with extensive global expertise as a strategist, technologist, innovator, marketer, and communicator. For over 30 years across five continents, he has built success with Fortune 500 corporations, vendors, governments, and as a leading research analyst and consultant.
JETRO showcased Japan Digital Transformation Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo® at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. The Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) is a non-profit organization that provides business support services to companies expanding to Japan. With the support of JETRO's dedicated staff, clients can incorporate their business; receive visa, immigration, and HR support; find dedicated office space; identify local government subsidies; get...
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
In this presentation, you will learn first hand what works and what doesn't while architecting and deploying OpenStack. Some of the topics will include:- best practices for creating repeatable deployments of OpenStack- multi-site considerations- how to customize OpenStack to integrate with your existing systems and security best practices.
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Archi...
Digital transformation has increased the pace of business creating a productivity divide between the technology haves and have nots. Managing financial information on spreadsheets and piecing together insight from numerous disconnected systems is no longer an option. Rapid market changes and aggressive competition are motivating business leaders to reevaluate legacy technology investments in search of modern technologies to achieve greater agility, reduced costs and organizational efficiencies. ...
"With Digital Experience Monitoring what used to be a simple visit to a web page has exploded into app on phones, data from social media feeds, competitive benchmarking - these are all components that are only available because of some type of digital asset," explained Leo Vasiliou, Director of Web Performance Engineering at Catchpoint Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to ch...
Personalization has long been the holy grail of marketing. Simply stated, communicate the most relevant offer to the right person and you will increase sales. To achieve this, you must understand the individual. Consequently, digital marketers developed many ways to gather and leverage customer information to deliver targeted experiences. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lou Casal, Founder and Principal Consultant at Practicala, discussed how the Internet of Things (IoT) has accelerated our abilit...
For far too long technology teams have lived in siloes. Not only physical siloes, but cultural siloes pushed by competing objectives. This includes informational siloes where business users require one set of data and tech teams require different data. DevOps intends to bridge these gaps to make tech driven operations more aligned and efficient.
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service.