Welcome!

News Feed Item

Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report: Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

Trends in orphan diseases partnering deals
Disclosed headlines, upfronts, milestones and royalties by stage of development
Orphan diseases partnering contract documents
Top orphan diseases deals by value

The Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the orphan diseases partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter orphan diseases partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors orphan diseases technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This report contains over 90 links to online copies of actual orphan diseases deals and where available, contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of orphan diseases dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in orphan diseases dealmaking since 2009 covering trends by year, deal type, stage of development, technology type and therapeutic indication. In addition the chapter includes an analysis of financial deal terms by stage at signing covering headline value, upfront payment, milestone payments and royalty rates. Analysis includes median values and distribution of values for each stage of development.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading orphan diseases deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma and big biotech, most active bigpharma/bigbiotech, and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapters 4 and 5 provide a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma and big biotech companies with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of orphan diseases deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides comprehensive access to all orphan diseases deals since 2009 where a deal contract is available, providing the user with direct access to contracts as filed with the SEC regulatory authorities. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 7 provides a comprehensive directory of all orphan diseases partnering deals by specific therapeutic indication announced since 2009. The chapter is organized by specific orphan diseases therapeutic indication. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided with each report of all orphan diseases partnering deals signed and announced since 2009. The appendices are organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in orphan diseases partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of orphan diseases technologies and products.

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Chapter 2 - Trends in orphan diseases dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Orphan diseases partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.4. Big biotech orphan diseases dealmaking activity
2.5. Most active in orphan diseases partnering
2.6. Orphan diseases partnering by deal type
2.7. Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector
2.8. Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development
2.9. Orphan diseases partnering by technology type
2.10. Average deal terms for orphan diseases
2.10.1 Orphan diseases headline values
2.10.2 Orphan diseases upfront payments
2.10.3 Orphan diseases milestone payments
2.10.4 Orphan diseases royalty rates

Chapter 3 - Leading orphan diseases deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top orphan diseases deals by value

Chapter 4 - Big pharma orphan diseases deals

4.1. Introduction
4.2. How to use big pharma partnering deals
4.3. Big pharma orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Dainippon Sumitomo
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
Grifols
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Mitsubishi Tanabe
Novartis
Pfizer
Sanofi
Shire
Shire Human Genetic Therapies
Takeda
Teva

Chapter 5 - Big biotech orphan diseases deals

5.1. Introduction
5.2. How to use big biotech partnering deals
5.3. Big biotech orphan diseases partnering company profiles
Acorda Therapeutics
Actelion
BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
Grifols
Ipsen
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
ViroPharma

Chapter 6 - Orphan diseases partnering contracts directory

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Company A-Z

Aradigm
Arbios Systems
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners
Cell Therapeutics
Chiesi Farmaceutici
Chroma Therapeutics
Edison Pharmaceuticals
EpiCept
Galderma
GlaxoSmithKline
GlycoMimetics
Grifols
Halozyme Therapeutics
HepaLife
Hyperion Therapeutics
Ikaria
Intellect Neurosciences
Isis Pharmaceuticals
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Meda
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals
Orphan Therapeutics
Penwest Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer
S*Bio
Saint Louis University
Ucyclyd Pharma
Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals
UniQure
Viropharma

6.3. By deal type

Asset purchase
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Development
Equity purchase
Licensing
Marketing
Option
Settlement
Supply

6.4. By stage of development

Discovery
Formulation
Marketed
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Preclinical
Regulatory

6.5. By technology type

Assays
Biological compounds
Biomaterials
Cell culture
Enabling technology
Gene therapy
Implant
Oligonucleotide
Peptides
RNA therapeutics
Screening
Small molecules
Stem cells

Chapter 7 - Orphan diseases dealmaking by therapeutic target

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Deals by therapeutic target
Orphan diseases

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by company A-Z 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 2 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by deal type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 3 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by stage of development 2009-Jan 2014
Appendix 4 - Directory of orphan diseases deals by technology type 2009- Jan 2014
Appendix 5 - Partnering resource center

Online partnering
Partnering events
Further reading on dealmaking
Deal type definitions

About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form - Therapy Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Orphan diseases partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Big biotech - top 50 - Orphan diseases deals 2009 to Jan 2014
Figure 5: Big biotech orphan diseases deal frequency - 2009 to 2014
Figure 6: Active orphan diseases dealmaking activity- 2009 to 2014
Figure 7: Orphan diseases partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 8: Orphan diseases partnering by industry sector since 2009
Figure 9: Orphan diseases partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 10: Orphan diseases partnering by technology type since 2009
Figure 11: Orphan diseases deals with a headline value
Figure 12: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 13: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 14: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 15: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 16: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 17: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 18: Orphan diseases deal headline value distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 19: Summary median headline value by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 20 Orphan diseases deals with upfront payment values
Figure 21: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 22: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 23: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 24: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 25: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 26: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 27: Orphan diseases deal upfront payment distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 28: Summary median upfront payments by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 29: Orphan diseases deals with milestone payments
Figure 30: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 31: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 32: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 33: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 34: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 35: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 36: Orphan diseases deal milestone distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 37: Orphan diseases deals with royalty rates, %
Figure 38: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - discovery stage
Figure 39: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - preclinical stage
Figure 40: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase I stage
Figure 41: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase II stage
Figure 42: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - phase III stage
Figure 43: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - regulatory stage
Figure 44: Orphan diseases deal royalty rate distribution, US$million - marketed stage
Figure 45: Summary median royalty rate by stage of development, 2009-2014
Figure 46: Top orphan diseases deals by value since 2009
Figure 47: Online partnering resources
Figure 48: Forthcoming partnering events

Read the full report:
Orphan Diseases Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/2043441/Orphan-Diseases-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Ericsson has been named “Gold Sponsor” of SYS-CON's @ThingsExpo, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York, New York. Ericsson is a world leader in the rapidly changing environment of communications technology – providing equipment, software and services to enable transformation through mobility. Some 40 percent of global mobile traffic runs through networks we have supplied. More than 1 billion subscribers around the world re...
There is an ever-growing explosion of new devices that are connected to the Internet using “cloud” solutions. This rapid growth is creating a massive new demand for efficient access to data. And it’s not just about connecting to that data anymore. This new demand is bringing new issues and challenges and it is important for companies to scale for the coming growth. And with that scaling comes the need for greater security, gathering and data analysis, storage, connectivity and, of course, the...
SYS-CON Events announced today that DatacenterDynamics has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. DatacenterDynamics is a brand of DCD Group, a global B2B media and publishing company that develops products to help senior professionals in the world's most ICT dependent organizations make risk-based infrastructure and capacity decisions.
Between the mockups and specs produced by analysts, and resulting applications built by developers, there exists a gulf where projects fail, costs spiral, and applications disappoint. Methodologies like Agile attempt to address this with intensified communication, with partial success but many limitations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Charles Kendrick, CTO & Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, will present a revolutionary model enabled by new technologies. Learn how business and devel...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Peak 10, Inc., a national IT infrastructure and cloud services provider, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Peak 10 provides reliable, tailored data center and network services, cloud and managed services. Its solutions are designed to scale and adapt to customers’ changing business needs, enabling them to lower costs, improve performance and focus inter...
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
So, you bought into the current machine learning craze and went on to collect millions/billions of records from this promising new data source. Now, what do you do with them? Too often, the abundance of data quickly turns into an abundance of problems. How do you extract that "magic essence" from your data without falling into the common pitfalls? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Natalia Ponomareva, Software Engineer at Google, will provide tips on how to be successful in large scale machine lear...
If there is anything we have learned by now, is that every business paves their own unique path for releasing software- every pipeline, implementation and practices are a bit different, and DevOps comes in all shapes and sizes. Software delivery practices are often comprised of set of several complementing (or even competing) methodologies – such as leveraging Agile, DevOps and even a mix of ITIL, to create the combination that’s most suitable for your organization and that maximize your busines...
Struggling to keep up with increasing application demand? Learn how Platform as a Service (PaaS) can streamline application development processes and make resource management easy.
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Chris Klein, CEO and Co-founder of Rachio, will discuss next generation communities that are using IoT to create more sustainable, intelligent communities. One example is Sterling Ranch, a 10,000 home development that – with the help of Siemens – will integrate IoT technology into the community to provide residents with energy and water savings as well as intelligent security. Everything from stop lights to sprinkler systems to building infrastructures will run ef...
Whether your IoT service is connecting cars, homes, appliances, wearable, cameras or other devices, one question hangs in the balance – how do you actually make money from this service? The ability to turn your IoT service into profit requires the ability to create a monetization strategy that is flexible, scalable and working for you in real-time. It must be a transparent, smoothly implemented strategy that all stakeholders – from customers to the board – will be able to understand and comprehe...
Machine Learning helps make complex systems more efficient. By applying advanced Machine Learning techniques such as Cognitive Fingerprinting, wind project operators can utilize these tools to learn from collected data, detect regular patterns, and optimize their own operations. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Stuart Gillen, Director of Business Development at SparkCognition, will discuss how research has demonstrated the value of Machine Learning in delivering next generation analytics to im...
In the world of DevOps there are ‘known good practices’ – aka ‘patterns’ – and ‘known bad practices’ – aka ‘anti-patterns.' Many of these patterns and anti-patterns have been developed from real world experience, especially by the early adopters of DevOps theory; but many are more feasible in theory than in practice, especially for more recent entrants to the DevOps scene. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists will dis...
See storage differently! Storage performance problems have only gotten worse and harder to solve as applications have become largely virtualized and moved to a cloud-based infrastructure. Storage performance in a virtualized environment is not just about IOPS, it is about how well that potential performance is guaranteed to individual VMs for these apps as the number of VMs keep going up real time. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, in product and marketing at Tintri, will discu...
Unless you don’t use the internet, don’t live in California, or haven’t been paying attention to the recent news… you should be aware that self-driving cars are on their way to becoming a reality. I have seen them – they are real. If you believe in the future reality of self-driving cars, then continue reading on. If you don’t believe in the future possibilities, then I am not sure what to do to convince you other than discuss the very real changes that will roll out with the consumer producti...