Welcome!

News Feed Item

Paladin Energy: Financial Report for Year Ended 30 June 2014

PERTH, WESTERN AUSTRALIA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/28/14 -- Paladin Energy Ltd ("Paladin" or "the Company") (TSX: PDN)(ASX: PDN) announces the release of its consolidated Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2014. The Financial Report is appended to this News Release.

HIGHLIGHTS

OPERATIONS


- LHM produced a record 5.592Mlb U3O8 for the year ended 30 June 2014,
  achieving a 6% improvement on the year ended 30 June 2013.

- KM placed on care and maintenance on 26 May 2014 after production ceased
  and circuit clean-up.

- Combined production for the year ended 30 June 2014 of 7.943Mlb (3,603t)
  U3O8 is a decrease of 4% over the year ended 30 June 2013.

- C1 cost of production(1) continues to fall:

  - Langer Heinrich Mine (LHM) C1 cost of production for the year has
    decreased 4% to US$28.8/lb U3O8 from US$30.0/lb U3O8 in the year ended
    30 June 2013.

  - Kayelekera Mine (KM) C1 cost of production has decreased 16% to
    US$35.9/lb U3O8 from US$42.6/lb U3O8 for the year ended 30 June 2013.

- Revised FY2014 production guidance achieved at the upper end of the range.

SALES AND REVENUE


- Sales revenue totalled US$328.8M for the year from sales of 8.665Mlb U3O8.

- Average realised uranium sales price for the year was US$37.9/lb U3O8,
  compared to the average UxC spot price for the period of US$33.9/lb U3O8.

CORPORATE


- Institutional placement of shares in August 2013 raised US$80.7M.

- Sale of a 25% interest in the Langer Heinrich mining operation in Namibia
  to CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
  CNNC, the leading Chinese nuclear utility, for consideration of US$190M
  (completed 23 July 2014).

- Existing US$110M project finance facility and US$20M working capital
  facility refinanced into a new US$70M syndicated loan facility. Net debt
  repayments totalled US$68.8M (for FY2014).

- A number of cost reduction initiatives completed and, as a result,
  administration, marketing and non-production costs decreased by 45% year-
  on-year and total exploration expenditure decreased by 54%. Additional
  measures are yet to be implemented.

- In addition to the impairments of US$255.7M (after tax) for the December
  half year, which mostly comprised of the US$226.5M (after tax) impairment
  of the Queensland exploration assets, further impairments of US$40.6M have
  been recognised primarily for inventory at LHM due to low uranium prices
  and at KM due to its transition to care and maintenance.

EXPLORATION


- Michelin Project - positive mineral resource update with 25% increase in
  Measured and Indicated Resources.

(1) C1 cost of production = cost of production excluding product distribution costs, sales royalties and depreciation and amortisation before adjustment for impairment. C1 cost, which is non-IFRS information, is a widely used 'industry standard' term.

Results

(References below to 2014 and 2013 are to the equivalent year ended 30 June 2014 and 2013 respectively).


- Safety and Sustainability:

  - The 12-month moving average Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
    increased from 1.1 to 3.1. This rate is slightly higher than the West
    Australian metalliferous surface mining average LTIFR of 2.3. For
    FY2014, there were 12 LTI's and 2 fatalities as compared to seven LTI's
    for the previous year.

  - A major health and safety review and action plan is underway. This plan
    includes additional staff and resources in the safety area and intense
    in-house training, which is a major initiative for the next 12-24
    months.

- Production:

  - Combined production of 7.943Mlb U3O8 for the year ended 30 June 2014,
    down 4% on the previous year as a result of KM transitioning to care and
    maintenance.

- Langer Heinrich Mine (LHM):

  - Record production for the year of 5.592Mlb, an increase of 6% over the
    previous year:

    - overall recovery of 87% (FY2013: 86%); and

    - feed grades of 783ppm U3O8 (FY2013: 812ppm).

  - LHM C1 cost of production for the year fell to US$28.8/lb U3O8, down 4%
    from US$30.0/lb U3O8 for the previous year.

  - Production constraint due to water supply experienced during the year
    has now been resolved in a sustainable manner and will be optimised in
    the years ahead.

  - Optimisation strategies have produced improved operating performance
    that will be reflected in FY2015 C1 costs.

  - A thorough review of standard operating procedures is underway, that is
    expected to lead to further improvements in operating performance and
    costs.

  - A complete IX resin inventory change has been initiated for the first
    time in the life of the project. This has been done on the basis of
    improved process modelling capability and economic analysis, and will
    lead to reduced C1 costs.

  - The (patent pending) nano-filtration technology developed by Paladin for
    KM will be implemented at LHM in FY2015. This innovation will also
    deliver substantial C1 cost savings.

- Cost Reduction Initiatives:

  - The focus remains on process innovation, where considerable success has
    been achieved to date, and further substantial gains are expected to
    improve unit costs for LHM in the coming year. In particular, leach and
    IX reagents, which represent a high proportion of the current C1 costs,
    offer a significant cost reduction opportunity. The sustained reduction
    in operating costs and improved plant performance demonstrated over the
    past year is a reflection of the proven success of the twin strategies
    of optimisation and innovation.

  - Further cost savings and optimisation initiatives are being implemented
    to reduce corporate costs over FY2015.

  - Target for LHM is C1 cost below US$26/lb by the end of FY2015 and
    US$22/lb in FY2017 (in FY2014 terms).

  - Target for KM on restart is C1 costs below US$30/lb (in FY2014 terms).

- Kayelekera Mine (KM):

  - Production for the year was 2.351Mlb, a decrease of 21% over the year
    ended 30 June 2013, in line with the care and maintenance budget:

    - overall recovery of 86.2% (FY2013: 84.6%); and

    - acid recovery plant (formerly nano-filtration) successfully
      commissioned and continued to improve beyond design criteria.

  - On 7 February 2014, the Company announced that KM would be placed on
    care and maintenance due to falling uranium prices affecting the
    viability of KM and to preserve the remaining ore body. It is expected
    that production will recommence once the uranium price provides a
    sufficient incentive (circa US$75/lb) and a grid power supply is
    available on site to replace the existing diesel generators with lower
    cost hydroelectricity.

  - Placing KM on care and maintenance will improve Paladin's forecast cash
    flow position by US$20M-US$25M in CY2015. Paladin anticipates the
    ongoing cost of maintaining KM on care and maintenance of approximately
    US$16M pa will be funded from proceeds received from the sale of uranium
    oxide on hand and produced during the rundown phase.

  - KM C1 cost of production for the year fell to US$35.9/lb U3O8, down 16%
    from US$42.6/lb U3O8 for the year ended 30 June 2013. Prior to care and
    maintenance, the C1 cost of production for KM had decreased by 17% year-
    on-year from US$39.8/lb in the March 2013 quarter to US$32.9/lb in the
    March 2014 quarter.

  - C1 cost reductions were mainly due to a substantial reduction in acid
    consumption following the commissioning of the acid recovery plant, as
    well as optimising resin-in-pulp and ore blend.

- Profit and Loss:

  - Total sales volume for the year of 8.665Mlb U3O8 reflected a 5% increase
    over sales of 8.253Mlb U3O8 for the year ended 30 June 2013.

  - Sales revenue decreased 19% from US$408.4M in 2013 to US$328.8M for the
    year ended 30 June 2014, as a result of spot price reduction causing a
    23% decrease in realised sales price, partially offset by a 5% increase
    in sales volume. The average realised uranium sales price in the year
    ended 30 June 2014 was US$37.9/lb U3O8 (FY2013: US$49.5/lb U3O8)
    compared to the average UxC spot price for the year of US$33.9/lb U3O8.

  - Gross loss before impairments for the year of US$3.4M, compared to a
    gross profit before impairments in FY2013 of US$55.9M, due primarily to
    lower uranium prices.

  - Care and maintenance resulted in a higher impairment of KM inventory of
    US$40.7M (FY2013: US$30.9M) and lower uranium prices saw an impairment
    of LHM inventory of US$21.0M (FY2013: US$Nil). This was in addition to
    the impairment of Queensland exploration assets at 31 December 2013 of
    US$226.5M after tax. Net loss after tax attributable to members of the
    Group of US$338.4M was recorded for the year.

- Cash Flow:

  - Positive cash flow from operating activities totalled US$10.1M for the
    year after interest payments of US$33.0M and exploration expenditure of
    US$1.7M.

  - Cash outflow from investing activities totalled US$25.3M:

    - plant and equipment acquisitions of US$20.3M, predominantly the new
      tailings facility at LHM and acid recovery plant and tailings pipeline
      at KM; and

    - capitalised exploration expenditure of US$5.8M. Exploration
      expenditure in future periods will be lower.

  - Cash inflow from financing activities of US$26.3M in the year ended 30
    June 2014 is mainly attributable to:

    - the net proceeds received from the share placement of US$78.2M;

    - the US$20M non-refundable deposit received as part of the settlement
      of the sale of a 25% minority interest in Langer Heinrich to CNNC; and

    - net debt repayments of US$68.8M.

- Cash Position:

  - Cash of US$88.8M at 30 June 2014.

  - On 23 July 2014 - completion of the settlement of the sale of a 25%
    interest in the Langer Heinrich mining operation for consideration of
    US$190M. The sale was subject to a number of conditions precedent, which
    were met in full by 30 June 2014. A US$20M deposit was received in April
    2014 with the balance of US$170M received on 23 July 2014.

- Exploration and Development:

  - Manyingee Project, Western Australia - As announced on 14 January 2014,
    a revised Mineral Resources estimate for the Manyingee Deposit was
    completed. The results include an Indicated Mineral Resource of 15.7Mlb
    U3O8 and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 10.2Mlb U3O8, both at an
    average grade of 850ppm U3O8, using a 250ppm and 0.2m minimum thickness
    cut-off. Compared to the previous Mineral Resource estimate announced in
    1999 (reported at a 300ppm U3O8 cut-off), the updated 2014 Mineral
    Resource estimate shows a minor reduction in contained U3O8 for the
    Indicated portion of the Mineral Resource and an increase in the
    Inferred portion of the Mineral Resource. Despite the change in
    disequilibrium factor used to determine uranium grades, which resulted
    in a reduction in the Indicated Mineral Resource material grade, the
    overall grade of the deposit has increased due to revised geological
    modelling and estimation techniques. The Company is preparing a draft
    permit application for advancement of a Field Leach Trial (FLT) to
    further advance this project. A final application is expected to be
    submitted to Western Australia regulatory officials once completed in
    FY2015.

  - Aurora - Michelin Uranium Project, Canada - As announced on 26 June
    2014, a revised Mineral Resource estimate for the Michelin Deposit (the
    "2014 Mineral Resource Estimate"), was completed. The 2014 Mineral
    Resource Estimate for the Michelin Deposit was successful in converting
    some 13.2Mlb U3O8 of previously Inferred category material into the
    Measured and Indicated categories, as well as adding 3.8Mlb U3O8 for a
    Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource total of 84.1Mlb U3O8. This is
    equivalent to a 25% increase in Measured and Indicated material and a
    36% increase in the grade of the Mineral Resources recoverable using
    open pit mining techniques. Mineral Resources remaining in the Inferred
    category now stand at 22.9Mlb U3O8.

- Production Guidance

  - Revised FY2014 production guidance was achieved at 7.943Mlb U3O8, at the
    upper end of the range of 7.8-8.0Mlb U3O8 advised on 7 February 2014.

  - With KM on care and maintenance, Paladin's guidance for LHM for FY2015
    is 5.4-5.8Mlb U3O8.

- Sales Volumes

  - Uranium sales volumes are expected to fluctuate quarter-on-quarter due
    to the uneven timing of contractual commitments and resultant delivery
    scheduling by customers. Now that production has reached design levels,
    sales, production volumes and inventories are expected to be comparable
    on an annualised basis.

- Langer Heinrich Minority Interest Sale

  - On 20 January 2014, the Company announced that it had signed an
    agreement to sell a 25% interest in LHM to CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding
    Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of CNNC, the leading Chinese nuclear
    utility, for consideration of US$190M.

  - An offtake component of the agreement will allow CNNC to purchase its
    pro-rata share of product based on the prevailing market spot price at
    the time of sale. There is also an opportunity for Paladin to benefit by
    securing additional long term offtake arrangements with CNNC, at arm's
    length market rates, from Paladin's share of LHM production.

  - On 23 July 2014, the Company completed the settlement of the sale. The
    sale was subject to a number of conditions precedent which were met in
    full by 30 June 2014.

  - Proceeds from the sale will be utilised to repay debt across the
    Company.

  - With this major initiative to joint venture a minority equity stake in
    Langer Heinrich now completed, the door is open to pursue other
    opportunities, utilising the unique platform Paladin has developed in
    the global uranium mining industry, to further consolidate and
    strengthen its balance sheet. This will, in turn, also prepare the
    Company for growth into a major Tier 1 uranium producer.

- Successful Refinancing of Langer Heinrich and Kayelekera Facilities

  - On 17 January 2014, the Company announced it had entered into a project
    finance facility of US$110M and US$20M working capital facility for the
    refinancing of the previous LHM and the KM project finance facilities.

  - On 23 July 2014, the Company announced it had refinanced the existing
    US$110M project finance facility and US$20M working capital facility
    into a new US$70M syndicated loan facility. Proceeds were utilised to
    prepay US$30.8M of the existing facility, taking the outstanding balance
    to US$70M.

  - This new facility will provide significant cash flow benefits and
    further strengthens Paladin's financial position. The annual principal
    repayments will be reduced by US$32M over the first 3.5 years of the
    facility (2014 to 2017 calendar years), from US$18.3M pa to US$9.1M pa
    with the first repayment of US$4.55M not due until December 2014.

The documents comprising the Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2014, including the Report to Shareholders, Management Discussion and Analysis, Financial Statements and Certifications will be filed with the Company's other documents on Sedar (sedar.com) and on the Company's website (paladinenergy.com.au).

Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

The news release includes non-GAAP performance measures: C1 cost of production, non-cash costs as well as other income and expenses. The Company believes that, in addition to the conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to generate cash flow. The additional information provided herein should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Declaration

The information in this announcement that relates to minerals exploration and mineral resources is based on information compiled by David Princep BSc, FAusIMM (CP) who has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr Princep is a full-time employee of Paladin Energy Ltd. Mr. Princep consents to the inclusion of the information in this announcement in the form and context in which it appears. The Mineral Resources for the Manyingee deposit were announced to the ASX on the 14 January 2014, the Mineral Resources for the Michelin Deposit were announced to the ASX on the 26 June 2014 and the information contained within has not materially changed since it was last reported.

Conference Call

Conference Call and Investor Update is scheduled for 06:30 Perth & Hong Kong, Friday 29 August 2014, 18:30 Toronto and 23:30 London, Thursday 28 August 2014. Details are included in a separate news release dated 22 August 2014.

To view the Financial Report please visit the following link: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/paladin_energy_2014_annual_report.pdf

ACN 061 681 098

Contacts:
Paladin Energy Ltd
John Borshoff
Managing Director/CEO
Tel: +61-8-9381-4366 or Mobile: +61-419-912-571
[email protected]

Paladin Energy Ltd
Craig Barnes
Chief Financial Officer
Tel: +61-8-9381-4366 or Mobile: +61-424- 724-416
[email protected]

Paladin Energy Ltd
Andrew Mirco
Investor Relations Contact
Tel: +61-8-9381-4366 or Mobile: +61-409-087-171
[email protected]

Paladin Energy Ltd
Greg Taylor
Investor Relations Contact
Tel: +1-905-337-7673 or Mobile: +1-416-605-5120 (Toronto)
[email protected]
www.paladinenergy.com.au

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Claude Remillard, Principal Program Manager in Developer Division at Microsoft, contrasted how his team used config as code and immutable patterns for continuous delivery of microservices and apps to the cloud. He showed how the immutable patterns helps developers do away with most of the complexity of config as code-enabling scenarios such as rollback, zero downtime upgrades with far greater simplicity. He also demoed building immutable pipelines in the cloud ...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
"IoT is going to be a huge industry with a lot of value for end users, for industries, for consumers, for manufacturers. How can we use cloud to effectively manage IoT applications," stated Ian Khan, Innovation & Marketing Manager at Solgeniakhela, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
@GonzalezCarmen has been ranked the Number One Influencer and @ThingsExpo has been named the Number One Brand in the “M2M 2016: Top 100 Influencers and Brands” by Onalytica. Onalytica analyzed tweets over the last 6 months mentioning the keywords M2M OR “Machine to Machine.” They then identified the top 100 most influential brands and individuals leading the discussion on Twitter.
Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more business becomes digital the more stakeholders are interested in this data including how it relates to business. Some of these people have never used a monitoring tool before. They have a question on their mind like “How is my application doing” but no id...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Predictive analytics tools monitor, report, and troubleshoot in order to make proactive decisions about the health, performance, and utilization of storage. Most enterprises combine cloud and on-premise storage, resulting in blended environments of physical, virtual, cloud, and other platforms, which justifies more sophisticated storage analytics. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Peter McCallum, Vice President of Datacenter Solutions at FalconStor, discussed using predictive analytics to mon...
All clouds are not equal. To succeed in a DevOps context, organizations should plan to develop/deploy apps across a choice of on-premise and public clouds simultaneously depending on the business needs. This is where the concept of the Lean Cloud comes in - resting on the idea that you often need to relocate your app modules over their life cycles for both innovation and operational efficiency in the cloud. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at19th Cloud Expo, Valentin (Val) Bercovici, CTO of Soli...
Information technology is an industry that has always experienced change, and the dramatic change sweeping across the industry today could not be truthfully described as the first time we've seen such widespread change impacting customer investments. However, the rate of the change, and the potential outcomes from today's digital transformation has the distinct potential to separate the industry into two camps: Organizations that see the change coming, embrace it, and successful leverage it; and...
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service. In his session at 19th Cloud Exp...
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
Regulatory requirements exist to promote the controlled sharing of information, while protecting the privacy and/or security of the information. Regulations for each type of information have their own set of rules, policies, and guidelines. Cloud Service Providers (CSP) are faced with increasing demand for services at decreasing prices. Demonstrating and maintaining compliance with regulations is a nontrivial task and doing so against numerous sets of regulatory requirements can be daunting task...
Fact: storage performance problems have only gotten more complicated, as applications not only have become largely virtualized, but also have moved to cloud-based infrastructures. Storage performance in virtualized environments isn’t just about IOPS anymore. Instead, you need to guarantee performance for individual VMs, helping applications maintain performance as the number of VMs continues to go up in real time. In his session at Cloud Expo, Dhiraj Sehgal, Product and Marketing at Tintri, sha...
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to simplify and streamline our lives by automating routine tasks that distract us from our goals. This promise is based on the ubiquitous deployment of smart, connected devices that link everything from industrial control systems to automobiles to refrigerators. Unfortunately, comparatively few of the devices currently deployed have been developed with an eye toward security, and as the DDoS attacks of late October 2016 have demonstrated, this oversight can ...