Click here to close now.

Welcome!

News Feed Item

Majestic Gold Corp. Announces Third Quarter 2014 Results

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/29/14 -- Majestic Gold Corp. ("Majestic" or the "Company") (TSX VENTURE:MJS)(FRANKFURT:A0BK1D) announces its financial and operational results for the third quarter ended June 30, 2014. This release should be read in conjunction with the Company's condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related management discussion and analysis. The following financial results are expressed in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

2014 Third Quarter Overview


--  Gold production in the third quarter of 2014 decreased to 4,269 ounces,
    compared to 5,119 ounces produced in the third quarter of 2013. Total
    gold production for the nine months ended June 30, 2014, increased to
    14,824 ounces, compared to 14,769 ounces produced for the comparative
    period of 2013. 
--  Gold sales revenue in the third quarter of 2014 was $8.6 million from
    the sale of 6,590 ounces, at an average realized gold price of $1,311
    per ounce, compared to revenue of $3.3 million from the sale of 2,251
    ounces, at an average realized gold price of $1,470 per ounce, for the
    comparative quarter of 2013. Gold sales revenue for the nine months
    ended June 30, 2014, was $19.8 million from the sale of 14,950 ounces,
    at an average realized gold price of $1,322 per ounce, compared to
    revenue of $15.8 million from the sale of 9,734 ounces, at an average
    realized gold price of $1,621 per ounce, for the comparative period of
    2013. 
--  Average cash costs for the third quarter of 2014 were $1,189 per ounce,
    compared to $1,040 per ounce for the third quarter of 2013. For the nine
    months ended June 30, 2014, average cash costs were $1,060 per ounce
    compared to $1,043 per ounce for the comparative period of 2013. 
--  Gross profit was $0.5 million for the third quarter of 2014, compared to
    $0.9 million for the third quarter of 2013. Gross profit for the nine
    months ended June 30, 2014, was $3.1 million compared to $5.4 million
    for the comparative period of 2013. 
--  General and administrative expenses ("G&A") were $0.8 million for the
    third quarter of 2014, compared to $1.9 million for the third quarter of
    2013. G&A expenses were $4.7 million for the for the nine months ended
    June 30, 2014, compared to $5.6 million for the comparative period of
    2013.

                                                                            
PRODUCTION RESULTS                                                          
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Three months ended June  Nine months ended June
                                                 30,                     30,
                                    2014        2013        2014        2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
Production data                                                             
  Tonnes mined                   361,361     501,851   1,231,838   1,431,589
  Tonnes milled                  380,744     499,175   1,225,076   1,444,307
  Head grade (g/t)                  0.42        0.36        0.41        0.36
  Mill recovery                      88%         86%         88%         86%
  Gold produced (ozs)              4,269       5,119      14,824      14,769
  Gold realized, net of                                                     
   smelting fees (ozs)             4,080       4,770      13,896      13,764
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                                                            
FINANCIAL                                                                   
 INFORMATION                                                                
                                                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Three months ended June 30,  Nine months ended June 30,
                              2014          2013          2014          2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating data                                                              
  Gold produced                                                             
   (ozs)                     4,269         5,033        14,824        14,769
  Gold realized net                                                         
   of smelting fees                                                         
   (ozs)                     4,080         4,681        13,896        13,764
  Gold sold (ozs)            6,590         2,251        14,950         9,734
  Average realized                                                          
   gold price ($/oz                                                         
   sold)             $       1,311 $       1,470 $       1,322 $       1,621
  Total cash costs                                                          
   ($/oz sold) (1)           1,189         1,040         1,060         1,043
Financial data                                                              
  Total revenues     $   8,641,683 $   3,551,168 $  20,127,407 $  16,576,510
  Gross profit (2)         456,620       858,996     3,118,460     5,444,311
  Net loss                                                                  
   attributable to                                                          
   shareholders          (979,226)   (1,663,360)   (3,253,046)   (2,782,687)
  Basic and diluted                                                         
   loss per share           (0.00)        (0.00)        (0.00)        (0.00)
  Cash and cash                                                             
   equivalents          12,444,592    16,255,747    12,444,592    16,255,747
  Total assets          99,279,878   108,561,402    99,279,878   108,561,402
  Total debt            20,445,677    19,566,849    20,445,677    19,566,849
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
(1) "Total cash costs" are presented on a per ounce sold basis.             
(2) "Gross profit" represents total revenues, net of cost of goods sold.    

Stephen Kenwood, President and CEO of Majestic Gold Corp., is the Company's Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 and is the non-independent Qualified Person that has reviewed and approved the geological and technical information contained in this press release.

About Majestic Gold

Currently focused solely in China, Majestic Gold Corp. is a Vancouver, BC based company engaged in commercial gold production at the Songjiagou Gold Mine in Yantai, China. The mine is an open pit and underground operation. Additional information on the Company and its projects is available at www.sedar.com and on the Company's website at www.majesticgold.com.

Cautionary Notes

Certain statements contained herein may constitute forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements are statements which relate to future events. Such statements include estimates, forecasts and statements as to management's expectations with respect to, among other things, business and financial prospects, financial multiples and accretion estimates, future trends, plans, strategies, objectives and expectations, including with respect to production, exploration drilling, reserves and resources, exploitation activities and events or future operations. Information inferred from the interpretation of drilling results and information concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to be forward-looking statements, as it constitutes a prediction of what might be found to be present when, and if, a project is actually developed.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans, "anticipates", believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential", or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggestions herein. Except as required by applicable law, Majestic Gold does not intend to update any forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results

Production Disclaimer

The Company's production decision was not based on a feasibility study of mineral reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability. The Company's production decision was made based on the open pit optimization resource model set out in the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA"), which takes into account the relatively low mining costs negotiated by the Company. The pit optimization that was conducted in the preliminary assessment generated a production schedule summary at grade cut-off of 0.30 gram per tonne Au.

The PEA includes the inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that the preliminary assessment will ever be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Internet of Things (IoT) will be a hybrid ecosystem of diverse devices and sensors collaborating with operational and enterprise systems to create the next big application. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Bramh Gupta, founder and CEO of robomq.io, and Fred Yatzeck, principal architect leading product development at robomq.io, discussed how choosing the right middleware and integration strategy from the get-go will enable IoT solution developers to adapt and grow with the industry, while at th...
The most often asked question post-DevOps introduction is: “How do I get started?” There’s plenty of information on why DevOps is valid and important, but many managers still struggle with simple basics for how to initiate a DevOps program in their business. They struggle with issues related to current organizational inertia, the lack of experience on Continuous Integration/Delivery, understanding where DevOps will affect revenue and budget, etc. In their session at DevOps Summit, JP Morgenthal...
Agile, which started in the development organization, has gradually expanded into other areas downstream - namely IT and Operations. Teams – then teams of teams – have streamlined processes, improved feedback loops and driven a much faster pace into IT departments which have had profound effects on the entire organization. In his session at DevOps Summit, Anders Wallgren, Chief Technology Officer of Electric Cloud, will discuss how DevOps and Continuous Delivery have emerged to help connect dev...
Malicious agents are moving faster than the speed of business. Even more worrisome, most companies are relying on legacy approaches to security that are no longer capable of meeting current threats. In the modern cloud, threat diversity is rapidly expanding, necessitating more sophisticated security protocols than those used in the past or in desktop environments. Yet companies are falling for cloud security myths that were truths at one time but have evolved out of existence.
Overgrown applications have given way to modular applications, driven by the need to break larger problems into smaller problems. Similarly large monolithic development processes have been forced to be broken into smaller agile development cycles. Looking at trends in software development, microservices architectures meet the same demands. Additional benefits of microservices architectures are compartmentalization and a limited impact of service failure versus a complete software malfunction. ...
Today air travel is a minefield of delays, hassles and customer disappointment. Airlines struggle to revitalize the experience. GE and M2Mi will demonstrate practical examples of how IoT solutions are helping airlines bring back personalization, reduce trip time and improve reliability. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Shyam Varan Nath, Principal Architect with GE, and Dr. Sarah Cooper, M2Mi’s VP Business Development and Engineering, will explore the IoT cloud-based platform technologies drivi...
In the midst of the widespread popularity and adoption of cloud computing, it seems like everything is being offered “as a Service” these days: Infrastructure? Check. Platform? You bet. Software? Absolutely. Toaster? It’s only a matter of time. With service providers positioning vastly differing offerings under a generic “cloud” umbrella, it’s all too easy to get confused about what’s actually being offered. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Kevin Hazard, Director of Digital Content for SoftL...
Containers are changing the security landscape for software development and deployment. As with any security solutions, security approaches that work for developers, operations personnel and security professionals is a requirement. In his session at DevOps Summit, Kevin Gilpin, CTO and Co-Founder of Conjur, will discuss various security considerations for container-based infrastructure and related DevOps workflows.
It is one thing to build single industrial IoT applications, but what will it take to build the Smart Cities and truly society-changing applications of the future? The technology won’t be the problem, it will be the number of parties that need to work together and be aligned in their motivation to succeed. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jason Mondanaro, Director, Product Management at Metanga, discussed how you can plan to cooperate, partner, and form lasting all-star teams to change the world...
Internet of Things is moving from being a hype to a reality. Experts estimate that internet connected cars will grow to 152 million, while over 100 million internet connected wireless light bulbs and lamps will be operational by 2020. These and many other intriguing statistics highlight the importance of Internet powered devices and how market penetration is going to multiply many times over in the next few years.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and Containers together help companies to achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of...
The cloud has transformed how we think about software quality. Instead of preventing failures, we must focus on automatic recovery from failure. In other words, resilience trumps traditional quality measures. Continuous delivery models further squeeze traditional notions of quality. Remember the venerable project management Iron Triangle? Among time, scope, and cost, you can only fix two or quality will suffer. Only in today's DevOps world, continuous testing, integration, and deployment upend...
The time is ripe for high speed resilient software defined storage solutions with unlimited scalability. ISS has been working with the leading open source projects and developed a commercial high performance solution that is able to grow forever without performance limitations. In his session at Cloud Expo, Alex Gorbachev, President of Intelligent Systems Services Inc., shared foundation principles of Ceph architecture, as well as the design to deliver this storage to traditional SAN storage co...
To many people, IoT is a buzzword whose value is not understood. Many people think IoT is all about wearables and home automation. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Kavis, Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Partners, discussed some incredible game-changing use cases and how they are transforming industries like agriculture, manufacturing, health care, and smart cities. He will discuss cool technologies like smart dust, robotics, smart labels, and much more. Prepare...
"We provide a web application framework for building really sophisticated web applications that run on a browser without any installation need so we get used for biotech, defense, and banking applications," noted Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit (http://DevOpsSummit.SYS-CON.com), held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York