|By PR Newswire||
|September 1, 2014 11:10 AM EDT||
NEW YORK, Sept. 1, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue: Early-Stage Minimally-Invasive Biomarkers in Alzheimer%s Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis and Market Study of New Developments and Opportunities, 2014
Biopharm Reports has carried out a comprehensive analysis and market study of new developments relating to early-stage minimally-invasive biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease, which have been 'functionally reviewed' alongside existing AD drugs and candidates in the AD drug pipeline, and applicable commercial AD diagnostics.
New advances have been made in the discovery and validation of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease (AD), offering much-needed opportunities to accelerate disease research, drug discovery and the development of low-cost minimally-invasive tests that will be available to much wider patient populations.
This report gives a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of new findings relating to the discovery and clinical evaluation of AD-related biomarkers with potential to allow early detection or progression of this disease, based on minimally-invasive or non-invasive methods. With a focus on controlled human studies of AD, these biomarker findings are 'functionally reviewed' alongside drugs and drug candidates in the development pipeline, and a market analysis of applicable (minimally-invasive) AD-related diagnostics tests, platforms and developments. This report also includes an analysis of related opportunities in AD research, drug discovery, clinical trials and clinical diagnostics.
This work was carried out to provide a detailed and up-to-date analysis of minimally-invasive AD biomarkers and related opportunities to commercial developers in this field, including companies involved in AD drug R&D, diagnostics companies and others supplying applicable technologies into life science and clinical research laboratories. New and emerging developments relating to early-stage biomarkers of AD, presented in this report, are broadly classified into approximately 35 different 'groups', which indicate their biological associations or origins relating to this disease. Overall, more than 270 biomarkers have been identified (where multivariate panels of partially-defined species are identified as one biomarker) and these are further classified in terms of the molecular groups to which they below.
Recent years have seen major advances in the discovery of minimally-invasive biomarkers of AD and early stages of this disease, and related applicable diagnostics capabilities. These include three methods with AD diagnostic accuracies from 95% – 96% and another that predicted conversion from MCI to AD within the year, with an accuracy of 87%. Of seven others, three gave diagnostic sensitivities and specificities relating to early-stage AD ranging from 85% to 89% and 82% to 97%, respectively, and four provided sensitivities and specificities relating to the detection of AD, ranging from 82% to 95% and 79% to 97%, respectively.
While larger long-term studies are required, these and other findings show that diagnostic capabilities relating to AD have reached an important breakthrough point, offering opportunities to accelerate research, drug discovery and the development of low-cost minimally-invasive tests that will be available to much wider patient populations.- An in-depth review of candidate biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease - A focused analysis of early-stage biomarkers identified in AD patient studies - Covering more than thirty five areas of the AD biomarker landscape- Early-stage disease, predictive conversion to AD and disease progression - Validated patient studies citing diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy - Blood, saliva, urine and other minimally-invasive techniques- Most recent findings and reviewed developments - Functionally reviewed with drugs and drug candidates in the development pipeline - Potential opportunities for companion diagnostics- An in-depth review of the current AD drug development pipeline and companies - Commercial review of minimally-invasive AD diagnostic tests and companies
Few major diseases have proved as unyielding to research as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Even in the 60's and 70's, drugs developed to meet the challenges of cancer were changing the time-course of this disease, and today some cancers can be treated very successfully. Unfortunately, similar progress has not been seen in the case of AD. In 2014, after decades that have seen some of the greatest achievements in medicine, there are still no disease-altering therapies for AD and those few treatments that do exist provide only small, and generally short-lived, benefits for some patients.
The fundamental challenges to the development of more effective treatments for AD reflect scientist's poor understanding of this disease. While hallmark neurological changes seen in AD have been mapped in some detail, efforts to translate this knowledge into an understanding of the underlying causative mechanisms, and the subsequent use of this understanding to produce disease-altering treatments, have not so far been successful. More fundamentally, scientist's poor understanding of AD is also seen in uncertainties relating to the diagnosis of this disease, particularly in its early stages, and the consequential absence of adequate diagnostic tests.
Many believe that current AD treatments are not effective since by the time the disease is symptomatic, the point at which current treatments are given, the underlying neurological damage has already reached a point of no return. Current treatments may therefore be 'too little, too late'. It is also believed that the changes leading to AD may begin many years or even decades before the first symptoms are seen. Unfortunately, causative basic of these early changes are not understood either. This has focused much attention on fundamental disease research and the discovery of disease markers, in the hope that new findings will provide insights into the changes that take place as this disease develops, while also identifying new treatment strategies.
Some of the most important advances in AD biomarker discovery have been provided by imaging methods such as MRI and PET, which have helped to map the time-course of this disease, as well as changes relating to molecules such as Abeta and Tau. Studies have also profiled biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), particularly relating to Abeta. However, while these methods are important in AD research, both are complex and expensive and are therefore not readily available to the wider population.
The lack of accessibility of these techniques in routine research and diagnostic testing has limited their use, with inevitable consequences on the progress of AD research and clinical investigation. Moreover, there is significant interest, and a rational basis for, investigating AD from changes that take place outside of the central nervous system, notably those that might be identified and monitored in the blood and other biofluids. Such approaches, if successfully translated into accurate and reliable diagnostic methods, offer minimally-invasive or non-invasive approaches and the hope of simpler and cheaper tests that will be available to much wider populations. With a focus on the most recent advances, this report provides an in-depth analysis of AD biomarkers identified using minimally invasive approaches, mostly in blood, but also including urine, saliva and other areas.
The goal for this study was to identify and profile as many advances relevant to early-stage minimally invasive candidate AD biomarkers as possible, by combining a 'wide-net' approach on the one hand, and focused analyses around the most promising findings on the other. With a focus on human studies involving AD patients (and those with (presumed) early-stage disease) and studies published over the last five year, 40,000+ AD were identified, which were narrowed down to 800 by in-depth analysis. During this process, study findings were analysed by structured systematic manual approaches and the use of in-house developed tools designed to assist the identification of biomarker relationships, correlations or associations in this field. Subsequently, these findings were functionally reviewed* alongside current drugs and drug candidates in the development pipeline (marketed, Phases 3 to 1 and preclinical) and applicable commercially available or developmental minimally-invasive diagnostics. Biomarkers
New and emerging developments relating to early-stage biomarkers of AD, presented in this report, are broadly classified into approximately 35 different 'groups', which indicate their biological associations or origins relating to this disease. Together, these areas embrace the current AD-biomarker landscape. Overall, more than 270 biomarkers have been identified (where multivariate panels of partially-defined species are identified as one biomarker) and these are further classified in terms of the molecular groups to which they below.
AD Drug Pipeline
This report covers today's AD drug development pipeline, up until August 2014. These are 'functionally reviewed'* where currently known minimally invasive AD biomarkers allow. Today, there are four FDA approved drugs for AD and 103 in the development pipeline. Of these, 11, 41, 30 and 21 candidates are at phase 3, phase 2, phase 1 and preclinical stages, respectively. An analysis of these drugs and candidates in terms of molecule types shows that small molecules represent the major group (70% overall), followed by antibodies (8%), vaccines (7%) and others (15%). In terms of the general pharmacological targeting strategies, 34 (32%) of candidates are targeted around Abeta. *'Functional integration' in this context relates to links, associations or direct connections between specific biomarkers and the underlying drug pharmacological mechanisms of specific drugs.
AD Minimally-Invasive Diagnostics
This report identifies 20 companies with AD-related diagnostics tests, platforms and developments relating to minimally-invasive techniques and capabilities. These diagnostic capabilities are presented on a company-by-company basis, however this group does not include laboratory suppliers of technologies such as PCR, microarray, mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, immunoassay, which are used or are generally applicable to AD research and clinical testing. Companies with imaging technologies or other related specifically to tests on CSF (which requires invasive techniques) are not included.
This report provides a systematic 'functional analysis' of minimally-invasive AD biomarkers presented in this report. This is based on the analysis of links, associations or direct relationships between specific biomarkers and the underlying pharmacological mechanisms of specific drugs. For example, there are a number of candidate biomarkers relating to Abeta, which are discussed in the context of Abeta targeting drugs. This has been carried out to assist in the identification of biomarkers that may provide important insights in research, drugs discovery, clinical trial end-points and potential companion diagnostics.
This report includes an in-depth analysis of biomarkers-related opportunities in AD research, drug discovery, clinical trials and clinical diagnostics.
Chapter 1. Background 26
1. Alzheimer's Disease
1.1 Statistics and Costs1.2 Histopathology1.3 Amyloid Beta (Abeta)1.4 Tau Proteins and Neurofibrillary Tangles1.5 Cholinergic Hypothesis1.6 Diagnosis1.7 Cognitive Tests1.8 Stages of AD1.9 Treatment of AD1.10 Biomarkers1.11 Genetics1.13 Blood Brain Barrier1.14 Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease
Chapter 2. Blood Biomarkers 40
Chapter 3. Autoantibodies 83
Chapter 4. Urinary Biomarkers 105
Chapter 5. Salivary Biomarkers 108
Chapter 6. Other Biomarkers 111
Chapter 7. AD Drug Pipeline 114
7.2 Approved Drugs
7.3 Phase 3 Drugs
7.4 Phase 2 Drugs
7.5 Phase 1 Drugs
7.6 Preclinical Drugs
Chapter 8. Diagnostics Companies of Minimally-Invasive AD Diagnostics 147
Chapter 9. An Integrated Analysis of AD Biomarkers 156
9.1 Introduction9.2 Minimally-Invasive Biomarkers9.3 Diagnostic Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy9.4 The Drug Development Pipeline9.5 Drug Target Areas9.6 Integrated Analysis
Chapter 10. Conclusions and Opportunities 178
Figure 7.1 AD drugs and candidate AD drugs/treatments, from current marketed products, through to preclinical studies.
Figure 7.2 AD drugs and candidate AD drug/treatment by molecule types, from current marketed drugs, through to Preclinical studies.
Figure 7.3 AD drugs and AD candidate drug/treatment by general targeting strategies, from current marketed drugs, through to preclinical studies.
Figure 7.4 Phase 3 AD drug candidates by molecule types
Figure 7.5 Phase 3 AD drug candidates, by pharmacological targeting areas
Figure 7.6 Phase 2 AD drug candidates by molecule types
Figure 7.7 Phase 2 AD drug candidates, by pharmacological targeting areas
Figure 7.8 Phase 1 AD drug candidates by molecule types
Figure 7.9 Phase 1 AD drug candidates, by pharmacological targeting areas
Figure 7.10 Preclinical AD drug candidates by molecule types
Figure 7.11 Preclinical AD drug candidates, by pharmacological targeting areas
Figure 9.1 AD drugs and candidate AD drugs/treatments, from current marketed products, through to preclinical studies.
Figure 9.2 AD drugs and AD candidate drug/treatment by general targeting strategies, from current marketed drugs, through to preclinical studies.
Figure 9.3 AD drugs and AD candidate drug/treatment by general targeting strategies by phase, from current marketed drugs, through to preclinical studies.
Table 1. Statistics and Costs relation to Alzheimer's disease, based on WHO statistics on Global Dementia.
Table 7.1 Approved drugs for the treatment of AD.
Table 7.2 Phase 3 candidate drugs for the treatment of AD.
Table 7.3 Phase 2 candidate drugs for the treatment of AD.
Table 7.4 Phase 1 candidate drugs for the treatment of AD.
Table 7.5 Preclinical candidate drugs for the treatment of AD.
Table 8.1 Companies with marketed or developmental products relating to minimally-invasive AD diagnostics.
Table 9.1 Candidate biomarkers of with AD
Table 9.2 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy levels reported from nineteen AD diagnostics studies
Table 9.3 Numbers of AD drugs and pipeline candidate AD drugs, classified according to their general pharmacological targeting mechanisms and pipeline phase
Table 9.4 AD drugs and pipeline candidate AD drugs, classified according to their general pharmacological targeting mechanisms.
Table 9.5 Abeta targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.6 Cholinergic targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.7 Serotonin targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.8 Energy metabolism targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.9 Tau targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.10 Other targeting drugs and pipeline candidate drugs/treatments from marketed products through to preclinical studies.
Table 9.11 Other AD drugs and AD drug candidates showing integrated biomarkers
Intl: +1 339-368-6001
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
Jul. 25, 2016 10:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,662
Continuous testing helps bridge the gap between developing quickly and maintaining high quality products. But to implement continuous testing, CTOs must take a strategic approach to building a testing infrastructure and toolset that empowers their team to move fast. Download our guide to laying the groundwork for a scalable continuous testing strategy.
Jul. 25, 2016 10:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,917
Let’s face it, embracing new storage technologies, capabilities and upgrading to new hardware often adds complexity and increases costs. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Seth Oxenhorn, Vice President of Business Development & Alliances at FalconStor, discussed how a truly heterogeneous software-defined storage approach can add value to legacy platforms and heterogeneous environments. The result reduces complexity, significantly lowers cost, and provides IT organizations with improved efficienc...
Jul. 25, 2016 10:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,939
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 19th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo Silicon Valley Call for Papers is now open.
Jul. 25, 2016 10:00 PM EDT Reads: 2,498
The IoT is changing the way enterprises conduct business. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how businesses can gain an edge over competitors by empowering consumers to take control through IoT. He cited examples such as a Washington, D.C.-based sports club that leveraged IoT and the cloud to develop a comprehensive booking system. He also highlighted how IoT can revitalize and restore outdated business models, making them profitable ...
Jul. 25, 2016 08:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,931
StackIQ has announced the release of Stacki 3.2. Stacki is an easy-to-use Linux server provisioning tool. Stacki 3.2 delivers new capabilities that simplify the automation and integration of site-specific requirements. StackIQ is the commercial entity behind this open source bare metal provisioning tool. Since the release of Stacki in June of 2015, the Stacki core team has been focused on making the Community Edition meet the needs of members of the community, adding features and value, while ...
Jul. 25, 2016 08:15 PM EDT Reads: 230
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a Solutions Architect at Pythian. He loves order – making him a premier Microsoft SQL Server expert. Not only has he programmed and administered SQL Server, but he has also shared his expertise and passion with b...
Jul. 25, 2016 08:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,915
With 15% of enterprises adopting a hybrid IT strategy, you need to set a plan to integrate hybrid cloud throughout your infrastructure. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Steven Dreher, Director of Solutions Architecture at Green House Data, discussed how to plan for shifting resource requirements, overcome challenges, and implement hybrid IT alongside your existing data center assets. Highlights included anticipating workload, cost and resource calculations, integrating services on both sides...
Jul. 25, 2016 08:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,965
Big Data engines are powering a lot of service businesses right now. Data is collected from users from wearable technologies, web behaviors, purchase behavior as well as several arbitrary data points we’d never think of. The demand for faster and bigger engines to crunch and serve up the data to services is growing exponentially. You see a LOT of correlation between “Cloud” and “Big Data” but on Big Data and “Hybrid,” where hybrid hosting is the sanest approach to the Big Data Infrastructure pro...
Jul. 25, 2016 07:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,881
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Yoseph Reuveni, Director of Software Engineering at Jet.com, will discuss Jet.com's journey into containerizing Microsoft-based technologies like C# and F# into Docker. He will talk about lessons learned and challenges faced, the Mono framework tryout and how they deployed everything into Azure cloud. Yoseph Reuveni is a technology leader with unique experience developing and running high throughput (over 1M tps) distributed systems with extre...
Jul. 25, 2016 07:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,087
"We are a well-established player in the application life cycle management market and we also have a very strong version control product," stated Flint Brenton, CEO of CollabNet,, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Jul. 25, 2016 07:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,794
We all know the latest numbers: Gartner, Inc. forecasts that 6.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2016, up 30 percent from last year, and will reach 20.8 billion by 2020. We're rapidly approaching a data production of 40 zettabytes a day – more than we can every physically store, and exabytes and yottabytes are just around the corner. For many that’s a good sign, as data has been proven to equal money – IF it’s ingested, integrated, and analyzed fast enough. Without real-ti...
Jul. 25, 2016 07:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,008
In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Sagi Brody, Chief Technology Officer at Webair Internet Development Inc., and Logan Best, Infrastructure & Network Engineer at Webair, focused on real world deployments of DDoS mitigation strategies in every layer of the network. He gave an overview of methods to prevent these attacks and best practices on how to provide protection in complex cloud platforms. He also outlined what we have found in our experience managing and running thousands of Linux and Unix ...
Jul. 25, 2016 07:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,746
"Operations is sort of the maturation of cloud utilization and the move to the cloud," explained Steve Anderson, Product Manager for BMC’s Cloud Lifecycle Management, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Jul. 25, 2016 07:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,881
I wanted to gather all of my Internet of Things (IOT) blogs into a single blog (that I could later use with my University of San Francisco (USF) Big Data “MBA” course). However as I started to pull these blogs together, I realized that my IOT discussion lacked a vision; it lacked an end point towards which an organization could drive their IOT envisioning, proof of value, app dev, data engineering and data science efforts. And I think that the IOT end point is really quite simple…
Jul. 25, 2016 06:30 PM EDT Reads: 979