Welcome!

Blog Feed Post

Deconstructing the '2014 State of Devops' Report

There is a very famous maxim in statistics - correlation does not imply causation.

If you Google 'interesting correlations', you'll see that correlations have been established between ice cream consumption and murder, pirate shortage and global warming, organic food and autism, internet explorer and murder (this one is not so surprising ), obesity and the debt bubble and many other such extremely disconnected phenomenon.

Having said that, the reverse is also true - correlation does not imply no causation.

Moreover, there is this entire universe of literature available on 'cognitive biases' - we see what we want to see and we  hear what we want to hear - but that's a topic for another day.

Why all this?
Well, went through the "2014 State of Devops' Report - recently co-published by PuppetLabs, ThoughtWorks and the IT  Revolution Press. With distinguished names like Gene Kim and Jez Humble associated with this report as contributors I had  high expectations.

Instead of reading the report cover to cover and absorbing the information which the report threw at me, I decided on a 'pull' approach. I listed down the questions I would typically ask if I were to do a current state assessment of Devops in the industry and then observe to what extent the report addressed those.

I know it’s a bit unfair to analyze any piece of work with a set of parameters which it was never meant to comply to.  However, being in this journey myself along with many of my colleagues, I am assuming that I am also a target recipient  of this report and in that sense a 'customer'. And like any customer, I narrate my experience of this product.


Below are the questions and the answers I got after reading the report.

Q1. What is the degree of awareness about Devops among the IT community today?

I know this is a difficult question to answer considering that there are about 25 million IT professionals in the world (a conservative guess as the number was pegged at 15 million in 2006).

The report mentions that around 9200 people participated in this survey from some 110 countries. From a sampling  perspective this is less than 0.04%. I am assuming that this was not a pre-screened survey population who (a). were aware of Devops and (b). involved in some Devops related activities in their organizations. The survey was made publicly available  and people were free to participate. However, a person who is not aware of Devops is not likely to participate in a State of Devops survey so probably all the respondents were aware.

So, my first question is not answered. The intention to was to know the degree of awareness about Devops across the global  IT community. A difficult question to answer no doubt but an important one nevertheless for a 'state of Devops' survey.

Certain demographic details of the respondents are available though - country, industry, role, size of the organization (employees, servers) and department (IT development or operations).

Two interesting observations in the demographics. There is a new role called Devops Engineer (30% claiming this role) and a new department called Devops Department (16% claiming to be working in one).

Q2. How many IT organizations have started implementing Devops?

In absolute terms, obviously, the report does not have the data.

However, the report does mention another statistic which can be extrapolated to get this data. It says that 92% of  respondents working in DevOps departments said they were currently implementing DevOps practices, or already had. This is  sharply higher than the overall group, of which 57 percent say they are implementing, or have already implemented, DevOps  practices.

My interpretation of this is that 57% of the 9200 respondents said that they are or have implemented Devops. That is 5250  people. How many organizations do these people represent?

It’s not clear as to how many organizations were represented by the 9200 participants. The report does mention that around 1000 people volunteered to disclose the names of their organizations which were publicly traded and that number is 355. 
Does this mean there were other people who volunteered the names of their organizations which were not publicly traded? 

This part is not clear.

Assuming that ONLY 1000 people volunteered the names of their organizations (and all of them were publicly traded!) and  they represented 355 companies (35%), then 5250 people would roughly represent 1800 companies. Provided I am getting all  my assumptions right, that's an encouraging number.

Q3. What have they started implementing?

The report mentions 4 Devops practices
Continuous delivery
Use of version control for all production artifacts
Automated testing
Monitoring application and system health

The report refers to these as 'Top' practices so it's not clear whether existence of other practices were also checked.

This is, in fact, the most disturbing part. It almost amounts to trivializing Devops if we're equating it to these 4  practices, all of which are related to tooling (although not surprising considering this is coming from PuppetLabs - a  primary vendor for IT infra automation solutions).  In my view, without the more foundational practices related to demand and workload synchronizing among Dev and Ops, 
alignment of their KPIs and goals, fixing product responsibilities beyond projects and interventions at all levels to  remove the trust deficit between the two silos, no amount of tooling and automation will achieve the required synergies and performance breakthroughs.


Q4. What are the initial results?

This is where the report becomes fuzzy. My expectation from this question was to know whether IT performance improved  after following Devops practices. The report does not answer that at all, directly.

What it says is that good organizational performance is dependent on good IT performance. I already know that and I also  know that it is not a straight forward relationship but that's a different topic altogether.

I don't want to know whether IT performance improves organizational performance and the fact that the latter also depends  on good organizational culture and job satisfaction - when I am reading a 'state of Devops' survey report.

The report does say that Devops 'top' practices have a strong correlation with IT performance metrics like deployment  frequency, lead time to change and MTTR. This is very good and almost ground breaking. We can always debate whether these  are the only metrics which define IT performance but nobody can refute that these are very important metrics. And if we've been able to establish that Devops is positively influencing these metrics, it is great news for all us.

I hope in the next survey we get to know the quantum of improvement as well.

In a somewhat convoluted way, the report does say how Devops can contribute to better organizational culture and job satisfaction. While they are useful, in my view they have been used more as filler material for the report to compensate for lack of data.

There are these predictable lofty claims like ' high performing IT organizations deploy code 30 times more frequently with 50 % fewer failures' or 'high-performing IT teams had 50 percent higher market capitalization growth over three years than those with low-performing IT organizations'. However, it still begs the question 'did Devops practices helped them achieve these goals and if yes, which ones?'.

Q5. What challenges are they facing?

The report is dead silent on this which is very surprising.

Weren't questions like 'what are your biggest roadblocks for Devops' or 'have you had any failed Devops initiatives', part of the survey?

While there are some very useful 'recommendations for improvement' section at the end, more real life voice of  practitioners is the expectation from this kind of a survey.

Q6. What innovative solutions / approaches are they coming up with, if any?

Again an area not addressed at all.

The only one which can remotely qualify for this is establishing a Devops ' department' which seems to be more successful  in initiating Devops practices atleast, if not getting the benefits out of them.

07. What is the summary of the survey? 

The summary of the report paints a very rosy picture about the future of Devops but I can't say whether this was derived  from the summary of the survey.

This is the biggest disconnect.

The survey data seems to have focused on demographic details, IT and organizational performance metrics and existence of  some 'top' devops practices. Rest was all statistical jugglery - mainly selective correlation analysis.

There are 2 sections devoted to organizational culture and job satisfaction which would have been otherwise good reading  if the authors had not tried to force fit Devops into them.
The relationship being implied was circular in nature - good organization culture = x, y, z, devops also needs x, y, z and hence devops = good organization culture.

The report states "in our survey, we were able to measure culture  quantitatively, and found it is one of the top predictors of organizational performance. Culture really does matter to the business"

The "measurement" goes like this - Ron Westrum,a sociologist who found that organizational culture was predictive of safety in the health care industry. He had defined 3 types of organizational cultures - pathological, bureaucratic and  generative. All of these have some characteristic traits. The generative one has traits like high cooperation, risks are  shared, failure lead to inquiry, etc., typically the good desirable traits. Then the report simply says 'you can easily  map these attributes to Devops practices". I fail to see the measurement in this leave alone the quantitative part.

08. Did the report meet its intended objective?

The report starts with this "our goal is to provide a picture of how DevOps works today, based on real data from real  people. We hope this picture will help IT managers and practitioners understand how to build greater value in their teams  — and help their companies win in the marketplace"

Well in terms of real data from real people are concerned, yes that part is correct. But what exactly did those 9200  people say? Except talking about their demographic details and sharing some metrics about their IT departments / companies and whether or not they are falling those 4 Devops practices, did they share any real life experiences? Experiences  related to success and failure, what worked and what did not, business triggers, challenges, innovative solutions? From  that perspective the survey / report was a huge disappointment. If I had wanted to read Gene Kim and Scott Ambler's views 
on Devops I could have easily read their blogs and books.

Here my expectation was to hear voices from the trenches - from  people who are in the process of making it happen. That in my view would have helped IT managers and practitioners 
understand how to build greater value in their teams - far more than the statistical correlations, theory on types of  organizational cultures and well intentioned albeit predictable advice from the experts.

To summarize, looking at the 8 answers I got to my questions I think the report failed to fulfill my expectations. I give  3.5 out of 8.

But of course, as I stated at the beginning of post, it is unfair to apply a set of parameters to a product which it was  never mandated to comply with. So, if the authors of the report happen to read this, my request to them is to treat this  as an honest attempt to dissect their hard work with the same professional rigor which they had applied when they created  it.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Sujoy Sen

Sujoy is a TOGAF Certified Enterprise Architect, a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt and Manager of Organizational Excellence from American Society for Quality, a PMP, a CISA, an Agile Coach, a Devops Evangelist and lately, a Digital enthusiast. With over 20 years of professional experience now, he has led multiple consulting engagements with Fortune 500 customers across the globe. He has a Masters Degree in Quality Management and a Bachelors in Electrical Engineering. He is based out of New Jersey.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...