Welcome!

Blog Feed Post

The Mystery of MVP Paradox

The concept of ‘Minimum Viable Product (MVP)’ has been made widely popular by The Lean Startup movement and is religiously used by everyone ever since. Enterprises are taking a page out of Eric Reis’s book and trying to adapt and adopt some of its best practices, MVP being one of them. But the problem and paradox of MVP is that in order to succeed in a modern digital world, it should be neither just minimum nor simply viable. Which also rises a question whether ‘MVP’ is still the right term to use. Today we dive deeper into why large companies should go with this strategy and uncover the contradictions it has gathered around to finally get to the bottom of what is essentially MVP?

What is MVP - Perfectialhttps://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/img0-300x123.jpg 300w, https://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/img0-768x315.jpg 768w, https://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/img0-1024x420.jpg 1024w, https://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/img0-600x246.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 2134px) 100vw, 2134px" />

Why Bother with MVP?

If executed correctly, MVP helps to focus on the most important first and get a real feedback from users. By putting customers’ needs as a priority, it checks if by any chance you are building a product no one wants.


MVP in a modern digital world should be neither minimum nor viable.
Click To Tweet


MVP is not the end product but it still has to bring customers value. The idea is that instead of developing a polished final version of a product that can be costly, time-consuming and generally risky, you focus on just enough features to bring impact first as a way to test your hypothesis. This way you fail fast, learn fast, lower the risk and apply your gained knowledge in the next iteration of the product development. Something startups have embraced long ago and enterprises are learning to adjust to by becoming agile.

But the challenging part for large companies is in changing their mindset. Enterprises are actually used to releasing highly complex and polished products that showcase their quality. And delivering a product that has incomplete features may look like a failure. And by adopting MVP, they need to shift from releasing these complete products to learning what features have the biggest ROI through a release cycle and investing in them.

Minimum Viable Product philosophy can help enterprises better adopt those agile principles, speed up innovation implementation and product release from years to months. The only thing left to tackle – is how to execute MVP?

How Not to Build MVP

A highly popular ‘cupcake MVP’ suggests that rather than start from a dull and dry cake and later add filling and icing, you start with a cupcake and iterate into a final version of a cake.

This approach is a  source of inspiration of a very popular on the Internet ‘Skateboard into a car’ analogy.

How to Build MVP - Perfectialhttps://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/How_To_Build_A_MVP-300... 300w, https://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/How_To_Build_A_MVP-768... 768w, https://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/How_To_Build_A_MVP-600... 600w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" />

Image source: expressiveproductdesign.com

While its initial thought is completely true – you can’t develop separate parts that eventually combine into a product. What are the odds that a person who’s interested in buying a car will be excited by the prospect of purchasing a wheel? Pretty much as slim as the idea of them wanting to buy a skateboard or a bicycle, actually.

MVP has to have common core features with your final product. It should be a sequence of products that explore your key idea for the final version. By testing and iterating the bare minimum you can create another prototype that’s not only minimum but also viable and that eventually will lead you to the product itself. But building a full-featured motorcycle when you want to attract an automotive market is not the right way of doing it. By pursuing this model you will either put your initial idea of a car on hold and become a motorcycle expert instead or you will build a product that has no validated market through your MVP.

Should MVP be ‘Minimum’ or ‘Full-Featured’?

So the idea is clear, come up with a business hypothesis, eliminate the core to test it quickly and cost-effectively and learn from the feedback. Where’s the misunderstanding?

The problem is, entrepreneurs often mistake the minimum part for insignificant. Fearing to give away key features they interpret minimum as secondary.


MVP helps enterprises adopt agile principles, speed up innovation and release from years to months.
Click To Tweet


We get it, everyone wants to repeat the success of Dropbox who built a landing page MVP and a three-minute demo video explaining the technology and how it’s meant to work. This does look like an easy way to build MVP. But a part of their success was due to that video going viral. And while to go viral is every marketer’s dream, in reality, it’s hard to come by.

A minimum should not be an excuse to release an unfinished product. It’s one of the MVP’s hidden pitfalls – going only halfway and then ship to get a feedback. Think of it this way, when releasing the initial version of say, Twitter, the question shouldn’t be whether to go with writing and sending messages feature or the ability to follow others. Both are the core of the product and should be included, but stripped down to the bare minimum. Any additional features like saving, favoriting tweets or making lists of people you follow should be added once you’ve validated your idea. The end-to-end experience is critical. Without it, your product will feel broken, hard to follow and as a result useless.

V is for Valuable

Which leads us to the last question – how to avoid being useless? We live in the age when ideas are dime a dozen and is it not enough for your long coveted product to enter the market, already overpolluted by digital noise, as merely viable.

There’s a discussion whether viable is even the right word to use. And the alternatives are numerous – Minimum Delightful Product, Minimum Loveable Product, Minimum Awesome Product. No matter how they call it, the argument is the same – being simply viable is not enough.

What distinguishes successful businesses is that they were able to offer value. If you look at the infographic below, you will see that each of these successful products that started as MVP were able to bring value. Yahoo offered curated content before there were proper search engines.

Minimum Viable Product - Perfectialhttps://perfectial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Minimum-Viable-Product... 300w" sizes="(max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px" />

Image source: foundersspace.com

So no, Dropbox didn’t get lucky because they got away with only building a landing page. They were able to bring value to customers where no one else did. And what is rarely mentioned in their success story is that from the very beginning they provided a thought out technical background and simple UX.

According to Apple’s former chief evangelist, Guy Kawasaki MVP doesn’t have to be perfect but it has to be revolutionary. A great product or service must be distinguished by 5 qualities. It has to be deep, intelligent, complete, empowering, elegant. And that’s another contradiction, your Minimum Viable Product should be more than just viable.

The paradox of MVP is the approach that is very often chosen and the misinterpretation of the term itself. Of very often building MVPs that have no common ground with the final product you have in mind. Of fearing to give away all the killer features in the initial stage and thus creating a very weak product, hoping the market will buy it. Your MVP has to have the same core as the product you want to build. Yes, it has to be minimum in order to be built quickly but it also has to bring value by solving a problem no one before you did or didn’t even know it existed.

The post The Mystery of MVP Paradox appeared first on Perfectial.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Rostyslav Demush

Ross Demush is a digital marketing specialist at custom software development company Perfectial, a leading provider of web & mobile development services, specializing in FinTech, Real Estate, Media & Entertainment & eLearning.

Latest Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...